Objective:To explore the relationships among 4 primary indicators in the performance assessment and evaluation system of tertiary public hospitals.Methods:A questionnaire survey was employed to collect data on healthcare professionals'perceptions of the rationality of performance evaluation indicators.Structural equation modeling(SEM)and Amos 21.0 Statistical Software were utilized for data analysis,with the mediation effects tested using the Bootstrap method.Results:A total of 826 valid questionnaires were obtained.Medical quality,operational efficiency,and sustainable development had a positive impact on satisfaction.Operational efficiency and sustainable development played a chain-mediated role in the process of medical quality influencing satisfaction evaluation,namely"medical quality → operational efficiency → sustainable development → satisfaction".Conclusion:It helps to flexibly apply and deepen the integration of knowledge in the field of enterprise management into the field of hospital management,helps hospitals to scientifically formulate internal performance evaluation programs under the premise of limited resources,and provides new ideas for the country to optimize the performance appraisal index system of tertiary public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Objective It explores the importance and effectiveness perception of 55 third-tier indicators in the cur-rent performance evaluation system.Methods From the perspective of those being assessed,it employs survey ques-tionnaires,Importance Performance Analysis(IPA),and focus group interviews to conduct research on the impor-tance and effectiveness perception.Results The overall perception of the importance and effectiveness of third-tier in-dicators is relatively high,and the performance evaluation indicator system can effectively assess the development level of level-3 public hospitals.There is a general discrepancy between the perception of importance and effective-ness.Some third-tier indicators face issues of insufficient perception of both importance and effectiveness.Conclu-sion Performance evaluation policy formulation based on the implementation of policies and after excluding the scores of indicators closely related to stakeholders can re-monitor and analyze indicators.This allows for the addition or removal of third-tier indicators,adjustment of indicator weights,optimization of indicator content,precision in mea-suring indicators,and improvement of the performance evaluation effectiveness of level-3 public hospitals.

Pulmonary blast injury has become the main type of trauma in modern warfare, characterized by externally mild injuries but internally severe injuries, rapid disease progression, and a high rate of early death. The injury is complicated in clinical practice, often with multiple and compound injuries. Currently, there is a lack of effective protective materials, accurate injury detection instrument and portable monitoring and transportation equipment, standardized clinical treatment guidelines in various medical centers, and evidence-based guidelines at home and abroad, resulting in a high mortality in clinlcal practice. Therefore, the Trauma Branch of Chinese Medical Association and the Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Trauma organized military and civilian experts in related fields such as thoracic surgery and traumatic surgery to jointly develop the Clinical treatment guideline for pulmonary blast injury ( version 2023) by combining evidence for effectiveness and clinical first-line treatment experience. This guideline provided 16 recommended opinions surrounding definition, characteristics, pre-hospital diagnosis and treatment, and in-hospital treatment of pulmonary blast injury, hoping to provide a basis for the clinical treatment in hospitals at different levels.