1.Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study
Ik Hyun JO ; Hyun Gun KIM ; Young-Seok CHO ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Eun Ran KIM ; Yoo Jin LEE ; Sung Wook HWANG ; Kyeong-Ok KIM ; Jun LEE ; Hyuk Soon CHOI ; Yunho JUNG ; Chang Mo MOON
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):95-107
Background/Aims:
Early colorectal cancer (ECC) is commonly resected endoscopically. Perforation is a devastating complication of endoscopic resection. We aimed to identify the characteristics and predictive risk factors for perforation related to endoscopic resection of ECC.
Methods:
This nationwide retrospective multicenter study included patients with ECC who underwent endoscopic resection. We investigated the demographics, endoscopic findings at the time of treatment, and histopathological characteristics of the resected specimens. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the clinical factors associated with procedure-related perforations. Survival analysis was conducted to assess the impact of perforation on the overall survival of patients with ECC.
Results:
This study included 965 participants with a mean age of 63.4 years. The most common endoscopic treatment was conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (n=573, 59.4%), followed by conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (n=259, 26.8%). Thirty-three patients (3.4%) experienced perforations, most of which were managed endoscopically (n=23/33, 69.7%). Patients who undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection-hybrid and precut endoscopic mucosal resection have a higher risk of perforation than those who undergo conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (odds ratio, 78.65 and 39.72, p<0.05). Procedure-related perforations were not associated with patient survival.
Conclusions
Perforation after endoscopic resection had no significant impact on the prognosis of ECC. The type of endoscopic resection was a crucial predictor of perforation. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to further investigate endoscopic resection of ECC.
2.Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study
Ik Hyun JO ; Hyun Gun KIM ; Young-Seok CHO ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Eun Ran KIM ; Yoo Jin LEE ; Sung Wook HWANG ; Kyeong-Ok KIM ; Jun LEE ; Hyuk Soon CHOI ; Yunho JUNG ; Chang Mo MOON
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):95-107
Background/Aims:
Early colorectal cancer (ECC) is commonly resected endoscopically. Perforation is a devastating complication of endoscopic resection. We aimed to identify the characteristics and predictive risk factors for perforation related to endoscopic resection of ECC.
Methods:
This nationwide retrospective multicenter study included patients with ECC who underwent endoscopic resection. We investigated the demographics, endoscopic findings at the time of treatment, and histopathological characteristics of the resected specimens. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the clinical factors associated with procedure-related perforations. Survival analysis was conducted to assess the impact of perforation on the overall survival of patients with ECC.
Results:
This study included 965 participants with a mean age of 63.4 years. The most common endoscopic treatment was conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (n=573, 59.4%), followed by conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (n=259, 26.8%). Thirty-three patients (3.4%) experienced perforations, most of which were managed endoscopically (n=23/33, 69.7%). Patients who undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection-hybrid and precut endoscopic mucosal resection have a higher risk of perforation than those who undergo conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (odds ratio, 78.65 and 39.72, p<0.05). Procedure-related perforations were not associated with patient survival.
Conclusions
Perforation after endoscopic resection had no significant impact on the prognosis of ECC. The type of endoscopic resection was a crucial predictor of perforation. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to further investigate endoscopic resection of ECC.
3.Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study
Ik Hyun JO ; Hyun Gun KIM ; Young-Seok CHO ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Eun Ran KIM ; Yoo Jin LEE ; Sung Wook HWANG ; Kyeong-Ok KIM ; Jun LEE ; Hyuk Soon CHOI ; Yunho JUNG ; Chang Mo MOON
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):95-107
Background/Aims:
Early colorectal cancer (ECC) is commonly resected endoscopically. Perforation is a devastating complication of endoscopic resection. We aimed to identify the characteristics and predictive risk factors for perforation related to endoscopic resection of ECC.
Methods:
This nationwide retrospective multicenter study included patients with ECC who underwent endoscopic resection. We investigated the demographics, endoscopic findings at the time of treatment, and histopathological characteristics of the resected specimens. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the clinical factors associated with procedure-related perforations. Survival analysis was conducted to assess the impact of perforation on the overall survival of patients with ECC.
Results:
This study included 965 participants with a mean age of 63.4 years. The most common endoscopic treatment was conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (n=573, 59.4%), followed by conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (n=259, 26.8%). Thirty-three patients (3.4%) experienced perforations, most of which were managed endoscopically (n=23/33, 69.7%). Patients who undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection-hybrid and precut endoscopic mucosal resection have a higher risk of perforation than those who undergo conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (odds ratio, 78.65 and 39.72, p<0.05). Procedure-related perforations were not associated with patient survival.
Conclusions
Perforation after endoscopic resection had no significant impact on the prognosis of ECC. The type of endoscopic resection was a crucial predictor of perforation. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to further investigate endoscopic resection of ECC.
4.Risk Factors for Perforation in Endoscopic Treatment for Early Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide ENTER-K Study
Ik Hyun JO ; Hyun Gun KIM ; Young-Seok CHO ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Eun Ran KIM ; Yoo Jin LEE ; Sung Wook HWANG ; Kyeong-Ok KIM ; Jun LEE ; Hyuk Soon CHOI ; Yunho JUNG ; Chang Mo MOON
Gut and Liver 2025;19(1):95-107
Background/Aims:
Early colorectal cancer (ECC) is commonly resected endoscopically. Perforation is a devastating complication of endoscopic resection. We aimed to identify the characteristics and predictive risk factors for perforation related to endoscopic resection of ECC.
Methods:
This nationwide retrospective multicenter study included patients with ECC who underwent endoscopic resection. We investigated the demographics, endoscopic findings at the time of treatment, and histopathological characteristics of the resected specimens. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the clinical factors associated with procedure-related perforations. Survival analysis was conducted to assess the impact of perforation on the overall survival of patients with ECC.
Results:
This study included 965 participants with a mean age of 63.4 years. The most common endoscopic treatment was conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (n=573, 59.4%), followed by conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (n=259, 26.8%). Thirty-three patients (3.4%) experienced perforations, most of which were managed endoscopically (n=23/33, 69.7%). Patients who undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection-hybrid and precut endoscopic mucosal resection have a higher risk of perforation than those who undergo conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (odds ratio, 78.65 and 39.72, p<0.05). Procedure-related perforations were not associated with patient survival.
Conclusions
Perforation after endoscopic resection had no significant impact on the prognosis of ECC. The type of endoscopic resection was a crucial predictor of perforation. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to further investigate endoscopic resection of ECC.
5.Aerobic Capacity and Obesity Ratio of Korea Firefighters by Job Duties:Implications for Fitness Management
Ji-Been KIM ; Min-Geon JE ; Chae-Been KIM ; Jung-Jun PARK ; Hyun-Joo KANG ; Wook SONG ; Chung-Gun LEE ; Yeon-Soon AHN ; Han-Joon LEE ; Dong-Il SEO
The Korean Journal of Sports Medicine 2024;42(1):23-30
Purpose:
Firefighting duties range from field roles such as suppression, rescue, and emergency medical services (EMS) to various administrative tasks. Despite these differences, they face uniform fitness standards in Korea. This study seeks to define distinct fitness needs for each duty and provide data for customized standards.
Methods:
One hundred seventy-six Korean male firefighters participated, categorized into suppression (n=76), rescue (n=22), administrative (n=27), and EMS (n=51) roles. All underwent maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) tests for aerobic capacity, with body composition measured using bioelectrical impedance and height recorded with a stadiometer.
Results:
The VO2 max (mL/kg/min) among Korean male firefighters varied across different job duties: suppression (39.96±5.84), rescue (44.84±4.85), administration (40.27±7.01), and EMS (40.51±6.75). Rescue had the highest VO2 max, which was significantly higher (p=0.013). The body mass index (BMI, kg/m2 ) values were as follows: suppression (25.07±2.55), rescue (24.95±1.71), EMS (24.33±3.21), and administration (25.10±2.48). There was no statistically significant difference in BMI values (p=0.464).
Conclusion
This study evaluated the VO2 max and BMI of South Korean male firefighters according to their job duties. It found that 54.5% did not meet the recommended VO2 max standard of 42 mL/kg/min for their activities, and 77.5% had a BMI indicating overweight or higher. However, it is important to note that not every firefighting duty requires high fitness levels. The key is ensuring firefighters possess the fitness necessary for their specific roles to maintain safety and efficiency. The study aims to provide data for creating fitness management guidelines tailored to the diverse duties of firefighters.
6.Impacts of Subtype on Clinical Feature and Outcome of Male Breast Cancer: Multicenter Study in Korea (KCSG BR16-09)
Jieun LEE ; Keun Seok LEE ; Sung Hoon SIM ; Heejung CHAE ; Joohyuk SOHN ; Gun Min KIM ; Kyung-Hee LEE ; Su Hwan KANG ; Kyung Hae JUNG ; Jae-ho JEONG ; Jae Ho BYUN ; Su-Jin KOH ; Kyoung Eun LEE ; Seungtaek LIM ; Hee Jun KIM ; Hye Sung WON ; Hyung Soon PARK ; Guk Jin LEE ; Soojung HONG ; Sun Kyung BAEK ; Soon Il LEE ; Moon Young CHOI ; In Sook WOO
Cancer Research and Treatment 2023;55(1):123-135
Purpose:
The treatment of male breast cancer (MBC) has been extrapolated from female breast cancer (FBC) because of its rarity despite their different clinicopathologic characteristics. We aimed to investigate the distribution of intrinsic subtypes based on immunohistochemistry, their clinical impact, and treatment pattern in clinical practice through a multicenter study in Korea.
Materials and Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 248 MBC patients from 18 institutions across the country from January 1995 to July 2016.
Results:
The median age of MBC patients was 63 years (range, 25 to 102 years). Among 148 intrinsic subtype classified patients, 61 (41.2%), 44 (29.7%), 29 (19.5%), and 14 (9.5%) were luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and triple-negative breast cancer, respectively. Luminal A subtype showed trends for superior survival compared to other subtypes. Most hormone receptor-positive patients (166 patients, 82.6%) received adjuvant endocrine treatment. Five-year completion of adjuvant endocrine treatment was associated with superior disease-free survival (DFS) in patients classified with an intrinsic subtype (hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.49; p=0.002) and in all patients (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.54; p=0.003).
Conclusion
Distribution of subtypes of MBC was similar to FBC and luminal type A was most common. Overall survival tended to be improved for luminal A subtype, although there was no statistical significance. Completion of adjuvant endocrine treatment was associated with prolonged DFS in intrinsic subtype classified patients. MBC patients tended to receive less treatment. MBC patients should receive standard treatment according to guidelines as FBC patients.
7.2020 Korean Emergency Physician Survey
Seon Koo KIM ; Kwang Hyun CHO ; In Byung KIM ; Mi Jin LEE ; Yoo Sang YOON ; Kyung Hye PARK ; Song Yi PARK ; Hong Jae KIM ; Dong Hoon KEY ; Beom Sok SEO ; Young Min JOO ; Chang Gun JEE ; Suk Jae CHOI ; In Hwan YEO ; Ji Hun KANG ; Woo Jin JUNG ; Dae Sung LIM ; Eu Sun LEE ; Hyung Min LEE ; Soon Joo WANG
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2022;33(4):1-10
Objective:
This study was carried out to establish a basis for understanding and correcting the problems of the emergency physicians (EP) in Korea by examining the current status through the 2020 emergency physician survey conducted by the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine (KSEM).
Methods:
An online survey was conducted from January 15 to February 26, 2021, through a website and mobile application. The final questionnaire was classified into three types based on the clinical work in the emergency department (ED), current position, and the year of board certification. The contents of the questionnaire were organized into eight themes, and a subcommittee was put in charge of each.
Results:
Of the 400 emergency medical institutions surveyed, 295 hospitals (74.2%) had board-certified EPs, and 1,453 EPs (72.5%) out of 2,000 were working in the ED. Of these, on average, 7.2 EPs worked together, and they worked 11.6 days/153.1 hours per month and did night shifts 5.9 days per month. 30.7% showed excessive sleepiness during the day, and only 9.6% said that they could adhere to mealtimes. 27.1% responded that they suffered from depression. The level of satisfaction was 3.2 points, and 43.0% responded that they would choose emergency medicine (EM) again as their major. The most important factor in choosing EM was the availability of adequate free time. Their responses indicated that the retirement age was 59.7 years, and the upper age limit for the night shift was 54.3 years.
Conclusion
Though there have been improvements since the first survey in 2010, there was no notable increase in EP satisfaction. Therefore, appropriate future policies should be formulated and implemented based on these survey results.
8.2020 Korean Emergency Physician Survey
Seon Koo KIM ; Kwang Hyun CHO ; In Byung KIM ; Mi Jin LEE ; Yoo Sang YOON ; Kyung Hye PARK ; Song Yi PARK ; Hong Jae KIM ; Dong Hoon KEY ; Beom Sok SEO ; Young Min JOO ; Chang Gun JEE ; Suk Jae CHO ; In Hwan YEO ; Ji Hun KANG ; Woo Jin JUNG ; Dae Sung LIM ; Eu Sun LEE ; Hyung Min LEE ; Soon Joo WANG
Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine 2022;33(5):520-520
9.Continuing besifovir dipivoxil maleate versus switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Results of 192-week phase 3 trial
Do Seon SONG ; Won KIM ; Sang Hoon AHN ; Hyung Joon YIM ; Jae Young JANG ; Young Oh KWEON ; Yong Kyun CHO ; Yoon Jun KIM ; Gun Young HONG ; Dong Joon KIM ; Young Kul JUNG ; Joo Hyun SOHN ; Jin-Woo LEE ; Sung Jae PARK ; Byung Seok LEE ; Ju Hyun KIM ; Hong Soo KIM ; Seung Kew YOON ; Moon Young KIM ; Kwan Sik LEE ; Young Suk LIM ; Wan Sik LEE ; Jin Mo YANG ; Kyun-Hwan KIM ; Kwang-Hyub HAN ; Soon Ho UM
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2021;27(2):346-359
Background/Aims:
Besifovir dipivoxil maleate (BSV), an acyclic nucleotide phosphonate, shows potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus. Our previous 48-week trial revealed that BSV has comparable antiviral efficacy to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and better safety profiles in terms of improved renal and bone safety. This extension study evaluated the prolonged efficacy and safety of BSV in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients.
Methods:
Patients continued to participate in an open-label BSV study after an initial 48-week double-blind comparison of BSV and TDF treatment. The antiviral efficacy and drug safety was evaluated up to 192 weeks in two groups: patients continuing BSV treatment (BSV-BSV) and patients switching from TDF to BSV after 48 weeks (TDF-BSV).
Results:
Among 197 patients receiving randomized treatments, 170 (86%) entered the open-label phase and 152 (77%) entered the 192-week extension study. Virological response rates over 192 weeks were 92.50% and 93.06% in the BSV-BSV and TDF-BSV groups, respectively (P=0.90). Hepatitis B envelop antigen seroconversion and alanine aminotransferase normalization rates were similar between the groups (P=0.75 and P=0.36, respectively). There were no drug-resistant mutations to BSV. Bone mineral density and renal function were well preserved in the BSV-BSV group, whereas these initially worsened then recovered after switching therapy in the TDF-BSV group.
Conclusions
BSV maintained potent antiviral efficacy after 192 weeks and showed no evidence of drug resistance. BSV was safe, well tolerated, and effective in patients who switched from TDF to BSV. Trial Registration Number: NCT01937806 (date: 10 Sep 2013).
10.Continuing besifovir dipivoxil maleate versus switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Results of 192-week phase 3 trial
Do Seon SONG ; Won KIM ; Sang Hoon AHN ; Hyung Joon YIM ; Jae Young JANG ; Young Oh KWEON ; Yong Kyun CHO ; Yoon Jun KIM ; Gun Young HONG ; Dong Joon KIM ; Young Kul JUNG ; Joo Hyun SOHN ; Jin-Woo LEE ; Sung Jae PARK ; Byung Seok LEE ; Ju Hyun KIM ; Hong Soo KIM ; Seung Kew YOON ; Moon Young KIM ; Kwan Sik LEE ; Young Suk LIM ; Wan Sik LEE ; Jin Mo YANG ; Kyun-Hwan KIM ; Kwang-Hyub HAN ; Soon Ho UM
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology 2021;27(2):346-359
Background/Aims:
Besifovir dipivoxil maleate (BSV), an acyclic nucleotide phosphonate, shows potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus. Our previous 48-week trial revealed that BSV has comparable antiviral efficacy to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and better safety profiles in terms of improved renal and bone safety. This extension study evaluated the prolonged efficacy and safety of BSV in treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients.
Methods:
Patients continued to participate in an open-label BSV study after an initial 48-week double-blind comparison of BSV and TDF treatment. The antiviral efficacy and drug safety was evaluated up to 192 weeks in two groups: patients continuing BSV treatment (BSV-BSV) and patients switching from TDF to BSV after 48 weeks (TDF-BSV).
Results:
Among 197 patients receiving randomized treatments, 170 (86%) entered the open-label phase and 152 (77%) entered the 192-week extension study. Virological response rates over 192 weeks were 92.50% and 93.06% in the BSV-BSV and TDF-BSV groups, respectively (P=0.90). Hepatitis B envelop antigen seroconversion and alanine aminotransferase normalization rates were similar between the groups (P=0.75 and P=0.36, respectively). There were no drug-resistant mutations to BSV. Bone mineral density and renal function were well preserved in the BSV-BSV group, whereas these initially worsened then recovered after switching therapy in the TDF-BSV group.
Conclusions
BSV maintained potent antiviral efficacy after 192 weeks and showed no evidence of drug resistance. BSV was safe, well tolerated, and effective in patients who switched from TDF to BSV. Trial Registration Number: NCT01937806 (date: 10 Sep 2013).

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail