The fundamental principles for treating ankle fractures, as with other intra-articular fractures, are anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation. Despite successful reduction, between 14% and 40% of patients continue to experience persistent pain or unsatisfactory functional outcomes. Furthermore, approximately 1% of patients progress to post-traumatic arthritis, necessitating further surgical intervention. Ankle fractures are frequently accompanied by intra-articular injuries, including osteochondral lesions, ligament tears, and syndesmosis injuries. Arthroscopy is becoming increasingly prevalent in managing acute ankle fractures by assessing intra-articular damage and facilitating accurate reduction. This review examined the role and indications for arthroscopy in ankle fractures, particularly emphasizing its benefits in diagnosing and managing associated injuries, including osteochondral lesions, syndesmosis, and deltoid ligament injuries. Furthermore, arthroscopy facilitates fracture reduction, offering a minimally invasive approach with a shorter recovery period and enhanced visualization. Its use extends to pediatric fractures and complex cases such as Maisonneuve and calcaneal fractures, potentially improving outcomes while minimizing complications. Understanding the evolving indications and benefits of arthroscopy for ankle fractures can lead to improved clinical outcomes and reduced complications.

The fundamental principles for treating ankle fractures, as with other intra-articular fractures, are anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation. Despite successful reduction, between 14% and 40% of patients continue to experience persistent pain or unsatisfactory functional outcomes. Furthermore, approximately 1% of patients progress to post-traumatic arthritis, necessitating further surgical intervention. Ankle fractures are frequently accompanied by intra-articular injuries, including osteochondral lesions, ligament tears, and syndesmosis injuries. Arthroscopy is becoming increasingly prevalent in managing acute ankle fractures by assessing intra-articular damage and facilitating accurate reduction. This review examined the role and indications for arthroscopy in ankle fractures, particularly emphasizing its benefits in diagnosing and managing associated injuries, including osteochondral lesions, syndesmosis, and deltoid ligament injuries. Furthermore, arthroscopy facilitates fracture reduction, offering a minimally invasive approach with a shorter recovery period and enhanced visualization. Its use extends to pediatric fractures and complex cases such as Maisonneuve and calcaneal fractures, potentially improving outcomes while minimizing complications. Understanding the evolving indications and benefits of arthroscopy for ankle fractures can lead to improved clinical outcomes and reduced complications.

The fundamental principles for treating ankle fractures, as with other intra-articular fractures, are anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation. Despite successful reduction, between 14% and 40% of patients continue to experience persistent pain or unsatisfactory functional outcomes. Furthermore, approximately 1% of patients progress to post-traumatic arthritis, necessitating further surgical intervention. Ankle fractures are frequently accompanied by intra-articular injuries, including osteochondral lesions, ligament tears, and syndesmosis injuries. Arthroscopy is becoming increasingly prevalent in managing acute ankle fractures by assessing intra-articular damage and facilitating accurate reduction. This review examined the role and indications for arthroscopy in ankle fractures, particularly emphasizing its benefits in diagnosing and managing associated injuries, including osteochondral lesions, syndesmosis, and deltoid ligament injuries. Furthermore, arthroscopy facilitates fracture reduction, offering a minimally invasive approach with a shorter recovery period and enhanced visualization. Its use extends to pediatric fractures and complex cases such as Maisonneuve and calcaneal fractures, potentially improving outcomes while minimizing complications. Understanding the evolving indications and benefits of arthroscopy for ankle fractures can lead to improved clinical outcomes and reduced complications.

