Background: Transfusion reactions have been under-reported, and the laboratory tests to evaluate the causes of the reactions are unfamiliar to physicians other than transfusion specialists. The paper-based transfusion reaction reporting system previously used in our hospital was one-way, with physicians submitting it to the Department of Transfusion Management. To address this, we developed an electronic reporting system that improves communication with physicians to identify the cause of transfusion reactions and recommend appropriate blood components. Methods: To assess the status of transfusion reaction reporting, transfusion reaction reports and transfusion nursing records of 5 years from 2019 to 2023 were analyzed. The transfusion reaction reporting system comprises two parts: the physician's report and the response from the Department of Transfusion Management. If physicians order blood products for patients with a history of prior transfusion reactions, a pop-up alert appears, warning them to check the details of the previous report. Results: From 2019 to 2023, 2.5% cases of transfusion-related symptoms occurred annually and only 2.6% of transfusion reactions were reported. In 21 out of the 31 cases, the cause was difficult to determine due to inadequate laboratory tests.The attending physicians of 12 cases were given a recommendation to use blood products or to conduct further laboratory tests by the Department of Transfusion Management to reduce recurrence, but the advice was followed only in 4 cases. Conclusion The electronic transfusion reaction reporting system could help physicians conduct appropriate investigations for transfusion reactions and inform physicians regarding the laboratory tests required to be undertaken. It is expected to enhance blood transfusion safety and management by improving communication with physicians.

Background: Transfusion reactions have been under-reported, and the laboratory tests to evaluate the causes of the reactions are unfamiliar to physicians other than transfusion specialists. The paper-based transfusion reaction reporting system previously used in our hospital was one-way, with physicians submitting it to the Department of Transfusion Management. To address this, we developed an electronic reporting system that improves communication with physicians to identify the cause of transfusion reactions and recommend appropriate blood components. Methods: To assess the status of transfusion reaction reporting, transfusion reaction reports and transfusion nursing records of 5 years from 2019 to 2023 were analyzed. The transfusion reaction reporting system comprises two parts: the physician's report and the response from the Department of Transfusion Management. If physicians order blood products for patients with a history of prior transfusion reactions, a pop-up alert appears, warning them to check the details of the previous report. Results: From 2019 to 2023, 2.5% cases of transfusion-related symptoms occurred annually and only 2.6% of transfusion reactions were reported. In 21 out of the 31 cases, the cause was difficult to determine due to inadequate laboratory tests.The attending physicians of 12 cases were given a recommendation to use blood products or to conduct further laboratory tests by the Department of Transfusion Management to reduce recurrence, but the advice was followed only in 4 cases. Conclusion The electronic transfusion reaction reporting system could help physicians conduct appropriate investigations for transfusion reactions and inform physicians regarding the laboratory tests required to be undertaken. It is expected to enhance blood transfusion safety and management by improving communication with physicians.

Background: Transfusion reactions have been under-reported, and the laboratory tests to evaluate the causes of the reactions are unfamiliar to physicians other than transfusion specialists. The paper-based transfusion reaction reporting system previously used in our hospital was one-way, with physicians submitting it to the Department of Transfusion Management. To address this, we developed an electronic reporting system that improves communication with physicians to identify the cause of transfusion reactions and recommend appropriate blood components. Methods: To assess the status of transfusion reaction reporting, transfusion reaction reports and transfusion nursing records of 5 years from 2019 to 2023 were analyzed. The transfusion reaction reporting system comprises two parts: the physician's report and the response from the Department of Transfusion Management. If physicians order blood products for patients with a history of prior transfusion reactions, a pop-up alert appears, warning them to check the details of the previous report. Results: From 2019 to 2023, 2.5% cases of transfusion-related symptoms occurred annually and only 2.6% of transfusion reactions were reported. In 21 out of the 31 cases, the cause was difficult to determine due to inadequate laboratory tests.The attending physicians of 12 cases were given a recommendation to use blood products or to conduct further laboratory tests by the Department of Transfusion Management to reduce recurrence, but the advice was followed only in 4 cases. Conclusion The electronic transfusion reaction reporting system could help physicians conduct appropriate investigations for transfusion reactions and inform physicians regarding the laboratory tests required to be undertaken. It is expected to enhance blood transfusion safety and management by improving communication with physicians.

