Background and Aims:Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery(OBCS)integrates oncologic and plastic surgical techniques and includes two primary approaches:volume displacement and volume replacement.The pedicled lateral thoracic artery perforator(LTAP)flap is a commonly used technique for volume replacement.Although recent studies in China have confirmed its safety in OBCS,its patient-reported outcomes have not been systematically evaluated,and comparative data with volume displacement techniques remain lacking.Therefore,this study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of LTAP flap versus mammoplasty(volume displacement)in OBCS,to inform surgical decision-making.Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted,including 106 patients with unilateral stage 0-Ⅲ breast cancer who underwent OBCS at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2023 to June 2024.Patients were divided into the LTAP flap group(27 cases)and the mammoplasty group(79 cases)based on the surgical technique.Intraoperative variables,cosmetic outcomes,postoperative complications,and Breast-Q scores before and after surgery were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinicopathological characteristics or preoperative Breast-Q scores(all P>0.05).The LTAP group had longer operative times,larger excised tissue volumes,and greater postoperative drainage volumes(all P<0.001).Postoperative cosmetic outcomes were significantly better in the LTAP group,with a higher rate of excellent-to-good cosmetic results(88.9%vs.57.3%)and higher Breast-Q scores in breast satisfaction,psychosocial well-being,and physical well-being(all P<0.05).There were no significant differences in complication rates or local recurrence between the two groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion:In OBCS,the LTAP flap demonstrates comparable safety to mammoplasty while achieving superior cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction.It is particularly suitable for patients with small breast volumes requiring large tissue excision and holds promise for broader clinical application.

Objective:To investigate the clinical application effects of the pedicled anterior intercostal artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.Methods:This study was a retrospective observational study. From January to December 2023, 16 female breast cancer patients who met the inclusion criteria were hospitalized in the Department of Breast Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, with the age of (48±8) years. The pedicled anterior intercostal artery perforator flap was used for breast reconstruction of patients after breast-conserving surgery. After complete resection of tumor tissue, a "crescent-shaped" incision was designed at the inframammary fold. The pedicled anterior intercostal artery perforator flap was harvested based on the tumor location and the defect area after tumor removal. The flap was de-epithelialized, coapted, and rotated anterogradely or retrogradely to fill the defect. The donor site wound was closed with layered sutures. The following parameters were recorded: breast tissue loss volume during surgery, surgical duration, retention duration of the drainage tube, positive proportion of tumors in the breast incision margin tissue, breast loss ratio, flap survival, and incidence ratio of complications after operation. Patients were followed up for local recurrence or distant metastasis of tumor. At the last follow-up, the Ueda score was used to evaluate cosmetic outcomes of reconstructed breasts after breast-conserving surgery, and the Breast-Q scale version 2.0 was applied to assess patients' satisfaction and quality of life with breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery.Results:The breast tissue loss volume during surgery in this group of patients was 20-128 (59±34) cm3, the surgical duration was 105-200 (143±27) min, the retention duration of the drainage tube was 3-7 (4.6±1.0) d, and the positive proportion of tumors in the breast incision margin tissue was 1/16, with breast loss ratio of 0. After the surgery, the patient's transplanted flaps all survived. One patient had postoperative fat liquefaction in the surgical area, and the incidence ratio of postoperative complications was 1/16. The patients were followed up for 3-12 (11±4) months, and no local breast cancer recurrence or distant metastasis occurred. At the last follow-up, the cosmetic score of breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery were excellent in 6 cases, good in 8 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good ratio of 14/16. At the last follow-up, the highest score in the evaluation of patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction and quality of life after breast-conserving surgery was the satisfaction with the surgeons, with a score of 59-100 (91±13), followed respectively by physiological health of the chest with a score of 60-100 (77±14), psychological health with a score of 35-100 (74±20), breast satisfaction with a score of 55-100 (73±13), satisfaction with information acquisition with a score of 53-100 (70±14), and sexual health with a score of 34-100 (70±23).Conclusions:The pedicled anterior intercostal artery perforator flap is safe and reliable for breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer, and can achieve high cosmetic effects and patient satisfaction. This flap is simple in design, easy to operate and highly reproducible, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Background and Aims:Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery(OBCS)integrates oncologic and plastic surgical techniques and includes two primary approaches:volume displacement and volume replacement.The pedicled lateral thoracic artery perforator(LTAP)flap is a commonly used technique for volume replacement.Although recent studies in China have confirmed its safety in OBCS,its patient-reported outcomes have not been systematically evaluated,and comparative data with volume displacement techniques remain lacking.Therefore,this study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of LTAP flap versus mammoplasty(volume displacement)in OBCS,to inform surgical decision-making.Methods:A retrospective case-control study was conducted,including 106 patients with unilateral stage 0-Ⅲ breast cancer who underwent OBCS at the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2023 to June 2024.Patients were divided into the LTAP flap group(27 cases)and the mammoplasty group(79 cases)based on the surgical technique.Intraoperative variables,cosmetic outcomes,postoperative complications,and Breast-Q scores before and after surgery were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinicopathological characteristics or preoperative Breast-Q scores(all P>0.05).The LTAP group had longer operative times,larger excised tissue volumes,and greater postoperative drainage volumes(all P<0.001).Postoperative cosmetic outcomes were significantly better in the LTAP group,with a higher rate of excellent-to-good cosmetic results(88.9%vs.57.3%)and higher Breast-Q scores in breast satisfaction,psychosocial well-being,and physical well-being(all P<0.05).There were no significant differences in complication rates or local recurrence between the two groups(all P>0.05).Conclusion:In OBCS,the LTAP flap demonstrates comparable safety to mammoplasty while achieving superior cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction.It is particularly suitable for patients with small breast volumes requiring large tissue excision and holds promise for broader clinical application.

Objective:To investigate the clinical application effects of the pedicled anterior intercostal artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.Methods:This study was a retrospective observational study. From January to December 2023, 16 female breast cancer patients who met the inclusion criteria were hospitalized in the Department of Breast Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, with the age of (48±8) years. The pedicled anterior intercostal artery perforator flap was used for breast reconstruction of patients after breast-conserving surgery. After complete resection of tumor tissue, a "crescent-shaped" incision was designed at the inframammary fold. The pedicled anterior intercostal artery perforator flap was harvested based on the tumor location and the defect area after tumor removal. The flap was de-epithelialized, coapted, and rotated anterogradely or retrogradely to fill the defect. The donor site wound was closed with layered sutures. The following parameters were recorded: breast tissue loss volume during surgery, surgical duration, retention duration of the drainage tube, positive proportion of tumors in the breast incision margin tissue, breast loss ratio, flap survival, and incidence ratio of complications after operation. Patients were followed up for local recurrence or distant metastasis of tumor. At the last follow-up, the Ueda score was used to evaluate cosmetic outcomes of reconstructed breasts after breast-conserving surgery, and the Breast-Q scale version 2.0 was applied to assess patients' satisfaction and quality of life with breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery.Results:The breast tissue loss volume during surgery in this group of patients was 20-128 (59±34) cm3, the surgical duration was 105-200 (143±27) min, the retention duration of the drainage tube was 3-7 (4.6±1.0) d, and the positive proportion of tumors in the breast incision margin tissue was 1/16, with breast loss ratio of 0. After the surgery, the patient's transplanted flaps all survived. One patient had postoperative fat liquefaction in the surgical area, and the incidence ratio of postoperative complications was 1/16. The patients were followed up for 3-12 (11±4) months, and no local breast cancer recurrence or distant metastasis occurred. At the last follow-up, the cosmetic score of breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery were excellent in 6 cases, good in 8 cases, and fair in 2 cases, with an excellent and good ratio of 14/16. At the last follow-up, the highest score in the evaluation of patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction and quality of life after breast-conserving surgery was the satisfaction with the surgeons, with a score of 59-100 (91±13), followed respectively by physiological health of the chest with a score of 60-100 (77±14), psychological health with a score of 35-100 (74±20), breast satisfaction with a score of 55-100 (73±13), satisfaction with information acquisition with a score of 53-100 (70±14), and sexual health with a score of 34-100 (70±23).Conclusions:The pedicled anterior intercostal artery perforator flap is safe and reliable for breast reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer, and can achieve high cosmetic effects and patient satisfaction. This flap is simple in design, easy to operate and highly reproducible, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.