Purpose: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) resulting from total hip arthroplasty (THA) pose significant challenges. Partial two-stage exchange arthroplasty (TSEA) retains either the femoral stem or acetabular cup by preserving bone stock and soft tissue and offers a potential alternative to total TSEA. Our meta-analysis evaluated the pooled success rate of partial TSEA in treating late chronic PJIs in THA. Our study also focused on the outcomes associated with retained prosthetic implant (stem or cup) and the type of prior surgery (primary vs. revision arthroplasty) performed. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 355 hips of patients with PJI following THA across 11 studies using a random-effects model to estimate the success rate of partial TSEA and spacer dislocation that occurs during the interval between the first and second stages of partial TSEA. The heterogeneity between the subgroups was also calculated. Results: The overall pooled success rate of partial TSEA in the study cohort was 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83-91).Lacking statistical significance (P=0.904), the success rates were 88% for stem-retained and 90% for cup-retained implant cases. The partial TSEA success rates were 88% for primary arthroplasty and 80% for revision arthroplasty, although this was not statistically significant (P=0.193). Spacer dislocation occurred in only 5% of the cases (95% CI 1-9). Conclusion Partial TSEA achieves high success rates comparable to those of total TSEA. Although revision arthroplasty cases carry a high risk of recurrence, partial TSEA remains a viable, tailored treatment option with a low complication rate.

Background: Posterior spinal fusion is performed for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), with bone graft playing a critical role in achieving solid fusion. Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) is the gold standard but has donor site morbidity, leading to increased use of non-ICBG. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of ICBG and non-ICBG bone grafts in AIS. Methods: This meta-analysis included 23 studies with 3,350 patients, categorized into ICBG and non-ICBG groups. The primary outcome was fusion rate; secondary outcomes were implant-related complication rate, infection rate, donor site pain, blood loss, and operation time. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted to estimate binary outcomes, and a weighted mean model was used to estimate continuous variables. Results: The fusion rate was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93-99) in ICBG group and 97% (95% CI, 95-98) in non-ICBG group. Implant-related complications occurred in 5% (95% CI, 3-7) and 4% (95% CI, 2-6) of each group, while surgical site infections occurred in 3% (95% CI, 2-7) and 2% (95% CI, 1-3). Donor site pain was observed exclusively in ICBG group, with a prevalence of 49% (95% CI, 3–97). Estimated pooled blood loss was 1,461.10 mL (95% CI, 545.30-2,376.90) in ICBG group and 1,047.45 mL (95% CI, 666.92-1,427.99) in non-ICBG group. The estimated pooled operation time was 246.77 (95% CI, 221.74-271.80) and 232.37 (95% CI, 194.88-269.86) for each group. Conclusions Considering both ICBG and non-ICBG demonstrated high fusion rates and low complication rates, non-ICBG grafts may serve as an effective and safe alternative to ICBG, minimizing morbidity, donor site pain, and blood loss.