Background: Transfusion reactions have been under-reported, and the laboratory tests to evaluate the causes of the reactions are unfamiliar to physicians other than transfusion specialists. The paper-based transfusion reaction reporting system previously used in our hospital was one-way, with physicians submitting it to the Department of Transfusion Management. To address this, we developed an electronic reporting system that improves communication with physicians to identify the cause of transfusion reactions and recommend appropriate blood components. Methods: To assess the status of transfusion reaction reporting, transfusion reaction reports and transfusion nursing records of 5 years from 2019 to 2023 were analyzed. The transfusion reaction reporting system comprises two parts: the physician's report and the response from the Department of Transfusion Management. If physicians order blood products for patients with a history of prior transfusion reactions, a pop-up alert appears, warning them to check the details of the previous report. Results: From 2019 to 2023, 2.5% cases of transfusion-related symptoms occurred annually and only 2.6% of transfusion reactions were reported. In 21 out of the 31 cases, the cause was difficult to determine due to inadequate laboratory tests.The attending physicians of 12 cases were given a recommendation to use blood products or to conduct further laboratory tests by the Department of Transfusion Management to reduce recurrence, but the advice was followed only in 4 cases. Conclusion The electronic transfusion reaction reporting system could help physicians conduct appropriate investigations for transfusion reactions and inform physicians regarding the laboratory tests required to be undertaken. It is expected to enhance blood transfusion safety and management by improving communication with physicians.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients’ values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

Objectives: This research delves into the application of texture analysis in spine computed tomography (CT) scans and its correlation with bone mineral density (BMD), as determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).It specifically addresses the discordance between the 2 measurements, suggesting that certain spinal-specific factors may contribute to this discrepancy. Methods: The study involved 405 cases from a single institution collected between May 6, 2012 and June 30, 2021. Each case underwent a spinal CT scan and a DXA scan. BMD values at the lumbar region (T12 to S1) and total hip were recorded. Texture features from axial cuts of T12 to S1 vertebrae were extracted using gray-level co-occurrence matrices, and a regression model was constructed to predict the BMD values. Results: The correlation between CT texture analysis results and BMD from DXA was moderate, with a correlation coefficient ranging between 0.4 and 0.5. This discordance was examined in light of factors unique to the spine region, such as abdominal obesity, aortic calcification, and lumbar degenerative changes, which could poten tially affect BMD measurements. Conclusions Emerging from this study is a novel insight into the discordance between spinal CT texture analysis and DXA-derived BMD measurements, highlighting the unique influence of spinal attributes. This revelation calls into question the exclusive reliance on DXA scans for BMD assessment, particularly in scenarios where DXA scanning may not be feasible or accurate.

Background: Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have been distributed worldwide under emergency use authorization, the real-world safety profiles of mRNA vaccines still need to be clearly defined. We aimed to identify the overall incidence and factors associated with adverse events (AEs) following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We conducted web-based survey from December 2 to 10 in 2021 with a 2,849 nationwide sampled panel. Study participants were individuals who had elapsed at least twoweeks after completing two dosing schedules of COVID-19 vaccination aged between 18–49 years. We weighted the participants to represent the Korean population. The outcome was the overall incidence of AEs following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and associated factors.We estimated the weighted odds ratios (ORs) using multivariable logistic regression models to identify the factors associated with AEs. Results: Of the 2,849 participants (median [interquartile range] age, 35 [27–42] years; 51.6% male), 90.8% (n = 2,582) for the first dose and 88.7% (n = 2,849) for the second dose reported AEs, and 3.3% and 4.3% reported severe AEs, respectively. Occurrence of AEs was more prevalent in mRNA-1273 (OR, 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59–2.67 vs. BNT162b2), female sex (1.88; 1.52–2.32), and those with dermatologic diseases (2.51; 1.32–4.77). History of serious allergic reactions (1.96; 1.06–3.64) and anticoagulant medication use (4.72; 1.92–11.6) were associated with severe AEs. Conclusion Approximately 90% of participants reported AEs following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Substantial factors, including vaccine type (mRNA-1273), female sex, and dermatologic diseases were associated with AEs. Our findings could aid policymakers in establishing vaccination strategies tailored to those potentially susceptible to AEs.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination may non-specifically alter the host immune system. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on hepatitis B surface Ag (HBsAg) titer and host immunity in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Consecutive 2,797 CHB patients who had serial HBsAg measurements during antiviral treatment were included in this study. Changes in the HBsAg levels after COVID-19 vaccination were analyzed. The dynamics of NK cells following COVID-19 vaccination were also examined using serial blood samples collected prospectively from 25 healthy volunteers. Vaccinated CHB patients (n=2,329) had significantly lower HBsAg levels 1–30 days post-vaccination compared to baseline (median, −21.4 IU/ml from baseline), but the levels reverted to baseline by 91–180 days (median, −3.8 IU/ml). The velocity of the HBsAg decline was transiently accelerated within 30 days after vaccination (median velocity: −0.06, −0.39, and −0.04 log 10 IU/ml/year in pre-vaccination period, days 1–30, and days 31–90, respectively). In contrast, unvaccinated patients (n=468) had no change in HBsAg levels. Flow cytometric analysis showed that the frequency of NK cells expressing NKG2A, an NK inhibitory receptor, significantly decreased within 7 days after the first dose of COVID-19 vaccine (median, −13.1% from baseline; p<0.001). The decrease in the frequency of NKG2A + NK cells was observed in the CD56dimCD16+ NK cell population regardless of type of COVID-19 vaccine. COVID-19 vaccination leads to a rapid, transient decline in HBsAg titer and a decrease in the frequency of NKG2A + NK cells.

