Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic multi-band ligation (EMBL) in the management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) combined with esophageal hiatal hernia (HH).Methods:This study was a prospective, multicenter, small-sample cohort study. Patients who were diagnosed as having RGERD combined with HH at Inner Mongolia Medical University Cancer Hospital and Inner Mongolia Medical University Hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 were selected to undergo EMBL. The 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM) related indicators, gastroesophageal reflux index (GERI), gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) scores, and gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores were compared before and after the operation. The patient satisfaction and complications were also investigated.Results:A total of 25 patients were included, all of whom were successfully treated with EMBL. Reflux symptoms were relieved to varied degrees in all patients. There were no serious complications during or after the operation, such as perforation, bleeding, and dysphagia. Postoperative follow-up at 6 and 12 months showed a significant decrease in DeMeester scores [18.00 (5.83, 54.75) points, 16.30 (4.38, 60.00) points] compared to preoperative baseline [105.00 (60.80, 147.70) points, Z=-3.72, P<0.001; Z=-3.82, P<0.001]. The percentage of time of pH<4 [8.80 (6.10, 11.80)%, 8.95 (5.15, 10.90)%] significantly decreased compared to the baseline [31.15 (16.75, 54.75)%, Z=-3.72, P<0.001; Z=-3.72, P<0.001], the number of long refluxes [7.90 (4.93, 11.75) times, 6.90 (4.00, 10.75) times] significantly decreased compared to the baseline [33.00 (13.00, 43.00) times, Z=-3.82, P<0.001; Z=-3.58, P<0.001], and the number of acid refluxes (14.86±8.71 times, 12.93±5.51 times) significantly decreased compared to before (30.42±17.99 times, t=5.88, P<0.001; t=4.79, P<0.001). Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure [9.70 (5.80, 19.58) mmHg, 11.70 (5.40, 19.78) mmHg] was significantly higher compared to before [4.70 (3.25, 7.00) mmHg, Z=-2.84, P<0.001; Z=-3.10, P<0.001]. GERD-Q scores (10.00±2.01 points, 9.43±1.74 points) were significantly higher compared to before (15.34±1.51 points, t=8.90, P<0.001; t=9.87, P<0.001), GERD-HRQL scores [7.00 (5.00, 7.75) points, 6.00 (5.75, 8.25) points] significantly decreased compared to preoperative baseline [13.50 (11.00, 21.25), Z=-3.73, P<0.001; Z=-3.72, P<0.001], and GERI (2.26%±1.58%, 2.07%±1.17%) significantly decreased compared to before (5.72%±2.27%, t=8.92, P<0.001; t=9.86, P<0.001). At 6 and 12 months postoperative follow-up, patient satisfaction [68.00% (15/25), 84.00% (21/25)] significantly increased compared to before [0.00% (0/25), Z=-4.63, P<0.001; Z=-6.48, P<0.001]. Conclusion:Preliminary small-sample study has shown that EMBL is safe, reliable and effective for the treatment of RGERD with HH.

Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic multi-band ligation (EMBL) in the management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) combined with esophageal hiatal hernia (HH).Methods:This study was a prospective, multicenter, small-sample cohort study. Patients who were diagnosed as having RGERD combined with HH at Inner Mongolia Medical University Cancer Hospital and Inner Mongolia Medical University Hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 were selected to undergo EMBL. The 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM) related indicators, gastroesophageal reflux index (GERI), gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) scores, and gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores were compared before and after the operation. The patient satisfaction and complications were also investigated.Results:A total of 25 patients were included, all of whom were successfully treated with EMBL. Reflux symptoms were relieved to varied degrees in all patients. There were no serious complications during or after the operation, such as perforation, bleeding, and dysphagia. Postoperative follow-up at 6 and 12 months showed a significant decrease in DeMeester scores [18.00 (5.83, 54.75) points, 16.30 (4.38, 60.00) points] compared to preoperative baseline [105.00 (60.80, 147.70) points, Z=-3.72, P<0.001; Z=-3.82, P<0.001]. The percentage of time of pH<4 [8.80 (6.10, 11.80)%, 8.95 (5.15, 10.90)%] significantly decreased compared to the baseline [31.15 (16.75, 54.75)%, Z=-3.72, P<0.001; Z=-3.72, P<0.001], the number of long refluxes [7.90 (4.93, 11.75) times, 6.90 (4.00, 10.75) times] significantly decreased compared to the baseline [33.00 (13.00, 43.00) times, Z=-3.82, P<0.001; Z=-3.58, P<0.001], and the number of acid refluxes (14.86±8.71 times, 12.93±5.51 times) significantly decreased compared to before (30.42±17.99 times, t=5.88, P<0.001; t=4.79, P<0.001). Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure [9.70 (5.80, 19.58) mmHg, 11.70 (5.40, 19.78) mmHg] was significantly higher compared to before [4.70 (3.25, 7.00) mmHg, Z=-2.84, P<0.001; Z=-3.10, P<0.001]. GERD-Q scores (10.00±2.01 points, 9.43±1.74 points) were significantly higher compared to before (15.34±1.51 points, t=8.90, P<0.001; t=9.87, P<0.001), GERD-HRQL scores [7.00 (5.00, 7.75) points, 6.00 (5.75, 8.25) points] significantly decreased compared to preoperative baseline [13.50 (11.00, 21.25), Z=-3.73, P<0.001; Z=-3.72, P<0.001], and GERI (2.26%±1.58%, 2.07%±1.17%) significantly decreased compared to before (5.72%±2.27%, t=8.92, P<0.001; t=9.86, P<0.001). At 6 and 12 months postoperative follow-up, patient satisfaction [68.00% (15/25), 84.00% (21/25)] significantly increased compared to before [0.00% (0/25), Z=-4.63, P<0.001; Z=-6.48, P<0.001]. Conclusion:Preliminary small-sample study has shown that EMBL is safe, reliable and effective for the treatment of RGERD with HH.

Objective:To study the safety and efficacy of hiatal hernia-endoscopic submucosal dissection (HH-ESD) for the treatment of giant hiatal hernia (>3 cm in length) complicated with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Methods:Patients with giant hiatal hernia complicated with refractory GERD who voluntarily received HH-ESD at the Digestive Endoscopy Center of the Affiliated People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University from April 2018 to March 2020 were included in the clinical study. The completion of HH-ESD and the occurrence of complications were observed, and the changes of indicators before and after the treatment were observed, including gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) score, endoscopy results, 24 h esophageal pH monitoring results, esophageal high-resolution manometry results and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage.Results:Data of 10 patients were collected during the study, with a medical history of 2-10 years. All patients successfully underwent HH-ESD treatment. No adverse events such as perforation and massive bleeding occurred during the operation, and the hospital stay was 6-12 days. Dysphagia occurred in 3 cases after the operation, which was relieved spontaneously within 3 or 6 months. The preoperative GERD-HRQL scores ranged from 19 to 29, which were reduced to 0-14 and 0-8 at 3 and 12 months after the operation, respectively. The preoperative GERD-Q score was 9-17, and the scores at 3 and 12 months after the operation were all 6-9, which were significantly lower than those before. Gastroscopy showed that esophagitis was improved in all patients, hernia sac was reduced, and Hill grade was reduced compared with that before. The preoperative DeMeester score was 30.3-247.1, and the postoperative 12-month score was 0.2-29.9, which was significantly lower than that before. The long diameter of hiatal hernia was 3.0-6.0 cm before the operation and 0-5.0 cm at 12 months after, which was smaller than that before. At 12 months of the follow-up, 7 patients had stopped PPI, and the remaining 3 had changed to intermittent oral PPI.Conclusion:Preliminary results show that HH-ESD is safe and effective for the treatment of giant hiatal hernia complicated with refractory GERD.

Objective To explore the work experience of specialty nurses for chronic wounds. Methods Five specialty nurses for chronic wounds were enrolled and given semi-structured in-depth interviews.The acquired data were analyzed with the 7-step analysis of Colaizzi. Result Three themes were extracted including responsibility and sense of mission, problems, gains and growth. Conclusions The responsibility is fundamental for the specialty nurses to hold their firm belief in their nursing career.They grow and achieve in their occupation by nursing the patients with chronic wounds.The nursing administration should understand the problems and help the work of chronic wounds specialists,take measures to clarify the responsibilities and roles of specialists in chronic wound nursing and provide necessary resource to support.