Intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with diverse spine diseases, including spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and disc herniation, which have socio-economic effects. A normal intervertebral disc has consistency and homeostasis, consisting of annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, notochordal cells, nucleus pulposus cells, and an endplate with an immune privilege. On the other hand, when the degenerative process has pathologic causes, the inflammatory reaction could lead to nerve sprouting and vascularization into the tissue. Histopathologically, the pathologic process involves the degradation of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis and necrosis of nucleus pulposus cells, inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, disruption of endplate chondrogenic cells, and other processes. Various approaches for managing disc degeneration have been reported. Among them, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been regarded as representative trials. In vitro and animal studies with MSCs have reported some promising outcomes in terms of inflammatory modulation and regeneration, but several limitations have been pointed out, including the issues of graft rejection and survival. Because the paracrine mechanism would be a main therapeutic factor of MSCs, extracellular vesicles (EVs), one of the factors released from MSCs, have been considered a promising source for regenerative medicine. EVs possess nucleic acids, functional proteins, and inflammation-related factors, playing a significant role in the inflammatory reaction and regeneration. The current review article discusses the pathophysiology of disc degeneration, outcomes of conventional MSCs and EVs, and current limitations and future perspectives on EV therapeutics.

Intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with diverse spine diseases, including spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and disc herniation, which have socio-economic effects. A normal intervertebral disc has consistency and homeostasis, consisting of annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, notochordal cells, nucleus pulposus cells, and an endplate with an immune privilege. On the other hand, when the degenerative process has pathologic causes, the inflammatory reaction could lead to nerve sprouting and vascularization into the tissue. Histopathologically, the pathologic process involves the degradation of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis and necrosis of nucleus pulposus cells, inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, disruption of endplate chondrogenic cells, and other processes. Various approaches for managing disc degeneration have been reported. Among them, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been regarded as representative trials. In vitro and animal studies with MSCs have reported some promising outcomes in terms of inflammatory modulation and regeneration, but several limitations have been pointed out, including the issues of graft rejection and survival. Because the paracrine mechanism would be a main therapeutic factor of MSCs, extracellular vesicles (EVs), one of the factors released from MSCs, have been considered a promising source for regenerative medicine. EVs possess nucleic acids, functional proteins, and inflammation-related factors, playing a significant role in the inflammatory reaction and regeneration. The current review article discusses the pathophysiology of disc degeneration, outcomes of conventional MSCs and EVs, and current limitations and future perspectives on EV therapeutics.

Intervertebral disc degeneration is associated with diverse spine diseases, including spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and disc herniation, which have socio-economic effects. A normal intervertebral disc has consistency and homeostasis, consisting of annulus fibrosus, nucleus pulposus, notochordal cells, nucleus pulposus cells, and an endplate with an immune privilege. On the other hand, when the degenerative process has pathologic causes, the inflammatory reaction could lead to nerve sprouting and vascularization into the tissue. Histopathologically, the pathologic process involves the degradation of the extracellular matrix, apoptosis and necrosis of nucleus pulposus cells, inhibition of chondrogenic differentiation, disruption of endplate chondrogenic cells, and other processes. Various approaches for managing disc degeneration have been reported. Among them, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been regarded as representative trials. In vitro and animal studies with MSCs have reported some promising outcomes in terms of inflammatory modulation and regeneration, but several limitations have been pointed out, including the issues of graft rejection and survival. Because the paracrine mechanism would be a main therapeutic factor of MSCs, extracellular vesicles (EVs), one of the factors released from MSCs, have been considered a promising source for regenerative medicine. EVs possess nucleic acids, functional proteins, and inflammation-related factors, playing a significant role in the inflammatory reaction and regeneration. The current review article discusses the pathophysiology of disc degeneration, outcomes of conventional MSCs and EVs, and current limitations and future perspectives on EV therapeutics.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: Oral sulfate tablets (OSTs) are bowel preparation agents that combine oral sulfate solution and simethicone. This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of OST compared to 2 L-polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (2 L-PEG/ASC). Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter, noninferiority trial enrolled 211 healthy adults who underwent colonoscopy between May 2020 and September 2022 at 13 university hospitals. The bowel cleansing rate was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS), and the preparation agents were administered in split regimens. Results: The total BBPS score (8.2 ± 1.5 vs. 7.8 ± 1.4, p = 0.040) and the high-quality bowel cleansing rates in the right colon (73.2% vs. 50.5), transverse colon (80.6% vs. 68.0%), and left colon (81.5% vs. 67.0%) on the BBPS were significantly higher in the OST group than in the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. However, the rates of successful cleansing according to BBPS (90.7% vs. 91.2%) and HCS (96.3% vs. 94.2%) did not significantly differ between the two groups.The taste, ease, and amount of consumption of the preparation agent; and willingness to repeat colonoscopy with the same agent (89.8% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.026) were significantly better in the OST group compared to the 2 L-PEG/ASC group. Adverse events and clinically significant laboratory changes were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion The OST was not inferior to 2 L-PEG/ASC in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and showed better tolerability when used for bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Background: CD14 recognizes lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and presepsin is a fragment of soluble CD14. Still, it remains uncertain whether Gram-negative bacteria induce higher presepsin levels than other microorganisms. To address this question, this study aimed to analyze presepsin levels based on microorganisms isolated in blood cultures. Materials and Methods: This study was a single-center study comprising suspected sepsis patients enrolled from July 2020 to September 2020. A total of 95 patients with a single isolate confirmed in blood culture were analyzed to evaluate if there are any differences in presepsin levels according to microbial isolates. Plasma presepsin level was measured using PATHFAST assay kit and analyzer (LSI Medience Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Results: There were 26 Gram-positive bacteremia, 65 Gram-negative bacteremia, and 3 fungemia patients with median presepsin levels of 869, 1,439, and 11,951 pg/mL, respectively. Besides, one case of algaemia demonstrated a presepsin level of 1,231 pg/mL. Our results showed no statistically significant difference in presepsin levels among patients with Gram-positive bacteremia, Gram-negative bacteremia, and fungemia. Furthermore, presepsin levels did not differ significantly among bloodstream infections caused by bacteria that were isolated from at least three different patients. In particular, Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were able to induce presepsin levels comparable to those induced by Gram-negative bacteria. Conclusion We demonstrated that there were no significant differences in plasma presepsin levels according to microbial isolates in blood culture. The major cause of the variability in presepsin levels during bloodstream infection might be the immunogenicity of each microorganism rather than the presence of LPS in the microorganism.

Granular cell tumor is a rare disease, and it is even rarer in the male breast. Although it is typically a benign tumor, due to its features and image findings, it can be easily misdiagnosed and managed as a malignant tumor. Therefore, the extent of the surgery can inappropriately be expanded. To avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment, surgeons must perform a careful evaluation. We describe a case of a granular cell tumor of the male breast treated with mastectomy.

A noncontact sensor field is an innovative device that can detect, measure, or monitor physical properties or conditions without direct physical contact with the subject or object under examination. These sensors use a variety of methods, including electromagnetic, optical, and acoustic technique, to collect information about the target without physical interaction. Noncontact sensors find wide-ranging applications in various fields such as manufacturing, robotics, automobiles, security, environmental monitoring, space industry, agriculture, and entertainment. In particular, they are used in the medical field, where they provide continuous monitoring of patient conditions and offer opportunities in rehabilitation medicine. This article introduces the potential of noncontact sensors in the field of rehabilitation medicine.