Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for heart function evaluation in emergency departments (EDs), but requires specific equipment and skilled operators. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile application for estimating left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%] using electrocardiography (ECG) and tests its non-inferiority to POCUS. Materials and Methods: Patients (aged ≥20 years) were included if they had both a POCUS-based EF evaluation and an ECG within 24 hours of their ED visit between January and May 2022, along with formal echocardiography within 2 weeks before or after the visit. A mobile app (ECG Buddy, EB) estimated LVEF (EF from EB) and the risk of LV dysfunction (LV-Dysfunction score) from ECG waveforms, which were compared to NT-proBNP levels and POCUS-evaluated LVEF (EF from POCUS). A non-inferiority margin was set at an area under the curve (AUC) difference of 0.05. Results: Of the 181 patients included, 37 (20.4%) exhibited LV dysfunction. The AUCs for screening LV dysfunction using POCUS and NT-proBNP were 0.885 and 0.822, respectively. EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score outperformed NT-proBNP, with AUCs of 0.893 and 0.884, respectively (p=0.017 and p=0.030, respectively). EF from EB was non-inferior to EF from POCUS, while LV-Dysfunction score narrowly missed the mark. A subgroup analysis of sinus-origin rhythm ECGs supported the non-inferiority of both EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score to EF from POCUS. Conclusion A smartphone application that analyzes ECG image can screen for LV dysfunction with a level of accuracy comparable to that of POCUS.

Although many wearable devices are used to assess sleep, their accuracy remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of the Actiwatch, a research-grade device, and the Fitbit, a consumer-grade device, against sleep diaries to assess sleep patterns. Methods: Twenty participants wore Fitbit and Actiwatch for two weeks and tracked their sleep patterns using sleep diaries. Total sleep time (TST), time-in-bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) from the two devices and sleep diaries were analyzed using analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The TIB measured by the sleep log, Fitbit, and Actiwatch were 420.9 minutes, 417.3 minutes, and 567.4 minutes, respectively. Compared to the sleep log, the Fitbit underestimated TST, TIB, and SE, with significant differences observed for TST (p<0.001) and SE (p<0.001), but not for TIB. The Actiwatch overestimated TIB (p<0.001) and TST (p=0.02) and underestimated SE (p<0.001) compared to the sleep log. The difference between the Fitbit and Actiwatch was significant for TST, TIB, and SE (all p<0.001). Conclusions: The Fitbit showed a smaller difference than the Actiwatch when compared with the sleep logs. The Fitbit could be used as a tool to assess sleep patterns in the clinic as well as in daily life.

Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for heart function evaluation in emergency departments (EDs), but requires specific equipment and skilled operators. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile application for estimating left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%] using electrocardiography (ECG) and tests its non-inferiority to POCUS. Materials and Methods: Patients (aged ≥20 years) were included if they had both a POCUS-based EF evaluation and an ECG within 24 hours of their ED visit between January and May 2022, along with formal echocardiography within 2 weeks before or after the visit. A mobile app (ECG Buddy, EB) estimated LVEF (EF from EB) and the risk of LV dysfunction (LV-Dysfunction score) from ECG waveforms, which were compared to NT-proBNP levels and POCUS-evaluated LVEF (EF from POCUS). A non-inferiority margin was set at an area under the curve (AUC) difference of 0.05. Results: Of the 181 patients included, 37 (20.4%) exhibited LV dysfunction. The AUCs for screening LV dysfunction using POCUS and NT-proBNP were 0.885 and 0.822, respectively. EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score outperformed NT-proBNP, with AUCs of 0.893 and 0.884, respectively (p=0.017 and p=0.030, respectively). EF from EB was non-inferior to EF from POCUS, while LV-Dysfunction score narrowly missed the mark. A subgroup analysis of sinus-origin rhythm ECGs supported the non-inferiority of both EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score to EF from POCUS. Conclusion A smartphone application that analyzes ECG image can screen for LV dysfunction with a level of accuracy comparable to that of POCUS.

Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for heart function evaluation in emergency departments (EDs), but requires specific equipment and skilled operators. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile application for estimating left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%] using electrocardiography (ECG) and tests its non-inferiority to POCUS. Materials and Methods: Patients (aged ≥20 years) were included if they had both a POCUS-based EF evaluation and an ECG within 24 hours of their ED visit between January and May 2022, along with formal echocardiography within 2 weeks before or after the visit. A mobile app (ECG Buddy, EB) estimated LVEF (EF from EB) and the risk of LV dysfunction (LV-Dysfunction score) from ECG waveforms, which were compared to NT-proBNP levels and POCUS-evaluated LVEF (EF from POCUS). A non-inferiority margin was set at an area under the curve (AUC) difference of 0.05. Results: Of the 181 patients included, 37 (20.4%) exhibited LV dysfunction. The AUCs for screening LV dysfunction using POCUS and NT-proBNP were 0.885 and 0.822, respectively. EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score outperformed NT-proBNP, with AUCs of 0.893 and 0.884, respectively (p=0.017 and p=0.030, respectively). EF from EB was non-inferior to EF from POCUS, while LV-Dysfunction score narrowly missed the mark. A subgroup analysis of sinus-origin rhythm ECGs supported the non-inferiority of both EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score to EF from POCUS. Conclusion A smartphone application that analyzes ECG image can screen for LV dysfunction with a level of accuracy comparable to that of POCUS.

Although many wearable devices are used to assess sleep, their accuracy remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of the Actiwatch, a research-grade device, and the Fitbit, a consumer-grade device, against sleep diaries to assess sleep patterns. Methods: Twenty participants wore Fitbit and Actiwatch for two weeks and tracked their sleep patterns using sleep diaries. Total sleep time (TST), time-in-bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) from the two devices and sleep diaries were analyzed using analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The TIB measured by the sleep log, Fitbit, and Actiwatch were 420.9 minutes, 417.3 minutes, and 567.4 minutes, respectively. Compared to the sleep log, the Fitbit underestimated TST, TIB, and SE, with significant differences observed for TST (p<0.001) and SE (p<0.001), but not for TIB. The Actiwatch overestimated TIB (p<0.001) and TST (p=0.02) and underestimated SE (p<0.001) compared to the sleep log. The difference between the Fitbit and Actiwatch was significant for TST, TIB, and SE (all p<0.001). Conclusions: The Fitbit showed a smaller difference than the Actiwatch when compared with the sleep logs. The Fitbit could be used as a tool to assess sleep patterns in the clinic as well as in daily life.

Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for heart function evaluation in emergency departments (EDs), but requires specific equipment and skilled operators. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile application for estimating left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%] using electrocardiography (ECG) and tests its non-inferiority to POCUS. Materials and Methods: Patients (aged ≥20 years) were included if they had both a POCUS-based EF evaluation and an ECG within 24 hours of their ED visit between January and May 2022, along with formal echocardiography within 2 weeks before or after the visit. A mobile app (ECG Buddy, EB) estimated LVEF (EF from EB) and the risk of LV dysfunction (LV-Dysfunction score) from ECG waveforms, which were compared to NT-proBNP levels and POCUS-evaluated LVEF (EF from POCUS). A non-inferiority margin was set at an area under the curve (AUC) difference of 0.05. Results: Of the 181 patients included, 37 (20.4%) exhibited LV dysfunction. The AUCs for screening LV dysfunction using POCUS and NT-proBNP were 0.885 and 0.822, respectively. EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score outperformed NT-proBNP, with AUCs of 0.893 and 0.884, respectively (p=0.017 and p=0.030, respectively). EF from EB was non-inferior to EF from POCUS, while LV-Dysfunction score narrowly missed the mark. A subgroup analysis of sinus-origin rhythm ECGs supported the non-inferiority of both EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score to EF from POCUS. Conclusion A smartphone application that analyzes ECG image can screen for LV dysfunction with a level of accuracy comparable to that of POCUS.

Although many wearable devices are used to assess sleep, their accuracy remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of the Actiwatch, a research-grade device, and the Fitbit, a consumer-grade device, against sleep diaries to assess sleep patterns. Methods: Twenty participants wore Fitbit and Actiwatch for two weeks and tracked their sleep patterns using sleep diaries. Total sleep time (TST), time-in-bed (TIB), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) from the two devices and sleep diaries were analyzed using analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The TIB measured by the sleep log, Fitbit, and Actiwatch were 420.9 minutes, 417.3 minutes, and 567.4 minutes, respectively. Compared to the sleep log, the Fitbit underestimated TST, TIB, and SE, with significant differences observed for TST (p<0.001) and SE (p<0.001), but not for TIB. The Actiwatch overestimated TIB (p<0.001) and TST (p=0.02) and underestimated SE (p<0.001) compared to the sleep log. The difference between the Fitbit and Actiwatch was significant for TST, TIB, and SE (all p<0.001). Conclusions: The Fitbit showed a smaller difference than the Actiwatch when compared with the sleep logs. The Fitbit could be used as a tool to assess sleep patterns in the clinic as well as in daily life.

Purpose: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is widely used for heart function evaluation in emergency departments (EDs), but requires specific equipment and skilled operators. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of a mobile application for estimating left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction [left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%] using electrocardiography (ECG) and tests its non-inferiority to POCUS. Materials and Methods: Patients (aged ≥20 years) were included if they had both a POCUS-based EF evaluation and an ECG within 24 hours of their ED visit between January and May 2022, along with formal echocardiography within 2 weeks before or after the visit. A mobile app (ECG Buddy, EB) estimated LVEF (EF from EB) and the risk of LV dysfunction (LV-Dysfunction score) from ECG waveforms, which were compared to NT-proBNP levels and POCUS-evaluated LVEF (EF from POCUS). A non-inferiority margin was set at an area under the curve (AUC) difference of 0.05. Results: Of the 181 patients included, 37 (20.4%) exhibited LV dysfunction. The AUCs for screening LV dysfunction using POCUS and NT-proBNP were 0.885 and 0.822, respectively. EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score outperformed NT-proBNP, with AUCs of 0.893 and 0.884, respectively (p=0.017 and p=0.030, respectively). EF from EB was non-inferior to EF from POCUS, while LV-Dysfunction score narrowly missed the mark. A subgroup analysis of sinus-origin rhythm ECGs supported the non-inferiority of both EF from EB and LV-Dysfunction score to EF from POCUS. Conclusion A smartphone application that analyzes ECG image can screen for LV dysfunction with a level of accuracy comparable to that of POCUS.

Purpose: The fifth World Health Organization (WHO) classification (2022 WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms have recently been published. In this study, patients were reclassified according to the revised classification and their prognoses were analyzed to confirm the clinical utility of the new classifications. Methods: We included 101 adult patients, 77 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 24 with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), who underwent bone marrow aspiration and next-generation sequencing (NGS) between August 2019 and July 2023. We reclassified the patients according to the revised criteria, examined the differences, and analyzed the prognosis using survival analysis. Results: According to the 2022 WHO and ICC, 23 (29.9%) patients and 32 (41.6%) patients were reclassified into different groups, respectively, due to the addition of myelodysplasia-related (MR) gene mutations to the diagnostic criteria or the addition of new entities associated with TP53 mutations. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with AML and MR gene mutations was shorter than that of patients in other AML groups; however, the difference was not significant. Patients with AML and TP53 mutation had a significantly shorter OS than the other AML group (p = 0.0014, median OS 2.3 vs 10.3 months). They also had significantly shorter OS than the AML and MR mutation group (p = 0.002, median OS 2.3 vs 9.6 months). Conclusion The revised classifications allow for a more detailed categorization based on genetic abnormalities, which may be helpful in predicting prognosis. AML with TP53 mutations is a new ICC category that has shown a high prognostic significance in a small number of cases.

Purpose: The fifth World Health Organization (WHO) classification (2022 WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms have recently been published. In this study, patients were reclassified according to the revised classification and their prognoses were analyzed to confirm the clinical utility of the new classifications. Methods: We included 101 adult patients, 77 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 24 with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), who underwent bone marrow aspiration and next-generation sequencing (NGS) between August 2019 and July 2023. We reclassified the patients according to the revised criteria, examined the differences, and analyzed the prognosis using survival analysis. Results: According to the 2022 WHO and ICC, 23 (29.9%) patients and 32 (41.6%) patients were reclassified into different groups, respectively, due to the addition of myelodysplasia-related (MR) gene mutations to the diagnostic criteria or the addition of new entities associated with TP53 mutations. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with AML and MR gene mutations was shorter than that of patients in other AML groups; however, the difference was not significant. Patients with AML and TP53 mutation had a significantly shorter OS than the other AML group (p = 0.0014, median OS 2.3 vs 10.3 months). They also had significantly shorter OS than the AML and MR mutation group (p = 0.002, median OS 2.3 vs 9.6 months). Conclusion The revised classifications allow for a more detailed categorization based on genetic abnormalities, which may be helpful in predicting prognosis. AML with TP53 mutations is a new ICC category that has shown a high prognostic significance in a small number of cases.