Peri-implantitis is a pathologic condition associated with dental plaque that occurs in the implant tissue and is characterized by inflammation of the mucous membrane surrounding the implant, followed by the progressive loss of supporting bone. In this study, a case of guided bone regeneration therapy based on plaque control of peri-implant inflammation was reported. Four years after surgery for the left second premolar implant, the patient presented with "left lower posterior tooth swelling and discomfort for more than 2 years". The X-ray periapical film showed a decrease in distal bone mineral density of implant, and the clinical diagnosis was peri-implantitis of the left second premolar. Implants underwent guided bone regeneration and regular periodontal maintenance treatment. Re-examination at 3.5 months, 11 months, 18 months, and 7 years showed that the alveolar bone height and bone mineral density were stable, and the periodontal depth became shallow. However, the gingival recession was mild. In the present case, follow-up at 7 years demonstrated that the clinical periodontal indexes could be remarkably improved after complete periodontal treatment for peri-implantitis, and the alveolar bone could be well restored and regenerated.
Humans ; Peri-Implantitis/etiology* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Bone Regeneration ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods* ; Dental Plaque/prevention & control* ; Male ; Female ; Dental Implants/adverse effects*

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the osteogenic efficacy of three-dimensional printing individualized titanium mesh (3D-PITM) as a scaffold material in guided bone regeneration (GBR). METHODS: 1) Patients undergoing GBR for alveolar bone defects were enrolled as study subjects, and postoperative healing complications were recorded. 2) Postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired at least 6 months post-surgery were used to calculate the percentage of actual bone formation volume. 3) Alveolar bone specimens were collected during the first-stage implant surgery for histomorphometric analysis. This analysis quantitatively measured the proportions of newly formed bone and newly formed unmineralized bone within the specimens. Specimens were categorized into three groups based on healing complications (good healing group, wound dehiscence group, 3D-PITM exposure group) to compare differences in the proportions of newly formed bone and newly formed unmineralized bone. RESULTS: 1) Twelve patients were included. Guided bone regeneration failed in one patient, and 3D-PITM exposure occurred in three patients (exposure rate: 25%). 2) The mean percentage of actual bone formation volume in the 11 successful guided bone regeneration cases was 95.23%±28.85%. 3) Histomorphometric analysis revealed that newly formed bone constituted 40.35% of the alveolar bone specimens, with newly formed unmineralized bone accounting for 13.84% of the newly formed bone. Intergroup comparisons showed no statistically significant differences (P>0.05) in the proportions of newly formed bone or newly formed unmineralized bone between the good healing group and the wound dehiscence group or the 3D-PITM exposure group. CONCLUSIONS 3D-PITM enables effective bone augmentation. Radiographic assessment demonstrated favorable bone formation volume, while histological analysis confirmed substantial formation of newly formed mineralized bone within the surgical site.
Humans ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Titanium ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Bone Regeneration ; Osteogenesis ; Surgical Mesh ; Tissue Scaffolds ; Alveolar Process/surgery* ; Adult ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Female ; Wound Healing ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods* ; Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery*

OBJECTIVES: Color doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were utilized to evaluate changes in mucosal vascular parameters and the osteogenic effects following guided bone regeneration (GBR) in the maxillary anterior region using trapezoidal or modified triangular flaps. METHODS: Patients undergoing single maxillary anterior dental implant surgery with GBR were randomly allocated into two groups: a trapezoidal flap group and a modified triangular flap group. After GBR surgery, the mucosal vascular parameters at the surgical site were assessed at various time intervals (preoperative, 2 h, 1 and 3 days, and 1, 2, and 4 weeks postoperative) using CDFI. In addition, the effects of bone augmentation were evaluated through the analysis of CBCT images obtained preoperatively, 2 h, and 6 months postoperative. RESULTS: The buccal mucosa in the edentulous area had a lower blood flow rate than the corresponding tooth in the same jaw, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The mucosal blood flow rate in the surgical area increased compared with that in the preoperative period. The peak flow rate was recorded at 2 weeks postoperatively and then decreased to levels comparable to those of the reference tooth. A statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (P<0.05). The buccal alveolar ridge width of the implant platform was reduced by (1.3±0.9) mm in the trapezoidal flap group and (0.9±0.7) mm in the modified triangular flap group, respectively, at 6 months postoperatively, compared with 2 h postoperative. The buccal alveolar ridge width of the 5 mm from the implant platform was reduced by (0.9±0.6) mm and (0.3±0.6) mm, respectively. The buccal alveolar ridge width of the 10 mm from the implant platform was reduced by (0.6±0.8) mm and (0.2±0.6) mm, respectively. The height of the alveolar ridge was reduced by (1.9±1.4 ) mm and (1.4±1.3) mm. The change in graft volume was (136±78 ) mm³ and (114±85) mm³. However, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS When a tooth is missing, blood flow to the buccal mucosa on the side of the missing tooth is reduced. The modified triangular flap group demonstrated superior microcirculation of blood flow in the operative area after GBR of the maxillary anterior teeth. Trapezoidal and modified triangular flaps achieved the anticipated bone augmentation during bone augmentation surgery in the maxillary anterior region, with no considerable effect on the changes in alveolar bone size parameters.
Humans ; Surgical Flaps/blood supply* ; Bone Regeneration ; Mouth Mucosa/blood supply* ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Osteogenesis ; Maxilla/surgery* ; Male ; Female ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal/methods*

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) often utilizes a combination of autologous bone grafts, deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM), and collagen membranes. DBBM and collagen membranes pre-coated with bone-conditioned medium (BCM) extracted from locally harvested autologous bone chips have shown great regenerative potential in GBR. However, the underlying molecular mechanism remains largely unknown. Here, we investigated the composition of BCM and its activity on the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells. We detected a fast and significant (P < 0.001) release of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) from autologous bone within 10 min versus a delayed bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) release from 40 min onwards. BCMs harvested within short time periods (10, 20, or 40 min), corresponding to the time of a typical surgical procedure, significantly increased the proliferative activity and collagen matrix production of BCM-treated cells. Long-term (1, 3, or 6 days)-extracted BCMs promoted the later stages of osteoblast differentiation and maturation. Short-term-extracted BCMs, in which TGF-β1 but no BMP-2 was detected, reduced the expression of the late differentiation marker osteocalcin. However, when both growth factors were present simultaneously in the BCM, no inhibitory effects on osteoblast differentiation were observed, suggesting a synergistic TGF-β1/BMP-2 activity. Consequently, in cells that were co-stimulated with recombinant TGF-β1 and BMP-2, we showed a significant stimulatory and dose-dependent effect of TGF-β1 on BMP-2-induced osteoblast differentiation due to prolonged BMP signaling and reduced expression of the BMP-2 antagonist noggin. Altogether, our data provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the favorable outcome from GBR procedures using BCM, derived from autologous bone grafts.
Biomarkers ; metabolism ; Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 ; metabolism ; Cell Adhesion ; Cell Differentiation ; Cell Movement ; Cell Proliferation ; Culture Media, Conditioned ; pharmacology ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal ; methods ; Humans ; Mesenchymal Stem Cells ; metabolism ; Osteoblasts ; metabolism ; Osteogenesis ; drug effects ; Transforming Growth Factor beta1 ; metabolism

BACKGROUNDRegenerative techniques help promote the formation of new attachment and bone filling in periodontal defects. However, the dimensions of intraosseous defects are a key determinant of periodontal regeneration outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of use of anorganic bovine bone (ABB) graft in combination with collagen membrane (CM), to facilitate healing of noncontained (1-wall) and contained (3-wall) critical size periodontal defects.

METHODSThe study began on March 2013, and was completed on May 2014. One-wall (7 mm × 4 mm) and 3-wall (5 mm × 4 mm) intrabony periodontal defects were surgically created bilaterally in the mandibular third premolars and first molars in eight beagles. The defects were treated with ABB in combination with CM (ABB + CM group) or open flap debridement (OFD group). The animals were euthanized at 8-week postsurgery for histological analysis. Two independent Student's t-tests (1-wall [ABB + CM] vs. 1-wall [OFD] and 3-wall [ABB + CM] vs. 3-wall [OFD]) were used to assess between-group differences.

RESULTSThe mean new bone height in both 1- and 3-wall intrabony defects in the ABB + CM group was significantly greater than that in the OFD group (1-wall: 4.99 ± 0.70 mm vs. 3.01 ± 0.37 mm, P < 0.05; 3-wall: 3.11 ± 0.59 mm vs. 2.08 ± 0.24 mm, P < 0.05). The mean new cementum in 1-wall intrabony defects in the ABB + CM group was significantly greater than that in their counterparts in the OFD group (5.08 ± 0.68 mm vs. 1.16 ± 0.38 mm; P < 0.05). Likewise, only the 1-wall intrabony defect model showed a significant difference with respect to junctional epithelium between ABB + CM and OFD groups (0.67 ± 0.23 mm vs. 1.12 ± 0.28 mm, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONSOne-wall intrabony defects treated with ABB and CM did not show less periodontal regeneration than that in 3-wall intrabony defect. The noncontained 1-wall intrabony defect might be a more discriminative defect model for further research into periodontal regeneration.

Alveolar Bone Loss ; surgery ; Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; therapeutic use ; Bone Regeneration ; physiology ; Bone Substitutes ; therapeutic use ; Cattle ; Dogs ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal ; methods ; Male ; Wound Healing ; physiology

Alveolar Bone Loss ; diagnostic imaging ; etiology ; prevention & control ; surgery ; Alveolar Process ; diagnostic imaging ; pathology ; Bone Substitutes ; therapeutic use ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dental Implantation ; methods ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal ; methods ; Humans

Alveolar Process ; physiology ; Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; therapeutic use ; Bone Matrix ; transplantation ; Bone Regeneration ; physiology ; Bone Transplantation ; methods ; Dental Implantation ; methods ; Esthetics, Dental ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal ; methods ; Humans ; Prosthodontics ; methods ; Tooth Extraction ; methods

Animals ; Bone Regeneration ; physiology ; Cell Differentiation ; Dental Enamel Proteins ; pharmacology ; Dental Pulp ; cytology ; Fibroblasts ; cytology ; Gingiva ; cytology ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal ; methods ; Humans ; Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells ; cytology ; physiology ; Mouth Mucosa ; cytology ; Periodontal Ligament ; cytology ; Tissue Engineering ; methods

Alveolar Bone Loss ; prevention & control ; Alveolar Process ; surgery ; Bone Regeneration ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal ; methods ; Humans ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Periodontitis ; surgery ; Tooth Extraction ; adverse effects ; Wound Healing

Animals ; Biocompatible Materials ; pharmacology ; Bone Morphogenetic Proteins ; pharmacology ; Cell Movement ; Chemokine CXCL12 ; pharmacology ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal ; methods ; Humans ; Periodontal Ligament ; cytology ; Periodontium ; cytology ; physiology ; Regeneration ; drug effects ; Stem Cells ; cytology