1.Comparison of MRI-ultrasound fusion–guided and transrectal ultrasound–guided prostate biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men.
Patrick P. Blaza ; Jason L. Letran ; German Jose T. Albano ;
Philippine Journal of Urology 2020;30(1):27-36
OBJECTIVE:
Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPBx) is the recommended method for the histopathologic confirmation of prostate cancer. However, the overall cancer detection rate is low; hence, patients are potentially exposed to multiple biopsies and their attendant morbidity. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate followed by MRI-Ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy (FBx) is an emerging diagnostic pathway that has been established and recommended in men with a persistently elevated PSA despite a previous negative biopsy. However, evidence regarding its value in the biopsy-naïve setting is scarce. The objective is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI fusion-guided prostate biopsy against TRUSPBx in biopsy-naïve men.
METHODS:
This is a retrospective cohort study involving biopsy-naïve men with a PSA of 3 to 20 ng/ml. Primary outcomes of the study include overall cancer detection rate (CDR) and detection of clinically-significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Subgroup analyses were performed based on PSA level and prostate volume. Independent t-test, Mann Whitney U test and Chi square test were used in the statistical analysis.
RESULTS:
A total of 185 biopsy-naïve men with a PSA level of 3 – 20 ng/mL were included in the study. Median pre-biopsy PSA level was 7.07 ng/mL (5.06 – 11.0) and 9.02 ng/mL (5.8 – 13.8) in the FBx arm and TRUS-guided biopsy arm, respectively. Ninety-nine (n=99; 53%) underwent MP-MRI of the prostate followed by MRI fusion-guided prostate biopsy and eighty-six (n=86; 46%) underwent the standard TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Compared to TRUSPBx, FBx significantly detected more prostate cancer (CDR: 68% vs 30%, p<0.0001) and csPCa (46% vs 22%, p=0.001). The diagnostic yield of FBx was distinctly superior in the subgroup of men with a PSA of 4 – 10 ng/mL (CDR: 64% vs 7%, p<0.0001; csPCa: 43% vs 2%, p<0.0001) and a prostate volume of <40grams (CDR: 82% vs 36%, p<0.0001; csPCa: 53% vs 21%, p=0.006).
CONCLUSION
Compared to the current standard, the diagnostic yield of MRI fusion-guided prostate biopsy is significantly better in biopsy-naïve men. FBx detected more men with prostate cancer, with a higher proportion of men having clinically-significant disease. This advantage is strongly evident in men with a PSA level of 4 – 10 ng/mL and an average prostate volume of 40 grams. Hence, Multiparametric MRI of the prostate followed by MRI fusion-guided prostate biopsy is an effective first-line diagnostic modality for prostate cancer in men presenting with elevated PSA levels.
Male
;
Image-Guided Biopsy
;
Prostatic Neoplasms
2.Validation of the Filipino translation of the international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire for erectile dysfunction.
Dony P. SANTIAGO ; Rodrigo S. HIPOL III ; German Jose T. ALBANO
Philippine Journal of Urology 2009;19(2):33-37
This is a correlation validation study wherein the English version of the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) was adapted into Filipino. Many of the sex-related terms in the questionnaire do not have a direct translation in Filipino which made adaptation difficult. In the pretest, there was no difficulty with comprehension and readability of the Filipino version. Subjects judged it as equivalent to the English IIEF-5. There was a high positive correlation with the English version (r=0.93). After modification by a Review Panel, the final instrument underwent validation in a study which included 64 heterosexual, sexually active male aged 40 years old and above. The mean age of the subjects was 54.7. Content validity was determined by 2 urologists. The translated tool was found to be reliable (coefficient of stability=0.92) and could discriminate subjects with or without ED (validity coefficient=0.95). This study did not document treatment responsiveness and specificity. The questionnaire, however, can be used to screen patients with ED. Prevalence among the sample population was determined and found to be 45.3%.
Human ; Male ; Middle Aged (a Person 45-64 Years Of Age) ; Adult (a Person 19-44 Years Of Age) ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Philippines ; Male

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail