Immunoglobulin M (IgM) nephropathy (IgMN) is characterized by the IgM deposition in the kidney’s mesangium. We assessed the impact of electron-dense deposits (EDDs) on IgMN and compared it to other kidney diseases. Methods: We enrolled 63 adult patients with IgMN who underwent renal biopsy from May 2003 to June 2017. We compared clinicopathological features of IgMN based on EDD presence; compared characteristics to 91 minimal change disease (MCD), 103 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and 469 immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) patients. Renal events were defined as a >50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), eGFR of <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, or end-stage renal disease development. Results: IgMN patients with EDDs had increased mesangial cellularity, matrix accumulation, prominent immunofluorescent staining, and more diffuse podocyte effacement than those without EDD. Clinical characteristics and renal outcomes did not differ significantly based on EDD presence. During 79.5 ± 58.8 months of follow-up, renal events developed in 46.2% and 46.0% of IgMN cases with and without EDD. IgMN (46.0%) and FSGS cases (40.8%) had similar frequencies of renal events and higher frequency than MCD (18.7%) or IgAN cases (26.4%). IgMN cases had more severe manifestations than MCD and IgAN; higher blood pressure, lower proteinuria, and eGFR levels at biopsy than MCD cases; higher blood pressure, proteinuria, frequency of acute kidney injury, and lower eGFR levels. Conclusion: Clinical characteristics of IgMN did not differ based on EDD presence. Therefore, IgMN should be defined based on IF findings. IgMN shared clinical characteristics with FSGS but had more severe than MCD and IgAN.

Hypernatremia is an occasionally encountered electrolyte disorder, which may lead to fatal consequences under improper management. Hypernatremia is a disorder of the homeostatic status regarding body water and sodium contents. This imbalance is the basis for the diagnostic approach to hypernatremia. We summarize the eight diagnostic steps of the traditional approach and introduce new biomarkers: exclude pseudohypernatremia, confirm glucose-corrected sodium concentrations, determine the extracellular volume status, measure urine sodium levels, measure urine volume and osmolality, check ongoing urinary electrolyte free water clearance, determine arginine vasopressin/copeptin levels, and assess other electrolyte disorders. Moreover, we suggest six steps to manage hypernatremia by replacing water deficits, ongoing water losses, and insensible water losses: identify underlying causes, distinguish between acute and chronic hypernatremia, determine the amount and rate of water administration, select the type of replacement solution, adjust the treatment schedule, and consider additional therapy for diabetes insipidus. Physicians may apply some of these steps to all patients with hypernatremia, and can also adapt the regimens for specific causes or situations.

Prevention and diagnosis of postcontrast acute kidney injury (AKI) after contrast-enhanced computed tomography is burdensome in outpatient department. We investigated whether an electronic alert system could improve prevention and diagnosis of postcontrast AKI. Methods: In March 2018, we launched an electronic alert system that automatically identifies patients with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2, provides a prescription of fluid regimen, and recommends a follow-up for serum creatinine measurement. Participants prescribed contrast-enhanced computed tomography at outpatient department before and after the launch of the system were categorized as historical and alert group, respectively. Propensity for the surveillance of postcontrast AKI was compared using logistic regression. Risks of AKI, admission, mortality, and renal replacement therapy were analyzed. Results: The historical and alert groups included 289 and 309 participants, respectively. The alert group was more likely to be men and take diuretics. The most frequent volume of prophylactic fluid in historical and alert group was 1,000 and 750 mL, respectively. Follow-up for AKI was more common in the alert group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.00; p < 0.001). Among them, incidence of postcontrast AKI was not statistically different. The two groups did not differ in risks of admission, mortality, or renal replacement therapy. Conclusion: The electronic alert system could assist in the detection of high-risk patients, prevention with reduced fluid volume, and proper diagnosis of postcontrast AKI, while limiting the prescribing clinicians’ burden. Whether the system can improve long-term outcomes remains unclear.