1.Early clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with lateral plate fixation for the treatment of single-segment adjacent segment disease following lumbar fusion
Weidong GUO ; Xiaoping ZHANG ; Qiudong WU ; Bo LIU ; Huanhuan QIAO ; Kang YAN ; Haien ZHAO ; Bo LIAO
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences) 2025;46(5):865-870
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion(OLIF)combined with lateral plate fixation in the treatment of single-level adjacent segment disease(ASDis)following lumbar fusion surgery so as to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this surgical approach.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 46 patients with single-level ASDis after lumbar fusion surgery from August 2022 to October 2024.Twenty-three patients underwent OLIF combined with lateral plate fixation(OLIF group),while 23 patients received posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)(PLIF group).The following parameters were compared between the two groups:operative time,intraoperative blood loss,visual analogue scale(VAS)for pain,Oswestry disability index(ODI),disc height(DH),intervertebral foramen height(IFH),and interbody fusion status.Results All the 46 patients successfully completed surgery for single-level ASDis and were followed up for(13.7±1.1)months.The OLIF group had significantly shorter operative time[(70.7±4.6)min vs.(128.6±12.0)min]and less intraoperative blood loss[(58.6±5.7)mL vs.(313.3±47.5)mL]compared to the PLIF group(all P<0.05).Both groups showed significant improvements in postoperative lumbar VAS and ODI scores at all follow-up time points compared to preoperative values(P<0.05).The OLIF group exhibited significantly lower lumbar VAS scores at 3 days and 3 months postoperatively than those of the PLIF group(P<0.05),and there was no statistical difference in VAS scores at the other follow-up time points(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative ODI between OLIF group and PLIF group at each time point(P>0.05).Postoperative DH and IFH were significantly improved in both groups compared to preoperative measurements(P<0.05).In OLIF group,1 case of transient left thigh numbness resolved with conservative treatment within 2 weeks;1 case of cage subsidence was observed at 1 month postoperatively,achieving fusion without further displacement by 13 months.All the OLIF cases achieved complete fusion(fusion rate:100%).In PLIF group,2 cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage healed with bed rest,1 case of wound exudation resolved with intensive dressing changes,and 1 case failed to achieve fusion(fusion rate:96%).Conclusion OLIF combined with lateral plate fixation demonstrates satisfactory early clinical outcomes for single-level ASDis after lumbar fusion,with significant advantages in operative efficiency(shorter time plus reduced blood loss)and short-term pain relief.Therefore,it is a safe and effective surgical approach.
2.Early clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with lateral plate fixation for the treatment of single-segment adjacent segment disease following lumbar fusion
Weidong GUO ; Xiaoping ZHANG ; Qiudong WU ; Bo LIU ; Huanhuan QIAO ; Kang YAN ; Haien ZHAO ; Bo LIAO
Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences) 2025;46(5):865-870
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion(OLIF)combined with lateral plate fixation in the treatment of single-level adjacent segment disease(ASDis)following lumbar fusion surgery so as to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this surgical approach.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 46 patients with single-level ASDis after lumbar fusion surgery from August 2022 to October 2024.Twenty-three patients underwent OLIF combined with lateral plate fixation(OLIF group),while 23 patients received posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF)(PLIF group).The following parameters were compared between the two groups:operative time,intraoperative blood loss,visual analogue scale(VAS)for pain,Oswestry disability index(ODI),disc height(DH),intervertebral foramen height(IFH),and interbody fusion status.Results All the 46 patients successfully completed surgery for single-level ASDis and were followed up for(13.7±1.1)months.The OLIF group had significantly shorter operative time[(70.7±4.6)min vs.(128.6±12.0)min]and less intraoperative blood loss[(58.6±5.7)mL vs.(313.3±47.5)mL]compared to the PLIF group(all P<0.05).Both groups showed significant improvements in postoperative lumbar VAS and ODI scores at all follow-up time points compared to preoperative values(P<0.05).The OLIF group exhibited significantly lower lumbar VAS scores at 3 days and 3 months postoperatively than those of the PLIF group(P<0.05),and there was no statistical difference in VAS scores at the other follow-up time points(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative ODI between OLIF group and PLIF group at each time point(P>0.05).Postoperative DH and IFH were significantly improved in both groups compared to preoperative measurements(P<0.05).In OLIF group,1 case of transient left thigh numbness resolved with conservative treatment within 2 weeks;1 case of cage subsidence was observed at 1 month postoperatively,achieving fusion without further displacement by 13 months.All the OLIF cases achieved complete fusion(fusion rate:100%).In PLIF group,2 cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage healed with bed rest,1 case of wound exudation resolved with intensive dressing changes,and 1 case failed to achieve fusion(fusion rate:96%).Conclusion OLIF combined with lateral plate fixation demonstrates satisfactory early clinical outcomes for single-level ASDis after lumbar fusion,with significant advantages in operative efficiency(shorter time plus reduced blood loss)and short-term pain relief.Therefore,it is a safe and effective surgical approach.
3.Efficacy of 308-nm excimer laser versus high-intensity ultraviolet radiation for the treatment of active localized vitiligo
Haien WU ; Yongbin LIU ; Yunhui SHAN ; Yafang YANG ; Ying WANG ; Tianqi MA ; Peng QIN ; Liang CUI ; Fang YAO ; Chunlin JIN ; Tienan LI
Chinese Journal of Dermatology 2018;51(6):413-416
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of 308-nm excimer laser compared to high-intensity ultraviolet radiation for the treatment of active localized vitiligo,and to observe changes in skin lesions before and after the treatment by confocal laser scanning microscopy.Methods Sixty patients with 203 skin lesions of active localized vitiligo and were enrolled into this study,and the vitiligo disease activity (VIDA) score of these patients ranged from 2 to 3.We selected more than 3 skin lesions from a same anatomical site of each patient,one of lesions served as a control and the other skin lesions (≥ 2) were randomly treated with 308-nm excimer laser (laser group) or high-intensity ultraviolet radiation (ultraviolet group).The treatment was conducted twice a week for 25 sessions,and a 3-month follow-up was performed.Results A total of 48 patients with 169 skin lesions completed the trial.The marked response rate was significantly higher in the laser group [66.15% (43/65)] than in the ultraviolet group [44.64% (25/56),x2 =8.28,P < 0.01].The patients with a VIDA score of 2 showed a significantly higher marked response rate [67.69%(44/65)] compared with those with a VIDA score of 3 [44.64%(25/56),x2 =6.80,P < 0.01].During the 3-month follow-up,no relapse was observed.Confocal laser scanning microscopy showed that the number of inflammatory cells increased at the dermal-epidermal junction of the intra-and extra-marginal lesional skin.After treatment,the number of inflammatory cells markedly decreased and returned to normal level in lesions.Conclusion Both 308-nm excimer laser and high-intensity ultraviolet radiation are effective in the treatment of active localized vitiligo,but the 308-nm excimer laser shows a more rapid onset of action and a better therapeutic effect.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail