Objective:To compare the anticoagulant efficacy and safety between argatroban and heparin in patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy undergoing artificial liver treatment.Methods:A total of 207 patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy who received artificial liver treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Wuxi No.5 People′s Hospital from January 2021 to October 2024 were enrolled, including 105 cases in the argatroban group and 102 cases in the heparin group. Changes in coagulation function, hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (PLT) count, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score before and after artificial liver treatment were compared between the two groups. The formation of deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities, coagulation in the extracorporeal circulation circuit and plasma separator, bleeding at the deep venous catheter site were compared between the two groups. The 28-day survival outcome of the patient were recorded. Two independent sample t-test, rank sum test, and chi-square test were used for statistical comparisons, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze the survival rate of patients. Results:There were no statistically significant differences in activated partial thromboplastin (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), Hb and PLT count before and after artificial liver treatment in the argatroban group ( Z=-1.74, -1.80, -1.26 and -0.52, respectively, all P>0.05), while the MELD score after treatment was lower than that before treatment and the difference was statistically significant ( t=6.49, P<0.001). After artificial liver treatment, the APTT in the argatroban group was 47.10(42.65, 51.90) s, which was shorter than that in the heparin group (56.05(50.02, 63.00) s). The INR, Hb, and PLT count in the argatroban group were 2.00(1.65, 2.54), 98.00(88.00, 112.00) g/L, and 92.00(75.50, 106.00)×10 9/L, respectively, which were all higher than those in the heparin group, which were 1.56(1.22, 1.93) g/L, 90.50(80.00, 104.75) g/L, and 74.00(64.75, 99.50)×10 9/L, respectively. The differences were all statistically significant ( Z=-7.16, -5.28, -3.05 and -3.32, respectively, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in MELD scores between the two groups ( P=0.250). The incidence of coagulation in the extracorporeal circulation circuit and plasma separator and bleeding at the deep venous catheter site in the argatroban group was 5.71%(6/105) and 1.90%(2/105), respectively, which were both lower than those in the heparin group (14.71%(15/102) and 9.80%(10/102), respectively). The differences were both statistically significant ( χ2=4.59 and 5.91, respectively, both P<0.05). At the end of the 28-day follow-up, the mortality rates in the argatroban group and the heparin group were 22.9%(24/105) and 34.3%(35/102), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( χ2=3.33, P=0.068). There was no statistically significant difference in the 28-day survival rate between the argatroban group and the heparin group ( χ2=2.09, P>0.05). Conclusions:Argatroban has a relatively minor impact on PLT count and Hb when it is used in artificial liver treatment for patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy. The incidence of coagulation in extracorporeal circulation circuits and plasma separators is low, and the risk of bleeding at the deep venous catheters is low. Argatroban is highly safe, which provides a new anticoagulation option for patients with a high risk of bleeding.

Objective:To compare the anticoagulant efficacy and safety between argatroban and heparin in patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy undergoing artificial liver treatment.Methods:A total of 207 patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy who received artificial liver treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Wuxi No.5 People′s Hospital from January 2021 to October 2024 were enrolled, including 105 cases in the argatroban group and 102 cases in the heparin group. Changes in coagulation function, hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (PLT) count, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score before and after artificial liver treatment were compared between the two groups. The formation of deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities, coagulation in the extracorporeal circulation circuit and plasma separator, bleeding at the deep venous catheter site were compared between the two groups. The 28-day survival outcome of the patient were recorded. Two independent sample t-test, rank sum test, and chi-square test were used for statistical comparisons, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze the survival rate of patients. Results:There were no statistically significant differences in activated partial thromboplastin (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), Hb and PLT count before and after artificial liver treatment in the argatroban group ( Z=-1.74, -1.80, -1.26 and -0.52, respectively, all P>0.05), while the MELD score after treatment was lower than that before treatment and the difference was statistically significant ( t=6.49, P<0.001). After artificial liver treatment, the APTT in the argatroban group was 47.10(42.65, 51.90) s, which was shorter than that in the heparin group (56.05(50.02, 63.00) s). The INR, Hb, and PLT count in the argatroban group were 2.00(1.65, 2.54), 98.00(88.00, 112.00) g/L, and 92.00(75.50, 106.00)×10 9/L, respectively, which were all higher than those in the heparin group, which were 1.56(1.22, 1.93) g/L, 90.50(80.00, 104.75) g/L, and 74.00(64.75, 99.50)×10 9/L, respectively. The differences were all statistically significant ( Z=-7.16, -5.28, -3.05 and -3.32, respectively, all P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in MELD scores between the two groups ( P=0.250). The incidence of coagulation in the extracorporeal circulation circuit and plasma separator and bleeding at the deep venous catheter site in the argatroban group was 5.71%(6/105) and 1.90%(2/105), respectively, which were both lower than those in the heparin group (14.71%(15/102) and 9.80%(10/102), respectively). The differences were both statistically significant ( χ2=4.59 and 5.91, respectively, both P<0.05). At the end of the 28-day follow-up, the mortality rates in the argatroban group and the heparin group were 22.9%(24/105) and 34.3%(35/102), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( χ2=3.33, P=0.068). There was no statistically significant difference in the 28-day survival rate between the argatroban group and the heparin group ( χ2=2.09, P>0.05). Conclusions:Argatroban has a relatively minor impact on PLT count and Hb when it is used in artificial liver treatment for patients with liver failure complicated with hepatic encephalopathy. The incidence of coagulation in extracorporeal circulation circuits and plasma separators is low, and the risk of bleeding at the deep venous catheters is low. Argatroban is highly safe, which provides a new anticoagulation option for patients with a high risk of bleeding.

Objective To explore the effect of focused nursing model on negative emotions and subjective well-being of lung cancer patients. Methods Eighty-six lung cancer patients hospitalized from November 2014 to November 2016 in our hospital were divided into two groups according to the order of admission in equal number. The control group was treated with routine care, and the observation group was with focused nursing model. The two groups were compared in terms of anxiety by SAS, depression by SDS, subjective well-being. Results The scores by SAS and SDS in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The levels of objective support, subjective support, self-evaluation and subjective well-being index of the observation group were higher than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Focused nursing model can effectively relieve negative emotions, improve subjective well-being of lung cancer patients, worthy of clinical promotion.