Objective To summarize the best evidences of thirst management in the patients with tra-cheal intubation to provide the evidence-based evidence for clinical practice.Methods According to the"6S"evidence pyramid model,the literatures on thirst management of the patients with tracheal intubation were systematically retrieved from the relevant guide websites,evidence-based databases,association websites and original literature databases at home and abroad.The databases included BMJ Best Practice,Up To Date,JBI Evidence-Based Health Care Center Database,Guidelines International Network(GIN),National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence,National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence(NICE),Scottish Inter-collegiate Guidelines Network(SIGN),Registered Nurses'Association of Ontario,Canada(RNAO),National Guideline Clearing House(NGC),Cochrane Library,American Society of Critical Care Medicine(SCCM),A-merican Association of Critical Care(AACN),European Society of Intensive Medicine(ESIM),Chinese Socie-ty of Critical Care Medicine,PubMed,Embase,CNKI,Wanfang Medical Network,VIP Database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database(SinoMed).The retrieval limit was from the database establishment to August 31,2023.Two researchers trained by evidence-based nursing independently completed the literature quality e-valuation,and the literatures meeting the quality standards conducted the evidence extracted and summary.Results A total of 23 literatures were included,including 1 clinical decision,1 evidence summary,12 random-ized controlled trials,3 quasi-experimental studies,and 6 cross-sectional studies.Eighteen pieces of best evi-dence were formed,including six aspects:definition of thirst,classification of thirst degree,risk factors,assess-ment methods,intervention strategies and quality management.Conclusion Nurses should conduct the clini-cal transform and application of the best evidences by combining the clinical situation and specific department policies to alleviate the thirst symptoms in the patients with tracheal intubation.

Objective To summarize the best evidence for diaphragm rehabilitation in mechanically ven-tilated ICU patients with ventilator-associated diaphragm dysfunction based on evidence-based methods.Meth-ods A systematic search was conducted across guideline websites,professional associations,and Chinese/English databases for evidence regarding diaphragm rehabilitation in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.The search timeframe spanned from database inception to December 31,2024.Two researchers independently per-formed quality assessment and synthesized the evidence.Results Twenty articles were included:2 clinical de-cisions,1 guideline,2 evidence summaries,3 systematic reviews,7 randomized controlled trials(RCT),and 5 expert consensuses/opinions.Twenty-seven pieces of evidence were formed across 6 themes:rehabilitation team,rehabilitation assessment,rehabilitation interventions,outcome evaluation,precautions,and education/training.Conclusion This study summarizes the best evidence for diaphragm rehabilitation in ICU mechani-cally ventilated patients.Healthcare professionals should implement diaphragm rehabilitation by integrating this evidence with specific clinical contexts to improve patient outcomes and enhance nursing quality.

Objective To systematically retrieve,evaluate and summarise the best available evidence on prevention and management of diagnostic blood loss in critically ill adult patients and to provide guidance for standardising diagnostic blood sampling in clinical practice.Methods A structured evidence question was created using the PIPOST framework(Population,Intervention,Professional,Outcome,Setting and Type of evidence).Guided by the"5S"levels-of-evidence pyramid,a top-down systematic search was conducted on databases of BMJ Best Practice,UpToDate,the Joanna Briggs Institute(JBI)EBP Database,GIN,SIGN,RNAO,NICE,Medlive Guideline,WHO,National Blood Authority(Australia),National Health Commission of China,Cochrane Library,PubMed,EMbase,CINAHL,Web of Science,Wanfang Data,CNKI,VIP,and SinoMed.Searched literature included clinical decision aids,guidelines,evidence summaries,systematic reviews Meta analysis,RCTs,quasi-experimental,cross-sectional,cohort studies and expert consensus/opinions.Search period covered between 1st January 2015 and 10th February 2025.Quality appraisal,evidence extraction,synthesis and grading were performed according to JBI and GRADE approaches.Results Nineteen articles were retrieved including five guidelines,five systematic reviews,one RCT,two quasi-experimental studies,two cross-sectional studies,one professional standard and three expert consensuses.A total of 26 recommendations were extracted and they were organised into five domains:education and training,blood-sampling assessment,frequency of sampling,strategies to minimise blood volume drawn,and quality control.Conclusion This evidence summary provides the best current guidance for preventing and managing iatrogenic blood loss caused by diagnostic testing in critically ill adults,providing evidence-based basis for standardizing blood tests by medical staff.

Diaphragmatic dysfunction often occurs in ICU patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation, which seriously affects patients′prognosis. This article reviewed the progress of rehabilitation treatment of diaphragmatic dysfunction in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation, focused on the concept and assessment of diaphragm rehabilitation, the current status, evaluation indexes, emphasized the importance of nurses, analyzed the dilemmas and countermeasures in the application, which aimed to provide a reference for the promotion of diaphragm rehabilitation in clinical practice.