Background: This study aimed to determine the effect of ramen sauce on tooth tone changes over time, after selecting three different ramen colors from the ramens sold in the market, and applying the sauce to bovine teeth. Methods: Healthy bovine teeth were selected, and cutting discs were used to produce 60 specimens (5×5×3 mm), with 15 specimens distributed per county. Three types of ramen (buldak, chacharoni black bean sauce, and ottogi curry noodle) were used as the experimental group, and water was used as the negative control group. Tooth tone measurement was performed using a spectrophotometer (CM-700d) to measure the color before and after 1 (3 h 44 min), 2 (7 h 28 min), 3 (11 h 12 min), and 4 weeks (14 h 56 min). Analysis of the color tone change was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 28. Results: In the experimental group, there was a significant color tone change before and after immersion. L* indicated the largest change in black bean sauce ramen, a* indicated buldak ramen, and b* indicated the largest change in curry ramen. The amount of color change (ΔE*) was the largest in curry ramen, followed by buldak and black bean sauce ramens. The results of the post-hoc analysis showed significant differences between all groups except buldak and black bean sauce ramens. Conclusion All three types of ramen revealed significant color change before and after immersion, and curry ramen showed the largest amount of color change among them.

Background: and Purpose Alzheimer’s disease (AD) does not always mean amyloid positivity. [ 18 F]THK-5351 has been shown to be able to detect reactive astrogliosis as well as tau accompanied by neurodegenerative changes. We evaluated the [ 18 F]THK-5351 retention patterns in positron-emission tomography (PET) and the clinical characteristics of patients clinically diagnosed with AD dementia who had negative amyloid PET findings. Methods: We performed 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging, [ 18 F]THK-5351 PET, and amyloid PET in 164 patients with AD dementia. Amyloid PET was visually scored as positive or negative. [ 18 F]THK-5351 PET were visually classified as having an intratemporal or extratemporal spread pattern. Results: The 164 patients included 23 (14.0%) who were amyloid-negative (age 74.9±8.3 years, mean±standard deviation; 9 males, 14 females). Amyloid-negative patients were older, had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and had better visuospatial and memory functions. The frequency of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele was higher and the hippocampal volume was smaller in amyloid-positive patients. [ 18 F]THK-5351 uptake patterns of the amyloid-negative patients were classified into intratemporal spread (n=10) and extratemporal spread (n=13).Neuropsychological test results did not differ significantly between these two groups. The standardized uptake value ratio of [ 18 F]THK-5351 was higher in the extratemporal spread group (2.01±0.26 vs. 1.61±0.15, p=0.001). After 1 year, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores decreased significantly in the extratemporal spread group (-3.5±3.2, p=0.006) but not in the intratemporal spread group (-0.5±2.8, p=0.916). The diagnosis remained as AD (n=5, 50%) or changed to other diagnoses (n=5, 50%) in the intratemporal group, whereas it remained as AD (n=8, 61.5%) or changed to frontotemporal dementia (n=4, 30.8%) and other diagnoses (n=1, 7.7%) in the extratemporal spread group. Conclusions Approximately 70% of the patients with amyloid-negative AD showed abnormal [ 18 F]THK-5351 retention. MMSE scores deteriorated rapidly in the patients with an extratemporal spread pattern.