OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and shoulder function of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. METHODS: Randomized controlled analysis was conducted on 68 patients over 70 years old with Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures treated with RTSA or ORIF between January 2020 and June 2022. The patients were randomly divided into RTSA group ( n=32) and ORIF group ( n=36). There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) in the baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index, injured side, Neer classification, and preoperative Charlson comorbidity index, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constant shoulder score, Oxford shoulder score (OSS), and hemoglobin (Hb). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, reduction of Hb on the 3rd day after operation, hospital stay, total cost of hospitalization, complication incidence, range of motion of shoulder joint at 2 years after operation, VAS score before operation and at 5 days and 1 month after operation, Constant shoulder score and OSS score before operation and at 2 years after operation, and imaging results during follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the ORIF group, the RTSA group had longer operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and higher total cost of hospitalization ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Hb reduction on the 3rd day after operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The VAS scores significantly improved in both groups at 5 days and 1 month after operation ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 26-35 months, with an average of 31.2 months. In the RTSA group, there were 2 cases of poor healing of superficial incision and 1 case of transient nerve injury. There was no complication such as bone resorption around the prosthesis, lucent band, prosthesis loosening, or periprosthetic fracture in all patients. In the ORIF group, there was 1 case of poor healing of superficial incision, 3 cases of nonunion of fracture, 1 case of arthritis secondary to humeral head necrosis, and 1 case of bone absorption of large tuberosity, and no displacement or fracture failure of internal fixation was found in all patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications [9.4% (3/32) vs 16.7% (6/36)] between the two groups [ OR (95% CI): 0.828 (0.171, 4.014), P=0.814]. In the RTSA group, 28 cases were graded 0 and 4 cases were graded 1 at 2 years after operation. Constant and OSS scores of RTSA group were significantly better than those of ORIF group ( P<0.05). The Constant score was significantly better than ORIF group in activity and strength, range of motion, lifting, abduction, and external rotation ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in pain, daily function, and internal rotation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The RTSA group had a significantly greater range of motion in lifting, abduction, and external rotation than ORIF group ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in internal rotation between the two groups ( P>0.05). CONCLUSION Application of RTSA as the initial treatment of Neer three/four-part proximal humeral fractures in the elderly can achieve better rehabilitation of joint activity and lower risk of early reoperation, and improve the quality of life of elderly fracture patients. However, the difficulty of revision and the high cost of treatment require the surgeon to pay full attention and strictly grasp the indications.
Humans ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation* ; Male ; Female ; Shoulder Fractures/surgery* ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder/methods* ; Aged ; Bone Plates ; Open Fracture Reduction/methods* ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Treatment Outcome ; Shoulder Joint/physiopathology* ; Aged, 80 and over ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology* ; Length of Stay

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical effects of external fixation and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) after external fixation in treating open fractures of tibial shaft. METHODS: From January 2020 to June 2022, 151 patients with open fracture of tibial shaft treated with external fixation stenting were divided into external fixation group and combined group according to different surgical methods. There were 81 patients in external fixation group, including 48 males and 33 females, aged from 21 to 68 years old with an average of (42.58±7.44) years old;according to Gustilo classification, 49 patients with typeⅡ, 32 patients with type ⅢA;the time from injury to treatment ranged from 2.5 to 10 h with an average of (4.25±0.74) h;external fixed stenting was performed. There were 70 patients in combined group, including 42 males and 28 females, aged from 20 to 69 years old with an average of (41.39±7.02) years old;35 patients with type Ⅱ and 35 patients with type ⅢA according to Gustilo classification;the time from injury to treatment ranged from 3 to 9 h with an average of (4.31±0.85) h;MIPPO treatment was performed after external fixed stenting. The time of callus formation, fracture healing and complications were compared between two groups. Rasmussen score and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score were used to evaluate functional recovery of knee joint at 6 months after operation. RESULTS: Both groups were followed up for 6 to 13 months with an average of (10.17±2.33) months. The time of callus formation and fracture healing were (13.98±4.02) d and (70.26±12.15) d in combined group, and (18.56±4.37) d and (79.87±15.41) d in external fixation group, respectively. Combined group was better than external fixation group in the time of callus formation and fracture healing (P<0.05). At six months after operation, Rasmussen and HSS scores in combined group were (26.79±3.11) and (83.36±9.44), which were higher than those in external fixation group (24.51±4.63) and (79.63±8.46) (P<0.05). In external fixation group, there were 2 patients with incision infection, 2 patients with nail tract infection, 1 patient with stent loosening, fracture displacement, delayed union and malunion, and 1 patient with biocompatibility reaction in combined group, with statistical significance between two groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION MIPPO could accelerate callus formation and fracture healing, improve knee function, improve clinical effects and reduce complications in patients with open tibial shaft fractures after external and external fixation.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Aged ; Tibial Fractures/physiopathology* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; Bone Plates ; External Fixators ; Fractures, Open/physiopathology* ; Stents ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and complication rates of staged open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and external fixation combined with limited internal fixation (EFLIF) in the treatment of high-energy Pilon fractures. METHODS: A retrospective selection was conducted on 78 patients diagnosed with high-energy tibial Pilon fractures who received treatment between January 2021 and October 2023. These patients were categorized into the staged ORIF group and the EFLIF group according to their respective treatment protocols. The staged ORIF group comprised 48 patients, including 29 males and 19 females, aged from 33 to 53 years old with a mean age of (43.25±4.67) years old. The time from injury to treatment averaged (6.54±2.21) hours. All patients received staged ORIF treatment. The EFLIF Group consisted of 30 patients, including 18 males and 12 females, aged from 36 to 54 years old with a mean age of (43.37±3.24) years old. The time from injury to treatment averaged (6.87±1.96) hours. All patients received EFLIF treatment. The recovery of ankle joint function, fracture reduction quality, fracture healing time, and surgical-related indicators between two groups were observed and compared six months after surgery. Additionally, the postoperative complications of the two groups were recorded. RESULTS: Both groups of patients were followed up and the duration ranged from 6 to 12 months, with an average of (8.97±1.26) months. At 6-month postoperative follow-up, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score in the ORIF group was (83.15±20.93), which did not show a statistically significant difference compared to the EFLIF group (81.88±20.67), P>0.05. The excellent and good rate of fracture reduction in the staged ORIF group was 33.33% (16/48), which did not show a statistically significant difference compared to the EFLIF group (30.00%, 9/30), P>0.05. The hospitalization duration and fracture healing time in the staged ORIF group were (16.57±1.25) days and (12.14±1.15) weeks, respectively. When compared to the EFLIF group, which demonstrated a hospitalization duration of (15.97±2.16 ) days and a fracture healing time of (12.36±1.17) weeks, no statistically significant differences were observed (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the staged ORIF group was (76.54±11.65) ml, which was significantly higher than that in the EFLIF group (70.15±10.29) ml, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of superficial tissue infection was 2.08%(1/48), which was significantly lower than that observed in the EFLIF group at 16.67% (5/30), and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSION Both staged ORIF and EFLIF were effective treatment options for high-energy closed Pilon fractures of the tibia. However, regarding the prevention of superficial tissue infection, staged ORIF demonstrates superior risk control compared to EFLIF.
Humans ; Male ; Female ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Tibial Fractures/physiopathology* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods* ; Retrospective Studies ; External Fixators ; Open Fracture Reduction/methods* ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to compare the surgical access and post-operative outcome of two intra-oral incisions used for approaching a mandibular body fracture. METHODS: This clinical trial involved 60 patients with mandibular body fractures who were randomly allocated to control and study groups. The fractures were approached using the routine vestibular incision in the control group and crevicular incision with vertical release in the study group. The effects of incision design on the post-surgical outcome variables like swelling, trismus, paresthesia, wound healing and gingival recession were statistically analysed with non-parametric tests by using SPSS 22.0 software. Comparison of continuous variables between the groups and time points was done using Mann Whitney test and Friedman test respectively. Chi-square test was used to compare proportions between groups. Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction was used for pair wise comparisons. RESULTS: The study group demonstrated favourable surgical outcome in the immediate postoperative phase as compared to the control group. The difference in mouth opening, swelling and neurosensory impairment between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Crevicular incision was found to be an ideal alternative to vestibular incision in achieving surgical access and fixation of mandibular body fractures with reduction in postoperative patient discomfort and better surgical outcome.
Adult ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Mandibular Fractures ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Middle Aged ; Open Fracture Reduction ; methods ; Orthognathic Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Surgical Wound ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

Bosworth ankle fracture-dislocation is rare, known to be an irreducible type of ankle injury, with a high incidence of complication. We present two cases of even rarer variants of Bosworth ankle fracture-dislocation. The first case is a type of supination external rotation adduction, and the second case is a type of supination external rotation adduction. These types have not been described before. In both of the cases we failed to achieve close reduction, and therefore proceeded with emergency surgeries, with open reduction and internal fixation. Both of the cases were performed with a postero-lateral approach to reduce the dislocations, and fix the fractures successfully. Unfortunately in one of the cases, acute compartment syndrome developed post-surgically. However, both cases showed good functional outcomes.
Acute Disease ; Ankle Fractures ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Ankle Injuries ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Compartment Syndromes ; Fracture Dislocation ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Open Fracture Reduction ; methods ; Postoperative Complications ; Recovery of Function ; Rotation ; Supination ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

Adult ; Female ; Fractures, Open ; pathology ; physiopathology ; surgery ; therapy ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult

OBJECTIVETo study the mechanical properties and the clinical results of minimum-contact plate in the treatment of fractures.

METHODSFour-point bending and torsion tests were conducted to compare the new minimum contact plate (MCP) with dynamic compression plate (DCP) and limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). The fracture healing time and growth of bony callus were observed in 29 cases of long bone fracture fixed with MCP to evaluate the advantages of this kind of plate.

RESULTSThe 29 patients who underwent MCP were followed up from 6 to 14 months. The average healing time for femoral, tibial and humeral fractures was 12, 13 and 10 weeks, respectively. All fractures were healed. No displacement of fracture, screw pullout, deformation or break of the plate were found.

CONCLUSIONSThe bending stiffness of MCP is significantly greater than that of DCP and LC-DCP (P<0.05). MCP can protect the periosteal blood supply against avascular osseous necrosis and accelerate bone healing. It is a kind of reliable and effective plate in treatment of fractures.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Plates ; Child ; Female ; Femoral Fractures ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; instrumentation ; methods ; Fracture Healing ; Fractures, Closed ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Fractures, Open ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Tibial Fractures ; physiopathology ; surgery ; Torsion Abnormality ; Treatment Outcome