Patients with lacunar infarction (LI) have a higher risk of stroke recurrence compared to other types of stroke, and it is an important pathological basis for vascular dementia. Homocysteine (Hcy) is closely associated with the occurrence and development of LI. The mechanism by which Hcy causes LI involves multiple complex biological processes (including inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, etc.) and synergistic effects with various risk factors (such as hypertension and hyperglycemia), but the specific mechanism is currently not fully elucidated.

OBJECTIVEThe aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes for hand-assisted, laparoscopic, and open resection for rectal cancer.

METHODSThree hundred ninety patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between June 2009 and June 2012 were included. Patients were classified into a hand-assisted group (HALS, n=101), a laparoscopic surgery group (LS, n=157), and an open surgery group (OS, n=132). Patient and disease characteristics, operative parameters, postoperative morbidity, pathological results and length of recovery were compared among three groups.

RESULTSThe mean operating time was (173±39) min for the HALS group, (231±61) min for the LS group, and (173±39) min for the OS group (P<0.01). Conversion rates did not differ between HALS and LS groups (2.0% vs 3.2%, P=0.708). The overall complication rates were 11.9%, 11.5%, and 19.7% in the HALS, LS and OS groups respectively (P=0.100). The specimen quality with a specimen length, distal resection margin, harvested lymph nodes, and positive lymph nodes did not differ among the three groups. Patients in the HALS and LS groups recovered significantly faster than those from the OS group.

CONCLUSIONSThis comparative study shows that HALS and LS can reproduce the equivalent short-term results of standard OS. HALS retained the minimal invasive advantages of LS, and significantly shorten the operation time.

Aged ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Laparotomy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes for hand-assisted, laparoscopic, and open resection for rectal cancer. Methods Three hundred ninety patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between June 2009 and June 2012 were included. Patients were classified into a hand-assisted group (HALS, n=101), a laparoscopic surgery group (LS, n=157), and an open surgery group (OS, n=132). Patient and disease characteristics, operative parameters, postoperative morbidity, pathological results and length of recovery were compared among three groups. Results The mean operating time was (173±39) min for the HALS group, (231±61) min for the LS group, and (173 ±39) min for the OS group (P<0.01). Conversion ratesdid not differ between HALS and LS groups (2.0% vs 3.2%, P=0.708). The overall complication rates were 11.9%, 11.5%, and 19.7% in the HALS, LS and OS groups respectively (P=0.100). The specimen quality with a specimen length, distal resection margin, harvested lymph nodes, and positive lymph nodes did not differ among the three groups. Patients in the HALS and LS groups recovered significantly faster than those from the OS group. Conclusions This comparative study shows that HALS and LS can reproduce the equivalent short-term results of standard OS. HALS retained the minimal invasive advantages of LS, and significantly shorten the operation time.

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes for hand-assisted, laparoscopic, and open resection for rectal cancer. Methods Three hundred ninety patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between June 2009 and June 2012 were included. Patients were classified into a hand-assisted group (HALS, n=101), a laparoscopic surgery group (LS, n=157), and an open surgery group (OS, n=132). Patient and disease characteristics, operative parameters, postoperative morbidity, pathological results and length of recovery were compared among three groups. Results The mean operating time was (173±39) min for the HALS group, (231±61) min for the LS group, and (173 ±39) min for the OS group (P<0.01). Conversion ratesdid not differ between HALS and LS groups (2.0% vs 3.2%, P=0.708). The overall complication rates were 11.9%, 11.5%, and 19.7% in the HALS, LS and OS groups respectively (P=0.100). The specimen quality with a specimen length, distal resection margin, harvested lymph nodes, and positive lymph nodes did not differ among the three groups. Patients in the HALS and LS groups recovered significantly faster than those from the OS group. Conclusions This comparative study shows that HALS and LS can reproduce the equivalent short-term results of standard OS. HALS retained the minimal invasive advantages of LS, and significantly shorten the operation time.

Objective To investigate the diagnosis and surgical therapy of multiple primary colorectal carcinoma. Methods From 1998 to 2007, 47 patients with synchronous multiple primary colorectal carcinoma and 20 cases with metachronous carcinoma were treated in our hospital. Results In these 67 cases of multiple primary colorectal carcinoma, synchronous carcinoma (SC) accounted for 70% (47 cases) including 37 rectal cancer with a total of 95 larger bowel cancer lesions. There were 6 cases with Dukes A stage, 22 cases with Dukes B stage, 15 cases with Dukes C stage and 4 cases with Dukes D stage. In this whole group there were 20 cases with lymph node metastasis, 21 cases with adenoma and multiple polyps in SC. Three cases received total coloectomy, 10 cases did subtotal coloectomy, 34 cases were treated by radical resection and intestine segment resection. In 20 metachronous carcinoma cases, there were 31 colon cancer(70%) with a total of 44 intestinal cancer lesions. Altogether, there were 17 cases with two tumors, 2 cases with three tumors, one case with four tumors. The duration between the first and the last carcinoma was from 7 months to 19 years, including less than two years in 7 cases, from two to five years in 5 cases, and more than five years in 8 cases. In all 20 MC cases the first (primary) carcinoma received radical resection, while radical resection was performed for the secondary carcinoma in 14 cases and for the third carcinoma in 2 cases. In the SC and the primary carcinoma of MC patients who received radical resection, the 5-year survival rates were 74% and 78% respectively. Conclusion In cases of colonic carcinoma we shouldn't be satisfied with the diagnosis of single colon tumor before a thorough screening of the whole colon was made. In radical resection surgery for SC or MC cases an attempt to preserve enough residual intestinal tract should be made in order to improve the life quality of post-operative patients.