The fundamental principles for treating ankle fractures, as with other intra-articular fractures, are anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation. Despite successful reduction, between 14% and 40% of patients continue to experience persistent pain or unsatisfactory functional outcomes. Furthermore, approximately 1% of patients progress to post-traumatic arthritis, necessitating further surgical intervention. Ankle fractures are frequently accompanied by intra-articular injuries, including osteochondral lesions, ligament tears, and syndesmosis injuries. Arthroscopy is becoming increasingly prevalent in managing acute ankle fractures by assessing intra-articular damage and facilitating accurate reduction. This review examined the role and indications for arthroscopy in ankle fractures, particularly emphasizing its benefits in diagnosing and managing associated injuries, including osteochondral lesions, syndesmosis, and deltoid ligament injuries. Furthermore, arthroscopy facilitates fracture reduction, offering a minimally invasive approach with a shorter recovery period and enhanced visualization. Its use extends to pediatric fractures and complex cases such as Maisonneuve and calcaneal fractures, potentially improving outcomes while minimizing complications. Understanding the evolving indications and benefits of arthroscopy for ankle fractures can lead to improved clinical outcomes and reduced complications.

Enterococcus faecium, particularly in its multidrug-resistant forms, causes invasive nosocomial infections. Given the limited data comparing the effectiveness of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and the CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) for quinupristin–dalfopristin (QD) resistance and the need to evaluate their practical application, we retrospectively investigated the susceptibility patterns of 287 E.faecium bloodstream isolates from Korean hospitals to QD using the updated EUCAST and CLSI CBPs and two antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods: disk diffusion (DD) and Sensititre broth microdilution (Sensititre). QD resistance rates were 5.9% (CLSI) and 18.8% (EUCAST) for DD and 22.6% (CLSI) and 28.2% (EUCAST) for Sensititre. The most prevalent QD resistance gene types among QD-resistant isolates were ermB+msrC+ or ermB– msrC+. Categorical agreement between DD and Sensititre ranged from 77.7% to 90.7%, depending on the testing method and CBPs applied. The EUCAST zone diameter CBPs more effectively help identify QD-resistant E. faecium isolates using the DD method than the CLSI zone diameter CBPs. In comparison, the CLSI minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) CBPs provide more reliable results for resistance classification in the Sensititre method than EUCAST MIC CBPs. These findings would help improve clinical decision-making for treating multidrug-resistant E. faecium infections.

Background: Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of all-arthroscopic treatment of terrible triad injuries followed-up for a minimum of 5 years and investigate how arthroscopic partial excision for radial head fractures affects the results at the final follow-up. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with terrible triad injuries who underwent all-arthroscopic treatment between January 2011 and June 2018. In group I, we performed conservative or arthroscopic fixation of stable radial head fractures, while in group II, arthroscopic partial excision of unstable radial head fractures involving <30%–50% of the articular surface area was performed. Clinical outcomes were measured by visual analog scale score and assessment of instability, range of motion (ROM), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using x-rays, and the integrity of the repaired lateral collateral ligament complex was confirmed through magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Thirty-two patients with an average age of 49.5±16.2 years met the inclusion criteria and were followed-up for a mean of 82.7±22.2 months. Twenty patients were assigned to group I and 12 patients to group II. Clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups at the final follow-up (P>0.05). On radiological evaluation, more heterotopic ossifications were found in the radial head excision group (group II, 66.7% vs. group I, 35%; P=0.02); however, there was no significant difference in ROM between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions In all-arthroscopic treatment of terrible triad injuries, arthroscopic partial excision of the radial head did not seem to have a significant impact on elbow joint stability.Level of evidence: III.

Background: Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of all-arthroscopic treatment of terrible triad injuries followed-up for a minimum of 5 years and investigate how arthroscopic partial excision for radial head fractures affects the results at the final follow-up. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with terrible triad injuries who underwent all-arthroscopic treatment between January 2011 and June 2018. In group I, we performed conservative or arthroscopic fixation of stable radial head fractures, while in group II, arthroscopic partial excision of unstable radial head fractures involving <30%–50% of the articular surface area was performed. Clinical outcomes were measured by visual analog scale score and assessment of instability, range of motion (ROM), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using x-rays, and the integrity of the repaired lateral collateral ligament complex was confirmed through magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Thirty-two patients with an average age of 49.5±16.2 years met the inclusion criteria and were followed-up for a mean of 82.7±22.2 months. Twenty patients were assigned to group I and 12 patients to group II. Clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups at the final follow-up (P>0.05). On radiological evaluation, more heterotopic ossifications were found in the radial head excision group (group II, 66.7% vs. group I, 35%; P=0.02); however, there was no significant difference in ROM between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions In all-arthroscopic treatment of terrible triad injuries, arthroscopic partial excision of the radial head did not seem to have a significant impact on elbow joint stability.Level of evidence: III.

Background: Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of all-arthroscopic treatment of terrible triad injuries followed-up for a minimum of 5 years and investigate how arthroscopic partial excision for radial head fractures affects the results at the final follow-up. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with terrible triad injuries who underwent all-arthroscopic treatment between January 2011 and June 2018. In group I, we performed conservative or arthroscopic fixation of stable radial head fractures, while in group II, arthroscopic partial excision of unstable radial head fractures involving <30%–50% of the articular surface area was performed. Clinical outcomes were measured by visual analog scale score and assessment of instability, range of motion (ROM), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using x-rays, and the integrity of the repaired lateral collateral ligament complex was confirmed through magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Thirty-two patients with an average age of 49.5±16.2 years met the inclusion criteria and were followed-up for a mean of 82.7±22.2 months. Twenty patients were assigned to group I and 12 patients to group II. Clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups at the final follow-up (P>0.05). On radiological evaluation, more heterotopic ossifications were found in the radial head excision group (group II, 66.7% vs. group I, 35%; P=0.02); however, there was no significant difference in ROM between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions In all-arthroscopic treatment of terrible triad injuries, arthroscopic partial excision of the radial head did not seem to have a significant impact on elbow joint stability.Level of evidence: III.

Background: Our study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results of all-arthroscopic treatment of terrible triad injuries followed-up for a minimum of 5 years and investigate how arthroscopic partial excision for radial head fractures affects the results at the final follow-up. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with terrible triad injuries who underwent all-arthroscopic treatment between January 2011 and June 2018. In group I, we performed conservative or arthroscopic fixation of stable radial head fractures, while in group II, arthroscopic partial excision of unstable radial head fractures involving <30%–50% of the articular surface area was performed. Clinical outcomes were measured by visual analog scale score and assessment of instability, range of motion (ROM), and Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using x-rays, and the integrity of the repaired lateral collateral ligament complex was confirmed through magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Thirty-two patients with an average age of 49.5±16.2 years met the inclusion criteria and were followed-up for a mean of 82.7±22.2 months. Twenty patients were assigned to group I and 12 patients to group II. Clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups at the final follow-up (P>0.05). On radiological evaluation, more heterotopic ossifications were found in the radial head excision group (group II, 66.7% vs. group I, 35%; P=0.02); however, there was no significant difference in ROM between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions In all-arthroscopic treatment of terrible triad injuries, arthroscopic partial excision of the radial head did not seem to have a significant impact on elbow joint stability.Level of evidence: III.

An avulsion fracture occurs when a muscle-tendon unit attached to a bone produces sufficient force to tear a fragment of the bone. If not treated properly, this injury can lead to deformity, nonunion, malunion, pain, and disability. Although avulsion fractures around the foot and ankle can occur anywhere there are tendon and ligament attachments, they are common in the anterior talofibular ligament, anterior-inferior tibiotalar ligament, calcaneal tuberosity, the base of the fifth metatarsal, and navicular bone. The optimal treatment for each fracture depends on the location and severity of the fracture.Conservative treatment involves limiting weight bearing for a period, splint immobilization, and using various orthoses. Surgical treatment is usually reserved for cases of severe displacement or when nonsurgical treatment has failed. The goals of surgery include reduction of the fracture fragment, prevention of nonunion or malunion and soft tissue injury, and early return to function. The decision for each treatment modality may depend on the patient demographics or preferences and the surgeon experience. This review summarizes previous and current views on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of common avulsion fractures to guide the treatment and diagnosis.