Objective:To explore the early- to mid-term therapeutic efficacy of using porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves to reconstruct severe bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of the clinical data of the 39 patients (40 knees) who had undergone rTKA by porous-coated metaphyseal sleeve reconstruction at Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between May 2017 and September 2023. The cohort included 6 males (6 knees) and 33 females (34 knees), with an age of (67.0±9.7) years. The revision was to cure periprosthetic infection after TKA in 12 knees, to correct prosthesis loosening in 19 knees, to treat periprosthetic fracture in 4 knees, to stabilize postoperative joint instability in 4 knees, and to manage postoperative joint stiffness in 1 knee. All patients underwent standard revision procedures, including removal of the original prosthesis, management of bone defects, implantation of revision prosthesis, and adjustment of ligamentous balance and fixation. The patients' surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of complications, as well as visual analogue scale (VAS), knee range of motion, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee joint scores at the last follow-up were recorded.Results:The surgical time was (2.7±0.8) hours, and intraoperative blood loss (337.5±165.4) mL for this cohort. All the 39 patients were followed up for (4.8±2.1) years after surgery. At the last follow-up, their VAS pain score was 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) points, their knee range of motion reached 116.3°±12.2°, and their total score, pain score, and function score of the HSS system were respectively 87.0 (82.8, 89.3) points, 25.0 (22.8, 29.0) points, and 61.0 (60.0, 62.0) points, all showing statistically significant improvements compared with their preoperative values [(6.8±1.7) points, 70.4°±15.2°, (43.1±9.6) points, (9.3±3.1) points, and (33.8±10.1) points] ( P<0.05). In all patients, incisions healed at one stage after surgery, and no complications such as deep vein thrombosis or neurovascular injury occurred. Complications included popliteal artery thrombosis in 1 patient (1 knee) immediately after surgery, acute infection in 1 patient (1 knee) at 3 years after surgery, and periprosthetic fracture due to a traffic accident in 1 patient (1 knee) at 4 years after surgery, and distal prosthesis-related pain in 3 patients (3 knees). Conclusion:Use of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves in rTKA to reconstruct severe bone defects exhibits favorable early- to mid-term therapeutic outcomes.

Objective:To explore the early- to mid-term therapeutic efficacy of using porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves to reconstruct severe bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA).Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted of the clinical data of the 39 patients (40 knees) who had undergone rTKA by porous-coated metaphyseal sleeve reconstruction at Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between May 2017 and September 2023. The cohort included 6 males (6 knees) and 33 females (34 knees), with an age of (67.0±9.7) years. The revision was to cure periprosthetic infection after TKA in 12 knees, to correct prosthesis loosening in 19 knees, to treat periprosthetic fracture in 4 knees, to stabilize postoperative joint instability in 4 knees, and to manage postoperative joint stiffness in 1 knee. All patients underwent standard revision procedures, including removal of the original prosthesis, management of bone defects, implantation of revision prosthesis, and adjustment of ligamentous balance and fixation. The patients' surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of complications, as well as visual analogue scale (VAS), knee range of motion, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee joint scores at the last follow-up were recorded.Results:The surgical time was (2.7±0.8) hours, and intraoperative blood loss (337.5±165.4) mL for this cohort. All the 39 patients were followed up for (4.8±2.1) years after surgery. At the last follow-up, their VAS pain score was 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) points, their knee range of motion reached 116.3°±12.2°, and their total score, pain score, and function score of the HSS system were respectively 87.0 (82.8, 89.3) points, 25.0 (22.8, 29.0) points, and 61.0 (60.0, 62.0) points, all showing statistically significant improvements compared with their preoperative values [(6.8±1.7) points, 70.4°±15.2°, (43.1±9.6) points, (9.3±3.1) points, and (33.8±10.1) points] ( P<0.05). In all patients, incisions healed at one stage after surgery, and no complications such as deep vein thrombosis or neurovascular injury occurred. Complications included popliteal artery thrombosis in 1 patient (1 knee) immediately after surgery, acute infection in 1 patient (1 knee) at 3 years after surgery, and periprosthetic fracture due to a traffic accident in 1 patient (1 knee) at 4 years after surgery, and distal prosthesis-related pain in 3 patients (3 knees). Conclusion:Use of porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves in rTKA to reconstruct severe bone defects exhibits favorable early- to mid-term therapeutic outcomes.

With enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), research and application of knee revision protheses and customized components or prostheses in the past decade, revision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is developing rapidly. However, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has always been a major clinical challenge. A comprehensive preoperative examination to find any potential infection sites should be conducted. The overall condition of the patients should be improved. Surgeons should evaluate the classification and degree of soft tissue and bone defects comprehensively and carefully select appropriate surgical approaches, bone reconstruction strategies, and revision prostheses to ultimately restore the alignment, stability, and the range of motion of the knee joint. In the future, efforts should be made to build a team of experts for the support of revisions of TKAs, including preoperative planning, 3D printing, surgical techniques, and ERAS. Nevertheless, primary TKAs protocols should always be firmly sticked to, which are a key to a low rate of revision surgeries. Prevention of PJIs and periprosthetic fractures, as well as establishing a high-quality follow-up system are of the same importance.

Objective:To analyze the clinical efficacy of internal fixation and prosthesis revision in the treatment of periprosthesis fracture after total knee arthroplasty.Methods:A total of 35 patients (35 knees) with periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty were retrospectively analyzed from January 2008 to January 2022 in the Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, including 13 males and 22 females, aged 71.4±4.1 years (range, 62-81 years). Left knee 19 cases, right knee 16 cases. There were 20 cases of Rorabeck type II and 15 cases of Rorabeck type III. The initial replacement was performed using a fixed platform post-stabilized knee prosthesis, which was fixed with bone cement. Patients with Rorabeck type II were treated with internal fixation alone (internal fixation group) and patients with Rorabeck type III underwent revision with replacement prosthesis (revision group). The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, range of motion (ROM) of knee joint, alignment of lower extremity and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients successfully completed the operation and were followed up for 5.2±3.6 years (range, 1-12 years). Intraoperative blood loss was 680±102 ml (range, 420-1100 ml). The operative time in the internal fixation group was 105±17 min, which was less than 140±21 min in the revision group, and the difference was statistically significant ( t=-5.450, P<0.001). There was no complication of nerve or blood vessel injury during the operation. Five cases in the internal fixation group had unsatisfactory lower extremity force lines (>3° deviation from normal) after surgery, and all lower extremity force lines in the revision group were satisfied, and the difference in the satisfaction rate of lower extremity force lines between the two groups was not statistically significant ( P=0.057). The fracture healing time, knee ROM and HSS scores at the last follow-up were 5.1±1.3 months, 86°±5° and 84±5 in the internal fixation group and 4.8±1.5 months, 83°±6° and 82±4 in the revision group. One case in the revision group was diagnosed postoperatively with periprosthetic infection with pathogen culture suggestive of Candida albicans, recurrent anterior knee sinus tracts and patellar ectasia, which progressed to osteomyelitis, and mid-thigh amputation was performed 1 year after revision. Conclusion:The stability of prosthesis is an important reference for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty. Strong internal fixation in patients with unloosened prosthesis and revision with replacement of prosthesis in patients with loose prosthesis can achieve good knee joint function.

Humans ; Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ; Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Postoperative Hemorrhage

Humans ; Tranexamic Acid ; Atrial Fibrillation ; Antifibrinolytic Agents ; Arthroplasty ; Blood Loss, Surgical ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Objective: To investigate the influence of displacement of femoral and tibial components on the biomechanics of femoral or tibial bone in coronal view. Methods: A series of CT and MRI of the left knee joint of a Han male volunteer was taken and a three-dimensional finite element model of the healthy knee joint was established. The femoral component and the tibial component were designed with varus 6°, varus 3°, 0°, valgus 3°, and valgus 6°, and were combined into 25 three-dimensional finite element model (FEM) of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A 1 000 N load was applied along the femoral mechanical axis. The von Mises cloud stress distribution was observed. Moreover, the lateral compartment load ratio, the high contact stress of cancellous bone and medial cortical bone below the tibial component, the upper surface of the polyethylene liner, and the femoral cartilage in the lateral compartment was measured. The statistically significant indicators compared with the neutral position (0° varus or valgus of the tibia and the femoral prosthesis, and 5° posterior slope of tibia prosthesis) were identified by scatter plots to find the dense and sparse areas of point items. The optimal position of the femoral component and the tibial component was determined by the number of items with statistical significance in the sparse area. Results: When the femoral component was placed at 0° position, there was no significant difference in the high contact stress of cancellous bone below the tibial component in the five groups. When the femoral component was placed at 0° position, the tibial component was 6° varus or 6° valgus and the stress was increased by 9.21±3.38 MPa and 9.08±4.13 MPa (P<0.05), respectively. With the changes of femoral and tibial components from 6° varus to 6° valgus, the high contact stress of the medial cortical bone below the tibia was gradually decreased (P<0.05). When the femoral component was placed at 0°, the tibial component changes from 6° varus to 6° valgus without significant difference in the high contact stress on the upper surface of each group of polyethylene gasket. Compared with the neutral position group, the high contact stress of the 6° varus or 6° valgus group were increased by 2.88±2.53 MPa and 3.47±2.86 MPa, respective ly (P<0.05). The lateral compartment load ratio and the high contact stress of lateral compartment femoral cartilage was gradually decreased (P<0.05), when the femoral and tibial components changed from 6° varus to 6° valgus. The number (2.8%, 1/36) of indicators in the sparse area (the combination of all combinations of femur or tibia from 3° varus to 3° valgus) was less than that (57.8%, 37/64) in the dense area (set of all combinations except sparse area), and the difference was significant (χ²=29.61, P<0.001). Conclusion It is suggested that the position of the femoral component and the tibial component in fixed medial unicompartmental arthroplasty should not exceed 3° varus or valgus in patients with standard lower limb alignment.

