Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

Background: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are used to reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). However, many patients opt for device removal after SCS implantation due to diminished effect or complications. There is limited research on the actual duration of SCS use in CRPS patients, and no nationwide population-based studies exist. This study aimed to estimate the real-world duration of SCS use in CRPS patients and examine the influencing factors on the duration of SCS use by analyzing the National Healthcare Insurance Database. Methods: Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with CRPS who underwent permanent SCS implantation between 2014 and2021 were included. The authors analyzed the median duration of SCS implantation and evaluated the impacts of age, sex, hospital type, and insurance type. Results: Of 408 potential patients, 373 patients were included. The median duration of SCS use was 4.4 (95%confidence interval [CI]: 4.0–4.8) years. Male patients retained SCSs longer than female patients (4.7 vs. 4.0 years, P = 0.014), and veterans’ healthcare beneficiaries showed the longest duration of SCS use (median 6.9 [95% CI: 4.6–7.8] years). Age and hospital type did not affect the duration of SCS use (P = 0.381 and P = 0.122, respectively). Conclusions The median SCS use duration in CRPS patients was 4.4 years. Considering the high cost and invasiveness of SCS, patients should be informed about the expected duration of SCS use, alongside potential risks and benefits.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to determine the association of electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities and in-hospital mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection admitted in a tertiary care hospital in the Philippines.

We conducted a retrospective study of confirmed COVID-19–infected patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes were extracted from the medical records. Electrocardiographic analysis was derived from the 12-lead electrocardiogram recorded upon admission. The frequencies and distributions of various clinical characteristics were described, and the ECG abnormalities associated with in-hospital mortality were investigated.

A total of 163 patients were included in the study; most were female (52.7%) with a median age of 55 years. Sinus rhythm with any ECG abnormality (65%), nonspecific ST and T-wave changes (35%), and sinus tachycardia (22%) were the frequently reported ECG findings. The presence of any ECG abnormality was detected in 78.5% of patients, and it was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (P = 0.038). The analysis revealed a statistically significant association between in-hospital mortality and having atrial fibrillation or flutter (P = 0.002), supraventricular tachycardia (P = 0.011), ventricular tachycardia (P = 0.011), third-degree atrioventricular block (P = 0.011), T-wave inversion (P = 0.005), and right ventricular hypertrophy (P = 0.011).

The presence of any ECG abnormality in patients with COVID-19 infection was associated with in-hospital mortality. Electrocardiographic abnormalities that were associated with mortality were atrial fibrillation or flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia, third-degree atrioventricular block, T-wave inversion, and right ventricular hypertrophy.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2016, several therapies have been approved for treating atopic dermatitis (AD) in Singapore, including biologics, oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and topical crisaborole. This study supplements the 2016 Singapore treatment guidelines for AD, focusing on newer therapies for moderate-to-severe disease, while revisiting older treatment regimens to accommodate changes in knowledge and practice. METHOD: A modified Delphi panel was held, led by 2 co-chairs. The voting expert panel consisted of 12 dermatologists experienced in managing AD in Singapore. Delphi survey rounds were conducted between 24 July and 27 October 2023. Panellists indicated their agreement with drafted statements using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. An expert meeting was held to facilitate the consensus process between rounds 1 and 2 of voting. RESULTS: All expert panellists participated in both survey rounds, with a 100% response rate. Thirty-nine statements, classified into general principles, conventional treatments, biologics and JAK inhibitors, were proposed. Of these, 27 statements reached consensus at the end of round 1. After the expert meeting, 17 statements were included in round 2, of which 16 statements reached consensus. One statement did not reach consensus. Key updates are the inclusion of dupilumab and JAK inhibitors as potential first-line treatments for moderate-to-severe AD, in certain populations. CONCLUSION This modified Delphi study generated consensus among Singapore dermatology experts, to update treatment guidelines in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The consensus statements developed are intended to supplement the 2016 Singapore treatment guidelines for AD. Further revisions may be required when new evidence and/or treatments become available.
Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy* ; Humans ; Singapore ; Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Biological Products/therapeutic use* ; Delphi Technique ; Consensus ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use* ; Severity of Illness Index ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use* ; Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use* ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Boron Compounds

Objectives: Responding to the reality of neonate patients with delayed childhood development due to late diagnosis of and intervention on hearing impairment, this study aims to determine the features based on time-frequency domain of auditory brainstem response (ABR) signals and to test the protocol on ABR signals from PhysioNet. Methods: This is done by pre-processing, performing time-frequency analysis, and characterizing hearing impairment using the dominant features of the ABR. In this study, normal (N) and hearing impaired (HI) ABR adult human signals were acquired from Physionet.org, a publicly available database. Considering its high signal-to-noise ratio, numerous filters and transformations were applied to extract the ABR. Consequently, the features acquired — dominant frequency and bigrams, were used as data classifiers. Results: Initial results using only N classifiers, that is features from the Normal dataset, and bandpass Chebyshev filter with a lower cut-off frequency of 60 Hz show that the tests yielded low to middle sensitivity. Further tests were done to improve the sensitivity that incorporated the HI classifiers, used data filtered with a low cut-off frequency of 300 Hz, and data divided per stimulus intensity level. Conclusion Conclusions made are 1) data with both N and HI classifiers have higher sensitivity than those using only N classifiers, 2) data with a Chebyshev cut-off frequency of 300 Hz have a higher sensitivity than those with 60 Hz, and 3) data divided per intensity level have a higher sensitivity than data analyzed as a whole, and that features with stimulus intensity in middle ranges have a better distinction between HI and N patients.
Evoked Potentials ; Brain Stem ; Delayed Diagnosis

This clinical pathway for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients presenting with acute chest pain, including acute coronary syndromes, provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to diagnose, risk stratify, and manage acute chest pain in adult patients. The writing committee reviewed existing international and local guidelines. Modifications to the algorithm following face-to-face and virtual meetings resulted in expert decisions written as recommendations and presented in a flow diagram format. The USTH Chest Pain Pathway provides guidance based on current guidelines and recommendations on assessing and evaluating acute chest pain, tailored to local needs and institution-specific facilities. We recommend its use to ensure quality patient care in the hospital.
Acute Coronary Syndrome|critical Pathways

Tables and figures are commonly adopted methods for presenting specific data or statistical analysis results. Figures can be used to display characteristics and distributions of data, allowing for intuitive understanding through visualization and thus making it easier to interpret the statistical results. To maximize the positive aspects of figure presentation and increase the accuracy of the content, in this article, the authors will describe how to choose an appropriate figure type and the necessary components to include. Additionally, this article includes examples of figures that are commonly used in research and their essential components using virtual data.