Risks, Incidents, Guidelines, and Strategies Pertaining to Chemical Storage and Handling in Primary Healthcare – A Narrative Review Introduction Effective chemical storage and handling are critical in primary healthcare (PHC) to safeguard healthcare workers, patients, and the environment. Despite their importance, PHC facilities face unique challenges due to limited resources, inadequate monitoring, and the absence of tailored guidelines and protocols. This narrative review explores the state of chemical storage and handling practices in PHC. Methods A systematic methodology guided this narrative review, including a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Given the scarcity of PHC-specific studies, a purposive selection approach was employed to incorporate evidence from broader healthcare contexts. Data extraction and thematic analysis identified key risks, documented incidents, and evidence-based strategies for improving chemical storage and handling. Results Findings reveal that improper chemical practices lead to acute health effects such as respiratory distress and chemical burns, chronic conditions like asthma and operational disruptions. Non-compliance with regulations exacerbates financial and reputational risks. Case studies, including an ammonia gas leak in Malaysia and chlorine gas exposure in the United Kingdom, highlight the severe consequences of inadequate practices. Six strategies to improve chemical storage and handling in PHC settings were identified: i) regular monitoring and risk assessments, ii) safe physical storage practices, iii) training and education, iv) use of personal protective equipment (PPE), v) incident management and response plans, and vi) inventory organization and storage efficiency. Conclusions These evidence-based strategies can mitigate risks and enhance safety. The review underscores the urgent need for PHC-specific guidelines and future research to address existing gaps and foster safer PHC environments.

Impact of Compensation on Job Satisfaction Among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review Introduction Job satisfaction among healthcare workers is crucial for workforce retention, organizational stability, and healthcare delivery. Compensation, including salary, incentives, and fringe benefits, is a key driver of job satisfaction. This systematic review examines the impact of compensation on the job satisfaction of healthcare workers, providing actionable insights for improving healthcare organizations. Methods This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, ProQuest, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies published between 2015 and January 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on research examining the relationship between compensation and job satisfaction among healthcare workers. 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted, synthesized, and analyzed to identify themes related to compensation and job satisfaction. Results The review identified compensation as a key predictor of job satisfaction among healthcare workers. Despite its significance, widespread dissatisfaction and low satisfaction with compensation were reported across studies. Salary emerged as a critical factor, influencing satisfaction through its role in recognition of value and perceived equity. Incentives, particularly performance-based financing, demonstrated the potential to improve satisfaction by linking monetary rewards to performance metrics, although their effectiveness depended on robust organizational support. Fringe benefits, particularly opportunities for professional development, were found to enhance job satisfaction. Geographic and occupational differences were observed, with higher dissatisfaction in resource-limited settings and variations by location, nationality, and role. These findings highlight the multifaceted impact of compensation on satisfaction. Conclusions Equitable compensation strategies must address salary, incentives, and fringe benefits. Regular evaluations, stakeholder engagement, and benchmarking against sector standards are essential steps to enhance job satisfaction, retention, and care quality across diverse healthcare settings.