Revision total hip arthroplasty is becoming more common due to an increasing number of primary total hip arthroplasty procedures being performed annually. Chronic pelvic discontinuity is an important and difficult complication after primary total hip arthroplasty. It is estimated that chronic pelvic discontinuity account for 1%-5% of all acetabular revisions. Pelvic discontinuity occurs mostly in female patients or patients with a history of prior pelvic radiation or rheumatoid arthritis. There are three following crucial factors in regards to achieving satisfied outcomes in treating pelvic discontinuity, the amount of bone stock remaining, biologic in-growth potential and the healing potential of the discontinuity. Treatment approaches include cage reconstruction with bulk acetabular allograft, custom triflange acetabular component, a cup-cage construct, jumbo acetabular cup with porous metal augments, and acetabular distraction with a porous tantalum shell with or without modular porous augments. The present course reported the classification, evaluation, reconstruction options and outcomes of chronic pelvic discontinuity.

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) is one of severe complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). As the number of patients receiving THA increased recently, the incidence of PFFs also increased dramatically. There are a number of risk factors for PFFs, such as age, sex, falling and prosthesis loosening. The Vancouver classification system is the most commonly used classification method for PFFs. According to the fracture location, PFFs can be divided into type A intertrochanteric fracture, type B fracture around the stem and type C fracture beyond the stem. The Vancouver type B PFF is further subdivided into type B1 with a well-fixed prosthesis, type B2 with a loose prosthesis but with adequate bone stock, and type B3 with a loose prosthesis and poor proximal bone stock simultaneously. Currently, there are some controversies in treating PFFs, mainly including whether the stem is fixed or not, whether the prosthesis needs to be revised, the selection of the stem, the reconstruction of bone defects, and the methods of fracture fixation. We searched literatures related to PFFs after THA. The incidence, risk factors, classification methods, treatment principles and strategies of PFFs were summarized in the present study. Based on our long-term clinical experience, we evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment method and provided considerations for the clinical research and selection in treating PFFs.

OBJECTIVETo observe the effect of electromyography (EMG) guided point injection at Renying (ST 9) for post-stroke dysphagia caused by bulbar paralysis, and explore effective treatments for improving swallowing function on the basis of conventional medicine and rehabilitation training.

METHODSA total of 60 patients were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 30 cases in each one. The conventional drugs combined with rehabilitation training were given in the control group, the treatment was given once every day. Based on the treatment in the control group, the EMG guided point injection at Renying (ST 9) was added in the observation group, three times a week. All the treatment was given for 2 weeks. drinking test score and Toshima Ichiro swallow test score were observed before and after treatment in the two groups, and the effects were assessed.

RESULTSToshima Ichiro swallow test score increased after treatment in both groups compared with that before treatment, and drinking test score decreased compared with that before treatment (all <0.05), and the change rate in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group (both <0.05). The total effective rate of swallowing efficacy in the observation group was 93.3% (28/30), and the cured rate was 46.7% (14/30), which were better than 26.7% (8/30) and 3.3% (1/30) in the control group (both <0.05).

CONCLUSIONOn the basis of conventional drugs and rehabilitation training, the EMG guided point injection at Renying (ST 9) can effectively increase the swallowing function of patients with post-stroke dysphagia caused by bulbar paralysis .