1.Evaluation of the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with type Ⅱ respiratory failure
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine in Intensive and Critical Care 2023;30(5):547-550
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy(HFNC)and non-invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with typeⅡrespiratory failure during acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD).Methods A total of 84 patients with AECOPD combined with typeⅡrespiratory failure admitted to the department of internal medicine of Beijing Sijiqing Hospital from September 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the study objects.The patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 42 cases in each group.Both groups were given conventional treatment,the observation group was given HFNC,and the control group was given non-invasive mechanical ventilation.The difference of clinical efficacy between the two groups was compared,and the changes of heart rate(HR),respiratory rate(RR),arterial blood gas analysis index,lung function before and 7 days after treatment,complications and tracheal intubation rate,mortality were observed in the two groups.Results The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group[88.10%(37/42)vs.69.05%(29/42),P<0.05].Before treatment,HR,RR,arterial blood gas analysis indexes[arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2),arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide(PaCO2),arterial oxygen saturation(SaO2),pH value],pulmonary function indexes[forced expiratory volume in one second(FEV1),forced vital capacity(FVC),FEV1/FVC]of the two groups were no statistically significant.After treatment,HR,RR and PaCO2 were significantly lower than before treatment,while PaO2,SaO2,pH,FEV1,FVC and FEV1/FVC were significantly higher than before treatment.After treatment,HR,RR and PaCO2 in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group[HR(bpm):90.14±5.66 vs.93.57±4.77,RR(times/min):21.90±4.88 vs.22.45±4.31,PaCO2(mmHg,1 mmHg≈0.133 kPa):60.02±5.93 vs.62.83±6.29],PaO2,SaO2,pH,FEV1,FVC,FEV1/FVC were significantly higher than the control group[PaO2(mmHg):80.70±7.81 vs.76.21±8.23,SaO2:0.94±0.04 vs.0.92±0.04,pH value:7.36±0.05 vs.7.32±0.06,FEV1(L):1.73±0.41 vs.1.53±0.35,FVC(L):2.80±0.48 vs.2.57±0.43,FEV1/FVC:(61.98±5.67)%vs.(59.14±5.34)%,all P<0.05].The incidence of complications such as of dry throat[4.8%(2/42)vs.19.0%(8/42)],facial compression injury[0%(0/42)vs.14.3%(6/42)],abdominal distension[9.5%(4/42)vs.26.2%(11/42)]in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the rate of tracheal intubation and mortality between the observation group and the control group[11.90%(5/42)vs.26.19%(11/42)and 4.76%(2/42)vs.7.14%(3/42),both P>0.05].Conclusion HFNC is effective in treating AECOPD patients with typeⅡrespiratory failure,with fewer complications and high safety.
2.Comparison between HyperArc and conventional VMAT approach for brain metastases
Bo YANG ; Lang YU ; Zhiqun WANG ; Bei WANG ; Wenbo LI ; Jie ZHANG ; Xingliu WANG ; Hao ZHU ; Xiaoshen WANG ; Maoying LAN ; Feng ZHU ; Zhen ZHANG ; Ke HU ; Fuquan ZHANG ; Jie QIU
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2021;30(9):876-881
Objective:To compare the dosimetric parameters and plan complexity between newly-delicated HyperArc (HA) and conventional volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in the treatment of brain metastases.Methods:For 26 patients with brain metastases, HA, conventional coplanar (Cop) and non-coplanar (Non-cop) VMAT plans with a prescription dose of 9 Gy 3fx or 6 Gy 5fx were generated. The dosimetric parameters for planning target volume (PTV), RTOG conformity index (RTOG CI), Paddick CI, homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), maximum dose (D max) of brainstem and dose-volume parameters of brain-PTV(V 2Gy-V 26Gy) were statisticaly compared among these three approaches. In addition, the monitor unit (MU) and the plan complexity parameters (including MCSv and AlPO) were statistically compared. Results:To prevent missed targets during treatment, all plans were established with RTOG CI of greater than 1.1. For Paddick CI, HA provided significantly higher conformity (0.89±0.019) than Non-cop (0.87±0.036, P=0.001) and Cop (0.88±0.017, P=0.003) VMAT. For GI, the fastest dose fall-off was noted in HA (3.35±0.64), followed by conventional Non-cop VMAT of (3.70±0.80), and conventional Cop VMAT of (4.90±1.85)(all P<0.05). For the brainstem sparing, HA plan performed better than Non-cop plan[(604.14±531.61) cGy vs.(682.75±558.22) cGy, P<0.05)]. For normal brain tissue sparing, HA approach showed significant reduction than conventional Cop and Non-cop VMAT (both P<0.05). For MU, HA approach (2 872.60 ± 566.93) was significantly lower than those of Non-cop VMAT (3 771.28 ± 1 022.38, P<0.05) and Cop VMAT (4 494.08 ± 1 323.09, P<0.05). In terms of plan complexity, the MCSv of Cop plan was the lowest, indicating that the complexity was the highest ( P<0.05). The AlPO of HA was significantly higher than that of Non-cop VMAT ( P<0.05), suggesting that the complexity of HA plan was lower ( P<0.05). Conclusion:For the treatment of brain metastases, HA provides better conformity, more rapid dose fall-off, better sparing of brainstem and normal brain tissues and less plan complexity compared with conventional VMAT.
3.Implementation and assessment of software based on ESAPI compilation structure
Zhiqun WANG ; Bo YANG ; Jie ZHANG ; Lang YU ; Bei WANG ; Wenbo LI ; Gao ZHU ; Xiaoshen WANG ; Maoying LAN ; Xingliu WANG ; Zongkai ZHOU ; Weihua ZHU ; Zhen ZHANG ; Ke HU ; Fuquan ZHANG ; Jie QIU
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2021;30(11):1173-1177
Objective:To help clinicians simplify the post-processing operations of structures by developing rapid processing software for target area and organs at risk structures based on ESAPI.Methods:SmartStructure script software was developed based on ESAPI, verified and evaluated in clinical work. 10 cases of rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy, 10 breast cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy, 10 cervical cancer receiving postoperative radiotherapy, 10 nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving radical radiotherapy and 10 lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) were selected, and different types of tumors had different post-processing operations of structures. In each case, three methods were used for post-processing of structures. In the control group (manual group), normal manual processing was employed. In the experimental group 1(SmaStru-N group), scripts without templates were utilized. In the experimental group 2(SmaStru-P group). scripts combined with templates were adopted. The processing time of the three methods was compared. Clinicians scored the scripting software from multiple aspects and compared the feeling scores of scripting software and manual operation.Results:All three methods can be normally applied in clinical settings. The error rate in the manual group was 7.0%, 3.0% in the SmaStru-N group 0% in the SmaStru-P group, respectively. Compared with the manual method, SmaStru-N shortened the processing time of target area and organs at risk by 60.9% and 93.3% for SmaStru-P. In addition, SmartStructure was superior to manual method in terms of using feeling scores. Clinicians gave lower score for the" applicability" and" simplicity" , and higher score on the" accuracy" and" efficiency" .Conclusions:Compared with conventional manual structure processing method, SmartStructure software can rapidly and accurately process all structures of the target area and organs at risk, and its advantages become more obvious with the increasing number of structures that need to be processed. SmartStructure software can meet clinical requirements, reduce the error rate, elevate processing speed, improve the working efficiency of clinicians, providing basis for the development of adaptive radiotherapy.
4.Prognostic value of anemia in patients with extranodal nasal-type NK/T cell lymphoma:A multi-center study from CLROG
Hui FANG ; Suyu ZHU ; Liming XU ; Peiguo WANG ; Tao WU ; Liting QIAN ; Fuquan ZHANG ; Xiaorong HOU ; Shunan QI ; Yong YANG ; Jing JIN ; Yujing ZHANG ; Yuan ZHU ; Jianzhong CAO ; Shengmin LAN ; Junxin WU ; Yexiong LI
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2018;27(2):155-160
Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of anemia in patients diagnosed with extranodal nasal-type natural killer (NK)/T cell lymphoma (NKTCL).Methods Clinical data of 1 225 NKTCL patients receiving the first course of treatment from 10 medical institutions in China were retrospectively analyzed.According to the diagnostic criteria in China,anemia was defined as the hemoglobin (Hb) level< 120 g/L for the male and< 110 g/L for the female from the sea-level area.The severity of anemia was classified into the extremely severe anemia (Hb ≤ 30 g/L),severe anemia (31-60 g/L),moderate anemia (61-90 g/L) and mild anemia (>90 g/L).Results Among 1 225 patients,199(16.2%) were complicated with anemia,who had more adverse prognostic factors compared with their counterparts without anemia.Among NKTCL patients with anemia,the proportion of patients with stage Ⅱ-ⅣV,a median age> anemia,Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 2-4 and NK/T-cell lymphoma prognostic index (NKTCLPI) ≥ 2 was relatively high.Patients with anemia obtained worse clinical prognosis than those without anemia.The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NKTCL patients with anemia were calculated as 49.4% and 35.4%,significantly lower compared with 63.3% and 56.0% in their counterparts without anemia (both P<0.01).Single factor analysis demonstrated that anemia,age,ECOG score,group B symptom,lactate dehydrogenase,primary tumor site,primary tumor invasion and staging were the prognostic factors of OS and PFS.Multivariate analysis revealed that anemia was still the independent prognostic factor.Conclusions Anemia is not common in patients with NKTCL and these patients obtain poor clinical prognosis.Anemia is an independent prognostic factor for patients with NKTCL.
5.Prognostic role of primary tumor burden in extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma
Shunan QI ; Liming XU ; Zhiyong YUAN ; Jianzhong CAO ; Shengmin LAN ; Junxin WU ; Tao WU ; Suyu ZHU ; Liting QIAN ; Xiaorong HOU ; Fuquan ZHANG ; Yujing ZHANG ; Yuan ZHU ; Yong YANG ; Yexiong LI
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2017;26(5):532-537
Objective There is still a lack of effective clinical prognostic factors for predicting outcomes and guiding treatments in extranodal nasal-type NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL).This study was aimed to investigate the clinical features and prognostic role of primary tumor burden (PTB).Methods A total of 1383 patients were recruited from ten hospitals, including 947 stage Ⅰ patients (68.5%), 326 stage Ⅱ patients (23.6%), and 110 stage Ⅲ-IV patients (8.0%).There were 751 patients (54.3%) presenting with high PTB (H-PTB).The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates, and the log-rank test was conducted for survival difference analysis.Meanwhile, a multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression model.Results H-PTB was associated with high invasive potential, high frequency of B symptoms, advanced stage, regional lymph node involvement, lactate dehydrogenase elevation, and poor performance status.The patients with H-PTB had significantly lower 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates than those with low PTB (L-PTB)(OS:50.2% vs.72.1%, P=0.000;PFS:41.8% vs.62.5, P=0.000).PTB was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR=1.851) and PFS (HR=1.755) according to the Cox multivariate analysis.Moreover, H-PTB was associated with significantly lower locoregional control (LRC) in early-stage NKTCL, and the 5-year LRC rate was 71.6% in patients with H-PTB and 84.3% in those with L-PTB (P=0.000).Conclusions H-PTB is associated with multiple adverse clinical features in NKTCL, and it is an independent indicator for poor outcomes and LRC.H-PTB can be used as a reliable indicator for risk stratification and treatment decision.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail