Humans ; Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy* ; Child ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Cardiac Catheterization/methods*

Hemoptysis is a serious medical emergency associated with high mortality rates. Notably, it poses significant therapeutic challenges owing to the complexities in rapidly identifying the bleeding site and underlying cause. In severe cases, it can lead to death by asphyxia, thus necessitating prompt intervention. Bronchoscopy-guided endobronchial balloon occlusion (EBBO) is a vital procedure for blocking the bleeding bronchus, allowing time for subsequent embolization of the responsible vessel and definitive treatment. While traditional techniques for EBBO are intricate and demanding, recent advancements in balloon technology, along with procedural refinements, have simplified the process, reduced operation times, and enhanced medical staff proficiency. Nevertheless, a lack of standardized protocols and technical guidelines has hindered the widespread adoption of this technique in China. Accordingly, the Internal Medicine of Chinese Medical Association convened a group of experts to develop the "Expert consensus on endobronchial balloon occlusion in the treatment of hemoptysis (2025 edition)" to standardize this procedure. This consensus, grounded in evidence-based medicine and clinical practice both domestically and internationally, covers seven essential elements: treatment strategies, equipment, indications and contraindications, preoperative preparation, technical procedures and specifications, integration with other therapeutic techniques, efficacy assessment, and follow-up. By offering comprehensive guidance, the consensus aims to standardize and promote the use of EBBO for hemoptysis management in China.
Humans ; Hemoptysis/therapy* ; Balloon Occlusion/methods* ; Bronchoscopy ; Consensus ; Evidence-Based Medicine

Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) is frequently used in abdominal surgeries. However, relevant guidelines are rare. Chinese Trauma Surgeon Association organized a committee composed of 28 experts across China in July 2017, aiming to provide an evidence-based recommendation for the application of VSD in abdominal surgeries. Eleven questions regarding the use of VSD in abdominal surgeries were addressed: (1) which type of materials should be respectively chosen for the intraperitoneal cavity, retroperitoneal cavity and superficial incisions? (2) Can VSD be preventively used for a high-risk abdominal incision with primary suture? (3) Can VSD be used in severely contaminated/infected abdominal surgical sites? (4) Can VSD be used for temporary abdominal cavity closure under some special conditions such as severe abdominal trauma, infection, liver transplantation and intra-abdominal volume increment in abdominal compartment syndrome? (5) Can VSD be used in abdominal organ inflammation, injury, or postoperative drainage? (6) Can VSD be used in the treatment of intestinal fistula and pancreatic fistula? (7) Can VSD be used in the treatment of intra-abdominal and extra-peritoneal abscess? (8) Can VSD be used in the treatment of abdominal wall wounds, wound cavity, and defects? (9) Does VSD increase the risk of bleeding? (10) Does VSD increase the risk of intestinal wall injury? (11) Does VSD increase the risk of peritoneal adhesion? Focusing on these questions, evidence-based recommendations were given accordingly. VSD was strongly recommended regarding the questions 2-4. Weak recommendations were made regarding questions 1 and 5-11. Proper use of VSD in abdominal surgeries can lower the risk of infection in abdominal incisions with primary suture, treat severely contaminated/infected surgical sites and facilitate temporary abdominal cavity closure.
Abdomen ; surgery ; China ; Drainage ; methods ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Societies, Medical ; organization & administration ; Surgical Wound Infection ; prevention & control ; Traumatology ; organization & administration ; Vacuum

Patient satisfaction reflects the patients’ perception of the outcome of care and is being considered for use in future reimbursement schemes. No consensus exists regarding the best instrument to measure patient satisfaction in the field of spine surgery. This systematic review aimed to determine how patient satisfaction for spine surgery has been measured previously and whether a disease-specific, comprehensive instrument to measure patient satisfaction has been established; we also aimed to define the dimensions of care that determine patient satisfaction in spine surgery. A systematic search of three online databases, unpublished sources, and citations was undertaken to identify 156 empirical studies that reported on patient satisfaction in the field of spine surgery. Manuscripts were reviewed in terms of the patient satisfaction instrument used, and the instruments were categorized as per content and method axes. Taxonomy of patient satisfaction with spine surgery identified the major characteristics of providers and medical care that influenced patient satisfaction and acted as a structure to categorically define the dimensions of patient satisfaction in spine surgery. The reviewed studies predominantly used global (108/156) rather than multidimensional (46/156), instruments. Most studies (96.2%) reported satisfaction with outcome rather than with care, and only 18.5% of the studies (29/156) utilized a disease-specific instrument. The following seven dimensions of patient status, outcome, and care experience that affected patient satisfaction were identified: pain, function, patient expectations/preference, specific patient health characteristics, caregiver interpersonal manner, efficacy/clinical outcomes, and postoperative care/therapy. Currently, no disease-specific instrument that includes all dimensions of patient satisfaction in spine surgery has been developed. Such a patient satisfaction instrument should be designed, tested for reliability and validity, and widely implemented.
Caregivers ; Classification ; Consensus ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Methods ; Patient Satisfaction ; Reproducibility of Results ; Spine

Infantile colic is a common self-limiting condition that causes significant distress to parents and caregivers. There is no clear cause, gold standard remedy or preventative action. The role of the family physician is to rule out sinister causes while providing counselling and reassurance for parents. The mainstay of management is parental support and reassurance while looking out for red flags in the baby such as fever, lethargy, distended abdomen and failure to thrive. This article provides a framework to approaching infantile colic and practical pointers to share with parents.
Caregivers ; Colic ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Crying ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant Formula ; Infant, Newborn ; Muscle Hypertonia ; diagnosis ; Parenting ; Parents ; Pediatrics ; methods ; Physicians, Family ; Primary Health Care ; methods ; Professional-Patient Relations

OBJECTIVE: To investigate trends of the research designs and statistical methods in the Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine (ARM) published from 2005 to 2015 through a comparison of articles with the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (APMR). METHODS: The authors reviewed all articles published in ARM and APMR for the years 2005 and 2015 in order to determine their research designs as well as their statistical methods used in each article. RESULTS: In ARM, randomized controlled trials increased from 4.5% in 2005 to 6.5% in 2015. In APMR, randomized controlled trials increased from 8.1% in 2005 to 14.0% in 2015, meta-analyses increased to 5.3%, and systematic reviews increased to 6%. The number of studies using statistical methods increased in ARM from 1.9 to 2.6 per article and in APMR, from 2.7 to 3.1. Use of advanced methods in ARM also showed an increase from 2005 to 2015. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that there is a trend of increased awareness and attempts to use varied research approaches in ARM articles. There should also be more in-depth discussions and opportunities for researchers to share their experiences regarding statistical methods in the clinical field.
Arm ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Methods* ; Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine ; Rehabilitation* ; Research Design*

There are vast land and lots of people in western China, but the economy developing is relatively slow. However, the minimally invasive surgery was carried out firstly in China. Moreover, the type, number and difficulty of the minimally invasive surgery increased year by year. Especially, in the western area of China, Dr Zhou Zongguang, Yu Peiwu and Zheng Shuguo et al. have performed much pioneering work in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, gastric cancer and laparoscopic liver resection. They led the standard development of minimally invasive in China. In the future, western China should continue to strengthen the standardized training of minimally invasive surgery, make great effort to carry out evidence-based research of minimally invasive surgery, provide evidences of high level of clinical application in minimally invasive surgery. At the same time, we should carry out the robotic and 3D laparoscopic surgery actively, leading the development of minimally invasive surgery more standardized and more widespread in western China.
China ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; methods ; trends ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Hepatectomy ; methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; methods ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; education ; methods ; standards ; trends ; Rectal Neoplasms ; surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Stomach Neoplasms ; surgery

Colorectal cancer is a systemic disease that requires multidisciplinary treatment. The comprehensive quality of colorectal surgeon directly impacts on the efficacy of diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. Multidisciplinary teams help surgeons enhance their ability of evidence-based medicine, improve the quality of main specialty, expand the knowledge of other specialty, enhance the doctor-patient communication, and increase the research level. Thus, multidisciplinary teams can improve the comprehensive quality of colorectal surgeons.
Colorectal Neoplasms ; diagnosis ; therapy ; Colorectal Surgery ; Communication ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; methods ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Patient Care Team ; standards ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Quality of Health Care ; Surgeons ; standards

This study aimed to develop a guideline for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin. We adopted the new guideline definition from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), adhered closely to the six domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II), and made recommendations based on systematic reviews. We established a Guideline Steering Group and a Guideline Development Group, formulated 12 questions in the form of Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) and completed a literature search. As far as we know, we will develop the first evidenced-based guideline for vancomycin TDM under the framework of the Grade of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
Anti-Bacterial Agents ; administration & dosage ; economics ; pharmacokinetics ; China ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Monitoring ; methods ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ; drug effects ; growth & development ; pathogenicity ; Staphylococcal Infections ; drug therapy ; microbiology ; pathology ; Vancomycin ; administration & dosage ; economics ; pharmacokinetics

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a patient-centered, surgeon-led system combining anesthesia, nursing, nutrition and psychology. It aims to minimize surgical stress and maintain physiological function in perioperative care, thereby expediting recovery. ERAS theory has been clinically applied for nearly 20 years and it is firstly used in colorectal surgery, then widely used in other surgical fields. However, ERAS is not used commonly in esophagectomy because of its surgical complexity and high morbidity of postoperative complications, which limits the application of ERAS in the field of esophagectomy. In recent years, with the increasing maturation of minimally invasive esophagectomy, attention to tissue and organ protection concept, improvement of making gastric tube, breakthrough of anastomosis technique, and the presentation and application of new concepts, ERAS has made great progress in the field of esophagectomy. This article summarizes some ERAS measures in the treatment of esophageal cancer based on evidence-based medicine, and performs an effective ERAS mode for clinical application of esophagectomy. During preoperative preparation and evaluation, we propose preoperative education and nutrition evaluation without regular intestinal preparation, and advocate preemptive analgesia without preanesthetic medication. During intra-operative management, anesthesia scheme should be optimized, fluid transfusion should be controlled properly, suitable operation mode should be chosen, and intraoperative hypothermia should be avoided. During postoperative management, sufficient analgesia should be administered with non-opioid analgesics, drainage tube placement must be decreased and removed earlier, urinary catheter and gastrointestinal decompression tube should be removed earlier, and oral intake and ambulation should be resumed as early as possible. "Received surgery yesterday, oral intake today, discharged home 5-7 days", ERAS program based on "non tube no fasting" has been applied in some medical centers and becomes more and more maturation. In the future, we will rely on the increasing improvement and systemic training of ERAS mode in order to promote such application in more medical centers. With the multi-center clinical trials, based on constant enrichments and improvements, a general expert consensus will be made finally.
Analgesia ; methods ; Anesthesia, General ; methods ; Decompression, Surgical ; instrumentation ; methods ; Drainage ; instrumentation ; methods ; Esophageal Neoplasms ; rehabilitation ; surgery ; Esophagectomy ; methods ; psychology ; rehabilitation ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Feeding Methods ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; methods ; rehabilitation ; Nutritional Status ; Patient Education as Topic ; methods ; Perioperative Care ; methods ; Urinary Catheterization ; methods ; Walking