OBJECTIVE To evaluate the differences in efficacy， safety， and cost-effectiveness among multiple dosing regimens of four intravenous thrombolytic agents [alteplase （rt-PA）， tenecteplase （TNK）， reteplase （rPA）， and recombinant human prourokinase （rhPro-UK）] in the treatment of ischemic stroke.METHODS Randomized controlled trials （RCTs） of the above agents for intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke were searched. Network meta-analysis （NMA） was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of different regimens， and a Markov model was constructed to evaluate cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.RESULTS Twenty RCTs involving 10 regimens were included. NMA showed that the 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen （two intravenous boluses of 18 mg rPA） was superior to all TNK regimens （0.1， 0.25， and 0.4 mg/kg）， all rt-PA regimens （0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg）， and the 35 mg rhPro-UK regimen in terms of excellent functional outcome； the 0.25 mg/kg TNK regimen was superior to the 0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA regimens. In terms of good functional outcome， the 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen was superior to the 0.25 and 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimens， the 0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA regimens， and the 35 mg rhPro-UK regimen； the 0.25 mg/kg TNK regimen was superior to the 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimen. The 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen had the lowest incidence of poor functional outcome. In terms of avoiding extremely poor functional outcomes， the 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA regimen was the best， and the 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimen was the worst. In terms of safety， the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage （sICH） with the 35 mg rhPro-UK regimen was significantly lower than that with the 12 mg+12 mg rPA regimen （two intravenous boluses of 12 mg rPA） and the 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimen； the sICH incidences with the 0.25 mg/kg TNK regimen and the 0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA regimens were significantly lower than that with the 0.4 mg/kg TNK regimen， and the 0.6 mg/kg rt-PA regimen was superior to the 0.9 mg/kg rt-PA regimen. Cost-utility analysis showed that， at a willingness-to-pay threshold of twice the 2025 national per capita gross domestic product， the 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen had the greatest cost-effectiveness advantage； sensitivity analysis confirmed that the base-case results were robust； in both scenario analyses， the probability that this regimen was cost-effective was 100%.CONCLUSIONS Among the 10 intravenous thrombolysis regimens for ischemic stroke， the 18 mg+18 mg rPA regimen was the optimal regimen combining efficacy and cost-effectiveness； the 35 mg rhPro-UK regimen may be the preferred option for patients at high bleeding risk.