2.Observer-Blind Randomized Control Trial for the Effectiveness of Intensive Case Management in Seoul: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Severe Mental Illness
Hye-Young MIN ; Seung-Hee AHN ; Jeung Suk LIM ; Hwa Yeon SEO ; Sung Joon CHO ; Seung Yeon LEE ; Dohhee KIM ; Kihoon YOU ; Hyun Seo CHOI ; Su-Jin YANG ; Jee Eun PARK ; Bong Jin HAHM ; Hae Woo LEE ; Jee Hoon SOHN
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(5):513-521
Objective:
In South Korea, there is a significant gap in systematic, evidence-based research on intensive case management (ICM) for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ICM through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ICM with standard case management (non-ICM).
Methods:
An RCT was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Seoul-intensive case management (S-ICM) vs. non-ICM in individuals with SMI in Seoul. A total of 78 participants were randomly assigned to either the S-ICM group (n=41) or the control group (n=37). Various clinical assessments, including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), along with quality-of-life measures such as the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO Quality of Life scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were evaluated over a 3-month period. Statistical analyses, including analysis of covariance and logistic regression, were used to determine the effectiveness of S-ICM.
Results:
The S-ICM group had significantly lower odds of self-harm or suicidal attempts compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–1.38). Psychiatric symptoms measured by the BPRS and perceived social support measured by the MSPSS significantly improved in the S-ICM group. The S-ICM group also had significantly higher odds of CGI-I compared to the control group (aOR=8.20, 95% CI: 2.66–25.32).
Conclusion
This study provides inaugural evidence on the effectiveness of S-ICM services, supporting their standardization and potential nationwide expansion.
3.No difference in inflammatory mediator expression between mast cell-rich and mast cell-poor rosacea lesions in Korean patients: a comparative study
Jin Ju LEE ; Bo Ram KWON ; Min Young LEE ; Ji Yeon BYUN ; Joo Young ROH ; Hae Young CHOI ; You Won CHOI
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e78-
4.Observer-Blind Randomized Control Trial for the Effectiveness of Intensive Case Management in Seoul: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Severe Mental Illness
Hye-Young MIN ; Seung-Hee AHN ; Jeung Suk LIM ; Hwa Yeon SEO ; Sung Joon CHO ; Seung Yeon LEE ; Dohhee KIM ; Kihoon YOU ; Hyun Seo CHOI ; Su-Jin YANG ; Jee Eun PARK ; Bong Jin HAHM ; Hae Woo LEE ; Jee Hoon SOHN
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(5):513-521
Objective:
In South Korea, there is a significant gap in systematic, evidence-based research on intensive case management (ICM) for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ICM through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ICM with standard case management (non-ICM).
Methods:
An RCT was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Seoul-intensive case management (S-ICM) vs. non-ICM in individuals with SMI in Seoul. A total of 78 participants were randomly assigned to either the S-ICM group (n=41) or the control group (n=37). Various clinical assessments, including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), along with quality-of-life measures such as the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO Quality of Life scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were evaluated over a 3-month period. Statistical analyses, including analysis of covariance and logistic regression, were used to determine the effectiveness of S-ICM.
Results:
The S-ICM group had significantly lower odds of self-harm or suicidal attempts compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–1.38). Psychiatric symptoms measured by the BPRS and perceived social support measured by the MSPSS significantly improved in the S-ICM group. The S-ICM group also had significantly higher odds of CGI-I compared to the control group (aOR=8.20, 95% CI: 2.66–25.32).
Conclusion
This study provides inaugural evidence on the effectiveness of S-ICM services, supporting their standardization and potential nationwide expansion.
5.No difference in inflammatory mediator expression between mast cell-rich and mast cell-poor rosacea lesions in Korean patients: a comparative study
Jin Ju LEE ; Bo Ram KWON ; Min Young LEE ; Ji Yeon BYUN ; Joo Young ROH ; Hae Young CHOI ; You Won CHOI
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e78-
6.Observer-Blind Randomized Control Trial for the Effectiveness of Intensive Case Management in Seoul: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Severe Mental Illness
Hye-Young MIN ; Seung-Hee AHN ; Jeung Suk LIM ; Hwa Yeon SEO ; Sung Joon CHO ; Seung Yeon LEE ; Dohhee KIM ; Kihoon YOU ; Hyun Seo CHOI ; Su-Jin YANG ; Jee Eun PARK ; Bong Jin HAHM ; Hae Woo LEE ; Jee Hoon SOHN
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(5):513-521
Objective:
In South Korea, there is a significant gap in systematic, evidence-based research on intensive case management (ICM) for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ICM through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ICM with standard case management (non-ICM).
Methods:
An RCT was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Seoul-intensive case management (S-ICM) vs. non-ICM in individuals with SMI in Seoul. A total of 78 participants were randomly assigned to either the S-ICM group (n=41) or the control group (n=37). Various clinical assessments, including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), along with quality-of-life measures such as the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO Quality of Life scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were evaluated over a 3-month period. Statistical analyses, including analysis of covariance and logistic regression, were used to determine the effectiveness of S-ICM.
Results:
The S-ICM group had significantly lower odds of self-harm or suicidal attempts compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–1.38). Psychiatric symptoms measured by the BPRS and perceived social support measured by the MSPSS significantly improved in the S-ICM group. The S-ICM group also had significantly higher odds of CGI-I compared to the control group (aOR=8.20, 95% CI: 2.66–25.32).
Conclusion
This study provides inaugural evidence on the effectiveness of S-ICM services, supporting their standardization and potential nationwide expansion.
7.No difference in inflammatory mediator expression between mast cell-rich and mast cell-poor rosacea lesions in Korean patients: a comparative study
Jin Ju LEE ; Bo Ram KWON ; Min Young LEE ; Ji Yeon BYUN ; Joo Young ROH ; Hae Young CHOI ; You Won CHOI
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e78-
8.Observer-Blind Randomized Control Trial for the Effectiveness of Intensive Case Management in Seoul: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Severe Mental Illness
Hye-Young MIN ; Seung-Hee AHN ; Jeung Suk LIM ; Hwa Yeon SEO ; Sung Joon CHO ; Seung Yeon LEE ; Dohhee KIM ; Kihoon YOU ; Hyun Seo CHOI ; Su-Jin YANG ; Jee Eun PARK ; Bong Jin HAHM ; Hae Woo LEE ; Jee Hoon SOHN
Psychiatry Investigation 2025;22(5):513-521
Objective:
In South Korea, there is a significant gap in systematic, evidence-based research on intensive case management (ICM) for individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ICM through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing ICM with standard case management (non-ICM).
Methods:
An RCT was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Seoul-intensive case management (S-ICM) vs. non-ICM in individuals with SMI in Seoul. A total of 78 participants were randomly assigned to either the S-ICM group (n=41) or the control group (n=37). Various clinical assessments, including the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale, and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), along with quality-of-life measures such as the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHO Quality of Life scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were evaluated over a 3-month period. Statistical analyses, including analysis of covariance and logistic regression, were used to determine the effectiveness of S-ICM.
Results:
The S-ICM group had significantly lower odds of self-harm or suicidal attempts compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–1.38). Psychiatric symptoms measured by the BPRS and perceived social support measured by the MSPSS significantly improved in the S-ICM group. The S-ICM group also had significantly higher odds of CGI-I compared to the control group (aOR=8.20, 95% CI: 2.66–25.32).
Conclusion
This study provides inaugural evidence on the effectiveness of S-ICM services, supporting their standardization and potential nationwide expansion.
9.No difference in inflammatory mediator expression between mast cell-rich and mast cell-poor rosacea lesions in Korean patients: a comparative study
Jin Ju LEE ; Bo Ram KWON ; Min Young LEE ; Ji Yeon BYUN ; Joo Young ROH ; Hae Young CHOI ; You Won CHOI
The Ewha Medical Journal 2025;48(1):e78-
10.Immunophenotypic and Transcriptomic Analysis of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Bullous Pemphigoid
Jeewoo CHOI ; Jae-Yong NAM ; Min Sung KIM ; You Won CHOI ; Hae Young CHOI ; Ji Yeon BYUN
Annals of Dermatology 2025;37(4):191-200
Background:
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease driven by autoantibodies against BP180 and BP230. While type 2 inflammation plays a key role, the precise immune cell alterations and transcriptomic changes remain unclear.
Objective:
To characterize immune cell composition and transcriptomic changes in BP patients using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-based immunophenotyping and RNA sequencing.
Methods:
A case-control study was conducted on 10 newly diagnosed, treatment-naive BP patients and six healthy controls. Disease activity was assessed using the Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated for FACS analysis to determine immune cell subsets. RNA sequencing was performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and enriched pathways. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and correlation analysis.
Results:
FACS analysis revealed a reduction in CD4 + T cells, T helper 2 (Th2), and B cells in BP patients (p<0.05), alongside an increase in M2a-like monocytes (p<0.001). RNA sequencing identified 262 DEGs, with secretory leukocyte peptidase inhibitor (SLPI) and transmembrane protein 237 being the most significantly upregulated. Proline-serine-threonine phosphatase interacting protein 2 (PSTPIP2) and SAM domain, SH3 domain, and nuclear localization signals 1 (SAMSN1) positively correlated with BPDAI (p<0.001). Gene ontology analysis highlighted enrichment in inflammatory responses and neutrophil degranulation pathways.
Conclusion
BP patients show distinct immune dysregulation, including decreased CD4 + T cells, Th2, and B cells, increased M2a-like monocytes, altered gene expression profiles, and correlations between PSTPIP2, SAMSN1 and disease activity. These findings provide insights into pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets of BP.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail