Background: and Purpose In patients with ischemic stroke and isolated cervical internal carotid artery occlusion (c-ICA-O), endovascular therapy (EVT) can improve cerebral perfusion. To maintain vessel patency, EVT is frequently combined with carotid artery stenting (CAS). We assessed the efficacy and safety of emergent CAS during EVT for isolated c-ICA-O. Methods: This retrospective multinational cohort study (42 centers) included consecutive patients who underwent EVT for isolated c-ICA-O within 24 hours from the time last seen well. Patients who underwent emergent CAS were compared with those who did not. Co-primary outcomes were c-ICA vessel patency and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) 24 hours post-EVT. Secondary outcomes included any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at 24 hours and disability at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] shift). Outcomes were adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: Of 317 patients (mean age, 68.6 years [standard deviation, 12.9]; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 11 [interquartile range, 6–17]; 26.8% female), 219 (69.1%) underwent CAS, whereas 98 (30.9%) did not. At 24 hours, vessel patency was more common after CAS (83.5% vs. 40.7%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 9.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.91–18.17); sICH rates did not differ (2.3% vs. 3.1%; aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.18–4.73). Any ICH was more common after CAS (19.3% vs. 9.3%; aOR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.12–5.60). CAS was not associated with mRS at 3 months (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.62–1.56). Conclusions In patients undergoing EVT for isolated c-ICA-O, emergent CAS was technically effective and reasonably safe. More frequent vessel patency in patients who underwent CAS did not translate into improved functional outcome at 3 months.

Background: and Purpose Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a lipoprotein structurally similar to low-density lipoprotein and is considered a genetically determined risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Although Lp(a) has been linked to ischemic stroke, its role in secondary stroke prevention, particularly in stroke recurrence, remains unclear. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and Scopus databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting Lp(a) levels in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence, and secondary outcomes included poor functional outcome, all-cause mortality, and recurrent vascular events. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 12 studies, including one RCT post hoc analysis and 11 observational studies, comprising 17,903 patients (mean age 63 years, 38% female), were included. Elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with increased stroke recurrence (OR: 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–2.63; P=0.020) and poor functional outcome (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.40–3.11; P<0.001). No significant associations were found between Lp(a) levels and all-cause mortality (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 0.89–5.43; P=0.088) or recurrent vascular events (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 0.95–7.44; P=0.063). Conclusion Elevated Lp(a) levels are linked to increased stroke recurrence and poor functional outcome in stroke patients. Lp(a) may represent a novel therapeutic target in secondary stroke prevention in addition to a promising biomarker.

Background: and Purpose Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a lipoprotein structurally similar to low-density lipoprotein and is considered a genetically determined risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Although Lp(a) has been linked to ischemic stroke, its role in secondary stroke prevention, particularly in stroke recurrence, remains unclear. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and Scopus databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting Lp(a) levels in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence, and secondary outcomes included poor functional outcome, all-cause mortality, and recurrent vascular events. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 12 studies, including one RCT post hoc analysis and 11 observational studies, comprising 17,903 patients (mean age 63 years, 38% female), were included. Elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with increased stroke recurrence (OR: 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–2.63; P=0.020) and poor functional outcome (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.40–3.11; P<0.001). No significant associations were found between Lp(a) levels and all-cause mortality (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 0.89–5.43; P=0.088) or recurrent vascular events (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 0.95–7.44; P=0.063). Conclusion Elevated Lp(a) levels are linked to increased stroke recurrence and poor functional outcome in stroke patients. Lp(a) may represent a novel therapeutic target in secondary stroke prevention in addition to a promising biomarker.

Background: and Purpose Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a lipoprotein structurally similar to low-density lipoprotein and is considered a genetically determined risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Although Lp(a) has been linked to ischemic stroke, its role in secondary stroke prevention, particularly in stroke recurrence, remains unclear. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and Scopus databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting Lp(a) levels in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The primary outcome was stroke recurrence, and secondary outcomes included poor functional outcome, all-cause mortality, and recurrent vascular events. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 12 studies, including one RCT post hoc analysis and 11 observational studies, comprising 17,903 patients (mean age 63 years, 38% female), were included. Elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with increased stroke recurrence (OR: 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09–2.63; P=0.020) and poor functional outcome (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.40–3.11; P<0.001). No significant associations were found between Lp(a) levels and all-cause mortality (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 0.89–5.43; P=0.088) or recurrent vascular events (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 0.95–7.44; P=0.063). Conclusion Elevated Lp(a) levels are linked to increased stroke recurrence and poor functional outcome in stroke patients. Lp(a) may represent a novel therapeutic target in secondary stroke prevention in addition to a promising biomarker.

Endovascular therapy (EVT) is strongly indicated for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior and posterior circulation according to international recommendations, but the benefit is unclear for AIS patients with distal vessel occlusions (DVO) since these patients were systematically excluded from the vast majority of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) establishing the safety and efficacy of EVT. Observational data from multiple registries appear promising but also highlight numerous challenges: identification of DVO is not straightforward and may necessitate advanced imaging, potential clinical benefits from the intervention are more limited than in LVOs since DVO patients present with milder deficits, recanalization of smaller caliber arteries is technically challenging and associated with greater risk for complications namely symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and vessel perforation. There are multiple ongoing RCTs evaluating the safety and efficacy of EVT in AIS patients with DVOs in Europe, North America and Australasia. In view of the former considerations the current narrative review aims to present the different approaches to define DVO, summarize the epidemiology and natural history of DVO under best medical treatment, outline the diagnostic utility of different imaging modalities and critically address the observational data on the benefits and risks of EVT for DVO, with a special focus in M2 middle cerebral artery occlusions. Finally, we will also discuss the design and methodology of ongoing RCTs that will provide definitive data on the safety and efficacy of EVT for AIS patients with DVO.

Background: and Purpose Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) presents with a challenging clinical phenotype, and siponimod has a potential to treat the active clinical phenotype of this disease. This single-center longitudinal study aimed to determine the therapeutic effects of siponimod in patients with active SPMS over 12 months. Methods: The clinical and radiological parameters of 50 patients with active SPMS treated using siponimod were assessed at baseline and after a 1-year follow-up period using the annual relapse rate (ARR), the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), the occurrence of gadolinium-enhanced lesion (GdE+), the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. The urine bladder postvoid residual (PVR) volume was also measured in a subcohort of 39 participants. Participants with an EDSS score ≥5.0 at baseline were finally assessed separately in prespecified subgroup analyses. Results: There were significant reductions in ARR (p<0.001), GdE+ (p<0.001), and MFIS score (p=0.001) during the follow-up period. The progression of physical and cognitive disabilities remained stable (p>0.05). The PVR-volume analysis revealed a significant decrease in urine bladder PVR volume (p<0.001). These observations were consistent for the subgroup with EDSS score ≥5.0. Conclusions Siponimod demonstrated efficacy in reducing ARR, GdE+, fatigue levels, and PVR volume, while maintaining stability in the cognitive and physical disability statuses of patients with SPMS. Similar findings were documented in the subgroup with EDSS score ≥5.0.