Purpose: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is widely used to treat prostate cancer (PC). However, ADT has been associated with various adverse events (AEs) affecting the liver and kidneys. We aimed to evaluate the risk of liver- and kidney-related AEs after ADT. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Health Insurance Database of Korea from 2007 to 2022 and included patients diagnosed with PC between 2013 and 2017. Patients who received ADT were matched 1:1 with those who did not using propensity score matching in the liver and kidney cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The study included 9,877 and 16,834 patients in the liver and kidney cohorts, respectively. The risk of hepatitis was higher among ADT users (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04–1.54), and the risk was even greater among patients aged ≥70 years (aHR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.09–1.72). Longer ADT duration was associated with an increased risk of hepatitis (aHR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06–1.65). ADT use was not significantly associated with the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) (AKI: aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.92–1.64; CKD: aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.97–1.38). Conclusion In patients with PC, ADT, particularly when used for an extended duration, was associated with an increased risk of hepatitis, but not with kidney-related AEs. Close monitoring for liver AEs is recommended in patients undergoing long-term ADT.

Background/Aims: The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) by 2030; therefore, widespread HCV screening is required. The WHO recommends HCV self-testing (HCVST) as a new approach. We aimed to evaluate disease burden reduction using the HCVST screening strategy and identify the most cost-effective approach. Methods: We developed a dynamic open-cohort Markov model to assess the long-term effects and costeffectiveness of HCVST in the Republic of Korea from 2024 to 2030. Strategies for comparison included universal, birth cohort, high-risk group screening, and no screening, focusing on the following: (1) incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) saved; (2) severe liver disease cases; and (3) liverrelated death reduction. Results: Universal HCVST screening is the most effective strategy for achieving the WHO goal by 2030, substantially lowering the incidence of severe liver disease by 71% and preventing liver-related deaths by 69%, thereby averting 267,942 DALYs. Moreover, with an ICER of US$8,078 per DALY and high cost-effectiveness, the sensitivity results prove that cost-effectiveness is robust. Although high-risk group screening offers the lowest cost compared with other strategies, its effectiveness in preventing severe liver disease is minimal, falling short of the current WHO goal. Conclusions Our study confirms that universal HCVST screening is a cost-effective strategy aligned with the WHO goal to eliminate HCV by 2030. Despite its higher costs compared to risk-based screening, the disease burden can be significantly reduced by providing effective HCVST access to individuals who might otherwise not be tested.

Purpose: This study aims to develop and implement an economic evaluation using a micro-costing approach to provide a precise and transparent analysis of the direct costs of cystoscopic procedures in Korean hospitals. The study seeks to identify key cost components and evaluate whether current reimbursement rates accurately reflect these direct costs. Materials and Methods: Significant variations in cost items were identified across different studies. An economic evaluation was conducted using a micro-costing methodology for the cost analysis of cystoscopic procedures, developed through literature review, data collection from studies, and expert consultations. Results: Gangnam Severance Hospital (GSH) performed 2,188 cystoscopic procedures, including 1,847 cystoscopies and 341 JJ stent removals, with average costs of $100.8 and $110.6, respectively. At National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (NHIMC), 1,463 procedures were performed, including 1,167 cystoscopies and 296 JJ stent removals, with average costs of $119.2 and $125.3. Cystoscopy costs at GSH were driven by reprocessing ($45.8, 45.4%) and equipment ($33.1, 32.9%), while NHIMC’s were $52.5 (44.0%) for equipment and $48.7 (40.8%) for reprocessing. Both hospitals incurred financial losses, with NHIS (National Health Insurance Service) covering only about 71.7% and 60.6% of costs for cystoscopy, and 71.0% and 62.7% for JJ stent removal. Conclusions The significant discrepancy between HIRA (Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service)’s estimated costs and those identified here suggests that current fees for cystoscopic procedures may be underestimated and require reassessment.Given the results, reevaluating these rates is essential to ensure fair compensation for healthcare providers and to deliver optimal patient care.

Background/Aims: The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) by 2030; therefore, widespread HCV screening is required. The WHO recommends HCV self-testing (HCVST) as a new approach. We aimed to evaluate disease burden reduction using the HCVST screening strategy and identify the most cost-effective approach. Methods: We developed a dynamic open-cohort Markov model to assess the long-term effects and costeffectiveness of HCVST in the Republic of Korea from 2024 to 2030. Strategies for comparison included universal, birth cohort, high-risk group screening, and no screening, focusing on the following: (1) incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) saved; (2) severe liver disease cases; and (3) liverrelated death reduction. Results: Universal HCVST screening is the most effective strategy for achieving the WHO goal by 2030, substantially lowering the incidence of severe liver disease by 71% and preventing liver-related deaths by 69%, thereby averting 267,942 DALYs. Moreover, with an ICER of US$8,078 per DALY and high cost-effectiveness, the sensitivity results prove that cost-effectiveness is robust. Although high-risk group screening offers the lowest cost compared with other strategies, its effectiveness in preventing severe liver disease is minimal, falling short of the current WHO goal. Conclusions Our study confirms that universal HCVST screening is a cost-effective strategy aligned with the WHO goal to eliminate HCV by 2030. Despite its higher costs compared to risk-based screening, the disease burden can be significantly reduced by providing effective HCVST access to individuals who might otherwise not be tested.

