OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of copper, zinc, and vitamin D deficiencies in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients and the associations between those deficiencies and clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 210 patients admitted to the SICU of Asan Medical Center between June 2020 and June 2022. Micronutrient levels were measured within 7 days of SICU admission. Primary outcomes were the mortality rate, length of SICU stay, hospital stay duration, and mechanical ventilation duration. Results: Copper deficiency was found in 35% (68/193), zinc deficiency in 52% (100/193), and severe vitamin D deficiency in 46% (82/179) of patients. Copper-deficient patients showed a significantly higher mortality rate (25.0% vs. 12.8%, P=0.044), longer hospital stays (57.8±47.0 vs. 45.2±36.6 days, P=0.041), and extended mechanical ventilation duration (26.9±23.3 vs. 18.8±15.7 days, P=0.012). Zinc deficiency was associated with higher C-reactive protein levels (16.2±9.5 vs. 11.5±8.8 mg/dL, P=0.001) and lower prealbumin levels (6.5±2.8 vs. 9.9±5.6 mg/dL, P<0.001). Severe vitamin D deficiency (<10 ng/mL) was not significantly associated with mortality or other clinical outcomes (mortality:<10 ng/mL vs. ≥10 ng/mL, 13% vs. 18%, P=0.583). Conclusion Micronutrient deficiencies are prevalent in SICU patients. Copper deficiency significantly correlated with poor clinical outcomes, and zinc deficiency showed a strong association with inflammatory markers. Early assessment and supplementation of micronutrients could be beneficial for critically ill surgical patients.

Background: Hand hygiene is considered the simplest and most cost-effective method of infection prevention. Regular observation and feedback on hand hygiene compliance are key strategies for its enhancement. This study evaluated the effectiveness of hand hygiene surveillance, including direct observation and feedback, by comprehensively analyzing the reported hand hygiene compliance within the Korean National Healthcare-Associated Infections Surveillance System from 2019 to 2022. Methods: Participating medical institutions included general hospitals and hospitals with infection control departments that consented to participate. Hand hygiene surveillance was conducted using direct observation. Collected data, including healthcare workers, clinical areas, hand hygiene moments, and hand hygiene compliance, were recorded to calculate hand hygiene compliance rates. Additionally, the volume of alcohol-based hand sanitizers used per patient per day was investigated as an indirect indicator of hand hygiene compliance. The study was conducted from July 2019 to December 2022. Results: Hand hygiene compliance increased from 87.2% in Q3 2019 to 89.9% in 2022. Nurses and medical technologists showed the highest compliance rates, whereas doctors showed the lowest compliance rates. Intensive care units excelled in compliance, whereas emergency de partments lagged. Compliance was highest after patient contact and lowest when the patient’s surroundings were touched. Larger hospitals consumed more alcohol-based hand sanitizers than smaller hospitals did. Conclusion This study confirmed an improvement in hand hygiene compliance through sustained surveillance, indicating its contribution not only to preventing infection transfer within healthcare facilities but also to fostering a culture of hand hygiene in the country.

Background: This study implemented an external quality assessment (EQA) of serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis/ immunotyping (IFE/IT) tests and aimed to present domestic guidelines regarding the interpretation report. Methods: We conducted the EQA of SPEP and IFE/IT tests similar to the proficiency testing (PT) program of the Korean Association of External Quality Assessment (KEQAS). We prepared four test samples by pooling residual serum specimens, according to the SPEP pattern, and the existence and isotype of monoclonal proteins. Each test sample was aliquoted and sent to 29 clinical laboratories, each laboratory conducted SPEP and IFE/IT tests and returned quantitative values and interpretation reports. Results: Variations in the quantitative values (g/dL) of each fraction and ratios (%) of each fraction to total protein were observed. The differences between the electrophoresis methods or manufacturers were not statistically significant. Of the four EQA samples, two samples had a monoclonal protein, and the presence and absence of monoclonal protein and isotypes were consistent in all participating institutions. However, there were statistically significant differences in the numerical values and ratios of monoclonal proteins between institutions. Conclusions This study examined the possibility of SPEP and IFE/IT tests being included in the PT program of the KEQAS, and we identified what should be supplemented for future assessments. Furthermore, we have presented the guidelines regarding SPEP and IFE/IT tests in Korea for the first time, and further studies are required to establish the EQA programs and standardized guidelines.

