Objective To explore the application and efficacy of glucocorticoids in severe non-antineoplastic drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Methods A retrospective study was conducted on patients with severe non-antineoplastic DILI who were hospitalized at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from November 2016 to October 2025. Clinical data, laboratory results, suspected causative drugs, glucocorticoid use, and prognosis were collected. The time for peak total bilirubin decreased by 50% was used as an efficacy indicator. Patients were divided into a glucocorticoid group and a non-glucocorticoid group based on glucocorticoid use. Results A total of 102 patients with severe DILI were included, and 58 (56.9%) received glucocorticoid therapy. The most common suspected causative drugs were traditional Chinese medicine (65.7%), and the primary type of liver injury was hepatocellular (72.5%). The proportion of female patients (P＝0.030), baseline peak total bilirubin (P＜0.001), and international normalized ratio (P＝0.034) were significantly higher in the glucocorticoid group than in the non-glucocorticoid group. The median time for peak total bilirubin decreased by 50% was 9.5 days in the glucocorticoid group and 11 days in the non-glucocorticoid group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. No significant benefit of glucocorticoid therapy was observed in subgroups with positive autoantibodies, elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG), or elevated γ-globulin ratio. Low-dose and gradual tapering were the main methods of glucocorticoid administration. Adverse reactions occurred in 8 patients (13.8%) in the glucocorticoid group, which resolved after drug withdrawal or symptomatic treatment. Conclusions The usage rate of glucocorticoids is relatively high in patients with severe non-antineoplastic DILI. Glucocorticoid treatment may accelerate the improvement of cholestasis in these patients, with mild adverse reactions and good safety.

Background::The complete mesogastrium excision (CME) based on D2 radical gastrectomy is believed to significantly reduce the local-regional recurrence compared with D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer, and it is widely used in China. This study aimed to explore whether D2 + CME is superior to D2 on surgical outcomes during gastrectomy from Chinese data.Methods::Feasible studies comparing the D2 + CME (D2 + CME group) and D2 (D2 group) published up to March 2020 are searched from electronic databases. The data showing surgical and complication outcomes are extracted to be pooled and analyzed.Results::Fourteen records including 1352 patients were included. The D2 + CME group had a shorter mean operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -16.72 min, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -26.56 to - 6.87 min, P < 0.001), lower mean blood loss (WMD = -39.08 mL, 95% CI: -49.94 to -28.21 mL, P < 0.001), higher mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (WMD = 2.13, 95% CI: 0.58-3.67, P = 0.007), shorter time to first flatus (WMD =-0.31 d, 95% CI: -0.53 to - 0.10 d, P = 0.005), and postoperative hospital days (WMD =-1.09, 95% CI: -1.92 to -0.25, P = 0.010) than the D2 group. Subgroup analysis suggested that the advantages from the D2 + CME group were obvious in traditional open radical gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and distal gastrectomy compared with D2 group. The evaluations of post-operative complications showed that the patients who underwent D2 + CME had a lower incidence of post-operative complications than the patients who underwent D2 surgery alone (relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.45-0.87, P = 0.003). The D2 radical gastrectomy plus CME improved 3-year overall survival (OS) (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02-1.32, P = 0.020) and lowered the local recurrence rate (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28-0.94, P = 0.030). The patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery or total gastrectomy had more significant advantages compared between D2 + CME and D2 groups in 3-year OS. Conclusion::The data from China show that D2 radical gastrectomy plus CME are reliable procedures and safety compared to D2 radical gastrectomy with faster recovery, lower risk, and better prognosis.