Spine fracture and dislocation are common traumatic spinal conditions that often require surgical intervention due to compromised spinal stability. Surgical approaches include anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior spinal procedures. According to the specific surgical requirements, patients may be placed in the prone position or repositioned between prone and supine positions during surgery. Intraoperative repositioning has become an essential step in patient positioning. However, during repositioning, patients with spinal fracture and dislocation are at increased risk for complications such as hemodynamic instability, nerve injury, and pressure injuries to the skin and soft tissue. Notably, due to the instability of the spinal cord, even minor manipulations can further exacerbate the damage, potentially leading to severe outcomes like paraplegia. Although the current clinical guidelines provide instructive recommendations for standard position, there remains no specific protocols for intraoperative repositioning in patients with spine fracture and dislocation. With a concern for the lack of clinical studies on positioning techniques, risk prevention, and operational norms for special patients, no applicable guidelines or standards are available. A consensus was required to provide clinical reference, meet the requirements of surgical treatment, and minimize the safety risks of patients caused by improper placement of positions. Professional Committee of Operating Room Nursing of Shaanxi Nursing Association organized experts in nursing management and operating room nursing from major hospitals across China to formulate Expert consensus on intraoperative repositioning for patients with spinal fracture and dislocation ( version 2025). The consensus provides 11 recommendations covering pre-repositioning preparation, intraoperative maneuvers, and post-repositioning observation, aiming to provide references for clinical standardization of the intraoperative repositioning process and protection of patients′ safety.

Objective To explore the application value of serum Syndecan-1 and endocan-1 combined with rapid sequential organ failure(qSOFA)score in the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis.Methods The severity of 118 patients with sepsis was divided into the general sepsis group(48 cases),the severe sepsis group(42 cases)and the septic shock group(28 cases).According to the prognosis,patients were divided into the death group(n=32)and the survival group(n=86).A total of 118 healthy volunteers were selected as the control group.Serum Syndecan-1 and endocan-1 levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA).The value of serum Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA scores in the early diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve,and the area under the curve(AUC)was compared.Results Compared with the control group,levels of Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA scores were increased in the study group(P＜0.05).The serum Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA score in the general sepsis group,the severe sepsis group and the septic shock group were significantly increased in sequence(P＜0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of serum Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA score in the diagnosis of sepsis(0.967)were higher than that of Syndecan-1(AUC=0.868),endocan-1(AUC=0.798)and qSOFA score(AUC=0.873)alone(Z=6.541,5.495 and 6.395,P＜0.001).Compared with the survival group,the levels of Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA scores were significantly increased in the death group(P＜0.05).The combined prediction of AUC(0.983)was higher than that of Syndecan-1(AUC=0.814),endocan-1(AUC=0.834)and qSOFA score(AUC=0.924)alone(Z=6.596,9.268 and 6.904,P＜0.001).Conclusion Serum levels of Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA are increased in patients with sepsis,and the combination of the three has higher clinical value in the diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of sepsis.

Objective To explore the application value of serum Syndecan-1 and endocan-1 combined with rapid sequential organ failure(qSOFA)score in the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis.Methods The severity of 118 patients with sepsis was divided into the general sepsis group(48 cases),the severe sepsis group(42 cases)and the septic shock group(28 cases).According to the prognosis,patients were divided into the death group(n=32)and the survival group(n=86).A total of 118 healthy volunteers were selected as the control group.Serum Syndecan-1 and endocan-1 levels were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA).The value of serum Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA scores in the early diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve,and the area under the curve(AUC)was compared.Results Compared with the control group,levels of Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA scores were increased in the study group(P＜0.05).The serum Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA score in the general sepsis group,the severe sepsis group and the septic shock group were significantly increased in sequence(P＜0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of serum Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA score in the diagnosis of sepsis(0.967)were higher than that of Syndecan-1(AUC=0.868),endocan-1(AUC=0.798)and qSOFA score(AUC=0.873)alone(Z=6.541,5.495 and 6.395,P＜0.001).Compared with the survival group,the levels of Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA scores were significantly increased in the death group(P＜0.05).The combined prediction of AUC(0.983)was higher than that of Syndecan-1(AUC=0.814),endocan-1(AUC=0.834)and qSOFA score(AUC=0.924)alone(Z=6.596,9.268 and 6.904,P＜0.001).Conclusion Serum levels of Syndecan-1,endocan-1 and qSOFA are increased in patients with sepsis,and the combination of the three has higher clinical value in the diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of sepsis.

Spine fracture and dislocation are common traumatic spinal conditions that often require surgical intervention due to compromised spinal stability. Surgical approaches include anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior spinal procedures. According to the specific surgical requirements, patients may be placed in the prone position or repositioned between prone and supine positions during surgery. Intraoperative repositioning has become an essential step in patient positioning. However, during repositioning, patients with spinal fracture and dislocation are at increased risk for complications such as hemodynamic instability, nerve injury, and pressure injuries to the skin and soft tissue. Notably, due to the instability of the spinal cord, even minor manipulations can further exacerbate the damage, potentially leading to severe outcomes like paraplegia. Although the current clinical guidelines provide instructive recommendations for standard position, there remains no specific protocols for intraoperative repositioning in patients with spine fracture and dislocation. With a concern for the lack of clinical studies on positioning techniques, risk prevention, and operational norms for special patients, no applicable guidelines or standards are available. A consensus was required to provide clinical reference, meet the requirements of surgical treatment, and minimize the safety risks of patients caused by improper placement of positions. Professional Committee of Operating Room Nursing of Shaanxi Nursing Association organized experts in nursing management and operating room nursing from major hospitals across China to formulate Expert consensus on intraoperative repositioning for patients with spinal fracture and dislocation ( version 2025). The consensus provides 11 recommendations covering pre-repositioning preparation, intraoperative maneuvers, and post-repositioning observation, aiming to provide references for clinical standardization of the intraoperative repositioning process and protection of patients′ safety.

