1.Nutrition and food intake status among adults in Jeju according to sociodemographic characteristics and obesity
Hyunji HAM ; Hanbin KO ; Sumin KIM ; Youjeong JANG ; Jong-Seok BYUN ; Yoonsuk JEKAL ; Insuk CHAI ; Kyungho HA
Journal of Nutrition and Health 2024;57(6):667-684
Purpose:
This study evaluated the nutrition and food intake status among adults in Jeju, Republic of Korea, based on their sociodemographic characteristics and obesity.
Methods:
Nine hundred and forty-nine adults aged 19 years or older were included based on the 2022 Jeju Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey data. A dietary assessment was conducted using a one-day, 24-hour recall method, and the nutrition status was evaluated using the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. The sociodemographic status included sex, age, education, and household income, and obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m 2 .
Results:
The mean age of the subjects was 49.8 years, and the overall prevalence of obesity was 48.4% (59.5% for males and 37.2% for females). The top three insufficient nutrients consumed at less than the estimated average requirement were calcium (77.7%), vitamin A (77.3%), and vitamin C (61.3%), while 40.9% of the subjects consumed fat as more than 30% of their total energy intake. The sodium intake was approximately 1.5 times higher than the chronic disease risk reduction intake level. In terms of food groups, the participants consumed more meat (148.2 g/day), seafood (69.0 g/day), potatoes, and starches (41.6 g/day) but consumed fewer vegetables (214.3 g/day) and less dairy (62.0 g/day) than Korean adults. The nutritional status and food intake patterns differed by the sociodemographic status. In addition, the obese group consumed more poultry and beverages than the non-obese group (p < 0.05 for all).
Conclusion
Adults in Jeju under-consume essential nutrients while over-consuming certain nutrients, such as fat and sodium. The nutritional status also varied according to the sociodemographic characteristics. These findings suggest that sociodemographic factors should be considered carefully when developing nutritional policies and programs to improve the nutritional status and address obesity among adults in Jeju.
2.Nutrition and food intake status among adults in Jeju according to sociodemographic characteristics and obesity
Hyunji HAM ; Hanbin KO ; Sumin KIM ; Youjeong JANG ; Jong-Seok BYUN ; Yoonsuk JEKAL ; Insuk CHAI ; Kyungho HA
Journal of Nutrition and Health 2024;57(6):667-684
Purpose:
This study evaluated the nutrition and food intake status among adults in Jeju, Republic of Korea, based on their sociodemographic characteristics and obesity.
Methods:
Nine hundred and forty-nine adults aged 19 years or older were included based on the 2022 Jeju Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey data. A dietary assessment was conducted using a one-day, 24-hour recall method, and the nutrition status was evaluated using the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. The sociodemographic status included sex, age, education, and household income, and obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m 2 .
Results:
The mean age of the subjects was 49.8 years, and the overall prevalence of obesity was 48.4% (59.5% for males and 37.2% for females). The top three insufficient nutrients consumed at less than the estimated average requirement were calcium (77.7%), vitamin A (77.3%), and vitamin C (61.3%), while 40.9% of the subjects consumed fat as more than 30% of their total energy intake. The sodium intake was approximately 1.5 times higher than the chronic disease risk reduction intake level. In terms of food groups, the participants consumed more meat (148.2 g/day), seafood (69.0 g/day), potatoes, and starches (41.6 g/day) but consumed fewer vegetables (214.3 g/day) and less dairy (62.0 g/day) than Korean adults. The nutritional status and food intake patterns differed by the sociodemographic status. In addition, the obese group consumed more poultry and beverages than the non-obese group (p < 0.05 for all).
Conclusion
Adults in Jeju under-consume essential nutrients while over-consuming certain nutrients, such as fat and sodium. The nutritional status also varied according to the sociodemographic characteristics. These findings suggest that sociodemographic factors should be considered carefully when developing nutritional policies and programs to improve the nutritional status and address obesity among adults in Jeju.
3.Nutrition and food intake status among adults in Jeju according to sociodemographic characteristics and obesity
Hyunji HAM ; Hanbin KO ; Sumin KIM ; Youjeong JANG ; Jong-Seok BYUN ; Yoonsuk JEKAL ; Insuk CHAI ; Kyungho HA
Journal of Nutrition and Health 2024;57(6):667-684
Purpose:
This study evaluated the nutrition and food intake status among adults in Jeju, Republic of Korea, based on their sociodemographic characteristics and obesity.
Methods:
Nine hundred and forty-nine adults aged 19 years or older were included based on the 2022 Jeju Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey data. A dietary assessment was conducted using a one-day, 24-hour recall method, and the nutrition status was evaluated using the 2020 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. The sociodemographic status included sex, age, education, and household income, and obesity was defined as a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m 2 .
Results:
The mean age of the subjects was 49.8 years, and the overall prevalence of obesity was 48.4% (59.5% for males and 37.2% for females). The top three insufficient nutrients consumed at less than the estimated average requirement were calcium (77.7%), vitamin A (77.3%), and vitamin C (61.3%), while 40.9% of the subjects consumed fat as more than 30% of their total energy intake. The sodium intake was approximately 1.5 times higher than the chronic disease risk reduction intake level. In terms of food groups, the participants consumed more meat (148.2 g/day), seafood (69.0 g/day), potatoes, and starches (41.6 g/day) but consumed fewer vegetables (214.3 g/day) and less dairy (62.0 g/day) than Korean adults. The nutritional status and food intake patterns differed by the sociodemographic status. In addition, the obese group consumed more poultry and beverages than the non-obese group (p < 0.05 for all).
Conclusion
Adults in Jeju under-consume essential nutrients while over-consuming certain nutrients, such as fat and sodium. The nutritional status also varied according to the sociodemographic characteristics. These findings suggest that sociodemographic factors should be considered carefully when developing nutritional policies and programs to improve the nutritional status and address obesity among adults in Jeju.
4.Food purchase patterns, food policy recognition, and food environment satisfaction among adults in Jeju, Korea, according to food security: a cross-sectional study
Sumin KIM ; Youjeong JANG ; Hyunji HAM ; Hanbin KO ; Insuk CHAI ; Kyungho HA
Korean Journal of Community Nutrition 2024;29(5):406-417
Objectives:
Recently, food insecurity has been a major public health issue along with the food crisis caused by COVID-19, climate change, and the polarization of food supply due to socioeconomic disparities. Food insecurity is known to be related to the food choices and environment of the consumer. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the food security statuses of adults in Jeju and investigate their food purchase patterns, food policy recognition, and food environment satisfaction.
Methods:
Based on data from the 2022 Jeju Food Survey, 346 adults aged ≥19 years in Jeju were classified into food security and insecurity groups (quantitatively and qualitatively) using the questionnaire. Food purchase patterns, including purchasing frequency, items, and reasons, were surveyed for local and eco-friendly foods. The recognition and necessity of several food policies and satisfaction with diet and food environment (availability, accessibility, affordability, accommodation, and acceptability) were measured using the Likert scale.
Results:
Among the total participants, 47.4% were in the food insecurity group. The frequency of purchasing local and eco-friendly foods did not significantly differ by food security status. The insecurity group exhibited a higher recognition rate of basic rights to food (36.0%) than the security group (24.7%, P = 0.023). The recognition and necessity of specific food policies did not significantly differ by food security status, except for the policy of promoting food communities, for which the food security group exhibited higher recognition than the food insecurity group did (P = 0.004). The food insecurity group exhibited significantly lower scores regarding satisfaction toward diet and food environment factors (P < 0.05 for all).
Conclusions
Overall, the food security group reported higher satisfaction with their diet and food environment than the food insecurity group. Further in-depth studies to investigate the determinants of food insecurity and effective promotional strategies for food policies are needed.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail