Branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a form of ischemic stroke that presents with imaging findings similar to those of lacunar infarction, but has a different pathogenesis and is known to cause progressive paralysis. Due to regional variations, the epidemiology of BAD is not well understood, and its relationship with the functional prognosis remains unclear. Using a comprehensive Japanese stroke database, we investigated its epidemiological characteristics and associations with functional outcomes. Methods In this multicenter cohort study, we retrospectively analyzed data from 27 hospitals that contributed to the Saiseikai Stroke Database (2013–2021). We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of BAD compared with lacunar infarction (LI) for functional outcomes at discharge. Ischemic stroke caused by BAD or LI was included, and demographic characteristics and clinical data were evaluated and contrasted between BAD and LI. Results Of the 5,966 analyzed patients, 1,549 (25.9%) had BAD and 4,434 (74.1%) had LI. BAD was associated with worse functional outcomes (aOR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.42–3.17; relative to LI) and extended hospital stays (median 19 days for BAD vs. 13 days for LI). Moreover, aggressive treatment strategies, including the use of argatroban and dual antiplatelet therapy, were more common in BAD patients. Conclusion BAD presented worse functional outcomes and longer hospital stays than LI, necessitating treatment plans that take into account its progression and prognosis.

Branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a form of ischemic stroke that presents with imaging findings similar to those of lacunar infarction, but has a different pathogenesis and is known to cause progressive paralysis. Due to regional variations, the epidemiology of BAD is not well understood, and its relationship with the functional prognosis remains unclear. Using a comprehensive Japanese stroke database, we investigated its epidemiological characteristics and associations with functional outcomes. Methods In this multicenter cohort study, we retrospectively analyzed data from 27 hospitals that contributed to the Saiseikai Stroke Database (2013–2021). We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of BAD compared with lacunar infarction (LI) for functional outcomes at discharge. Ischemic stroke caused by BAD or LI was included, and demographic characteristics and clinical data were evaluated and contrasted between BAD and LI. Results Of the 5,966 analyzed patients, 1,549 (25.9%) had BAD and 4,434 (74.1%) had LI. BAD was associated with worse functional outcomes (aOR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.42–3.17; relative to LI) and extended hospital stays (median 19 days for BAD vs. 13 days for LI). Moreover, aggressive treatment strategies, including the use of argatroban and dual antiplatelet therapy, were more common in BAD patients. Conclusion BAD presented worse functional outcomes and longer hospital stays than LI, necessitating treatment plans that take into account its progression and prognosis.

Branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a form of ischemic stroke that presents with imaging findings similar to those of lacunar infarction, but has a different pathogenesis and is known to cause progressive paralysis. Due to regional variations, the epidemiology of BAD is not well understood, and its relationship with the functional prognosis remains unclear. Using a comprehensive Japanese stroke database, we investigated its epidemiological characteristics and associations with functional outcomes. Methods In this multicenter cohort study, we retrospectively analyzed data from 27 hospitals that contributed to the Saiseikai Stroke Database (2013–2021). We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of BAD compared with lacunar infarction (LI) for functional outcomes at discharge. Ischemic stroke caused by BAD or LI was included, and demographic characteristics and clinical data were evaluated and contrasted between BAD and LI. Results Of the 5,966 analyzed patients, 1,549 (25.9%) had BAD and 4,434 (74.1%) had LI. BAD was associated with worse functional outcomes (aOR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.42–3.17; relative to LI) and extended hospital stays (median 19 days for BAD vs. 13 days for LI). Moreover, aggressive treatment strategies, including the use of argatroban and dual antiplatelet therapy, were more common in BAD patients. Conclusion BAD presented worse functional outcomes and longer hospital stays than LI, necessitating treatment plans that take into account its progression and prognosis.