PURPOSE: We review the literature and describe our technique for laparoendoscopic single-site orchidopexy using a glove port and rigid instruments. We assessed the feasibility and outcomes of this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the case records of all children who had undergone laparoendoscopic single-site orchidopexy by use of a surgical glove port and conventional rigid instruments for a nonpalpable intraabdominal testis between January 2013 and September 2014. RESULTS: Data from a total of 20 patients were collected. The patients' mean age was 18 months. All cases had a nonpalpable unilateral undescended testis. Fourteen patients (70%) had an undescended testis on the right side and six patients (30%) had an undescended testis on the left side. Seventeen patients underwent primary orchidopexy. Three patients underwent single-port laparoscopic Fowler-Stephens orchidopexy for the first and the second stage. Average operating time was 57 minutes (range, 40 to 80 minutes). No patient was lost to follow-up. At follow-up, 2 testes were found to have retracted out of the scrotum and these were successfully dealt with in a second operation. One testis was hypoplastic in the scrotal pouch. There were no signs of umbilical hernia. CONCLUSIONS: Single-port laparoscopic orchidopexy using a glove port and rigid instruments is technically feasible and safe for various nonpalpable intraabdominal testes. However, surgical experience and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the superiority of this technique.
Cryptorchidism/pathology/*surgery ; Equipment Design ; Feasibility Studies ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gloves, Surgical ; Humans ; Infant ; Laparoscopy/instrumentation/methods ; Male ; Orchiopexy/*instrumentation/methods ; Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE: To assess the frequencies and sites of surgical glove perforations in lower extremity fracture surgery and hip joint replacement (HJR) surgery. Additionally, we also studied the usefulness of an indicator system glove. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed surgical glove perforations in 30 cases of lower extremity fracture surgery and 18 cases of HJR surgery conducted by one right handed 1st operator from April 2013 to July 2013. We assessed frequencies and sites of perforation in 152 gloves; 95 used in lower extremity fracture surgery and 57 used in HJR surgery. We studied the perforation rates and sites according to participants and operation types. Using the Biogel indicator system glove, which is well known as a fast indicator of glove perforation, we were also able to assess the time difference between operative participant detection of perforation and inspector nurse detection while observing in the operative field. RESULTS: There were 18 of 30 cases in lower extremity fracture surgeries and 12 of 18 cases in HJR surgeries which had more than one surgical glove perforation event. Of all 152 gloves used, perforation occurred in 15 of 57 gloves (26.3%) in HJR surgery and 23 of 95 gloves (24.2%) in lower extremity fracture surgery. Perforation occurred more frequently in operators than assistant doctors or scrub nurses. The most frequent perforation site was the second digit of the left hand. On average, the time difference between operative participant notice of perforation and inspector nurse notice of perforation was 20.6 seconds. CONCLUSION: The perforation of surgical gloves happened in approximately one out of every four persons. Importantly, we noted a 37.0% prevalence of glove perforation in 1st operators. Considering that glove perforation is a critical factor responsible for intra-operative infection, surgeons must be conscious of the risk of surgical glove perforation and use double gloving regularly. Furthermore, indicator double gloving is recommended for fast detection of outer glove perforation.
Gloves, Surgical* ; Hand ; Hip Joint* ; Humans ; Lower Extremity* ; Prevalence

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has gained increasing attention due to its potential to improve the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. However, inconvenience remains for inexperienced surgeons during surgery when instruments conflict with each other, and a glove port is used hesitantly for such diagnosis related groups (DRG) because of its high cost. Authors made a new glove port by an odd surgical gloves and one wound protectors. This glove port is ease to make besides being convenient to us, and inexpensive. This new glove port has the benefit of easy utilization and cost effectiveness for surgeons performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery.
Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Diagnosis-Related Groups ; Gloves, Surgical ; Laparoscopy ; Wounds and Injuries

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has become popular due to the advantage of minimizing surgical. We report on two cases of simultaneous appendectomy and cholecystectomy using a single-incision laparoscopic technique. The patients were 49- and 50-year old females diagnosed with acute appendicitis with concomitant cholelithiasis. Body mass indices of the patients were 22.3 and 26.0. A 3 cm abdominal incision was made via the umbilicus, and a single port platform was created using a small wound retractor (ALEXIS(R) wound retractor S, Applied Medical, Santa Margarita, CA, USA) and a surgical glove. Cholecystectomy was performed first, followed by the appendectomy. The operation times were 165 and 280 minutes, and blood loss was 50 and 150 cc, respectively. The postoperative hospital stays were five and seven days, and one patient had a wound seroma as a surgical complication. We believe that SILS for simultaneous appendectomy and cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe minimally invasive procedure.
Appendectomy* ; Appendicitis ; Cholecystectomy* ; Cholelithiasis ; Female ; Gloves, Surgical ; Humans ; Laparoscopy* ; Length of Stay ; Seroma ; Umbilicus ; Wounds and Injuries

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has become popular due to the advantage of minimizing surgical. We report on two cases of simultaneous appendectomy and cholecystectomy using a single-incision laparoscopic technique. The patients were 49- and 50-year old females diagnosed with acute appendicitis with concomitant cholelithiasis. Body mass indices of the patients were 22.3 and 26.0. A 3 cm abdominal incision was made via the umbilicus, and a single port platform was created using a small wound retractor (ALEXIS(R) wound retractor S, Applied Medical, Santa Margarita, CA, USA) and a surgical glove. Cholecystectomy was performed first, followed by the appendectomy. The operation times were 165 and 280 minutes, and blood loss was 50 and 150 cc, respectively. The postoperative hospital stays were five and seven days, and one patient had a wound seroma as a surgical complication. We believe that SILS for simultaneous appendectomy and cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe minimally invasive procedure.
Appendectomy* ; Appendicitis ; Cholecystectomy* ; Cholelithiasis ; Female ; Gloves, Surgical ; Humans ; Laparoscopy* ; Length of Stay ; Seroma ; Umbilicus ; Wounds and Injuries

PURPOSE: Single-site laparoscopic surgery has become increasingly common. We herein report an easy and low-cost thoracic trocar technique (TTT) for these types of procedures and recommend the simpler name "transumbilical scarless surgery" (TUSS) to minimize confusion in nomenclature. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent TUSS by TTT using a thoracic trocar and surgical glove in our hospital between November 2011 and November 2012. Operating time, postoperative stay, and complications were detailed. RESULTS: A total of 101 TUSS by TTT were successfully performed, comprising appendectomy (n = 63), ovarian cyst excision (n = 7), splenectomy (n = 5), nephroureterectomy (n = 5), orchidopexy (n = 4), pyeloplasty (n = 3), nephrolithotomy (n = 2), orchiectomy (n = 2), varicocelectomy (n = 2), lymphangioma excision (n = 2), ureterectomy (n = 1), Morgagni diaphragmatic hernia repair (n = 1), ovarian detorsion (n = 1), antegrade continence enema (n = 1), intestinal resection anastomosis (n = 1), and intestinal duplication excision (n = 1). Kirschner wires were used for some organ traction. Nine patients required an additional port, but no major complications occurred. The postoperative stay (mean +/- standard deviation) was 3.2 +/- 1.4 days, and operating time was 58.9 +/- 38.3 minutes. CONCLUSION: We recommend the simpler name of TUSS to minimize confusion in nomenclature for all transumbilical single-incision laparoendoscopic surgeries. TTT is an easy and low-cost TUSS technique.
Appendectomy ; Bone Wires ; Enema ; Female ; Gloves, Surgical ; Hernia, Diaphragmatic ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Lymphangioma ; Orchiectomy ; Orchiopexy ; Ovarian Cysts ; Retrospective Studies ; Splenectomy ; Surgical Instruments ; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive ; Traction

PURPOSE: Acute appendicitis is a type of abdominal disease that requires emergency surgery. Over the past three decades, laparoscopic appendectomy has become the standard operation for acute appendicitis. The aim of this paper is to compare the methods of single port appendectomy and conventional appendectomy and to illustrate the advantages of single port appendectomy. METHODS: The first group of patients underwent single port appendectomy using a surgical glove (Group 1), and those in the second group underwent surgery using the TriPort system (Group 2). The third group of patients underwent conventional three port surgery (Group 3). Questionnaires regarding patient satisfaction with scars were administered via telephone interview. Patient characteristics, histopathological data, postoperative data, and satisfaction score were analyzed by t-test and Pearson chi2 test. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in satisfaction scores was observed among the three groups. Overall, patients in the single port group using a surgical glove would be more likely to recommend the procedure to friends and family than would patients in the other two groups. Better cosmetic results were achieved for both groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic single port appendectomy, compared to those who underwent conventional three port laparoscopic appendectomy, with statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic single port appendectomy using a surgical glove is a feasible and safe procedure and shows no differences in terms of risk, such as postoperative complication, compared to a conventional three-trocar technique. Use of this method resulted in better satisfaction compared with the other two groups, illustrating its cosmetic improvement.
Appendectomy ; Appendicitis ; Cicatrix ; Cosmetics ; Emergencies ; Friends ; Gloves, Surgical ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postoperative Complications ; Surveys and Questionnaires

Vacuum-assisted wound healing has been proven to be more efficacious than conventional dressings. Vacuum dressing has been frequently modified given the restrictions in resources available. Here we present a modified method of vacuum dressing by using surgical or gynaecological gloves for lower and upper limb wounds. Vacuum dressing was applied with parts of a surgical or gynaecological glove and Opsite with T-tailing of the suction outlet. Vacuum-assisted wound healing using the surgical gloves showed relatively good wound healing in the amputation stump, finger, arm, and leg in the cases studied.
Amputation Stumps ; Arm ; Bandages ; Fingers ; Gloves, Surgical ; Leg ; Occlusive Dressings ; Polyurethanes ; Suction ; Upper Extremity ; Vacuum ; Wound Healing

PURPOSE: To study the feasibility and safety of the procedure, we present our early experience with laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyelolithotomy performed by use of a Carter-Thomason needle grasper. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients underwent LESS pyelolithotomy for the removal of renal pelvic stones. The patients' mean age was 57.8 years, and their mean body mass index was 23.01. We used a homemade single-port device made with a surgical glove that was inserted into a 2.5-cm periumbilical incision. The operation was performed transperitoneally by using a Carter-Thomason grasper. After removal of the stone, a double-J stent was placed in situ, and laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing was performed. No additional ports were used. RESULTS: All surgeries were completed successfully without conversion to conventional laparoscopy or open surgery. The mean operative time was 124.5 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 255.2 mL. There were no significant complications, except in one patient who required a blood transfusion. The mean duration of hospital stay was 8.3 days. The mean stone size was 3.9 cm. Chemical analysis of the stones showed that three patients had calcium-containing stones and one patient had a uric acid stone. Postoperative radiologic study showed a stone clearance rate of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, albeit limited, showed that LESS pyelolithotomy is a feasible and safe procedure. Especially with the use of a Carter-Thomason needle grasper, this operation can be performed without an additional port.
Blood Transfusion ; Body Mass Index ; Gloves, Surgical ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Needles ; Operative Time ; Stents ; Surgical Instruments ; Uric Acid ; Urinary Calculi

PURPOSE: A single surgeon skilled in conventional laparoscopic surgery used laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) to treat benign urological diseases. This study reports our surgical results and introduces a simple technique with tips based on our experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LESS surgery was performed on 116 patients by use of a homemade single-port device composed of an Alexis wound retractor and a powder-free surgical glove. Cases were 44 varicocelectomies (including 8 bilateral cases), 38 renal cyst marsupializations (including 3 bilateral cases), 26 ureterolithotomies (with 1 concomitant ureterolithotomy and contralateral renal cyst marsupialization), 4 prostatic enucleations, and 4 bladder rupture repairs. The mean patient age was 44.43+/-16.46 years (range, 11 to 76 years), and the male-to-female ratio was 87:29. RESULTS: In one ureterolithotomy case, LESS was converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery. The mean operative time was 87.03+/-45.03 minutes, the estimated blood loss was 61.90 ml (range, 0 to 2,000 ml), and the mean hospital stay was 3.03+/-2.12 days. Two patients underwent single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate (STEP) requiring patient-controlled anesthesia. No patients developed major complications, and all patients were satisfied, with 75.86% expressing a high degree of satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: We report successful treatment outcomes for LESS in 116 cases of benign urological disease. Our findings suggest that LESS can replace conventional laparoscopy.
Anesthesia ; Gloves, Surgical ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time ; Prostate ; Rupture ; Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive ; Urinary Bladder ; Urologic Diseases ; Urology