Objective:To evaluate the characteristic manifestations of lumbar fusion following oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), determine the specific incidence of these patterns, and the identify factors associated with fusion characteristics.Methods:This retrospective study analyzed 209 patients who underwent OLIF surgery at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between July 2017 and September 2023. The cohort had a mean age of 64.2±9.8 years and included 125 males and 84 females. A total of 338 lumbar segments were assessed, comprising 159 segments treated with stand-alone OLIF (OLIF-SA) and 179 segments treated with OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PSF). Inclusion criteria were: patients aged 18-80 years who underwent OLIF with complete radiographic records. Surgical parameters, including fixation method, number of fused segments, surgical approach, and cage dimensions (height and width), were obtained from operative records. Radiographic evaluation included preoperative osteophytes, Hounsfield unit (HU) values of endplates, and cage positioning. Fusion rate, fusion pattern (lateral vs. central), cage subsidence, and related influencing factors were assessed. Clinical outcomes were measured via the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 1-year follow-up. Results:The overall fusion rate was 98.2% (332/338), with a non-union rate of 1.8% (6/338). The incidence of lateral fusion was 40.2% (136/338). In the OLIF-SA group, lateral and central fusion rates were 50.3% (80/159) and 49.7% (79/159), respectively, with no cases of non-union. In the OLIF-PSF group, lateral fusion occurred in 31.3% (56/179), central fusion in 65.4% (117/179), and non-union in 3.3% (6/179), with statistically significant differences between groups ( P<0.05). Preoperative osteophytes and higher endplate HU values were significantly associated with lateral fusion ( P<0.05). However, cage dimensions and cage position (anterior-posterior and lateral placement) were not significantly associated with fusion pattern ( P>0.05). Overall, 61.5% (208/338) of segments showed no cage subsidence; 24.5% (83/338) had settling, and 14.0% (47/338) had grade 1 or higher subsidence. Among lateral fusion cases, the rates of no subsidence, anchoring, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 subsidence were 67.6%, 21.3%, 7.4%, 3.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. In the central fusion group, these rates were 59.2%, 27.6%, 9.2%, 2.5%, and 1.3%, respectively. In the non-union group, grade 2 and 3 subsidence occurred in 50% (3/6) each, significantly higher than in the other fusion groups ( P<0.05). Post hoc analysis confirmed that grade 2 and 3 subsidence rates were significantly elevated in the non-union group compared to the lateral and central fusion groups, while other subsidence categories showed no significant differences across groups. Clinically, patients showed significant improvements in ODI and VAS scores following surgery ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Lateral fusion occurred in 40.2% of OLIF cases. The OLIF-SA technique, preoperative osteophytes, and elevated preoperative HU values were significantly associated with lateral fusion. In contrast, surgical approach, number of fused segments, cage height, width, and cage positioning did not significantly influence the occurrence of lateral fusion.

Objective:To evaluate the characteristic manifestations of lumbar fusion following oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), determine the specific incidence of these patterns, and the identify factors associated with fusion characteristics.Methods:This retrospective study analyzed 209 patients who underwent OLIF surgery at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, between July 2017 and September 2023. The cohort had a mean age of 64.2±9.8 years and included 125 males and 84 females. A total of 338 lumbar segments were assessed, comprising 159 segments treated with stand-alone OLIF (OLIF-SA) and 179 segments treated with OLIF combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PSF). Inclusion criteria were: patients aged 18-80 years who underwent OLIF with complete radiographic records. Surgical parameters, including fixation method, number of fused segments, surgical approach, and cage dimensions (height and width), were obtained from operative records. Radiographic evaluation included preoperative osteophytes, Hounsfield unit (HU) values of endplates, and cage positioning. Fusion rate, fusion pattern (lateral vs. central), cage subsidence, and related influencing factors were assessed. Clinical outcomes were measured via the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 1-year follow-up. Results:The overall fusion rate was 98.2% (332/338), with a non-union rate of 1.8% (6/338). The incidence of lateral fusion was 40.2% (136/338). In the OLIF-SA group, lateral and central fusion rates were 50.3% (80/159) and 49.7% (79/159), respectively, with no cases of non-union. In the OLIF-PSF group, lateral fusion occurred in 31.3% (56/179), central fusion in 65.4% (117/179), and non-union in 3.3% (6/179), with statistically significant differences between groups ( P<0.05). Preoperative osteophytes and higher endplate HU values were significantly associated with lateral fusion ( P<0.05). However, cage dimensions and cage position (anterior-posterior and lateral placement) were not significantly associated with fusion pattern ( P>0.05). Overall, 61.5% (208/338) of segments showed no cage subsidence; 24.5% (83/338) had settling, and 14.0% (47/338) had grade 1 or higher subsidence. Among lateral fusion cases, the rates of no subsidence, anchoring, grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 subsidence were 67.6%, 21.3%, 7.4%, 3.9%, and 0.7%, respectively. In the central fusion group, these rates were 59.2%, 27.6%, 9.2%, 2.5%, and 1.3%, respectively. In the non-union group, grade 2 and 3 subsidence occurred in 50% (3/6) each, significantly higher than in the other fusion groups ( P<0.05). Post hoc analysis confirmed that grade 2 and 3 subsidence rates were significantly elevated in the non-union group compared to the lateral and central fusion groups, while other subsidence categories showed no significant differences across groups. Clinically, patients showed significant improvements in ODI and VAS scores following surgery ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Lateral fusion occurred in 40.2% of OLIF cases. The OLIF-SA technique, preoperative osteophytes, and elevated preoperative HU values were significantly associated with lateral fusion. In contrast, surgical approach, number of fused segments, cage height, width, and cage positioning did not significantly influence the occurrence of lateral fusion.

Spinal surgical site infection (SSI), especially deep SSI after internal fixation is difficult in treatment, with long course of disease and poor prognosis. At present, there are many controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI, with unsatisfactory overall efficacy of its diagnosis and treatment. Besides, no diagnosis and treatment guideline based on evidence-based medicine has been in existence. To this end, the Spinal Infection Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Spinal Infection Group of the Spinal Surgery Branch of the Chinese Rehabilitation Medicine Association jointly organized relevant experts to formulate Evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of surgical site infection in spinal trauma ( version 2024) based on an evidence-based approach. A total of 10 recommendations were proposed on the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI, so as to provide a clinical reference for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI.

Objective:To develop a robotic digestive endoscope system (RDES) and to evaluate its feasibility, safety and control performance by experiments.Methods:The RDES was designed based on the master-slave control system, which consisted of 3 parts: the integrated endoscope, including a knob and button robotic control system integrated with a gastroscope; the robotic mechanical arm system, including the base and arm, as well as the endoscopic advance-retreat control device (force-feedback function was designed) and the endoscopic axial rotation control device; the control console, including a master manipulator and an image monitor. The operator sit far away from the endoscope and controlled the master manipulator to bend the end of the endoscope and to control advance, retract and rotation of the endoscope. The air supply, water supply, suction, figure fixing and motion scaling switching was realized by pressing buttons on the master manipulator. In the endoscopy experiments performed on live pigs, 5 physicians each were in the beginner and advanced groups. Each operator operated RDES and traditional endoscope (2 weeks interval) to perform porcine gastroscopy 6 times, comparing the examination time. In the experiment of endoscopic circle drawing on the inner wall of the simulated stomach model, each operator in the two groups operated RDES 1∶1 motion scaling, 5∶1 motion scaling and ordinary endoscope to complete endoscopic circle drawing 6 times, comparing the completion time, accuracy (i.e. trajectory deviation) and workload.Results:RDES was operated normally with good force feedback function. All porcine in vivo gastroscopies were successful, without mucosal injury, bleeding or perforation. In beginner and advanced groups, the examination time of both RDES and ordinary endoscopy tended to decrease as the number of operations increased, but the decrease in time was greater for operating RDES than for operating ordinary endoscope (beginner group P=0.033; advanced group P=0.023). In the beginner group, the operators operating RDES with 1∶1 motion scaling or 5∶1 motion scaling to complete endoscopic circle drawing had shorter completion time [1.68 (1.40, 2.17) min, 1.73 (1.47, 2.37) min VS 4.13 (2.27, 5.16) min, H=32.506, P<0.001], better trajectory deviation (0.50±0.11 mm, 0.46±0.11 mm VS 0.82±0.26 mm, F=38.999, P<0.001], and less workload [42.00 (30.00, 50.33) points, 43.33 (35.33, 54.00) points VS 52.67 (48.67, 63.33) points, H=20.056, P<0.001] than operating ordinary endoscope. In the advanced group, the operators operating RDES with 1∶1 or 5∶1 motion scaling to complete endoscopic circle drawing had longer completion time than operating ordinary endoscope [1.72 (1.37, 2.53) min, 1.57 (1.25, 2.58) min VS 1.15 (0.86, 1.58) min, H=13.233, P=0.001], but trajectory deviation [0.47 (0.13, 0.57) mm, 0.44 (0.39, 0.58) mm VS 0.52 (0.42, 0.59) mm, H=3.202, P=0.202] and workload (44.62±21.77 points, 41.24±12.57 points VS 44.71±17.92 points, F=0.369, P=0.693) were not different from those of the ordinary endoscope. Conclusion:The RDES enables remote control, greatly reducing the endoscopists' workload. Additionally, it gives full play to the cooperative motion function of the large and small endoscopic knobs, making the control more flexible. Finally, it increases motion scaling switching function to make the control of endoscope more flexible and more accurate. It is also easy for beginners to learn and master, and can shorten the training period. So it can provide the possibility of remote endoscopic control and fully automated robotic endoscope.

Spinal surgical site infection (SSI), especially deep SSI after internal fixation is difficult in treatment, with long course of disease and poor prognosis. At present, there are many controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI, with unsatisfactory overall efficacy of its diagnosis and treatment. Besides, no diagnosis and treatment guideline based on evidence-based medicine has been in existence. To this end, the Spinal Infection Group of the Orthopedic Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the Spinal Infection Group of the Spinal Surgery Branch of the Chinese Rehabilitation Medicine Association jointly organized relevant experts to formulate Evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of surgical site infection in spinal trauma ( version 2024) based on an evidence-based approach. A total of 10 recommendations were proposed on the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI, so as to provide a clinical reference for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal SSI.

Objective:To investigate the safety and clinical efficacy of primary anterior lesion removal and bone graft fusion combined with secondary posterior fixation in the treatment of cervical suppurative spondylitis.Methods:Retrospective analysis was performed on the data of twenty cervical suppurative spondylitis patients treated with primary anterior lesion removal and bone graft fusion combinedwith secondary posterior fixation in our hospital from May 2016 to December 2020, including 14 males and 6 females. Aging from 40 to 87 years, with an average of 60.2±12.6 years. The laboratory tests of preoperative blood culture, such as white blood cell count (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and hypersensitive C-reactive protein (CRP) were performed.The selection and duration of antibiotic usewere guided according to bacterial culture and laboratory test results. visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopeadic Association (JOA) score and Frankle classification of neurological function were evaluated before surgery, 3 months after surgery, and 12 months after surgery, so were the Cobb angle and segmental angle of cervical lordosis. Single factor repeated measure ANOVA was used for statistical analysis of data.Results:Surgeries were performed successfully for all the 20 patients. 9 cases of Staphylococcus aureus, 4 cases of Streptococcus and 2 case of Escherichia coli were detected by pathogen examination. The remaining 5 cases were negative in bacterial culture. All 20 patients were followed up for 18.3±6.7 months. WBC, ESR and CRP at 3 and 12 months after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery ( F value: 17.90, 30.65, 18.64, P<0.001). The VAS at 3 months after surgery 1.35±0.49 and 12 months after surgery 1.15±0.48 were significantly lower than that before surgery 4.95±1.10 ( F=176.12, P<0.001). The JOA score at 3 months after surgery 15.40±1.93 and 12 months after surgery 16.06±1.36 were significantly better than that before surgery 11.45±2.78 ( F=65.33, P<0.001). The Cobb Angle of C 2-C 7 cervical lordosis after surgery 14.45°±4.36° and 12 months after surgery (13.70°±3.15°) were significantly larger than that before surgery (8.25°±4.36°) ( F=72.54, P<0.001). Cobb angle of the lesion segment after surgery (3.60°±1.90°) and 12 months after surgery (2.90°±1.44°) were significantly better than that before surgery (-3.55°±5.74°) (negative value indicated kyphosis) ( F=42.49, P<0.001). Bone fusion was observed in all graft areas at 12 months of follow-up. Conclusion:The treatment of cervical suppurative spondylitis with primary anterior lesion removal and bone graft fusion combined with secondary posterior fixation can effectively obtain intraspinal decompression, improve pain and nerve function, as well as restore cervical stability and correct kyphosis, with satisfactory clinical efficacy.

【Objective】 To investigate the effects of one-stage additional posterior pedicle screws （PPS） internal fixation on early Cage subsidence after oblique lateral interbody fusion （OLIF）. 【Methods】 We made a retrospective analysis of 118 patients with lumbar degenerative diseases treated with OLIF at the Department of Orthopedics， Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital， School of Medicine， Zhejiang University， from January 2016 to December 2019. We divided the patients into OLIF stand-alone group （58 ones） and OLIF with PPS fixation group （60 ones） according to the surgical procedure. All the patients had preoperative frontal and lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine， and CT and MR scans were performed. The clinical outcomes and reoperation rates of the two groups were compared at immediate postoperative follow-up and at 1， 3， 6 and 12 months. X-ray and CT examinations were performed to assess Cage subsidence in both groups at each postoperative follow-up. 【Results】 There was no statistical difference between the two groups in baseline data and surgical segmentation. Of the 118 patients with 141 discs who underwent OLIF surgery， 58 patients with 68 discs received OLIF stand-alone surgery and 60 ones with 73 discs received OLIF with PPS fixation. There were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding， complications， or postoperative clinical outcomes between the two groups （P>0.05）， and the Cage subsidence rate was 22.4% in OLIF stand-alone group and 5% in OLIF with PPS fixation group， with significant difference between the two groups （P<0.01）. 【Conclusion】 Both OLIF stand-alone and OLIF additional PPS fixation can achieve good early clinical outcomes， and first-stage additional PPS fixation can significantly reduce the occurrence of Cage subsidence in the early postoperative period after OLIF.

Oblique lumbar interbody fusion （OLIF） is an internationally popular and innovative technique for treating various lumbar diseases. Introduced to China in 2014， it has been widely used to treat lumbar spine diseases. Advances in biomechanical theory and new instruments have broadened the indications for OLIF surgery and reduced its learning curve. The development of standalone OLIF makes OLIF more minimally invasive. The improvement of localized surgical methods based on Chinese anatomical studies makes OLIF more suitable for Chinese patients. The development of L5/S1 OLIF technology has expanded the application range of OLIF. This paper reviews the clinical application and research progress of OLIF.

Objective: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)plus plating in the treatment of unstable Hangman's fractures. Methods: A retrospective case series study was carried out to analyze 12 patients who received ACDF plus plate internal fixation for unstable Hangman's fracture admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine from July 2014 to July 2018. There were nine males and three females, aged 24-70 years with an average of 46.2 years. According to Levine-Edwards typing, there were seven patients of type Ⅱ, four patients of type Ⅱ A and one patient of type Ⅲ. There were two patients of grade D and 10 patients of grade E according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and the operational complications were recorded. At 3 days, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after operation, the height of intervertebral disc, physiological curvature of cervical spine, fracture healing and bone graft fusion were evaluated. The recovery of neurological function was assessed by ASIA, and the neck pain relief and function improvement was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) and the neck disability index (NDI). Results: All patients were followed for 6-48 months(mean, 27.7 months). The operation time ranged from 50-100 minutes, with an average of 72.5 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 30-120 ml (mean, 65.8 ml). No serious complications occurred during and after operation. Two patients had dysphagia after operation, and the symptoms were relieved at the follow-up of 3 months. All patients achieved bony fusion of C_2-3 within the 6 month follow-up. No subsidence or migration of cages and significant loss of intervertebral space height were observed. The patient's neck and occipital pain was relieved obviously, and the flexion, extension and rotation of cervical spine were good. The neurologic dysfunction of two patients of ASIA Grade D recovered after surgery, and the final ASIA grade was E. The VAS score was decreased from 5.0 (4.0, 6.0)points preoperatively to 1.0(0, 1.0)points at the last follow-up (P<0.01). The NDI score was improved from (28.5±6.4)points preoperatively to (5.3±2.7)points at the last follow-up (P<0.01). Conclusion ACDF combined with plate internal fixation can provide immediate postoperative stability, high fusion rate, less complications, less pain, and satisfactory function recovery.

Objective To evaluate the influence of age on the surgical risk and prognosis for elderly patients who suffered from lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods A total of 129 patients above 70 years old with lumbar stenosis from January 2015 to August 2018 were divided into 4 groups by age:younger than 69 years,70-74 years,75-79 years and 80 years and above.50 patients below 69 years old were chosen at random as control group.Different parameters such as operation methods,predicted complication rate (POSSUM score),actual complication rate,number of operation levels,operation time,surgical blood loss,occult blood loss,total hospital stay,postoperative hospital stay,hospital cost and the ODI score in 3 months followup were recorded.The surgical risk and prognosis of elderly patients were analyzed by comparing the differences of above parameters between different age groups.Results There was no significant correlation between different age groups and surgical methods (F=15.637,P=0.208).The operation time and surgical blood loss both showed no significant difference between 4 groups.The predicted incidence of complications (POSSUM score) in group older than 80 years old (38.5％+12.34％) and 75-79 years old (41.1％+ 11.82％) were higher than the group younger than 69 years old (28.4％+ 15.44％).There was no significant difference between the two groups over 75 years old,and there was no significant difference between the 70-74 years old group and the other three groups.The actual incidence of complications was 43.75％ in group over 80 years old,42.86％ in group 75-79 years old and 42.03％ in group 70-74 years old.The actual complication rate of the group younger than 69 years was lower than other three groups,and the three other groups showed no significant difference between each other.The totally hospital stay and numbers of operation levels in groups 75-79 and 80 years and above were higher than groups 70-74 and 69 years and below.There was no significant difference in those parameters between groups 75-79 and 80 years and above,and between groups 70-74 years and 69 years and below.The ODI scores between 4 groups also showed no significant difference.Conclusion The risk of surgery for lumbar disc stenosis patients older than 75 years has increased,but the patient's surgical outcome has not decreased.Old age should not be a key factor in determining whether a patient is suitable for surgery.