Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, whether GLP-1RA improves clinically important renal outcomes is still unclear. In cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1RA, renal outcomes have been evaluated as secondary outcomes; however, their benefits have not been clarified, except for the effect of reducing albuminuria. Recently, the FLOW trial evaluated the renal benefits of GLP-1RA as a primary outcome in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease and showed a significant renoprotective effect. In this review, we discuss the renoprotective effects of GLP-1RA, summarize recently published research results, and describe the known mechanism of renal benefit and outlook.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, whether GLP-1RA improves clinically important renal outcomes is still unclear. In cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1RA, renal outcomes have been evaluated as secondary outcomes; however, their benefits have not been clarified, except for the effect of reducing albuminuria. Recently, the FLOW trial evaluated the renal benefits of GLP-1RA as a primary outcome in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease and showed a significant renoprotective effect. In this review, we discuss the renoprotective effects of GLP-1RA, summarize recently published research results, and describe the known mechanism of renal benefit and outlook.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, whether GLP-1RA improves clinically important renal outcomes is still unclear. In cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1RA, renal outcomes have been evaluated as secondary outcomes; however, their benefits have not been clarified, except for the effect of reducing albuminuria. Recently, the FLOW trial evaluated the renal benefits of GLP-1RA as a primary outcome in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease and showed a significant renoprotective effect. In this review, we discuss the renoprotective effects of GLP-1RA, summarize recently published research results, and describe the known mechanism of renal benefit and outlook.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, whether GLP-1RA improves clinically important renal outcomes is still unclear. In cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1RA, renal outcomes have been evaluated as secondary outcomes; however, their benefits have not been clarified, except for the effect of reducing albuminuria. Recently, the FLOW trial evaluated the renal benefits of GLP-1RA as a primary outcome in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease and showed a significant renoprotective effect. In this review, we discuss the renoprotective effects of GLP-1RA, summarize recently published research results, and describe the known mechanism of renal benefit and outlook.

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a major global health burden. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated potential in slowing CKD progression. We evaluated the expanding role of SGLT2 inhibitors, emphasizing their renoprotective benefits in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD patients. We also investigated the underlying mechanisms, including the reduction of glomerular hypertension via modulation of tubuloglomerular feedback. Our study critically analyzed current indications for SGLT2 inhibitor therapy based on recent clinical trial data. To optimize patient outcomes, we present a comprehensive analysis of practical considerations for the prescription of SGLT2 inhibitors, including the potential initial decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and a review of adverse events.

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a major global health burden. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated potential in slowing CKD progression. We evaluated the expanding role of SGLT2 inhibitors, emphasizing their renoprotective benefits in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD patients. We also investigated the underlying mechanisms, including the reduction of glomerular hypertension via modulation of tubuloglomerular feedback. Our study critically analyzed current indications for SGLT2 inhibitor therapy based on recent clinical trial data. To optimize patient outcomes, we present a comprehensive analysis of practical considerations for the prescription of SGLT2 inhibitors, including the potential initial decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and a review of adverse events.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a major global health burden. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated potential in slowing CKD progression. We evaluated the expanding role of SGLT2 inhibitors, emphasizing their renoprotective benefits in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD patients. We also investigated the underlying mechanisms, including the reduction of glomerular hypertension via modulation of tubuloglomerular feedback. Our study critically analyzed current indications for SGLT2 inhibitor therapy based on recent clinical trial data. To optimize patient outcomes, we present a comprehensive analysis of practical considerations for the prescription of SGLT2 inhibitors, including the potential initial decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and a review of adverse events.

This fifth revised version of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer incorporates recent research findings and changes in treatment strategies based on version 4.0 released in 2020. Each key question was developed by focusing on recent notable insights and crucial contemporary issues in the field of cervical cancer. These questions were evaluated for their significance and impact on the current treatment and were finalized through voting by the development committee. The selected key questions were as follows: the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors as firstor second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer; the oncologic safety of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer; the efficacy and safety of adjuvant systemic treatment after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer; and the oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node mapping compared to pelvic lymph node dissection. The recommendations, directions, and strengths of this guideline were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and were finally confirmed through public hearings and external reviews. In this study, we describe the revised practice guidelines for the management of cervical cancer.