Background: Exemestane, an aromatase inhibitor commonly used for breast cancer treatment, shares structural similarities with sex steroids analyzed in clinical laboratories. We aimed to investigate the influence of exemestane cross-reactivity in the measurement of sex steroids across various immunoassays. Methods: We conducted a multicenter study involving measurements of androstenedione, testosterone, estradiol, progesterone, and 17-hydroxyprogesterone in serum samples from women undergoing exemestane therapy (N = 15; 25 mg/day). Measurements were performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and various commercially available chemiluminescence immunoassays, ELISA, and radioimmunoassay. In-vitro cross-reactivity was assessed by adding exemestane and 17-hydroexemestane to serum samples. Results: Patients undergoing exemestane therapy had markedly falsely elevated androstenedione results in all immunoassays evaluated (N = 4), which correlated with serum exemestane levels. In-vitro experiments confirmed this interference to be caused by cross-reactivity with exemestane. Additionally, one immunoassay yielded falsely elevated estradiol results in 20% of patients. However, in-vitro experiments did not confirm this to be caused by cross-reactivity with exemestane or 17-hydroexemestane. Conclusions Exemestane cross-reacts with androstenedione immunoassays, causing falsely elevated results in treated patients. This analytical interference may raise unnecessary concerns, leading to expensive diagnostic workups.

Determination of cortisol levels in the urine (24 hours urine free cortisol), saliva (late-night), or serum (total cortisol after dexamethasone suppression) is recommended to screen for Cushing's syndrome (CS). This review focuses on the differences between the frequently used cortisol-antibody immunoassay-based methods and the highly specific mass-spectrometry-based methods that are progressively being employed in clinical laboratories for CS screening. The particular characteristics of cortisol metabolism and the lack of specificity of the immunoassays cause marked differences between both methods that are in turn highly dependent on the biological matrix, in which the cortisol is measured. Understanding the origin of these differences is essential for the interpretation of these results. Although cross-reactivity with endogenous steroids leads to grossly inaccurate results of immunoassay measurements of cortisol in the saliva and urine, preliminary evidence suggests that the clinical sensitivity of CS screening using immunoassays may be similar to CS screening using mass spectrometry. However, mass spectrometry offers more accurate results and considerably reduced variation across laboratories, while avoiding false-positive results. Moreover, mass spectrometry can overcome some common diagnostic challenges, such as identification of exogenous corticosteroids or simultaneous assessment of appropriate dexamethasone levels in suppression tests. Further, comprehensive mass spectrometry-based profiling of several steroid metabolites may be useful for discriminating among different subtypes of CS. Finally, this review discusses the main preanalytical factors that could cause variations in cortisol measurements and their influence on the reliability of the results.