1.Signal Analysis of Niraparib-Related Adverse Events Based on US FAERS Database
Hongying XIA ; Wenjie YIN ; Yanhua LI ; Lina YOU ; Xingxing GENG ; Feilong TAN
Journal of Kunming Medical University 2025;46(2):118-125
Objective To explore the risk signals of niraparib and provide references for rational and safe clinical medication.Methods Niraparib-related adverse drug events(ADEs)reports from Q1 2017 to Q2 2023 were extracted from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System(FAERS)database.Risk signals were identified using the reporting odds ratio(ROR),proportional reporting ratio(PRR),Bayesian confidence propagation neural network(BCPNN),and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker(MGPS)methods.The Risk signals were described and classified by preferred system organ classes(SOCs)and preferred terms(PTs)from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities(MedDRA)version 26.1,and the occurrence of niraparib-related ADEs was also analyzed.Results A total of 16,961 ADE reports with niraparib as the primary suspected drug were extracted.Through screening and analysis,32 PTs were identified involving 11 SOCs,which were largely consistent with the information in the drug label.However,suspicious signals not mentioned in the label,including neuropathy peripheral,decreased red blood cell count,reduced hematocrit,dehydration,and hot flashes,require further attention.The median occurrence time was 22 days(IQR 2-98 days),and the Weibull distribution test indicated an early failure-type curve.Conclusion When using niraparib,particularly in early stages of treatment,it is essential to monitor not only the ADEs mentioned in the drug instructions,such as decreased platelet count,nausea and fatigue,but also to pay close attention to the ADEs not included in the instructions,such as peripheral neuropathy and decreased red blood cell count,which exhibit strong signal values,to ensure patient medication safety.
2.The diagnostic value of CT imaging evaluation for lymph node metastasis in gallbladder cancer and its correlation with prognosis
Sen YANG ; Shuai YAN ; Feilong TAN ; Yihan WANG ; Bingbing LIU ; Xueliang YUE ; Hongshan LIU
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2025;40(4):290-294
Objective:To assess the accuracy of preoperative enhanced CT in evaluating the degree of lymph node metastasis in gallbladder cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on the enhanced CT imaging data of 124 gallbladder cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment at Henan Provincial People's Hospital from Jan 2017 to Dec 2018. Imaging staging was used to classify lymph node metastasis. Pathological and imaging data of 70 patients with confirmed postoperative lymph node pathology were compared to evaluate the accuracy of imaging methods in detecting lymph node involvement.Results:Lymph node metastasis in the 124 surgical patients was categorized into three groups using imaging evaluation methods. The overall accuracy of determining lymph node positivity and negativity was 63%, with a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 62%. The accuracy of detecting lymph node metastasis in gallbladder cancer was higher when lymph node fusion and internal necrosis were observed. The overall survival rate differed significantly among gallbladder cancer patients at different lymph node imaging stages ( P<0.05). Conclusion:CT imaging evaluation has diagnostic value for lymph node metastasis in gallbladder cancer and has a certain predictive effect on the prognosis of patients.
3.The diagnostic value of CT imaging evaluation for lymph node metastasis in gallbladder cancer and its correlation with prognosis
Sen YANG ; Shuai YAN ; Feilong TAN ; Yihan WANG ; Bingbing LIU ; Xueliang YUE ; Hongshan LIU
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2025;40(4):290-294
Objective:To assess the accuracy of preoperative enhanced CT in evaluating the degree of lymph node metastasis in gallbladder cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on the enhanced CT imaging data of 124 gallbladder cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment at Henan Provincial People's Hospital from Jan 2017 to Dec 2018. Imaging staging was used to classify lymph node metastasis. Pathological and imaging data of 70 patients with confirmed postoperative lymph node pathology were compared to evaluate the accuracy of imaging methods in detecting lymph node involvement.Results:Lymph node metastasis in the 124 surgical patients was categorized into three groups using imaging evaluation methods. The overall accuracy of determining lymph node positivity and negativity was 63%, with a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 62%. The accuracy of detecting lymph node metastasis in gallbladder cancer was higher when lymph node fusion and internal necrosis were observed. The overall survival rate differed significantly among gallbladder cancer patients at different lymph node imaging stages ( P<0.05). Conclusion:CT imaging evaluation has diagnostic value for lymph node metastasis in gallbladder cancer and has a certain predictive effect on the prognosis of patients.
4.Clinicopathological comparison of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with and without viral hepatitis
Sen YANG ; Yanbing LIU ; Pan WU ; Shuai YAN ; Feilong TAN ; Zhongyuan ZHAO ; Yiyang YAN ; Xueliang YUE ; Hongshan LIU
Chinese Journal of General Surgery 2023;38(4):292-296
Objective:To analyze the different clinicopathological features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with and without viral hepatitis.Methods:The clinicopathological data of 79 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cases from Mar 2012 to Sep 2018 at Henan Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Twenty-five of the 79 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were accompanied by viral hepatitis. Those with viral hepatitis had a lower mean age at onset than those without [(53±11) years vs. (60±11) years, P=0.011], higher proportion of male patients (80% vs. 52%, P=0.017), higher AFP positive rate (40% vs. 19%, P=0.041), lower CA19-9 positive rate (48% vs. 72%, P=0.036), tend to occur in the right liver lobe (76% vs. 44%, P=0.009), a lower rate of bile duct invasion (16% vs. 41%, P=0.03), and were more likely to be mass type (mass type proportion 96% vs. 72%, P=0.032). Conclusions:Viral hepatitis is common in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with and without viral hepatitis differ in clinicopathology. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with viral hepatitis is more likely to have the characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma, while intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma without viral hepatitis is more likely to have the characteristics of cholangiocarcinoma.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail