Objective:From the perspective of behavioral economics,it analyzes the reasons for the low utilization rate of palliative care and propose intervention measures,to promote the acceptance and application of palliative care by terminal cancer patients and their families.Methods:Using the theories and methods of behavioral economics to explore how cognitive and behavioral biases lead to irrational medical decisions in the choice of palliative care;based on the dual-process theory and nudge method,it aims to construct an intervention model for"palliative"care decision-making and propose intervention strategies.Results:Terminal cancer patients and their families with bounded rationality tend to prefer short-term aggressive treatment plans while making decisions,and use the extension of survival as the decision anchor point,weakening the influence of quality of life factors.The lack of sound mechanisms related to palliative care will further increase the cognitive bias of cancer patients and their families,putting them in a negative choice framework and risking losses,leading to the abandonment of more rational palliative care plans.Conclusion:By adopting the"perceptual-rational"thinking from the dual-process theory,transforming inter-temporal selection into the most cost-effective option,anchoring treatment expectations to patients'quality of life,increasing the value of palliative care benefits,and constructing a supportive selection framework as a target for intervention,it can help promote the use of palliative care.

The DRG payment has a significant impact on controlling the escalation of medical expenses and enhancing the quality and efficiency of healthcare.Ensuring the accuracy of diagnostic coding is the fundamental requirement for the DRG payment to be enforced.Based on the lens model,dual-system theory and prospect theory of behavioral economics,the cognition and motivation logic behind the coding of medical institutions under DRG are analyzed.It puts forward the corresponding suggestions,so as to provide a new theoretical perspective for improving the accuracy of DRG coding and advancing the implementation of the DRG payment reform.

In recent years,the physician-patient relationship has been tense,the physician-patient conflict has been escalating,and the number of irrational medical complaints has been constantly increasing,all of which have a negative impact on the public image of the hospital and the legal environment of medical treatment.From the perspective of behavioral economics,it analyzes the reasons for the occurrence of irrational medical complaints among outpatient patients by applying behavioral economics theories such as bounded rationality,social influence,herd effect,loss aversion,endowment effect,and mental accounting.It constructs a model of irrational complaint behaviors of outpatient patients based on behavioral economics theory,and tries to draw lessons from framing effect and nudge theory to propose countermeasures for hospitals to reduce irrational medical complaints and boost the complaint prevention management of medical institutions.

Objective:From the perspective of behavioral economics,it analyzes the reasons for the low utilization rate of palliative care and propose intervention measures,to promote the acceptance and application of palliative care by terminal cancer patients and their families.Methods:Using the theories and methods of behavioral economics to explore how cognitive and behavioral biases lead to irrational medical decisions in the choice of palliative care;based on the dual-process theory and nudge method,it aims to construct an intervention model for"palliative"care decision-making and propose intervention strategies.Results:Terminal cancer patients and their families with bounded rationality tend to prefer short-term aggressive treatment plans while making decisions,and use the extension of survival as the decision anchor point,weakening the influence of quality of life factors.The lack of sound mechanisms related to palliative care will further increase the cognitive bias of cancer patients and their families,putting them in a negative choice framework and risking losses,leading to the abandonment of more rational palliative care plans.Conclusion:By adopting the"perceptual-rational"thinking from the dual-process theory,transforming inter-temporal selection into the most cost-effective option,anchoring treatment expectations to patients'quality of life,increasing the value of palliative care benefits,and constructing a supportive selection framework as a target for intervention,it can help promote the use of palliative care.

The DRG payment has a significant impact on controlling the escalation of medical expenses and enhancing the quality and efficiency of healthcare.Ensuring the accuracy of diagnostic coding is the fundamental requirement for the DRG payment to be enforced.Based on the lens model,dual-system theory and prospect theory of behavioral economics,the cognition and motivation logic behind the coding of medical institutions under DRG are analyzed.It puts forward the corresponding suggestions,so as to provide a new theoretical perspective for improving the accuracy of DRG coding and advancing the implementation of the DRG payment reform.

In recent years,the physician-patient relationship has been tense,the physician-patient conflict has been escalating,and the number of irrational medical complaints has been constantly increasing,all of which have a negative impact on the public image of the hospital and the legal environment of medical treatment.From the perspective of behavioral economics,it analyzes the reasons for the occurrence of irrational medical complaints among outpatient patients by applying behavioral economics theories such as bounded rationality,social influence,herd effect,loss aversion,endowment effect,and mental accounting.It constructs a model of irrational complaint behaviors of outpatient patients based on behavioral economics theory,and tries to draw lessons from framing effect and nudge theory to propose countermeasures for hospitals to reduce irrational medical complaints and boost the complaint prevention management of medical institutions.

Objective:From the perspective of behavioral economics,it analyzes the reasons for the low utilization rate of palliative care and propose intervention measures,to promote the acceptance and application of palliative care by terminal cancer patients and their families.Methods:Using the theories and methods of behavioral economics to explore how cognitive and behavioral biases lead to irrational medical decisions in the choice of palliative care;based on the dual-process theory and nudge method,it aims to construct an intervention model for"palliative"care decision-making and propose intervention strategies.Results:Terminal cancer patients and their families with bounded rationality tend to prefer short-term aggressive treatment plans while making decisions,and use the extension of survival as the decision anchor point,weakening the influence of quality of life factors.The lack of sound mechanisms related to palliative care will further increase the cognitive bias of cancer patients and their families,putting them in a negative choice framework and risking losses,leading to the abandonment of more rational palliative care plans.Conclusion:By adopting the"perceptual-rational"thinking from the dual-process theory,transforming inter-temporal selection into the most cost-effective option,anchoring treatment expectations to patients'quality of life,increasing the value of palliative care benefits,and constructing a supportive selection framework as a target for intervention,it can help promote the use of palliative care.

The DRG payment has a significant impact on controlling the escalation of medical expenses and enhancing the quality and efficiency of healthcare.Ensuring the accuracy of diagnostic coding is the fundamental requirement for the DRG payment to be enforced.Based on the lens model,dual-system theory and prospect theory of behavioral economics,the cognition and motivation logic behind the coding of medical institutions under DRG are analyzed.It puts forward the corresponding suggestions,so as to provide a new theoretical perspective for improving the accuracy of DRG coding and advancing the implementation of the DRG payment reform.

In recent years,the physician-patient relationship has been tense,the physician-patient conflict has been escalating,and the number of irrational medical complaints has been constantly increasing,all of which have a negative impact on the public image of the hospital and the legal environment of medical treatment.From the perspective of behavioral economics,it analyzes the reasons for the occurrence of irrational medical complaints among outpatient patients by applying behavioral economics theories such as bounded rationality,social influence,herd effect,loss aversion,endowment effect,and mental accounting.It constructs a model of irrational complaint behaviors of outpatient patients based on behavioral economics theory,and tries to draw lessons from framing effect and nudge theory to propose countermeasures for hospitals to reduce irrational medical complaints and boost the complaint prevention management of medical institutions.

Objective:From the perspective of behavioral economics,it analyzes the reasons for the low utilization rate of palliative care and propose intervention measures,to promote the acceptance and application of palliative care by terminal cancer patients and their families.Methods:Using the theories and methods of behavioral economics to explore how cognitive and behavioral biases lead to irrational medical decisions in the choice of palliative care;based on the dual-process theory and nudge method,it aims to construct an intervention model for"palliative"care decision-making and propose intervention strategies.Results:Terminal cancer patients and their families with bounded rationality tend to prefer short-term aggressive treatment plans while making decisions,and use the extension of survival as the decision anchor point,weakening the influence of quality of life factors.The lack of sound mechanisms related to palliative care will further increase the cognitive bias of cancer patients and their families,putting them in a negative choice framework and risking losses,leading to the abandonment of more rational palliative care plans.Conclusion:By adopting the"perceptual-rational"thinking from the dual-process theory,transforming inter-temporal selection into the most cost-effective option,anchoring treatment expectations to patients'quality of life,increasing the value of palliative care benefits,and constructing a supportive selection framework as a target for intervention,it can help promote the use of palliative care.