BACKGROUND:Currently,research both domestically and internationally on patellofemoral pain syndrome has explored the kinematics and dynamics during daily activities such as stair ascent and descent,and walking. However,there is a lack of studies examining the lower limb biomechanical characteristics of young female patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in different squatting conditions.OBJECTIVE:To investigate the lower limb biomechanical characteristics among young female patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in different functional states of the subtalar joint,providing theoretical support for the clinical treatment of various types of patellofemoral pain syndrome.METHODS:A total of 33 participants were included in this study. There were 10 subjects in the healthy control group (group C). The other 27 subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome were divided into two groups according to the foot posture index:14 subjects in the normal subtalar joint group (group A,foot posture index 0-6 points) and 13 subjects in the abnormal subtalar joint group (group B,foot posture index 7-12 points). The biomechanical indices of thesubjects in each group were collected and compared when they walked on stairs at normal speed. The kinematic indices included the three-dimensional joint angles of the hip and knee and the sagittal plane joint angles of the ankle at the initial contact moment and the moment of maximum knee flexion angle during the stance period. The dynamic indices included the three-dimensional joint torques of the hip and knee and the sagittal plane joint torques of the ankle at the moment of maximum knee flexion angle during the stance period. The surface electromyography indices included the root mean square amplitudes of the vastus medialis,vastus lateralis,rectus femoris,semitendinosus and semimembranosus,biceps femoris,and gluteus medius in the pre-activation stage and the buffering stage.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1) At the initial ground contact moment,group A exhibited a greater knee flexion angle (P<0.05),greater hip external rotation angle (P<0.01),and smaller knee external rotation angle (P<0.01) compared to group B. Compared to group C,group A showed a greater knee flexion angle and smaller hip flexion angle (both P<0.01). Group B demonstrated a greater knee external rotation angle and smaller hip external rotation angle and hip flexion angle (all P<0.01) compared to group C. (2) At the moment of maximum knee flexion,group A had a smaller knee valgus angle (P<0.05),smaller knee external rotation angle (P<0.05),and greater knee flexion angle (P<0.01) compared to group B. Compared to group C,group A showed a smaller knee valgus angle (P<0.05),smaller hip flexion angle (P<0.01),and smaller hip external rotation angle (P<0.05). Group B had a smaller knee flexion angle,hip flexion angle,hip external rotation angle,and greater knee external rotation angle (all P<0.01) compared to group C. Additionally,group A exhibited a greater hip internal rotation moment (P<0.05) and plantarflexion moment (P<0.01) compared to group C. (3) At normal speed during the staircase buffering phase,group C showed higher activation levels than group A in the vastus lateralis (P<0.05),vastus medialis (P<0.01),gluteus medius (P<0.01),and biceps femoris (P<0.05). Group C also had higher activation levels than group B in the vastus medialis (P<0.01),gluteus medius (P<0.01),and biceps femoris (P<0.05). Additionally,group A showed higher activation in the semitendinosus and semimembranosus muscles compared to group B (P<0.05). (4) These findings indicate that young female patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome have stiffer hip and knee joint buffering while descending stairs,potentially compensated by the ankle joint. Low muscle activation levels contribute to patellofemoral pain,with those having normal subtalar joints but experiencing pain showing the lowest and most abnormal activation. ③ Abnormal biomechanics in the normal subtalar joint group are mainly due to insufficient hip and knee flexion. Abnormal biomechanics in the abnormal subtalar joint group are mainly due to excessive subtalar joint pronation.

Objective:To compare postural stability and balance in different tasks between people with and without chronic, non-specific low back pain (CNLBP).Methods:Twenty patients with CNLBP formed the study′s CNLBP group, while 25 healthy counterparts were chosen as a normal group. Both groups were tested for their ability to standing on one leg with their eyes closed (the SOLEC test), for postural balance, for postural stability (PST), and had their limits of stability (LOS) time determined. The results were compared.Results:Compared to the normal group, the CNLBP group showed a significant difference in left-right weight-bearing in a bipedal semi-squat and in two-legged alternate standing. Shifting the center of gravity in bipedal standing revealed significant differences in LOS time, anterior-posterior stability index (APSI), mediolateral stability index (MLSI) and overall stability. In bipedal standing with the eyes closed there were significant differences in APSI, MLSI and OSI observed. On average, the CNLBP group had significantly shorter SOLEC and LOS times on the left and rear left sides.Conclusions:The CNLBP patients had some postural control deficits compared to their healthy counterparts and were less able to maintain static balance on their left leg and dynamic balance. They were less able to maintain postural balance in a bipedal semi-squat and during alternate leg standing. They are at greater risk of falling when moving the body′s center of gravity to the left or the rear left side.

BACKGROUND:Currently,research both domestically and internationally on patellofemoral pain syndrome has explored the kinematics and dynamics during daily activities such as stair ascent and descent,and walking. However,there is a lack of studies examining the lower limb biomechanical characteristics of young female patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in different squatting conditions.OBJECTIVE:To investigate the lower limb biomechanical characteristics among young female patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome in different functional states of the subtalar joint,providing theoretical support for the clinical treatment of various types of patellofemoral pain syndrome.METHODS:A total of 33 participants were included in this study. There were 10 subjects in the healthy control group (group C). The other 27 subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome were divided into two groups according to the foot posture index:14 subjects in the normal subtalar joint group (group A,foot posture index 0-6 points) and 13 subjects in the abnormal subtalar joint group (group B,foot posture index 7-12 points). The biomechanical indices of thesubjects in each group were collected and compared when they walked on stairs at normal speed. The kinematic indices included the three-dimensional joint angles of the hip and knee and the sagittal plane joint angles of the ankle at the initial contact moment and the moment of maximum knee flexion angle during the stance period. The dynamic indices included the three-dimensional joint torques of the hip and knee and the sagittal plane joint torques of the ankle at the moment of maximum knee flexion angle during the stance period. The surface electromyography indices included the root mean square amplitudes of the vastus medialis,vastus lateralis,rectus femoris,semitendinosus and semimembranosus,biceps femoris,and gluteus medius in the pre-activation stage and the buffering stage.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1) At the initial ground contact moment,group A exhibited a greater knee flexion angle (P<0.05),greater hip external rotation angle (P<0.01),and smaller knee external rotation angle (P<0.01) compared to group B. Compared to group C,group A showed a greater knee flexion angle and smaller hip flexion angle (both P<0.01). Group B demonstrated a greater knee external rotation angle and smaller hip external rotation angle and hip flexion angle (all P<0.01) compared to group C. (2) At the moment of maximum knee flexion,group A had a smaller knee valgus angle (P<0.05),smaller knee external rotation angle (P<0.05),and greater knee flexion angle (P<0.01) compared to group B. Compared to group C,group A showed a smaller knee valgus angle (P<0.05),smaller hip flexion angle (P<0.01),and smaller hip external rotation angle (P<0.05). Group B had a smaller knee flexion angle,hip flexion angle,hip external rotation angle,and greater knee external rotation angle (all P<0.01) compared to group C. Additionally,group A exhibited a greater hip internal rotation moment (P<0.05) and plantarflexion moment (P<0.01) compared to group C. (3) At normal speed during the staircase buffering phase,group C showed higher activation levels than group A in the vastus lateralis (P<0.05),vastus medialis (P<0.01),gluteus medius (P<0.01),and biceps femoris (P<0.05). Group C also had higher activation levels than group B in the vastus medialis (P<0.01),gluteus medius (P<0.01),and biceps femoris (P<0.05). Additionally,group A showed higher activation in the semitendinosus and semimembranosus muscles compared to group B (P<0.05). (4) These findings indicate that young female patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome have stiffer hip and knee joint buffering while descending stairs,potentially compensated by the ankle joint. Low muscle activation levels contribute to patellofemoral pain,with those having normal subtalar joints but experiencing pain showing the lowest and most abnormal activation. ③ Abnormal biomechanics in the normal subtalar joint group are mainly due to insufficient hip and knee flexion. Abnormal biomechanics in the abnormal subtalar joint group are mainly due to excessive subtalar joint pronation.

Objective:To compare postural stability and balance in different tasks between people with and without chronic, non-specific low back pain (CNLBP).Methods:Twenty patients with CNLBP formed the study′s CNLBP group, while 25 healthy counterparts were chosen as a normal group. Both groups were tested for their ability to standing on one leg with their eyes closed (the SOLEC test), for postural balance, for postural stability (PST), and had their limits of stability (LOS) time determined. The results were compared.Results:Compared to the normal group, the CNLBP group showed a significant difference in left-right weight-bearing in a bipedal semi-squat and in two-legged alternate standing. Shifting the center of gravity in bipedal standing revealed significant differences in LOS time, anterior-posterior stability index (APSI), mediolateral stability index (MLSI) and overall stability. In bipedal standing with the eyes closed there were significant differences in APSI, MLSI and OSI observed. On average, the CNLBP group had significantly shorter SOLEC and LOS times on the left and rear left sides.Conclusions:The CNLBP patients had some postural control deficits compared to their healthy counterparts and were less able to maintain static balance on their left leg and dynamic balance. They were less able to maintain postural balance in a bipedal semi-squat and during alternate leg standing. They are at greater risk of falling when moving the body′s center of gravity to the left or the rear left side.

Objective:To investigate the application value of a multi-dimensional digital moni-toring platform for perioperative period in gastric cancer patients.Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrec-tomy in The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from July 2022 to January 2024 were collected. There were 35 males and 15 females, aged (64±12)years. All patients followed the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery, and the multi-dimensional digital monitoring platform based on wearable monitoring equipment was used to implement perioperative management measures. Observation indicators: (1) results of heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring; (2) results of blood glucose and blood oxygen monitoring; (3) results of exercise and sleep monitoring; (4) results of body composition monitoring. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(IQR). Repeated measurement data were analyzed using the repeated ANOVA. Measurement data with skewed distri-bution were transformed to normal distribution by SPSS transformation function before testing. For comparison between pre- and postoperation, paired sample t test was used for measurement data with normal distribution, and nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used for measure-ment data with skewed distribution. Results:(1) Results of HRV monitoring. From preoperation to the third day after surgery, the standard deviation normal to normal heart beat of 50 patients was changed from(103±26)ms to(101±36)ms, the mean of the standard deviations of normal to normal heart beat calculated per 5 min segment was changed from (45±16)ms to(33±12)ms, the number of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms in the entire recording was changed from 6.02%(4.96%) to 5.79%(4.20%), the low frequency power was changed from 376.78(468.96)ms 2 to 742.79(525.20)ms 2, the high frequency power was changed from 273.61(273.58)ms 2 to 397.48(164.87)ms 2, the ratio of low frequency power to high frequency power was changed from 1.6±0.5 to 1.6±0.6, showing significant differences in above indicators before and after operation ( F=34.43, 26.15, 24.58, 5.51, 6.11, 6.02, P<0.05). (2) Results of blood glucose and blood oxygen monitoring. From preoperation to the third day after surgery, the blood glucose of 50 patients was changed from 6.75(2.05)mmol/L to 6.90(2.63)mmol/L, showng a significant difference before and after operation ( F=45.84, P<0.05). The blood oxygen was changed from 97.00%(5.00%) to 97.50%(3.00%), showing no significant difference before and after operation ( F=2.25, P>0.05). (3) Results of exercise and sleep monitoring. From preoperation to the third day after surgery, the number of steps fo 50 pati-ents was changed from 3 043(1 224) to 1 473(767), sleep duration was changed from(8.2±1.1)hours to(7.3±0.8)hours, sleep score was changed from 80±10 to 78±5,showing significant differences in above indicators before and after operation ( F=716.46, 29.02, 47.32, P<0.05).(4) Results of body composition monitoring. The body weight of 50 patients was changed from (63±8)kg to(61±8)kg before and after operation, body fat rate was changed from 24%±8% to 22%±9%, muscle mass was changed from 43 (12)kg to 41(17)kg, body mass index was changed from (23.0±2.6)kg/m 2 to(22.1±2.5)kg/m 2, showing significant differences in above indicators before and after operation ( t=8.19, 3.00, Z=-2.78, t=7.34, P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in basal metabolic indicators from (1 390±134)kcal to (1 379±139)kcal before and after operation ( t=1.02, P>0.05). Conclusion:The multi-dimensional digital monitoring platform for preoperative period can accurately monitor the perioperative stress level and evaluate the postoperative recovery of gastric cancer patients, which can present the visual results.