Objective:To explore the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of a total pelvic floor resection procedure as a component of combined resection of pelvic organs for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer.Methods:This was a descriptive case series. Relevant clinical data of patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer without extrapelvic metastasis or with only oligometastasis who had undergone combined pelvic organ resection with resection of the entire pelvic floor in the Department of Anorectal Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2024 were collected from a Chinese database of combined pelvic organ resection for rectal cancer. The study cohort comprised 143 patients, 74 of whom were male (51.7%) and 69 were female (48.3%); their ages averaged 54 (range: 31–75) years; 57 of the patients (39.9%) had locally advanced rectal cancer and 86 (60.1%) locally recurrent rectal cancer. In our institution, the pelvic floor is categorized into two anatomical layers: the levator ani/presacral anterior tissue, and the bone/ligament/pelvic floor soft tissue. The entire pelvic floor was resected en bloc after making incisions on both sides of the pelvic floor, followed by presacral sacral dissection, and abdominoperineal dissection of the anterior side of the pelvic floor. The main factors studied were related to the following: (1) surgical conditions, comprising the scope of surgical resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, tissue reconstruction; (2) postoperative recovery, comprising time to recovery of intestinal function, time to removal of drainage tubes, and time to healing of the empty pelvic cavity; and (3) postoperative complications, classified according to the international Clavien-Dindo classification. Results:Combined pelvic organ resection with entire pelvic floor resection was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time was 480 (390 to 1,020) minutes, intraoperative blood loss 800 (50 to 3,500) mL, and volume of blood transfused intraoperatively 1, 000 (400 to 7, 400). R0 resection was achieved in 116 cases (81.1%) and R1 resection in 27 (18.9%). The first layer of the pelvic floor wall (levator ani/sacral anterior tissue) was resected in 79 cases (55.2%) and the second layer of the pelvic floor wall (bone/ligament/pelvic floor soft tissue) in 64 (44.8%). The procedure was completed in the lithotomy position in 114 cases (79.7%) were and in the lithotomy + prone jackknife position in 29 (20.3%). The pelvic floor was reconstructed with mesh in 140 cases (97.7%) and with mesh plus pedicled omental flaps in 92 cases (64.3%). The urinary tract was reconstructed in 92 cases (64.3%). The time to recovery of intestinal function was 3.6 (2.0 to 7.0) days, to removal of drainage tubes 29.4 (24.0 to 54.0) days, and to healing of the empty pelvic cavity 36.2 (27.0 to 56.0) days. Twenty-three patients (16.1%) had Grade I - II complications and 36 (25.2%) Grade IIIa - IV complications. The median duration of follow-up was 15.5 (0.5 to 30.0) months. Six of the patients (4.2%) died, including two (1.4%) who died within 30 days after surgery.Conclusions:Pelvic floor en bloc resection has a high R0 resection rate and is a safe and feasible procedure for pelvic organ resection surgeries in patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Severe intra-abdominal infections are life-threatening conditions and a significant challenge for surgeons. This article presents a case of an elderly patient with a severe intra-abdominal infection complicated by an anastomotic leak. This patient had experienced prolonged sepsis and multiple surgical traumas. Upon admission to our department, exploratory surgery revealed extensive bowel edema and adhesions, an anastomotic leak, and abdominal contamination with infection. In accordance with the principles of damage control surgery, the anastomotic leak was exteriorized, the abdomen was left open, and continuous intra-abdominal lavage with dual-lumen catheters was implemented to effectively control the infection. Negative pressure wound therapy was used to manage the open abdomen, and a negative pressure-assisted drainage device was used to manage the enteroatmospheric fistula. After granulation of the abdominal wound, split-thickness skin grafting was performed. The enteroatmospheric fistula was converted into an enterocutaneous fistula. A 3D-printed stoma baseplate was used to manage the digestive fistula. Concurrently, enhanced parenteral and enteral nutritional support was provided. Six months later, the patient successfully underwent definitive fistula resection and abdominal wall defect repair.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in the comprehensive management of full-thickness perineal wound dehiscence following pelvic exenteration (PE).Methods:This study employed a descriptive case series design. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 29 patients who developed postoperative perineal wound infections with full-thickness dehiscence after PE. These cases included 16 patients from the Department of General Surgery at Jiangyin People's Hospital (Jiangsu Province) and 13 patients from the Department of Colorectal Surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changzheng Hospital). VSD was applied to manage the dehisced wounds, with outcomes assessed based on wound healing time, complications, and follow-up data.Results:A total of 29 patients were included in the study. The operative time for PE was (498 ± 83) minutes. Among them, 23 patients underwent combined sacrococcygeal resection. The median number of VSD devices used was 28 (22, 39). The postoperative perineal wound healing time was 95 (82, 110) days in patients who underwent combined sacrococcygeal resection, 74 (63, 89) days in those without sacrococcygeal resection, 93 (79, 102) days in those treated with simple pelvic-abdominal isolation using a biological basement membrane mesh and 76 (60, 91) days in those who received combined pelvic packing with a pedicled omental flap. All patients uniformly developed Clavien-Dindo grade III complications at 2 weeks postoperatively, manifesting as perineal wound infection and dehiscence, which were successfully managed with VSD therapy. Subsequent evaluation identified delayed (>30 days) grade III complications, including enterocutaneous (3 cases) and urinary (2 cases) fistulae, all requiring surgical revision. All patients completed the follow-up at 6 months postoperatively. Three patients still presented with minimal exudate from the perineal wound, which resolved after standardized wound care and packing with alginate silver ion dressings. Four cases (13.8%) developed stoma high-output syndrome, which improved after oral medication. Eight patients (27.6%) developed adhesive intestinal obstruction, which improved with conservative treatment.Conclusions:VSD demonstrates unique advantages in managing complex wounds. For full-thickness perineal wound dehiscence after PE, VSD is a safe and effective therapeutic strategy.

Objective:To explore the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of a total pelvic floor resection procedure as a component of combined resection of pelvic organs for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer.Methods:This was a descriptive case series. Relevant clinical data of patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer without extrapelvic metastasis or with only oligometastasis who had undergone combined pelvic organ resection with resection of the entire pelvic floor in the Department of Anorectal Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University from 1 January 2023 to 30 June 2024 were collected from a Chinese database of combined pelvic organ resection for rectal cancer. The study cohort comprised 143 patients, 74 of whom were male (51.7%) and 69 were female (48.3%); their ages averaged 54 (range: 31–75) years; 57 of the patients (39.9%) had locally advanced rectal cancer and 86 (60.1%) locally recurrent rectal cancer. In our institution, the pelvic floor is categorized into two anatomical layers: the levator ani/presacral anterior tissue, and the bone/ligament/pelvic floor soft tissue. The entire pelvic floor was resected en bloc after making incisions on both sides of the pelvic floor, followed by presacral sacral dissection, and abdominoperineal dissection of the anterior side of the pelvic floor. The main factors studied were related to the following: (1) surgical conditions, comprising the scope of surgical resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, tissue reconstruction; (2) postoperative recovery, comprising time to recovery of intestinal function, time to removal of drainage tubes, and time to healing of the empty pelvic cavity; and (3) postoperative complications, classified according to the international Clavien-Dindo classification. Results:Combined pelvic organ resection with entire pelvic floor resection was successfully completed in all patients. The operation time was 480 (390 to 1,020) minutes, intraoperative blood loss 800 (50 to 3,500) mL, and volume of blood transfused intraoperatively 1, 000 (400 to 7, 400). R0 resection was achieved in 116 cases (81.1%) and R1 resection in 27 (18.9%). The first layer of the pelvic floor wall (levator ani/sacral anterior tissue) was resected in 79 cases (55.2%) and the second layer of the pelvic floor wall (bone/ligament/pelvic floor soft tissue) in 64 (44.8%). The procedure was completed in the lithotomy position in 114 cases (79.7%) were and in the lithotomy + prone jackknife position in 29 (20.3%). The pelvic floor was reconstructed with mesh in 140 cases (97.7%) and with mesh plus pedicled omental flaps in 92 cases (64.3%). The urinary tract was reconstructed in 92 cases (64.3%). The time to recovery of intestinal function was 3.6 (2.0 to 7.0) days, to removal of drainage tubes 29.4 (24.0 to 54.0) days, and to healing of the empty pelvic cavity 36.2 (27.0 to 56.0) days. Twenty-three patients (16.1%) had Grade I - II complications and 36 (25.2%) Grade IIIa - IV complications. The median duration of follow-up was 15.5 (0.5 to 30.0) months. Six of the patients (4.2%) died, including two (1.4%) who died within 30 days after surgery.Conclusions:Pelvic floor en bloc resection has a high R0 resection rate and is a safe and feasible procedure for pelvic organ resection surgeries in patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Severe intra-abdominal infections are life-threatening conditions and a significant challenge for surgeons. This article presents a case of an elderly patient with a severe intra-abdominal infection complicated by an anastomotic leak. This patient had experienced prolonged sepsis and multiple surgical traumas. Upon admission to our department, exploratory surgery revealed extensive bowel edema and adhesions, an anastomotic leak, and abdominal contamination with infection. In accordance with the principles of damage control surgery, the anastomotic leak was exteriorized, the abdomen was left open, and continuous intra-abdominal lavage with dual-lumen catheters was implemented to effectively control the infection. Negative pressure wound therapy was used to manage the open abdomen, and a negative pressure-assisted drainage device was used to manage the enteroatmospheric fistula. After granulation of the abdominal wound, split-thickness skin grafting was performed. The enteroatmospheric fistula was converted into an enterocutaneous fistula. A 3D-printed stoma baseplate was used to manage the digestive fistula. Concurrently, enhanced parenteral and enteral nutritional support was provided. Six months later, the patient successfully underwent definitive fistula resection and abdominal wall defect repair.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) in the comprehensive management of full-thickness perineal wound dehiscence following pelvic exenteration (PE).Methods:This study employed a descriptive case series design. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 29 patients who developed postoperative perineal wound infections with full-thickness dehiscence after PE. These cases included 16 patients from the Department of General Surgery at Jiangyin People's Hospital (Jiangsu Province) and 13 patients from the Department of Colorectal Surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changzheng Hospital). VSD was applied to manage the dehisced wounds, with outcomes assessed based on wound healing time, complications, and follow-up data.Results:A total of 29 patients were included in the study. The operative time for PE was (498 ± 83) minutes. Among them, 23 patients underwent combined sacrococcygeal resection. The median number of VSD devices used was 28 (22, 39). The postoperative perineal wound healing time was 95 (82, 110) days in patients who underwent combined sacrococcygeal resection, 74 (63, 89) days in those without sacrococcygeal resection, 93 (79, 102) days in those treated with simple pelvic-abdominal isolation using a biological basement membrane mesh and 76 (60, 91) days in those who received combined pelvic packing with a pedicled omental flap. All patients uniformly developed Clavien-Dindo grade III complications at 2 weeks postoperatively, manifesting as perineal wound infection and dehiscence, which were successfully managed with VSD therapy. Subsequent evaluation identified delayed (>30 days) grade III complications, including enterocutaneous (3 cases) and urinary (2 cases) fistulae, all requiring surgical revision. All patients completed the follow-up at 6 months postoperatively. Three patients still presented with minimal exudate from the perineal wound, which resolved after standardized wound care and packing with alginate silver ion dressings. Four cases (13.8%) developed stoma high-output syndrome, which improved after oral medication. Eight patients (27.6%) developed adhesive intestinal obstruction, which improved with conservative treatment.Conclusions:VSD demonstrates unique advantages in managing complex wounds. For full-thickness perineal wound dehiscence after PE, VSD is a safe and effective therapeutic strategy.

Objective:To investigate the safety and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD).Methods:The clinical data of 61 patients underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication from March 2018 to March 2022 in Jiangyin People′s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 14 patients had significant symptom relief after using proton pump inhibitor (PPI) before operation (group A), 30 patients had partial symptom relief after using PPI (group B), and 17 patients had persistent symptoms despite regular treatment with double-dose PPI for more than 8 weeks (group C). The surgical outcomes and recovery were compared among the three groups.Results:For the 61 patients, the surgical time was (117.46 ± 28.50) min, the intraoperative blood loss was 23.00 (8.00, 34.00) ml, and the postoperative hospital stay was 3.00 (2.00, 5.00) d. There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, concurrent hiatal hernia repair and mesh placement among the three groups ( P>0.05). No short-term severe complications such as abdominal bleeding, abdominal infection and gastrointestinal perforation occurred in any group. There were no statistical differences in satisfaction score, subjective relief of overall postoperative symptoms, reflux symptoms, PPI usage, dysphagia, abdominal distention, diarrhea or constipation among the three groups ( P<0.05). No upper abdominal pain, recurrence and reoperation occurred in the three groups. Conclusions:Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication has a definite therapeutic effect on rGERD, with significant anti reflux effects. There are no serious complications after surgery, and there are no recurrence or reoperation.

Objective:To introduce the experience of reconstructing the pelvic floor with a pedicled large omental flap combined with a basement membrane biological mesh in combined pelvic organ resection for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer combined with sacrococcygeal resection, and to discuss the feasibility, safety, and near-term therapeutic efficacy of this technique.Methods:For patients with sacrococcygeal resection of combined pelvic organs, a basement membrane mesh was used to rebuild the pelvic floor with a pedicled greater omentum flap to isolate the abdominopelvic cavity. The main operation was to pull the greater omentum, which preserved the double vascular arches, to the pelvic floor to cover the pelvic floor, and then the mesh was used to cover the posterior peritoneal defect and pelvic inlet with absorbable sutures of 2-0 or thicker.Results:In this study, a retrospective cohort study was used to collect clinical data through the China Rectal Cancer Combined Pelvic Organs Resections Case Database. Twenty patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer without extra-pelvic metastasis or only oligometastases underwent combined pelvic organ and sacrococcygeal resection in the Department of Anal and Intestinal Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Military Medical University during the period of July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, and 10 patients underwent simple basement membrane resection with a simple basement membrane. Among them, the pelvic floor were reconstructed by basement membrane mesh alone in 10 cases (mesh only group), and 10 cases were reconstructed the pelvic floor by pedicled large omental flap combined with basement membrane mesh (omental flap-combined mesh group). The recent outcomes of the two groups of patients were studied comparatively. Comparison of baseline data and intraoperative conditions between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences (all P>0.05); the drain removal time in the omental flap-combined mesh group was 26.7 (19-42) days, which was shorter than that in the mesh only group, which was 40.4 (24-56) days ( U=4.125, P=0.001); The empty pelvis healing time in the omental flap-combined mesh group was 29.4 (23~43) days, which was shorter than that of 42.2 (27~58) days in the mesh-only group ( U=4.043, P=0.001); the differences were all statistically significant. The postoperative complication rate of grade ≥III in the omental flap-combined mesh group was 1/10, which was lower than that of 6/10 in the mesh-only group; the difference was not statistically significant when comparing the two groups ( P = 0.057). Follow-up ended on 09/30/2023, with a median follow-up of 9.5 (3-15) months in 20 patients, and all 20 cases survived during the follow-up period, with no tumor recurrence at the surgical site. Conclusion:In locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer undergoing combined pelvic organ resection with sacrococcygeal, compared with reconstruction of the pelvic floor by basement membrane mesh alone, reconstruction of the pelvic floor and isolation of the abdominopelvic cavity by a pedicled greater omentum flap combined with a basement membrane mesh is safe and feasible.

Objective:To introduce the experience of reconstructing the pelvic floor with a pedicled large omental flap combined with a basement membrane biological mesh in combined pelvic organ resection for locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer combined with sacrococcygeal resection, and to discuss the feasibility, safety, and near-term therapeutic efficacy of this technique.Methods:For patients with sacrococcygeal resection of combined pelvic organs, a basement membrane mesh was used to rebuild the pelvic floor with a pedicled greater omentum flap to isolate the abdominopelvic cavity. The main operation was to pull the greater omentum, which preserved the double vascular arches, to the pelvic floor to cover the pelvic floor, and then the mesh was used to cover the posterior peritoneal defect and pelvic inlet with absorbable sutures of 2-0 or thicker.Results:In this study, a retrospective cohort study was used to collect clinical data through the China Rectal Cancer Combined Pelvic Organs Resections Case Database. Twenty patients with locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer without extra-pelvic metastasis or only oligometastases underwent combined pelvic organ and sacrococcygeal resection in the Department of Anal and Intestinal Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Military Medical University during the period of July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, and 10 patients underwent simple basement membrane resection with a simple basement membrane. Among them, the pelvic floor were reconstructed by basement membrane mesh alone in 10 cases (mesh only group), and 10 cases were reconstructed the pelvic floor by pedicled large omental flap combined with basement membrane mesh (omental flap-combined mesh group). The recent outcomes of the two groups of patients were studied comparatively. Comparison of baseline data and intraoperative conditions between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences (all P>0.05); the drain removal time in the omental flap-combined mesh group was 26.7 (19-42) days, which was shorter than that in the mesh only group, which was 40.4 (24-56) days ( U=4.125, P=0.001); The empty pelvis healing time in the omental flap-combined mesh group was 29.4 (23~43) days, which was shorter than that of 42.2 (27~58) days in the mesh-only group ( U=4.043, P=0.001); the differences were all statistically significant. The postoperative complication rate of grade ≥III in the omental flap-combined mesh group was 1/10, which was lower than that of 6/10 in the mesh-only group; the difference was not statistically significant when comparing the two groups ( P = 0.057). Follow-up ended on 09/30/2023, with a median follow-up of 9.5 (3-15) months in 20 patients, and all 20 cases survived during the follow-up period, with no tumor recurrence at the surgical site. Conclusion:In locally advanced or locally recurrent rectal cancer undergoing combined pelvic organ resection with sacrococcygeal, compared with reconstruction of the pelvic floor by basement membrane mesh alone, reconstruction of the pelvic floor and isolation of the abdominopelvic cavity by a pedicled greater omentum flap combined with a basement membrane mesh is safe and feasible.

Traumatic supraorbital fissure syndrome (TSOFS) is a symptom complex caused by nerve entrapment in the supraorbital fissure after skull base trauma. If the compressed cranial nerve in the supraorbital fissure is not decompressed surgically, ptosis, diplopia and eye movement disorder may exist for a long time and seriously affect the patients′ quality of life. Since its overall incidence is not high, it is not familiarized with the majority of neurosurgeons and some TSOFS may be complicated with skull base vascular injury. If the supraorbital fissure surgery is performed without treatment of vascular injury, it may cause massive hemorrhage, and disability and even life-threatening in severe cases. At present, there is no consensus or guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of TSOFS that can be referred to both domestically and internationally. To improve the understanding of TSOFS among clinical physicians and establish standardized diagnosis and treatment plans, the Skull Base Trauma Group of the Neurorepair Professional Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Neurotrauma Group of the Neurosurgery Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, Neurotrauma Group of the Traumatology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, and Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Trauma organized relevant experts to formulate Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic supraorbital fissure syndrome ( version 2024) based on evidence of evidence-based medicine and clinical experience of diagnosis and treatment. This consensus puts forward 12 recommendations on the diagnosis, classification, treatment, efficacy evaluation and follow-up of TSOFS, aiming to provide references for neurosurgeons from hospitals of all levels to standardize the diagnosis and treatment of TSOFS.