The gut microbiome is not just a bystander of colorectal carcinogenesis but is an active driver of colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC-associated microbiome contributes in the tumorigenesis through chronic inflammation, formation of toxic metabolite and genotoxins, oncogenic signal activation, immune evasion, and barrier disruption—all reinforcing a tumor microenvironment. In contrast, beneficial microbiome supports the barrier-immune-metabolic axis by maintaining mucosal integrity and balanced immune tone. Despite extensive studies of microbiome-based CRC biomarkers, microbiome-based CRC biomarkers have not been yet ready for routine clinical use due to variation across populations and lack of standardization of key steps such as sampling, analysis, cutoffs, and interpretation. Microbiome-based therapies aim to change the overall intestinal ecosystem rather than simply adding or removing single strains. At present, dietary modulation and prebiotics are considered supportive measures, while probiotics or synbiotics are in preclinical stage. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) still faces important challenges in effectiveness, standardization and safety. By its role in reshaping the tumor–host immune environment, FMT is viewed as a potential option for cancer therapy after further development through well-controlled clinical trials with careful safety monitoring.

Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

This video demonstrates the surgical technique of percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage (PEDD) for infectious spondylodiscitis performed under local anesthesia. Two representative cases are presented. The first case underwent transforaminal PEDD for L2–3 infectious spondylodiscitis, and the second case underwent combined transforaminal PEDD and drainage of a psoas abscess. In both cases, needle insertion was guided by C-arm fluoroscopy, followed by root block, discography, serial dilation, and insertion of a 3.7-mm endoscope. Under endoscopic visualization, necrotic disc material and infected granulation tissue were removed, and samples were collected for culture and biopsy. The procedure also enabled safe placement of a drainage catheter into the abscess cavity. Postoperatively, one patient improved with intravenous antibiotics after identification of Streptococcus constellatus, while the other was diagnosed with tuberculous spondylodiscitis and treated with antituberculosis therapy. Both patients showed gradual improvement in back pain and normalization of inflammatory markers. This video provides a detailed step-by-step guide to PEDD, highlighting its diagnostic and therapeutic advantages in infectious spondylodiscitis, as well as its educational value for surgeons learning full-endoscopic spine surgery.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of supplemental automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) added to mammography-based breast cancer screening for women with nondense breasts. Materials and Methods: A retrospective search of radiology databases at two tertiary institutions identified asymptomatic women with nondense breasts who underwent breast cancer screening using both digital mammography (DM) and supplemental ABUS between January 2020 and December 2023. We excluded women without sufficient follow-up data or those without an established final diagnosis, including histopathologic results. The performance measures of DM alone and ABUS combined with DM (ABUS plus DM) were compared. The primary outcome was the cancer detection rate (CDR), and the secondary outcomes were sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analyses were performed for women with scattered fibroglandular density and almost entirely fatty breasts. Results: A total of 2,904 pairs of screening examinations were performed in 1,683 women (59 ± 10 years), detecting 26 cancers. In comparison with DM alone, ABUS plus DM showed higher CDR (9.0 vs. 7.9 per 1,000 examinations, P < 0.001), higher sensitivity (100% [26/26] vs. 88.5% [23/26], P < 0.001), and lower specificity (95.0% [2,735/2,878] vs. 97.9% [2,817/2,878], P < 0.001). In women with scattered fibroglandular density, ABUS increased the CDR from 7.4 to 8.5 per 1,000 examinations and improved the sensitivity from 87.0% [20/23] to 100% [23/23] (P < 0.001). In women with almost entirely fatty breasts, ABUS plus DM showed the same CDR (16.4 per 1,000 examinations) and sensitivity (100% [3/3]) as DM alone. Three cancers (11.5% [3/26]), all of which were stage T1N0, were detected only by supplemental ABUS. Conclusion Supplemental ABUS improved cancer detection and sensitivity in women with nondense breasts, with the benefits primarily observed in those with scattered fibroglandular density.

Purpose: Postoperative complications following gastric cancer surgery significantly impact patient outcomes, yet standardized definitions for these events have not been consistently applied across institutions in Korea. This study aimed to develop a consensus-based, standardized complication classification system specific to gastrectomy for gastric cancer as part of the Korean Quality Improvement Platform in Surgery (K-QIPS) initiative. Methods: As part of K-QIPS, a dedicated task force team (TFT) was formed with surgical experts from fourteen high-volume hospitals across Korea. The TFT conducted ten formal meetings to review existing literature and international guidelines, and incorporated findings from randomized controlled trials. The final complication list was developed through expert consensus and structured into a standardized framework. A Data Entry Manual was created to support consistent data collection by surgical clinical reviewers. Results: The TFT defined specific postoperative complications following gastrectomy for gastric cancer, including anastomotic leakage, duodenal stump leakage, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal and luminal bleeding, delayed gastric emptying, and internal hernia. Notably, internal hernia was described in standardized form for the first time. General complications were developed first and overlapped in part with the gastric cancer-specific list. The task force also produced a Data Entry Manual that provides practical instructions to ensure consistency and accuracy in complication reporting. Conclusion This nationwide consensus initiative established the first standardized complication classification system for gastric cancer surgery in Korea. The proposed definitions and data entry system are expected to improve complication reporting, enable multicenter research, support surgical quality benchmarking, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Purpose: Limited treatment options exist for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after the failure of taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy. Here, we report the safety and efficacy of ifosfamide and mesna in patients with mCRPC after the failure of taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy (NCT06236789). Materials and Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer who had failed taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy received ifosfamide 2,500 mg/m2 and mesna 1,500 mg/m2 on days 1–3, repeated every 21 days. Safety, objective response rate, disease control rate, reduction in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration by >50% (PSA50) or >90% (PSA90), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 47 patients with mCRPC were included in the study. The median number of lines of treatment was 5 (range, 3 to 7). All patients were previously administered docetaxel and novel hormonal therapies including abiraterone (51.1%) and/or enzalutamide (61.7%). Thirty-eight patients (80.9%) were administered cabazitaxel. The objective response and disease control rates were 21.3% and 80.9%, respectively. PSA50 and PSA90 were achieved in 31.9% and 10.6%, respectively. During a median follow-up duration of 54.3 months, rPFS and OS were 5.0 and 9.0 months, respectively. All the patients experienced treatment-related adverse events of any grades; however, no new safety signs were detected. Genomic biomarker analysis revealed that alterations in the TP53 pathway were associated with inferior rPFS and OS. Conclusion Ifosfamide and mesna showed appreciable efficacy and manageable safety profiles in heavily treated patients with mCRPC.

Purpose: Although non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have often been implicated in various cancers, their causal roles in acute (AML) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) remain unclear. Here, we conducted a genome-wide two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal effects of a comprehensive set of ncRNAs on AML and CML. Materials and Methods: We used summary statistics of blood expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) from the eQTLGen consortium (31,684 European participants) as exposure data. Genome-wide association study summary statistics from the FinnGen study (AML, 322 cases; CML, 303 cases) and UK Biobank (UKBB) (AML, 318 cases; CML, 153 cases) served as outcome data. The generalized inverse-variance weighted (GIVW) method was used as the primary MR method. Two additional MR methods (generalized MR-Egger and weighted median), sensitivity analyses, and the HEIDI test were further employed to support our findings. Results: Upregulated HCG22 and RP11-42I10.1 were causally linked to increased AML risk, while the GMDS-AS1 locus was positively associated with increased CML risk. We highlight these ncRNAs for their consistent significance across all three MR methods, with no evidence of bias in sensitivity analyses (F-test, Cochran’s Q-test, MR-Egger intercept, MR-PRESSO global test) and no indication of confounding from the HEIDI test. These findings were primarily discovered in FinnGen (FDRGIVW < 0.05), their significance was validated in UKBB (pGIVW < 0.05). Upon validation with an independent linkage disequilibrium reference panel, they remained robust. Conclusion This study provides evidence of causal relationships between ncRNAs and the subtypes of AML and CML, notably highlighting HCG22 and RP11-42I10.1 in AML and the GMDS-AS1 locus in CML.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the detection ability of quality of life (QoL) changes and responsiveness of the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)-40 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ). Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL changes after various gastrectomies between January 2021 and April 2022. Participants were instructed to complete the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. QoL changes over time and QoL responsiveness were assessed for each questionnaire. Results: Data from 491 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 22 institutions were analyzed. The summary scores of the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed significant differences between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044 and p=0.038, respectively), but no difference was observed for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dysphagia on the KOQUSS-40 was significantly different between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.031); however, dysphagia on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 did not differ. The responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 was similar to that of the EORTC QLQ in patients who experienced ≥ 10% body weight loss, but approximately 10% less in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy than the EORTC QLQ. Conclusion KOQUSS-40 has several advantages over EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 when comparing QoL between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups. The findings provide information for researchers investigating the QoL of patients who have undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Purpose: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using dye and isotope (DUAL) is recommended over the dye-only (DYE) method after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) due to potentially lower false-negative rates. However, the long-term outcome of either method is unclear. We aimed to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of DYE versus DUAL SLNB methods in patients who received NCT. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 893 patients who underwent SLNB following NCT and had pathologically negative lymph nodes were included. After propensity score matching for cT, cN, and pT categories, 280 patients were in the DYE group and 560 in the DUAL group. Indigo carmine was used for dye and Tc-99m antimony trisulfate for isotope mapping. Results: Median follow-up was 75.6 months in the DYE group and 83.0 months in the DUAL group. Mean (±standard deviation) number of harvested sentinel nodes was 6.7 (±3.9) and 6.7 (±3.3) in the DYE and DUAL groups (p=0.875). Five-year distant metastasisfree survival was 95.2% in DYE group and 93.3% in DUAL group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 2.57; p=0.192). Disease-free survival (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.50; p=0.914) and overall survival (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.69; p=0.954) were not significantly different. Axillary recurrence rate was 1.8% and 2.5% in DYE and DUAL groups (p=0.647). Conclusion Long-term oncological outcomes did not significantly differ between DYE and DUAL SLNB methods. The dye-only method can be safely recommended for breast cancer patients who received NCT.