Background/Aims: The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) by 2030; therefore, widespread HCV screening is required. The WHO recommends HCV self-testing (HCVST) as a new approach. We aimed to evaluate disease burden reduction using the HCVST screening strategy and identify the most cost-effective approach. Methods: We developed a dynamic open-cohort Markov model to assess the long-term effects and costeffectiveness of HCVST in the Republic of Korea from 2024 to 2030. Strategies for comparison included universal, birth cohort, high-risk group screening, and no screening, focusing on the following: (1) incremental costeffectiveness ratio (ICER) per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) saved; (2) severe liver disease cases; and (3) liverrelated death reduction. Results: Universal HCVST screening is the most effective strategy for achieving the WHO goal by 2030, substantially lowering the incidence of severe liver disease by 71% and preventing liver-related deaths by 69%, thereby averting 267,942 DALYs. Moreover, with an ICER of US$8,078 per DALY and high cost-effectiveness, the sensitivity results prove that cost-effectiveness is robust. Although high-risk group screening offers the lowest cost compared with other strategies, its effectiveness in preventing severe liver disease is minimal, falling short of the current WHO goal. Conclusions Our study confirms that universal HCVST screening is a cost-effective strategy aligned with the WHO goal to eliminate HCV by 2030. Despite its higher costs compared to risk-based screening, the disease burden can be significantly reduced by providing effective HCVST access to individuals who might otherwise not be tested.

Purpose: With the emergence of next-generation therapies, real-world evaluation of current treatment strategies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is essential. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, primary treatment patterns, and survival outcomes of Korean patients with mHSPC. Materials and Methods: A nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using National Health Insurance claims data from 2011 to 2020, encompassing all Korean patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (n=217,895). Patient demographics, initial treatment patterns within 3 months of mHSPC diagnosis, time to initiation of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) therapy, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results: Primary treatment patterns for 10,821 newly diagnosed mHSPC patients were generally similar. Approximately half received first-line androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Most (68.8%–76.3%) were treated with combination therapy consisting of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and a first-generation antiandrogen, while 5.8%–8.0% received ADT alone. Among 1,418 patients diagnosed in 2015, 20.9% initiated mCRPC therapy at a median of 14.6 months. Median times to initial mCRPC drug use were 14.7 months for those on combination therapy and 19.7 months for those on LHRH agonists alone. Median overall survival (OS) was 61.3 months for all patients, 37.0 months for combination therapy, 51.5 months for LHRH agonists, and 25.5 months for patients with visceral metastases. Conclusion Most patients with newly diagnosed mHSPC received combination therapy with LHRH agonists and first-generation antiandrogens. In this real-world cohort, patients treated with LHRH agonists demonstrated longer OS and delayed initiation of mCRPC-directed therapy compared with those receiving combination therapy.

The global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has placed patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) at heightened risk owing to their vulnerability to infections. Our study focused on patients with ESKD, examining COVID-19 incidence, hospitalization, and mortality in relation to their renal replacement therapy (RRT) type and identifying factors influencing COVID-19 hospitalization. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service for patients with ESKD between July 2017 and June 2022. COVID-19 data for the general population were sourced from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Results: Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) constituted 90.7% of the cohort, followed by kidney transplantation (KT) recipients and peritoneal dialysis (PD). After adjusting for every 10,000 individuals, KT recipients exhibited the highest COVID-19 incidence, followed by those undergoing HD and PD, whereas the general population showed a higher infection rate of 43.64. Patients undergoing HD had the highest hospitalization rates, followed by KT recipients and those undergoing PD. The mortality rate per 10,000 individuals was highest in HD, followed by PD, the general population, and KT. Multivariate analysis indicated that age, RRT duration, residence in a nursing hospital, and comorbidities were associated with COVID-19 hospitalization. Conclusion: Among RRT modalities, KT recipients displayed the highest COVID-19 incidence, whereas those undergoing HD exhibited the highest hospitalization and mortality rates. This study contributes to our understanding of infectious diseases in patients on RRT and aids in preparedness for future infectious disease outbreaks.