1.Single-loop versus double-loop reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy: Does it impact on the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula?
Giovanni Domenico TEBALA ; Fanny MASSIMI ; Francesca DURO ; Ahmed ABDELSAMAD ; Stefano AVENIA ; Gian Luca BAIOCCHI ; Andrea BARBERIS ; Chafik BOUZID ; Antoine CASTEL ; Graziano CECCARELLI ; Andrea CELOTTI ; Nicola CILLARA ; Nicola CINARDI ; Roberto CIROCCHI ; Maria CONTICCHIO ; Giuseppe CURRÒ ; Antonella DELVECCHIO ; Raffaele Vincenzo De ROSA ; Jacopo DESIDERIO ; Antonio Di CINTIO ; Fabio Francesco Di MOLA ; Domenico Di NARDO ; Alessia FASSARI ; Alessandro GEMINI ; Carlos Augusto GOMES ; Gian Luca GRAZI ; Giuseppe MARGANI ; Alessandro MAZZOTTA ; Luca MORELLI ; Andrea MURATORE ; Fabrice MUSCARI ; Edoardo Maria MUTTILLO ; Alberto PATRITI ; Gaetano PICCOLO ; Luca PROPERZI ; Alessandro PUZZIELLO ; Lucia ROMANO ; Edoardo ROSSO ; Sara SAEIDI ; Andrea SAGNOTTA ; Edoardo SALADINO ; Marcello Giuseppe SPAMPINATO ; Laurent SULPICE ; Nádia TENREIRO ; Paolo UBIALI ; Riccardo MEMEO ;
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2026;30(2):192-202
Background:
s/Aims: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains a significant complication following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). It has been hypothesized that single loop (SL) reconstruction may increase the risk of POPF, leading to the proposal of double-loop (DL) reconstruction. In this approach, the pancreatic duct is connected to an isolated loop of bowel in a Roux-en-Y configuration.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to compare various types of reconstruction after PD, analyzing data from 1,502 patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, or robotic PD across 28 centers worldwide. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to enhance comparability.
Results:
The overall rate of POPF was 34.89%, with a grade C POPF rate of 4.26%. The type of reconstruction (SL vs. DL) did not significantly impact the rates of POPF or grade C POPF, both before and after PSM. The rate of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) was 20.71%, and patients with DL reconstruction had a lower incidence of DGE both before and after PSM.
Conclusions
Our study found no significant differences in the risk of POPF between SL and DL reconstruction. However, DL reconstruction is associated with a reduced risk of DGE, suggesting it may be a preferable option following open PD.
2.Turning points in the practice of liver surgery:A historical review
Giovanni Domenico TEBALA ; Stefano AVENIA ; Roberto CIROCCHI ; Antonella DELVECCHIO ; Jacopo DESIDERIO ; Domenico Di NARDO ; Francesca DURO ; Alessandro GEMINI ; Felice GIULIANTE ; Riccardo MEMEO ; Gennaro NUZZO
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2024;28(3):271-282
The history of liver surgery is a tale of progressive resolution of issues presenting one after another from ancient times to the present days when dealing with liver ailments. The perfect knowledge of human liver anatomy and physiology and the development of a proper liver resective surgery require time and huge efforts and, mostly, the study and research of giants of their own times, whose names are forever associated with anatomical landmarks, thorough descriptions, and surgical approaches. The control of parenchymal bleeding after trauma and during resection is the second issue that surgeons have to resolve. A good knowledge of intra and extrahepatic vascular anatomy is a necessary condition to develop techniques of vascular control, paving the way to liver transplantation. Last but not least, the issue of residual liver function after resection requires advanced techniques of volume redistribution through redirection of blood inflow. These are the same problems any young surgeon would face when approaching liver surgery for the first time. Therefore, obtaining a wide picture of historical evolution of liver surgery could be a great starting point to serve as an example and a guide.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail