Intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with diverse spine diseases, including spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and disc herniation, which have socio-economic effects. A normal intervertebral disc has consistency and homeostasis, consisting of annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, notochordal cells, nucleus pulposus cells, and an endplate with an immune privilege. On the other hand, when the degenerative process has pathologic causes, the inflammatory reaction could lead to nerve sprouting and vascularization into the tissue. Histopathologically, the pathologic process involves the degradation of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis and necrosis of nucleus pulposus cells, inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, disruption of endplate chondrogenic cells, and other processes. Various approaches for managing disc degeneration have been reported. Among them, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been regarded as representative trials. In vitro and animal studies with MSCs have reported some promising outcomes in terms of inflammatory modulation and regeneration, but several limitations have been pointed out, including the issues of graft rejection and survival. Because the paracrine mechanism would be a main therapeutic factor of MSCs, extracellular vesicles (EVs), one of the factors released from MSCs, have been considered a promising source for regenerative medicine. EVs possess nucleic acids, functional proteins, and inflammation-related factors, playing a significant role in the inflammatory reaction and regeneration. The current review article discusses the pathophysiology of disc degeneration, outcomes of conventional MSCs and EVs, and current limitations and future perspectives on EV therapeutics.

Intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with diverse spine diseases, including spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and disc herniation, which have socio-economic effects. A normal intervertebral disc has consistency and homeostasis, consisting of annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, notochordal cells, nucleus pulposus cells, and an endplate with an immune privilege. On the other hand, when the degenerative process has pathologic causes, the inflammatory reaction could lead to nerve sprouting and vascularization into the tissue. Histopathologically, the pathologic process involves the degradation of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis and necrosis of nucleus pulposus cells, inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, disruption of endplate chondrogenic cells, and other processes. Various approaches for managing disc degeneration have been reported. Among them, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been regarded as representative trials. In vitro and animal studies with MSCs have reported some promising outcomes in terms of inflammatory modulation and regeneration, but several limitations have been pointed out, including the issues of graft rejection and survival. Because the paracrine mechanism would be a main therapeutic factor of MSCs, extracellular vesicles (EVs), one of the factors released from MSCs, have been considered a promising source for regenerative medicine. EVs possess nucleic acids, functional proteins, and inflammation-related factors, playing a significant role in the inflammatory reaction and regeneration. The current review article discusses the pathophysiology of disc degeneration, outcomes of conventional MSCs and EVs, and current limitations and future perspectives on EV therapeutics.

Intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with diverse spine diseases, including spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and disc herniation, which have socio-economic effects. A normal intervertebral disc has consistency and homeostasis, consisting of annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, notochordal cells, nucleus pulposus cells, and an endplate with an immune privilege. On the other hand, when the degenerative process has pathologic causes, the inflammatory reaction could lead to nerve sprouting and vascularization into the tissue. Histopathologically, the pathologic process involves the degradation of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis and necrosis of nucleus pulposus cells, inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, disruption of endplate chondrogenic cells, and other processes. Various approaches for managing disc degeneration have been reported. Among them, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been regarded as representative trials. In vitro and animal studies with MSCs have reported some promising outcomes in terms of inflammatory modulation and regeneration, but several limitations have been pointed out, including the issues of graft rejection and survival. Because the paracrine mechanism would be a main therapeutic factor of MSCs, extracellular vesicles (EVs), one of the factors released from MSCs, have been considered a promising source for regenerative medicine. EVs possess nucleic acids, functional proteins, and inflammation-related factors, playing a significant role in the inflammatory reaction and regeneration. The current review article discusses the pathophysiology of disc degeneration, outcomes of conventional MSCs and EVs, and current limitations and future perspectives on EV therapeutics.

A noncontact sensor field is an innovative device that can detect, measure, or monitor physical properties or conditions without direct physical contact with the subject or object under examination. These sensors use a variety of methods, including electromagnetic, optical, and acoustic technique, to collect information about the target without physical interaction. Noncontact sensors find wide-ranging applications in various fields such as manufacturing, robotics, automobiles, security, environmental monitoring, space industry, agriculture, and entertainment. In particular, they are used in the medical field, where they provide continuous monitoring of patient conditions and offer opportunities in rehabilitation medicine. This article introduces the potential of noncontact sensors in the field of rehabilitation medicine.

Background/Aims: Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, hospitals have implemented infection control measures to minimize the spread of the virus within facilities. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) and common respiratory virus (cRV) infections in hematology units. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients hospitalized in Catholic Hematology Hospital between 2019 and 2020. Patients infected with vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE), carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), and cRV were analyzed. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) methods and interrupted time series analyses were performed to compare the incidence rates before and after the pandemic. Results: The incidence rates of CPE and VRE did not differ between the two periods. However, the incidence of CDI increased significantly (IRR: 1.41 [p = 0.002]) after the COVID-19 pandemic. The incidence of cRV infection decreased by 76% after the COVID-19 outbreak (IRR: 0.240 [p < 0.001]). The incidence of adenovirus, parainfluenza virus, and rhinovirus infection significantly decreased in the COVID-19 period (IRRs: 0.087 [p = 0.003], 0.031 [p < 0.001], and 0.149 [p < 0.001], respectively). Conclusions The implementation of COVID-19 infection control measures reduced the incidence of cRV infection. However, CDI increased significantly and incidence rates of CPE and VRE remained unchanged in hematological patients after the pandemic. Infection control measures suitable for each type of HCAI, such as stringent hand washing for CDI and enough isolation capacities, should be implemented and maintained in future pandemics, especially in immunocompromised patients.

Purpose: This study was conducted to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm that can diagnose cervical foraminal stenosis using oblique radiographs and evaluate its accuracy. Materials and Methods: A total of 997 patients who underwent cervical MRI and cervical oblique radiographs within a 3-month interval were included. Oblique radiographs were labeled as “foraminal stenosis” or “no foraminal stenosis” according to whether foraminal stenosis was present in the C2–T1 levels based on MRI evaluation as ground truth. The CNN model involved data augmentation, image preprocessing, and transfer learning using DenseNet161. Visualization of the location of the CNN model was performed using gradient-weight class activation mapping (Grad-CAM). Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve based on DenseNet161 was 0.889 (95% confidence interval, 0.851–0.927). The F1 score, accuracy, precision, and recall were 88.5%, 84.6%, 88.1%, and 88.5%, respectively.The accuracy of the proposed CNN model was significantly higher than that of two orthopedic surgeons (64.0%, p<0.001; 58.0%, p<0.001). Grad-CAM analysis demonstrated that the CNN model most frequently focused on the foramen location for the determination of foraminal stenosis, although disc space was also frequently taken into consideration. Conclusion A CNN algorithm that can detect neural foraminal stenosis in cervical oblique radiographs was developed. The AUC, F1 score, and accuracy were 0.889, 88.5%, and 84.6%, respectively. With the current CNN model, cervical oblique radiography could be a more effective screening tool for neural foraminal stenosis.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.