Objective:To explore the characteristics of serum galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) and Gd-IgA1/IgA ratio in normal children.Methods:The children from a kindergarten and 3 primary or secondary schools in Baoding (Hebei Province) from March to August 2023 were included in the cross-sectional study.According to their age, the children were divided into the 3-6-year-old group, >6-11-year-old group, and >11-16-year-old group.Besides, some adults were also included as the control group.The immunoturbidimetric assay was used to detect serum IgA levels, and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was employed to detect Gd-IgA1 and Gd-IgA1/IgA levels.The above indicators were subject to normal distribution tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA)or rank sum test.Results:A total of 136 normal subjects were included for analysis.Among these subjects, there were 64 males and 72 females.There were 13 children in the 3-6-year-old group, 51 children in the >6-11-year-old group, and 56 children in the >11-16-year-old group.Besides, 16 normal adults (28-45 years old) from the physical examination center were also included as the control group.The serum IgA levels of the 3-6-year-old group, >6-11-year-old group, >11-16-year-old group, and adult group were (0.88±0.35) g/L, (1.38±0.65) g/L, (1.78±0.61) g/L, and (2.49±0.94) g/L, respectively.Except for no statistically significant difference between the 3-6-year-old group and the >6-11-year-old group, as well as between the >11-16-year-old group and the adult group, all other age groups showed statistically significant differences in serum IgA levels (all P<0.05).The serum Gd-IgA1 levels of the 3-6-year-old group, >6-11-year-old group, >11-16-year-old group, and adult group were 7.77(5.77, 16.51) μg/L, 7.12(5.29, 9.82) μg/L, 8.96(6.21, 14.30) μg/L, and 9.39(6.63, 40.00) μg/L, respectively, with statistically significant differences ( H=9.22, P=0.027).There was no significant difference in the Gd-IgA1/IgA ratio among different groups ( P=0.130).The correlation analysis suggested that Gd-IgA1/IgA1 did not correlate with age ( r=0.134, P=1.200).The Gd-IgA1 level was positively correlated with the IgA level ( r=0.204, P=0.017).There was no significant difference in serum IgA, Gd-IgA1, and Gd-IgA1/IgA levels between different gender groups. Conclusions:There are differences in Gd-IgA1 levels among different age groups among these children, but Gd-IgA1/IgA is not correlated with age.As a diagnostic biomarker, Gd-IgA1 should be emphasized from the different levels among different age groups, while Gd-IgA1/IgA seems to be more convenient for clinical research and application.

Objective:To explore the characteristics of serum galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) and Gd-IgA1/IgA ratio in normal children.Methods:The children from a kindergarten and 3 primary or secondary schools in Baoding (Hebei Province) from March to August 2023 were included in the cross-sectional study.According to their age, the children were divided into the 3-6-year-old group, >6-11-year-old group, and >11-16-year-old group.Besides, some adults were also included as the control group.The immunoturbidimetric assay was used to detect serum IgA levels, and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was employed to detect Gd-IgA1 and Gd-IgA1/IgA levels.The above indicators were subject to normal distribution tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA)or rank sum test.Results:A total of 136 normal subjects were included for analysis.Among these subjects, there were 64 males and 72 females.There were 13 children in the 3-6-year-old group, 51 children in the >6-11-year-old group, and 56 children in the >11-16-year-old group.Besides, 16 normal adults (28-45 years old) from the physical examination center were also included as the control group.The serum IgA levels of the 3-6-year-old group, >6-11-year-old group, >11-16-year-old group, and adult group were (0.88±0.35) g/L, (1.38±0.65) g/L, (1.78±0.61) g/L, and (2.49±0.94) g/L, respectively.Except for no statistically significant difference between the 3-6-year-old group and the >6-11-year-old group, as well as between the >11-16-year-old group and the adult group, all other age groups showed statistically significant differences in serum IgA levels (all P<0.05).The serum Gd-IgA1 levels of the 3-6-year-old group, >6-11-year-old group, >11-16-year-old group, and adult group were 7.77(5.77, 16.51) μg/L, 7.12(5.29, 9.82) μg/L, 8.96(6.21, 14.30) μg/L, and 9.39(6.63, 40.00) μg/L, respectively, with statistically significant differences ( H=9.22, P=0.027).There was no significant difference in the Gd-IgA1/IgA ratio among different groups ( P=0.130).The correlation analysis suggested that Gd-IgA1/IgA1 did not correlate with age ( r=0.134, P=1.200).The Gd-IgA1 level was positively correlated with the IgA level ( r=0.204, P=0.017).There was no significant difference in serum IgA, Gd-IgA1, and Gd-IgA1/IgA levels between different gender groups. Conclusions:There are differences in Gd-IgA1 levels among different age groups among these children, but Gd-IgA1/IgA is not correlated with age.As a diagnostic biomarker, Gd-IgA1 should be emphasized from the different levels among different age groups, while Gd-IgA1/IgA seems to be more convenient for clinical research and application.

Objective To systematically assess the incidence of needlestick injury in Chinese nursing interns.Methods Research articles published on China Academic Journal Electronic Retrieval Database (CNKI),Chinese Scientific Journals Full-text Database (VIP),Wanfang DATA,ISI Web of Knowledge,PUBMED,OVID,Springer and other databases before 2013 were searched,which were relevant to needlestick injury in Chinese nursing interns.Using STATA 12.0 software,pooled estimates were summarized by Meta-analysis.Results 61 articles were included in this study,which covered a total of 15 451 nursing interns.Meta-analysis showed that the pooled incidence of needlestick injury in nursing interns was 65％,95％CI=60％～71％.Although the incidence declined year by year in recent decade,it was still higher than 55％.However,the injury reporting rate was 22％,95％ CI=16％～29％.Conclusions Needlestick injury showed a high incidence in Chinese nursing interns,but declined slightly year by year.However,the injury reporting rate was still very low.