Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 153 single-level OLIF cases between January 2016 and December 2023. Postoperative computed tomography was used to classify patients into central fusion, lateral fusion, and non-fusion groups. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic parameters—including osteophyte grade, Hounsfield unit (HU) values, and cage positioning—were analyzed to identify factors affecting fusion. Cage subsidence and clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Visual Analog Scale) were compared across groups. Results: Lateral fusion occurred in 39.9% of cases, central in 56.9%, and non-fusion in 3.2%. Preoperative osteophytes and higher HU values were associated with lateral fusion (p<0.001). OLIF with standalone cages (OLIF-SA) had a significantly higher lateral fusion rate than OLIF with posterior screw fixation (OLIF-PS) (p=0.002). Smoking was a significant risk factor for non-fusion (p=0.005). No significant difference in cage subsidence was observed between central and lateral fusion, but non-fusion showed more severe subsidence. Clinical outcomes improved across fusion groups, though non-fusion cases had worse ODI scores at follow-up. Conclusions Lateral fusion is a distinct OLIF feature influenced by osteophytes, bone density, and fixation type. It does not negatively affect cage subsidence or outcomes, but solid fusion remains essential for recovery. These findings enhance understanding of OLIF fusion and may guide surgical planning.

Objective:To evaluate the characteristic manifestations of lumbar fusion following oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), determine the specific incidence of these patterns, and the identify factors associated with fusion characteristics.Methods:This retrospective study analyzed 209 patients who underwent OLIF surgery at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between July 2017 and September 2023. The cohort had a mean age of 64.2±9.8 years and included 125 males and 84 females. A total of 338 lumbar segments were assessed, comprising 159 segments treated with stand-alone OLIF (OLIF-SA) and 179 segments treated with OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PSF). Inclusion criteria were: patients aged 18-80 years who underwent OLIF with complete radiographic records. Surgical parameters, including fixation method, number of fused segments, surgical approach, and cage dimensions (height and width), were obtained from operative records. Radiographic evaluation included preoperative osteophytes, Hounsfield unit (HU) values of endplates, and cage positioning. Fusion rate, fusion pattern (lateral vs. central), cage subsidence, and related influencing factors were assessed. Clinical outcomes were measured via the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 1-year follow-up. Results:The overall fusion rate was 98.2% (332/338), with a non-union rate of 1.8% (6/338). The incidence of lateral fusion was 40.2% (136/338). In the OLIF-SA group, lateral and central fusion rates were 50.3% (80/159) and 49.7% (79/159), respectively, with no cases of non-union. In the OLIF-PSF group, lateral fusion occurred in 31.3% (56/179), central fusion in 65.4% (117/179), and non-union in 3.3% (6/179), with statistically significant differences between groups ( P<0.05). Preoperative osteophytes and higher endplate HU values were significantly associated with lateral fusion ( P<0.05). However, cage dimensions and cage position (anterior-posterior and lateral placement) were not significantly associated with fusion pattern ( P>0.05). Overall, 61.5% (208/338) of segments showed no cage subsidence; 24.5% (83/338) had settling, and 14.0% (47/338) had grade 1 or higher subsidence. Among lateral fusion cases, the rates of no subsidence, anchoring, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 subsidence were 67.6%, 21.3%, 7.4%, 3.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. In the central fusion group, these rates were 59.2%, 27.6%, 9.2%, 2.5%, and 1.3%, respectively. In the non-union group, grade 2 and 3 subsidence occurred in 50% (3/6) each, significantly higher than in the other fusion groups ( P<0.05). Post hoc analysis confirmed that grade 2 and 3 subsidence rates were significantly elevated in the non-union group compared to the lateral and central fusion groups, while other subsidence categories showed no significant differences across groups. Clinically, patients showed significant improvements in ODI and VAS scores following surgery ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Lateral fusion occurred in 40.2% of OLIF cases. The OLIF-SA technique, preoperative osteophytes, and elevated preoperative HU values were significantly associated with lateral fusion. In contrast, surgical approach, number of fused segments, cage height, width, and cage positioning did not significantly influence the occurrence of lateral fusion.

Objective:To evaluate the characteristic manifestations of lumbar fusion following oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), determine the specific incidence of these patterns, and the identify factors associated with fusion characteristics.Methods:This retrospective study analyzed 209 patients who underwent OLIF surgery at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between July 2017 and September 2023. The cohort had a mean age of 64.2±9.8 years and included 125 males and 84 females. A total of 338 lumbar segments were assessed, comprising 159 segments treated with stand-alone OLIF (OLIF-SA) and 179 segments treated with OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PSF). Inclusion criteria were: patients aged 18-80 years who underwent OLIF with complete radiographic records. Surgical parameters, including fixation method, number of fused segments, surgical approach, and cage dimensions (height and width), were obtained from operative records. Radiographic evaluation included preoperative osteophytes, Hounsfield unit (HU) values of endplates, and cage positioning. Fusion rate, fusion pattern (lateral vs. central), cage subsidence, and related influencing factors were assessed. Clinical outcomes were measured via the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 1-year follow-up. Results:The overall fusion rate was 98.2% (332/338), with a non-union rate of 1.8% (6/338). The incidence of lateral fusion was 40.2% (136/338). In the OLIF-SA group, lateral and central fusion rates were 50.3% (80/159) and 49.7% (79/159), respectively, with no cases of non-union. In the OLIF-PSF group, lateral fusion occurred in 31.3% (56/179), central fusion in 65.4% (117/179), and non-union in 3.3% (6/179), with statistically significant differences between groups ( P<0.05). Preoperative osteophytes and higher endplate HU values were significantly associated with lateral fusion ( P<0.05). However, cage dimensions and cage position (anterior-posterior and lateral placement) were not significantly associated with fusion pattern ( P>0.05). Overall, 61.5% (208/338) of segments showed no cage subsidence; 24.5% (83/338) had settling, and 14.0% (47/338) had grade 1 or higher subsidence. Among lateral fusion cases, the rates of no subsidence, anchoring, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 subsidence were 67.6%, 21.3%, 7.4%, 3.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. In the central fusion group, these rates were 59.2%, 27.6%, 9.2%, 2.5%, and 1.3%, respectively. In the non-union group, grade 2 and 3 subsidence occurred in 50% (3/6) each, significantly higher than in the other fusion groups ( P<0.05). Post hoc analysis confirmed that grade 2 and 3 subsidence rates were significantly elevated in the non-union group compared to the lateral and central fusion groups, while other subsidence categories showed no significant differences across groups. Clinically, patients showed significant improvements in ODI and VAS scores following surgery ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Lateral fusion occurred in 40.2% of OLIF cases. The OLIF-SA technique, preoperative osteophytes, and elevated preoperative HU values were significantly associated with lateral fusion. In contrast, surgical approach, number of fused segments, cage height, width, and cage positioning did not significantly influence the occurrence of lateral fusion.

This study was designed to study the effect and mechanism of dehydroepiandrosterone(DHEA)on diabetic wound healing in mice.High-fat feed combined with streptozotocin was utilized to induce diabetes and full-thickness incisional wounds were made on the back.The mice were randomly divided into normal wound group(NW),diabetic wound group(DW)and DHEA intervention group(DHEA).The wounds were photographed and the wound healing rates were calculated;RT-PCR was used to detect the expression of inflammatory factors in wound tissues and wound macrophages,and the expression of Dicer1 and pentose phosphate pathway(PPP)related factors in wound macrophages.Furthermore,wound macrophages phagocytosis of apoptotic Jurkat cells were measured by flow cytometry.Data showed that the wound healing rate,the expression of inflammatory factors and the phagocytosis rate were similar between the DHEA group and the NW group(P＞0.05);compared with the DW group,the wound healing rate in the DHEA group was accelerated,the expression of TNF-α,IL-6 and IL-1β were decreased,the expression of IL-10 and TGF-β were increased,and the phagocytosis rate was increased(P＜0.01);the expression of Dicer1 in wound macrophages of the DW group was lower than that in the NW group,and the expression of PPP-related factors G6pdx,Taldo1,Pfkl,H6pd,Pgd,Aldoc1 and Tkt were increased(P＜0.01);the expression of Dicer1 between DW group and DHEA group was similar(P＞0.05),and the expression of PPP-related factors G6pdx,Taldo1,Pfkl,H6pd,Pgd,Aldoc1 and Tkt were lower in the DHEA group(P＜0.01).In conclusion,DHEA promotes diabetic wound healing by inhibiting macrophage pentose phosphate pathway activity.

This study was designed to study the effect and mechanism of dehydroepiandrosterone(DHEA)on diabetic wound healing in mice.High-fat feed combined with streptozotocin was utilized to induce diabetes and full-thickness incisional wounds were made on the back.The mice were randomly divided into normal wound group(NW),diabetic wound group(DW)and DHEA intervention group(DHEA).The wounds were photographed and the wound healing rates were calculated;RT-PCR was used to detect the expression of inflammatory factors in wound tissues and wound macrophages,and the expression of Dicer1 and pentose phosphate pathway(PPP)related factors in wound macrophages.Furthermore,wound macrophages phagocytosis of apoptotic Jurkat cells were measured by flow cytometry.Data showed that the wound healing rate,the expression of inflammatory factors and the phagocytosis rate were similar between the DHEA group and the NW group(P＞0.05);compared with the DW group,the wound healing rate in the DHEA group was accelerated,the expression of TNF-α,IL-6 and IL-1β were decreased,the expression of IL-10 and TGF-β were increased,and the phagocytosis rate was increased(P＜0.01);the expression of Dicer1 in wound macrophages of the DW group was lower than that in the NW group,and the expression of PPP-related factors G6pdx,Taldo1,Pfkl,H6pd,Pgd,Aldoc1 and Tkt were increased(P＜0.01);the expression of Dicer1 between DW group and DHEA group was similar(P＞0.05),and the expression of PPP-related factors G6pdx,Taldo1,Pfkl,H6pd,Pgd,Aldoc1 and Tkt were lower in the DHEA group(P＜0.01).In conclusion,DHEA promotes diabetic wound healing by inhibiting macrophage pentose phosphate pathway activity.

Type A (AOSpine type) thoracolumbar fractures are the most common. There has long been controversy over their treatment, especially for type A3N0/1, those without neurological injury. Although the fixation with pedicle screws via the anterior and posterior approaches has been widely carried out in clinical practice, such problems as unsatisfactory reduction, kyphosis recurrence and postoperative disc degeneration have not been resolved. In recent years, various attempts have been made to improve the prognosis of type A3 thoracolumbar fractures. This paper reviews the progress in researches on treatment of type A3N0/1 thoracolumbar fractures.

Objective To evaluate the clinical manifestations, endoscopic features and the clinical pathological characteristics of H. heilmannii-associated gastritis, and to compare these variables with those of H. pylori-ussociated gastritis. Methods The clinical data, endoscopic findings and pathologic characteristics of 3107 patients, who underwent endoscopy from 2005 to 2007, were retrospectively analyzed. Results Twenty-five cases of H. heilmannii infection were identified, the infection rates of H. heilmannii and H. pylori were 0.80% (25/3107) and 4.12% (1060/3107) respectively. Three cases were mixed infections. Of 25 patients, 20 showed such gastroenterologic symptoms to a greater or less extent as abdominal distending pain,nausea and anorexia, and other 5 cases were asymptomatic. All 25 patients showed chronic gastritis by en-doscopy, including chronic superficial gastritis (7/25, 28% ), erosion ( 3/25, 12% ), chronic atrophic gastritis (4/25, 16%), bile reflux(1/25, 4%), ulcer (1/25, 4%), polyp (1/25, 4%) and duodenal bulbar inflammation (2/25, 8% ). In rapid urease test, 3 cases were hyper-positive, 3 cases positive, 7 ca-ses mild-positive and 12 cases negative. According to histological observation, H. heilmannii scattered or ac-cumulated within the gastric pits, glandular lumen or mucus. The organism was observed in parietal cells with cell damage in one case. Sporadic lymphatic and plasmic infiltration were found in all patients with H.heilmannii infection, infiltration of neutrophils (12/25), gland atrophy and intestinal metaplasia (4/25)and lymphoid follicles (6/25) were also observed. Compared with H. pylori-associated gastritis, H. heilman-nii-associated gastritis showed less inflammation, less helicobacter density, mononuclear cell infiltration and neutrophilic activity ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion H. heilmanaii mainly induces chronic gastritis, which is less severe than H. pylori-associated gastritis.