Purpose: Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk. Materials and Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Results: Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low. Conclusions Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.

Purpose: Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk. Materials and Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Results: Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low. Conclusions Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.

Purpose: Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk. Materials and Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Results: Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low. Conclusions Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.

Purpose: Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk. Materials and Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Results: Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low. Conclusions Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.

Purpose: Metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus may play a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PC); however, this association remains to be explored in the context of specific PC stages. The objective of this study was to systematically review the evidence for an association between diabetes and overall, early, or advanced PC risk. Materials and Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) from inception until September 2023. Cohort and case-control studies that assessed PC risk in adult males (≥18 years) associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus or diabetes (if there was no distinction between diabetes type) were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study bias; those with NOS<7 were excluded. Evidence certainty was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Results: Thirty-four studies (n=26 cohorts and n=8 case-controls) were included. Of these, 32 assessed diabetes and all PC stages combined, 12 included early PC stages, and 15 included advanced PC stages. Our meta-analysis showed diabetes had a protective effect against early PC development (n=11, risk ratio [RR]=0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.61–0.83, I2=84%) but no association was found for combined (n=21, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.79–1.13, I2=99%) or advanced PC stages (n=15, RR=0.96; 95% CI=0.77–1.18, I2=98%) at diagnosis. According to GRADE, the evidence certainty was very low. Conclusions Diabetes may be protective against early PC stages, yet evidence linking diabetes to risk across all stages, and advanced PC specifically, is less conclusive. High heterogeneity may partially explain discrepancy in findings and was mostly associated with study design, method used for PC diagnosis, and risk measures. Our results may aid risk stratification of males with diabetes and inform new approaches for PC screening in this group, especially considering the reduced sensitivity of prostate-specific antigen values for those with diabetes.

BACKGROUND

Melioidosis is an infectious disease caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei. It is endemic in the Philippines and is underreported. Of the reported cases, the most common comorbidity is diabetes mellitus. The increasing cases of antibiotic resistance and the relatively high mortality rate highlights the need for increased awareness among clinicians regarding this disease. We aim to report a case of Burkholderia pseudomallei resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), used in its eradication following initial intravenous therapy.

A 51-year-old male Filipino with poor health-seeking behavior came with generalized body weakness, weight loss, dysarthria, fever, cough, difficulty breathing, bloatedness, dysuria, joint pains, and bilateral lower extremity hyperpigmented macules for four months. He has diabetes mellitus and hypertension and is a mechanic by trade. Initial workups revealed hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 14.7%, and urinalysis with bacteriuria. Imaging revealed bilateral pneumonia on chest xray, hepatosplenomegaly on whole abdomen ultrasound, and old cerebral infarcts on cranial computed tomography scan (CT scan). Empiric antibiotics for the impression of sepsis from community-acquired pneumonia and urinary tract infection were ertapenem and azithromycin. Upon isolation of Burkholderia pseudomallei from blood cultures, the team shifted to TMP-SMX and ceftazidime for initial therapy of melioidosis. Sensitivity showed resistance to TMP-SMX; hence the team revised the antimicrobials to four weeks of levofloxacin and ceftazidime. After eleven hospital days, the team sent the patient home, clinically improved. The team continued levofloxacin for eradication therapy for three months and the patient responded well.

Fever with multi-system involvement in a Filipino patient with diabetes mellitus with significant environmental risk factors, poor glycemic control, splenomegaly, and treatment failure with appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy should raise suspicion for melioidosis. It is paramount that antimicrobial resistance be detected and documented upon isolation of Burkholderia pseudomallei, given the high relapse rates and the need for a prolonged duration of treatment.

INTRODUCTION

Testicular torsion is a true urologic emergency. It occurs when the blood supply to the testis is compromised as the vessels twist along the spermatic cord. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are critical to prevent prolonged ischemia time which is crucial to its prognosis. This paper aimed to present cases of testicular torsion who underwent testis sparing surgery for torsion.

Cases of testicular torsion admitted at the institution from January 2023 to July 2024 were reviewed. Demographic data, scrotal ultrasound findings, intraoperative findings and ischemia time were documented. Patients who underwent tunica albuginea fasciotomy with tunica vaginalis flap were monitored post-surgery via scrotal ultrasound, documenting testicular size.

Twenty seven (27) cases of testicular torsion were reviewed. Of these cases, 4 improved after detorsion and orchidopexy, 12 cases with > 72 hours ischemia time and failed detorsion underwent orchiectomy, 11 cases with < 72 hours of ischemia time, tunica albuginea fasciotomy were performed. Five (5) of these 11 cases showed no improvement in appearance and no bleeding was observed and subsequent orchiectomy was performed. Six cases demonstrated improvement in appearance and bleeding after tunica albuginea fasciotomy, tunica vaginalis flap used to cover the resulting defect. Of these 6 cases, 2 cases showed intact testicular size, 1 case had testicular atrophy on monitoring and 3 cases were lost to follow-up.

Testicular torsion remains to be a critical urologic emergency. Prompt diagnosis and immediate surgery required to improve salvage rates. Tunica albuginea incision, with subsequent tunica vaginalis flap may be an option for the urologist to improve salvage, although not consistently prevent testicular atrophy.

BACKGROUND

Hypertensive patients have a high risk of developing mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression. Conflicting studies are available regarding the association of blood pressure control among hypertensive patients diagnosed with comorbid anxiety and/or depression.

This study aimed to determine the association of hypertension control with anxiety and depression symptoms among patients in a tertiary hospital in La Union.

A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 382 hypertensive patients at the outpatient department of Ilocos Training and Regional Medical Center. A validated Filipino translation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire was used to measure depression and anxiety symptoms. Descriptive statistics, such as frequency, percentages, mean, and standard deviation were used. The chi-square test and t-test were applied to compare anxiety and depression with socio-demographic profiles and blood pressure control through odds ratios.

Out of the 382 participants, 23% have anxiety symptoms, 7.3% have depression symptoms, and 4.2% have both conditions. Age and low income were significantly associated with depression symptoms while living alone was statistically associated with anxiety symptoms. Low educational attainment was significantly associated with both depression and anxiety symptoms. While no association was found between depression symptoms and blood pressure control, the presence of anxiety symptoms increases the likelihood of poor blood pressure control.

Hypertensive patients may experience depression and anxiety symptoms. In addition, the presence of anxiety symptoms contributes to poor BP control. Hence, early detection and regular screening of mental health conditions should be implemented to improve health outcomes and reduce the burden of disease in this population.

BACKGROUND

The Philippines faces a challenge in addressing the mental health needs of internally displaced persons (IDPs) following disasters. The lack of an integrated mental health triage system within evacuation centers and the shortage of specialists trained in post-traumatic stress triaging have hindered effective emergency response. Existing interventions primarily focus on traditional trauma and psychiatric symptoms, often lacking standardized mental health triage classifications and leading to data gaps, complicating resource allocation decisions.

To develop a culturally relevant mental health triage system, this study proposes the "Unahon Tool" to meet the needs of Filipino IDPs. Integrating with existing medical triage protocols equips frontline responders to identify stress-related concerns, enables informed decision-making for mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) allocation, and optimizes resource utilization.

The study involved key informants, including disaster responders, mental health specialists, and government officials, who participated in interviews and focus group discussions. Thematic analysis was used to identify behavioral aspects affecting IDP communities. The Unahon Tool development incorporated disaster response frameworks, mental health interventions, and other existing triage tools. A red-yellow-green categorization system was employed based on the severity and urgency of observed behaviors. Stakeholder consultations and expert reviews guided tool refinement.

The final Unahon Tool includes 17 behaviors categorized into red (urgent), yellow (moderate), and green (low) severity levels. It provides corresponding recommended interventions to aid responders. During direct observations, yellow-category behaviors like shouting and cursing were prevalent. Responders focused on reminders for peace and order in response to these behaviors. The tool's "Notes" section was identified as a potential area for contextual information inclusion.

The Unahon Tool fills a crucial gap in the Philippine disaster response infrastructure by offering a behavior-based mental health triage system. It enables responders to prioritize mental health resources effectively, reducing the burden on specialists and enhancing overall disaster response effectiveness. Future directions   include expanding tool adoption beyond Metro Manila, translating it into regional languages, and developing a version for children and teenagers. Collaboration with other regions and age groups will ensure broader applicability and effectiveness in addressing mental health needs among diverse IDP populations.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to present maternal and perinatal health indicators for the years 2019–2022. Methodology: This is a cross-sectional review that analyzed data on maternal and perinatal health indicators, generated from submissions of POGS-accredited hospitals (training and service) from January 2019 to December 2022. The data were compared to the national data obtained from official public documents published by the Philippine Statistics Authority in 2022 and 2023. Results: The number of member hospitals has steadily increased over the years, and compliance rates have been consistently over 85%. The total number of registered cases and live births declined in 2020 and 2021, but has increased to prepandemic levels in 2022. The primary cesarean section (CS) rates remained above 20%, with the highest rate noted in 2021 (25.5%). The top three-most common indications for primary CS were dysfunctional labor, fetal distress, and malpresentation. Stillbirth, perinatal, and maternal mortality rates showed an increase from 2019 to 2022, with peak rates registered for the year 2021. The top five causes of maternal death are: medical complications, hemorrhage, hypertension, infection, and others (unspecified). The case fatality rate among pregnant patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection was 1.18%. Conclusion From 2019 to 2021, there was a decline in the number of registered cases and live births, and an increase in the primary CS rates, maternal mortality ratio, perinatal death rates, and stillbirth rates. This may be explained by the prevailing social, health, and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic during these years.
Censuses ; COVID‑19