Objective To retrieve,evaluate and summarise the best evidence for exercise management in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain,and to provide an evidence-based knowledges for healthcare professionals in clinical practice.Methods According to"6S"model systematic searches on BMJ Best Practice,UpToDate,Joanna Briggs Institute evidence-based Healthcare Centre Database,Cochrane library,World Health Organization,National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,Registered Nurses'Association of Ontario,Guideline International Network,Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase,Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network,New Zealand Guidelines Group,Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,Medlive,the North American Spine Society,Chinese Association for the Study of Pain,American Society of Pain and Neuroscience,PubMed,CINAHL,Embase,Web of Science,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wanfang Data,VIP,SinoMed in exercise management for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain,expert consensus,systematic reviews,clinical decisions and evidence summaries were conducted,with a search timeframe of the inception of databases to 29 th February 2024.Two graduate nursing students trained in systematic evidence-based methodology independently conducted literature quality assessment,evidence review and extraction using literature quality assessment tools such as the JBI Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare,and consolidated the evidence after discussion by the evidence-based research team.Results A total of 15 papers were included in the literature,including 5 guidelines,3 expert consensus,1 systematic review,4 evidence summaries and 2 clinical decisions,and 31 pieces of evidence were summarised,including 6 aspects of exercise assessment,the type,frequency and intensity of exercise,precautions and health awareness.Conclusion This study summarises the best evidence for exercise management in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain,and provides an evidence-based knowledges for the care of patients in hospital,community or at home.

This study analyzes the clinical data of a patient presenting with acute poisoning following the co-ingestion of a pesticide (approximately 100-120 ml of 41% glyphosate-isopropylammonium) and alcohol (approximately 100 g of ethanol). The patient developed multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), manifesting as acute kidney injury (AKI), metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, acute lung injury (ALI), acute liver injury, acute intestinal injury, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Following administration of general supportive care combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and hemoperfusion (HP), the patient recovered fully and was discharged. Acute combined glyphosate and ethanol poisoning can induce MODS. Analysis of this patient's diagnosis and treatment process enhances clinicians' understanding of this toxicological presentation and offers valuable clinical insights to improve survival rates in similar cases.

This study analyzes the clinical data of a patient presenting with acute poisoning following the co-ingestion of a pesticide (approximately 100-120 ml of 41% glyphosate-isopropylammonium) and alcohol (approximately 100 g of ethanol). The patient developed multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), manifesting as acute kidney injury (AKI), metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, acute lung injury (ALI), acute liver injury, acute intestinal injury, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Following administration of general supportive care combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and hemoperfusion (HP), the patient recovered fully and was discharged. Acute combined glyphosate and ethanol poisoning can induce MODS. Analysis of this patient's diagnosis and treatment process enhances clinicians' understanding of this toxicological presentation and offers valuable clinical insights to improve survival rates in similar cases.

Objective To retrieve,evaluate and summarise the best evidence for exercise management in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain,and to provide an evidence-based knowledges for healthcare professionals in clinical practice.Methods According to"6S"model systematic searches on BMJ Best Practice,UpToDate,Joanna Briggs Institute evidence-based Healthcare Centre Database,Cochrane library,World Health Organization,National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,Registered Nurses'Association of Ontario,Guideline International Network,Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Infobase,Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network,New Zealand Guidelines Group,Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,Medlive,the North American Spine Society,Chinese Association for the Study of Pain,American Society of Pain and Neuroscience,PubMed,CINAHL,Embase,Web of Science,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wanfang Data,VIP,SinoMed in exercise management for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain,expert consensus,systematic reviews,clinical decisions and evidence summaries were conducted,with a search timeframe of the inception of databases to 29 th February 2024.Two graduate nursing students trained in systematic evidence-based methodology independently conducted literature quality assessment,evidence review and extraction using literature quality assessment tools such as the JBI Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare,and consolidated the evidence after discussion by the evidence-based research team.Results A total of 15 papers were included in the literature,including 5 guidelines,3 expert consensus,1 systematic review,4 evidence summaries and 2 clinical decisions,and 31 pieces of evidence were summarised,including 6 aspects of exercise assessment,the type,frequency and intensity of exercise,precautions and health awareness.Conclusion This study summarises the best evidence for exercise management in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain,and provides an evidence-based knowledges for the care of patients in hospital,community or at home.

BACKGROUND:Prevention of fractures after stroke is very important,and there are currently no models to predict the occurrence of hip fractures after stroke. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the risk factors leading to hip fracture in stroke patients and to establish a risk prediction model to visualize this risk. METHODS:A total of 439 stroke patients were selected from the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from June 2014 to June 2017,including 107 males and 332 females,with a mean age of(71.38±9.74)years.They were divided into fracture group(n=35)and non-fracture group(n=404)according to the presence or absence of hip fracture.Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the risk factors for hip fracture after stroke.The data were randomly divided into training set(70%)and test set(30%).Nomogram predicting the risk of hip fracture occurrence was created based on the results of the multifactor analysis,and performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve,calibration curves,and decision curve analysis.A web calculator was created to facilitate a more convenient interactive experience for clinicians. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the two groups in the number of falls,smoking,hypertension,glucocorticoids,number of strokes,Mini-Mental State Examination,visual acuity level,National Institute of Health Stroke Scale,Berg Balance Scale,and Stop Walking When Talking scale scores(P<0.05).(2)Multivariate analysis showed that number of falls[OR=17.104,95%CI(3.727-78.489),P=0.000],National Institute of Health Stroke Scale[OR=1.565,95%CI(1.193-2.052),P=0.001],Stop Walking When Talking[OR=12.080,95%CI(2.398-60.851),P=0.003]were independent risk factors positively associated with new hip fractures.Bone mineral density[OR=0.155,95%CI(0.044-0.546),P=0.012]and Berg Balance Scale[OR=0.840,95%CI(0.739-0.954),P=0.007]were negatively associated with new hip fractures after stroke.(3)The AUC values of nomogram were 0.956 and 0.907 in the training and test sets,respectively,and the calibration curves showed a high agreement between predicted and actual status with an area under the decision curve of 0.038 and 0.030,respectively.(4)These findings conclude that the number of falls,low bone mineral density,low Berg Balance Scale score,high National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score,and positive Stop Walking When Talking are risk factors for hip fracture after stroke.Based on this,a nomogram with high accuracy was developed and a web calculator(https://stroke.shinyapps.io/DynNomapp/)was created.

Objective:To investigate the current situation of the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for portal hypertension, which should aid the development of TIPS in China.Methods:The China Portal Hypertension Alliance (CHESS) initiated this study that comprehensively investigated the basic situation of TIPS for portal hypertension in China through network research. The survey included the following: the number of surgical cases, main indications, the development of Early-TIPS, TIPS for portal vein cavernous transformation, collateral circulation embolization, intraoperative portal pressure gradient measurement, commonly used stent types, conventional anticoagulation and time, postoperative follow-up, obstacles, and the application of domestic instruments.Results:According to the survey, a total of 13 527 TIPS operations were carried out in 545 hospitals participating in the survey in 2021, and 94.1% of the hospital had the habit of routine follow-up after TIPS. Most hospitals believed that the main indications of TIPS were the control of acute bleeding (42.6%) and the prevention of rebleeding (40.7%). 48.1% of the teams carried out early or priority TIPS, 53.0% of the teams carried out TIPS for the cavernous transformation of the portal vein, and 81.0% chose routine embolization of collateral circulation during operation. Most of them used coils and biological glue as embolic materials, and 78.5% of the team routinely performed intraoperative portal pressure gradient measurements. In selecting TIPS stents, 57.1% of the hospitals woulel choose Viator-specific stents, 57.2% woulel choose conventional anticoagulation after TIPS, and the duration of anticoagulation was between 3-6 months (55.4%). The limitation of TIPS surgery was mainly due to cost (72.3%) and insufficient understanding of doctors in related departments (77.4%). Most teams accepted the domestic instruments used in TIPS (92.7%).Conclusions:This survey shows that TIPS treatment is an essential part of treating portal hypertension in China. The total number of TIPS cases is far from that of patients with portal hypertension. In the future, it is still necessary to popularize TIPS technology and further standardize surgical indications, routine operations, and instrument application.

Objective:A nationwide multi-center and large sample survey was conducted to compare the validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Hypo-) Manic Episode with Mixed Features-DSM-5 Module (MINI-M) questionnaire and the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale Supplemented with Questions for the DSM-5 Mixed Features Specifier (CUDOS-M) depression subscale in identifying mixed features in patients experiencing (hypo-) manic episodes.Methods:Using a convenience sampling method, 366 patients with bipolar disorder experiencing acute (hypo-) manic episodes who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited. The diagnosis of "with mixed features" was based on the DSM-5 criteria for mixed features. The predictive validity of the MINI-M questionnaire and the CUDOS-M depression subscale to screen mixed features was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, the difference in area under the ROC curve (AUC) between the two instruments was compared.Results:The AUC for the MINI-M questionnaire and the CUDOS-M depression subscale in screening mixed features were 0.79 (95 %CI=0.75-0.84) and 0.81 (95 %CI=0.77-0.86), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in AUC between the two measurements ( Z=-1.19, P>0.05). Among patients with acute (hypo-) manic episodes, 45.9% (168/366) presented with mixed features according to the DSM-5 criteria, while the corresponding figures were 43.7% (160/366) using the MINI-M questionnaire (total score≥3) and 42.1% (154/366) using the CUDOS-M depression subscale (total score≥20). Screening results were comparable among the three measures. Conclusion:Mixed features are common among patients experiencing acute (hypo-) manic episodes. The MINI-M questionnaire and the CUDOS-M depression subscale demonstrate equivalent validity in identifying mixed features.