Objective: We aimed to identify the expectations and preferences for medication and medical decision-making in patients with major psychiatric disorders. Methods: A survey was conducted among patients with major psychiatric disorders who visited psychiatric outpatient clinics at 15 hospitals between 2016 and 2018 in Korea. The survey consisted of 12 questions about demographic variables and opinions on their expectations for medication, important medical decision-makers, and preferred drug type. The most preferred value in each category in the total population was identified, and differences in the preference ratio of each item among the disease groups were compared. Results: A total of 707 participants were surveyed. In the total population, patients reported high efficacy (44.01%±21.44%) as the main wish for medication, themselves (37.39%±22.57%) and a doctor (35.27%±22.88%) as the main decision makers, and tablet/capsule (36.16%±30.69%) as the preferred type of drug. In the depressive disorders group, the preference ratio of high efficacy was significantly lower, and the preference ratio of a small amount was significantly higher than that of the psychotic disorder and bipolar disorder groups. The preference ratio of a doctor as an important decision maker in the bipolar disorder group was higher compared to the other groups. Conclusion This study revealed the preference for medications and showed differences among patients with psychiatric disorders. Providing personalized medicine that considers a patient’s preference for the drug may contribute to the improvement of drug compliance and outcomes.

Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed. Results: Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35–4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea. Conclusion Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of copper, zinc, and vitamin D deficiencies in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients and the associations between those deficiencies and clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 210 patients admitted to the SICU of Asan Medical Center between June 2020 and June 2022. Micronutrient levels were measured within 7 days of SICU admission. Primary outcomes were the mortality rate, length of SICU stay, hospital stay duration, and mechanical ventilation duration. Results: Copper deficiency was found in 35% (68/193), zinc deficiency in 52% (100/193), and severe vitamin D deficiency in 46% (82/179) of patients. Copper-deficient patients showed a significantly higher mortality rate (25.0% vs. 12.8%, P=0.044), longer hospital stays (57.8±47.0 vs. 45.2±36.6 days, P=0.041), and extended mechanical ventilation duration (26.9±23.3 vs. 18.8±15.7 days, P=0.012). Zinc deficiency was associated with higher C-reactive protein levels (16.2±9.5 vs. 11.5±8.8 mg/dL, P=0.001) and lower prealbumin levels (6.5±2.8 vs. 9.9±5.6 mg/dL, P<0.001). Severe vitamin D deficiency (<10 ng/mL) was not significantly associated with mortality or other clinical outcomes (mortality:<10 ng/mL vs. ≥10 ng/mL, 13% vs. 18%, P=0.583). Conclusion Micronutrient deficiencies are prevalent in SICU patients. Copper deficiency significantly correlated with poor clinical outcomes, and zinc deficiency showed a strong association with inflammatory markers. Early assessment and supplementation of micronutrients could be beneficial for critically ill surgical patients.

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of copper, zinc, and vitamin D deficiencies in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients and the associations between those deficiencies and clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 210 patients admitted to the SICU of Asan Medical Center between June 2020 and June 2022. Micronutrient levels were measured within 7 days of SICU admission. Primary outcomes were the mortality rate, length of SICU stay, hospital stay duration, and mechanical ventilation duration. Results: Copper deficiency was found in 35% (68/193), zinc deficiency in 52% (100/193), and severe vitamin D deficiency in 46% (82/179) of patients. Copper-deficient patients showed a significantly higher mortality rate (25.0% vs. 12.8%, P=0.044), longer hospital stays (57.8±47.0 vs. 45.2±36.6 days, P=0.041), and extended mechanical ventilation duration (26.9±23.3 vs. 18.8±15.7 days, P=0.012). Zinc deficiency was associated with higher C-reactive protein levels (16.2±9.5 vs. 11.5±8.8 mg/dL, P=0.001) and lower prealbumin levels (6.5±2.8 vs. 9.9±5.6 mg/dL, P<0.001). Severe vitamin D deficiency (<10 ng/mL) was not significantly associated with mortality or other clinical outcomes (mortality:<10 ng/mL vs. ≥10 ng/mL, 13% vs. 18%, P=0.583). Conclusion Micronutrient deficiencies are prevalent in SICU patients. Copper deficiency significantly correlated with poor clinical outcomes, and zinc deficiency showed a strong association with inflammatory markers. Early assessment and supplementation of micronutrients could be beneficial for critically ill surgical patients.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.