Objective To systematically retrieve,evaluate and summarise the best available evidence on prevention and management of diagnostic blood loss in critically ill adult patients and to provide guidance for standardising diagnostic blood sampling in clinical practice.Methods A structured evidence question was created using the PIPOST framework(Population,Intervention,Professional,Outcome,Setting and Type of evidence).Guided by the"5S"levels-of-evidence pyramid,a top-down systematic search was conducted on databases of BMJ Best Practice,UpToDate,the Joanna Briggs Institute(JBI)EBP Database,GIN,SIGN,RNAO,NICE,Medlive Guideline,WHO,National Blood Authority(Australia),National Health Commission of China,Cochrane Library,PubMed,EMbase,CINAHL,Web of Science,Wanfang Data,CNKI,VIP,and SinoMed.Searched literature included clinical decision aids,guidelines,evidence summaries,systematic reviews Meta analysis,RCTs,quasi-experimental,cross-sectional,cohort studies and expert consensus/opinions.Search period covered between 1st January 2015 and 10th February 2025.Quality appraisal,evidence extraction,synthesis and grading were performed according to JBI and GRADE approaches.Results Nineteen articles were retrieved including five guidelines,five systematic reviews,one RCT,two quasi-experimental studies,two cross-sectional studies,one professional standard and three expert consensuses.A total of 26 recommendations were extracted and they were organised into five domains:education and training,blood-sampling assessment,frequency of sampling,strategies to minimise blood volume drawn,and quality control.Conclusion This evidence summary provides the best current guidance for preventing and managing iatrogenic blood loss caused by diagnostic testing in critically ill adults,providing evidence-based basis for standardizing blood tests by medical staff.

Diaphragmatic dysfunction often occurs in ICU patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation, which seriously affects patients′prognosis. This article reviewed the progress of rehabilitation treatment of diaphragmatic dysfunction in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation, focused on the concept and assessment of diaphragm rehabilitation, the current status, evaluation indexes, emphasized the importance of nurses, analyzed the dilemmas and countermeasures in the application, which aimed to provide a reference for the promotion of diaphragm rehabilitation in clinical practice.

Objective:To understand the clinical application status of the best evidence for airway clearance in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, analyze the barriers and enablers in the process of evidence application, so as to provide reference for formulating transformation strategies.Methods:The literature on airway clearance in ICU patients was systematically searched in domestic and foreign databases and association websites. The best evidences were summarized based on the included literature, and corresponding review indicators were constructed based on the best evidence for clinical baseline review. From July to August 2022, convenience sampling was used to select 30 nurses and 30 patients from ICU of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. We conducted barriers and transformation strategy analysis based on the review results.Results:A total of 33 review indicators were formulated. The clinical execution rate of the review indicators was 0 to 100%, with 60.6% (20/33) of the review indicators having a clinical execution rate of <60%. The main barriers were that the specialized team for airway clearance involved great personnel and was difficult to organize, nurses had insufficient awareness and importance of airway clearance knowledge, the department lacked corresponding evaluation tools and equipment, the implementation standards for airway clearance treatment within the department were not sound, and the health education materials for airway clearance were incomplete. The transformation strategy mainly included strengthening leadership support, conducting knowledge training on airway clearance, introducing tools and equipment related to airway clearance, improving the implementation standards of airway clearance and health education materials for airway clearance.Conclusions:There is a significant gap between the best evidence for airway clearance in ICU patients and clinical practice. Timely improvement should be made on relevant barriers to promote the conversion of best evidence into clinical practice and improve patient clinical outcomes.

Objective:To summarize the best evidence of thirst management in ICU patients and provide evidence-based basis for dinical practice.Method:According to the "6S" evidence pyramid model, the literature on thirst management of ICU patients was systematically retrieved from relevant guidelines websites, evidence-based databases, association websites and original literature databases at home and abroad. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to June 31, 2022. Two researchers with evidence-based nursing training independently completed literature quality evaluation. To extract and summarize the evidence of the literature that meets the quality standard.Results:A total of 17 articles were included, including 8 randomized controlled trials, 5 quasi-experimental studies and 4 cross-sectional studies. The 18 pieces of best evidence were formed, including 5 aspects: basic requirements of thirst management, intervention evaluation, intervention methods, matters needing attention and health education.Conclusions:This study summarized the best evidence of thirst management in ICU patients. Nurses should translate and apply the best evidence in combination with the clinical situation and specific policies of the department to relieve the thirst symptoms of ICU patients.

Hip fracture is considered as the most severe osteoporotic fracture characterized by high disability and mortality in the elderly. Improved surgical techniques and multidisciplinary team play an active role in alleviating prognosis, which places higher demands on perioperative nursing. Dysfunction, complications, and secondary impact of anaesthesia and surgery add more difficulties to clinical nursing. Besides, there still lack clinical practices in perioperative nursing for elderly patients with hip fracture in China. In this context, led by the Orthopedic Nursing Committee of Chinese Nursing Association, the Expert consensus on clinical practice in perioperative nursing for elderly patients with hip fracture ( version 2023) is developed based on the evidence-based medicine. This consensus provides 11 recommendations on elderly patients with hip fracture from aspects of perioperative health education, condition monitoring and inspection, complication risk assessment and prevention, and rehabilitation, in order to provide guiding advices for clinical practice, improve the quality of nursing and ameliorate the prognosis of elderly patients with hip fracture.

The awake prone position plays an important role in the treatment of hypoxemia and the improvement of respiratory distress symptoms in non-intubated patients. It is widely used in clinical practice because of its simple operation, safety, and economy. To enable clinical medical staff to scientifically and normatively implement prone position for awake patients without intubation, the committees of consensus formulation, guided by evidence-based methodology and Delphi method, conducted literature search, literature quality evaluation and evidence synthesis around seven topics, including indications and contraindications, evaluation, implementation, monitoring and safety management, termination time, complication prevention and health education of awake prone position. After two rounds of expert letter consultation, Expert consensus on implementation strategy of awake prone positioning for non-intubated patients in China (2023) was formulated, and provide guidance for clinical medical staff.
Humans ; Consensus ; Prone Position ; Wakefulness ; China ; Dyspnea