Objective:A nationwide multi-center and large sample survey was conducted to compare the validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (Hypo-) Manic Episode with Mixed Features-DSM-5 Module (MINI-M) questionnaire and the Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale Supplemented with Questions for the DSM-5 Mixed Features Specifier (CUDOS-M) depression subscale in identifying mixed features in patients experiencing (hypo-) manic episodes.Methods:Using a convenience sampling method, 366 patients with bipolar disorder experiencing acute (hypo-) manic episodes who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited. The diagnosis of "with mixed features" was based on the DSM-5 criteria for mixed features. The predictive validity of the MINI-M questionnaire and the CUDOS-M depression subscale to screen mixed features was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, the difference in area under the ROC curve (AUC) between the two instruments was compared.Results:The AUC for the MINI-M questionnaire and the CUDOS-M depression subscale in screening mixed features were 0.79 (95 %CI=0.75-0.84) and 0.81 (95 %CI=0.77-0.86), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in AUC between the two measurements ( Z=-1.19, P>0.05). Among patients with acute (hypo-) manic episodes, 45.9% (168/366) presented with mixed features according to the DSM-5 criteria, while the corresponding figures were 43.7% (160/366) using the MINI-M questionnaire (total score≥3) and 42.1% (154/366) using the CUDOS-M depression subscale (total score≥20). Screening results were comparable among the three measures. Conclusion:Mixed features are common among patients experiencing acute (hypo-) manic episodes. The MINI-M questionnaire and the CUDOS-M depression subscale demonstrate equivalent validity in identifying mixed features.

Objective To investigate the effects of different ratios of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids(ω-3 PUFA)on depression and cognitive impairment in patients with major depression.Methods A randomized,double-blinded controlled trial was used to randomly assign patients with depression to a cognitive improvement group,a depression improvement group,and a placebo group.The cognitive improvement group took 1388 mg of docosahexaenoic acid(DHA)and 692 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid(EPA)every day and the depression improvement group took 1248 mg of EPA and 832 mg of DHA every day.The placebo group took the same dose of soybean oil for 12 weeks,during which psychiatric medication was maintained.The 24-item Hamilton depression scale(HAMD-24)was used to evaluate depressive symptoms,and the standardized MATRICS consensus cognitive battery(MCCB)was used to evaluate cognitive function after 6 weeks and 12 weeks,respectively.Results The study recruited a total of 46 patients with depression including 22 in the cognitive improvement group,12 in the depression improvement group,and 12 in the placebo group.After 6 weeks of treatment,the HAMD-24 scores were significantly lower in the depression improvement group(19.00±10.70)and cognitive improvement group(16.58±9.39)than in the placebo group(31.10±10.03)(P<0.01).After 12 weeks of treatment,HAMD-24 scores were significantly lower in the depression improvement group(13.58±8.43)than in the placebo group(28.10±15.04)(P=0.02).No significant interaction effect was found on the cognitive assessment scores in any dimension after 6 weeks and 12 weeks of treatment(P>0.05).The incidence rate of adverse events in the depression improvement group was 16.7%(2/12),and no adverse events were reported in the other two groups.There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events among the three groups(P=0.13).Conclusion Treatment with ω-3PUFA for 6 weeks can improve the depressive symptoms of patients with depression.The formula with a higher ratio of EPA exhibits higher effectiveness while the two groups of ω-3PUFA formulas with different ratios do not improve cognitive function.

Objective:This study investigates the difference in the detection rate and symptomatology between ICD-10 and DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorder with mixed states.Methods:Based on the Phase Ⅰ (2012) and Phase Ⅱ (2021) databases of National Bipolar Mania Pathway Survey (BIPAS), patients with bipolar disorder were included. General demographic data, clinical characteristics, symptomatic phenotypes, and mixed characteristics were retrieved. The detection rates and symptomatic performances of patients with or without mixed states in Phase Ⅰ and Ⅱ were compared using the chi-square test.Results:For patients with mixed states, the detection rate during Phase Ⅱ (2021) using DSM-5 (18.79%, 199/1 059) criteria was significantly higher than that during Phase Ⅰ (2012) using ICD-10 (6.78%, 199/2 934; χ 2=125.05, P<0.001). Whether using ICD-10 or DSM-5 criteria, patients with mixed states had a significantly higher frequency of multiple symptomatic manifestations. Conclusion:The DSM-5 diagnostic criteria generate a high detection rate for bipolar disorder with mixed states. The clinical phenotypes of bipolar disorder with mixed states vary significantly using different diagnostic tools.