OBJECTIVE To explore the effect of Huangqin decoction on improving peritubular fat inflammatory microenvironment and protecting vascular endothelial function in obese hypertensive rats by regulating the NEK7-NLRP3/IL-1β inflammatory axis.METHODS Fifty 4-week-old male Wistar rats were selected,10 of which were randomly selected as the control group,and the oth-er 40 were fed a high-salt and high-fat diet to establish an obese hypertension model.The rats with successful modeling(20 rats)were randomly divided into the model group,normal-dose Huangqin decoction group,high-dose Huangqin decoction group,and IL-1β in-hibitor group,with 5 rats in each group.From the 12th week,the normal-dose group was gavaged with Huangqin decoction 2.835 g·kg-1,the high-dose group was gavaged with Huangqin decoction 5.67 g·kg-1,and the IL-1β inhibitor group was intraper-itoneally injected with 1.5 mg·kg-1 AS101,3 times a week,for 8 weeks.The rats were weighed and blood was collected 12 h after the last administration,and the thoracic aorta and perivascular fat tissue were isolated.Serum inflammatory factors were detected,patho-logical changes were observed,eNOS expression was detected by immunofluorescence,and NEK7,NLRP3,Caspase-1,ASC,and IL-1β expression levels were detected by Western blot and qPCR.RESULTS The rats in the model group had a significant increase in body weight,an increase in the area of peritubular fat lipid droplets,and severe endothelial injury;systolic blood pressure,diastolic blood pressure,serum IL-1β,IL-6,and TNF-α were significantly elevated in the model group,and the expression of eNOS was sig-nificantly reduced,and the expression levels of NEK7,NLRP3,Caspase-1,ASC,and IL-1β proteins and mRNAs were significantly elevated.Compared with the model group,rats in the Huangqin decoction and IL-1β inhibitor groups had lower body weights,reduced endothelial damage,lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures,lower serum IL-1β,IL-6,and TNF-α,and higher eNOS expression.NEK7,NLRP3,Caspase-1,ASC and IL-1β protein expression was significantly reduced in the high dose group of Huan-gqin decoction and the IL-1β inhibitor group.In addition,Huangqin decoction protected the endothelial function of obese hypertensive vessels in a dose-dependent manner,with the effect being more pronounced in the high-dose group.CONCLUSION Huangqin de-coction can improve the inflammatory microenvironment of perivascular fat and protect the vascular endothelial function in obese hyper-tension by regulating the NEK7-NLRP3/IL-1β inflammatory axis.

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of bundle treatment on patients with moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Methods A multicenter prospective observational study comparing the result of historical treatment strategy and bundle treatment was conducted. According to the new Berlin standard of definition, 73 patients with moderate or severe ARDS due to pulmonary factors, age from 18 to 65 years, admitted to Department of Critical Care Medicine of Taian Central Hospital and Handan Central Hospital were enrolled. Thirty-three patients admitted during September 2012 to May 2014 (prospective observation period) were enrolled as the bundle treatment group. Forty patients with matched disease history admitted from January 2010 to August 2012 were enrolled as the control group. The patients in bundle treatment group received bundle treatment based on the treatment strategy of primary diseases. Bundle treatment included restrictive fluid management, respiratory support, high-dose ambroxol combined with Xuebijing injection, prevention of ventilation associated pneumonia (VAP), individualized sedation plan, installation of continuous blood purification treatment for critical patients. A special team was organized to ensure the successful implementation of all bundle measures. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) score, oxygenation index, duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, incidence of VAP, and 28-day mortality 5 days after treatment were compared between two groups.Results There were no significant differences in basic characteristics of patients between the two groups, including gender, age, etiology, severity, etc. (allP> 0.05) with comparability. Compared with the control group, there was no significant difference in APACHEⅡ score 5 days after treatment in bundle treatment group (15.1±2.8 vs. 16.2±3.0,t = 1.618,P = 0.110). Compared with control group, oxygenation index in bundle treatment group was significantly improved [mmHg (1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 135.4±34.5 vs. 117.1±34.2,t = -2.273,P = 0.026), the duration of mechanical ventilation was obviously reduced (days: 8.70±2.50 vs. 10.10±2.67,t = 2.308,P = 0.024), incidence of VAP was significantly lower [18.2% (6/33) vs. 32.5% (13/40),χ2 = 5.027,P = 0.025], and 28-day mortality rate was obviously lowered [24.2% (8/33) vs. 37.5% (15/40),χ2 = 4.372,P = 0.037], the length of ICU stay shown no statistical difference (days:10.40±1.94 vs. 11.30±2.34,t = 1.620,P = 0.110).Conclusion Implementation of bundle treatment can significantly shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation, reduce the incidence of VAP, and improve the prognosis of patients.