1.Enavogliflozin, an SGLT2 Inhibitor, Improves Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Induced by High-Fat, High-Cholesterol Diet
Phuc Thi Minh PHAM ; Giang NGUYEN ; So Young PARK ; Thuy Linh LAI ; Dae-Hee CHOI ; Jeana HONG ; Seon Mee KANG ; Eun-Hee CHO
Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2026;50(1):165-177
Background:
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, a progressive condition caused by the accumulation of fat in the liver, begins with simple steatosis and can potentially progress to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in the presence of inflammation and fibrosis, ultimately leading to cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Increasing evidence indicates that sodiumglucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors effectively alleviate MASH in mouse models. However, there is a lack of research on the effects of enavogliflozin on liver disease. In the present study, we investigated the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on MASH induced by a high-fat, high-cholesterol (HFHC) diet in mice.
Methods:
Male C57BL/6 mice were fed a normal chow diet, HFHC diet, or HFHC diet with enavogliflozin for 12 weeks. LX-2 and HepG2 cells were treated with enavogliflozin in the presence of various pathological stimuli.
Results:
The HFHC diet induced excessive hepatic lipid accumulation, inflammation, and severe fibrosis. Administration of enavogliflozin not only ameliorated hepatic steatosis and fibrotic conditions but also suppressed the production of inflammatory cytokines. Positive outcomes were also observed in in vitro experiments, where enavogliflozin demonstrated the ability to impede the activation of hepatic stellate cells and alleviate lipid accumulation in hepatocytes. The potential pathway through which enavogliflozin attenuated liver fibrosis development may be associated with the transforming growth factor β1/Smad signaling pathway.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that enavogliflozin is effective in a mouse model of MASH by attenuating hepatic steatosis, suppressing inflammation, and improving liver fibrosis.
2.Structured Integration of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for the Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps
Hae Yeon KANG ; Soonwhan KANG ; Goh Eun CHUNG ; Dong Hoon BAEK ; Hong Sub LEE ; Jinbae PARK ; Sun Young YANG ; Seon Hee LIM ; Ji Min CHOI ; Jung KIM ; Jung Ho BAE
Gut and Liver 2026;20(1):86-96
Background/Aims:
Recent advances in computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) systems have demonstrated expert-level accuracy in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps. High-confidence (HC) diagnoses have been defined as those made within 3 seconds without hesitation, and these systems have been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to evaluate the performance of endoscopists with varying levels of experience in diagnosing colorectal polyps with the assistance of a new CADx system applying the 3-second rule and without artificial intelligence assistance.
Methods:
In this multicenter ex vivo study, 35 endoscopists assessed 100 polyps (51 adenomas, 39 hyperplastic polyps, 10 sessile serrated lesions) using narrow-band imaging video clips on an online platform. Assessments consisted of individual endoscopist diagnosis and CADx-assisted diagnosis. HC assignments followed the 3-second rule in both phases. Performance metrics included HC accuracy, HC rate, and adherence to the Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations (PIVI) and Simple Optical Diagnosis Accuracy (SODA) thresholds.
Results:
HC diagnostic accuracy improved from 78.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.6% to 80.0%) to 89.8% (95% CI, 88.6% to 90.9%) with CADx assistance (p<0.001). The proportion of HC predictions increased from 64.2% to 75.4% (p<0.001). Novice endoscopists showed marked improvement with CADx (74.1% vs 88.8%; p<0.001). CADx-assisted diagnoses nearly met SODA and PIVI thresholds under the 3-second rule. Additional analysis demonstrated that CADx assistance significantly improved interobserver agreement and ground truth, particularly for novices (κ=0.37 to κ=0.65; p<0.001).
Conclusions
Integrating CADx with the 3-second rule significantly enhances the performance of endoscopists in the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps, with the greatest benefit observed among novice endoscopists.
3.Considerations of Flow Cytometric Lymphocyte Subset Analysis in Korea Based on a Survey of Current Clinical Laboratory Practice
Mikyoung PARK ; Hyun-Woo CHOI ; Jihyang LIM ; Kyung-Hwa SHIN ; Eun-Jee OH ; Jaewoo SONG ; Kyeong-Hee KIM ; In Hwa JEONG ; Joo-Heon PARK ; Sang-Hyun HWANG ; Eun-Suk KANG
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2026;46(2):220-225
Flow cytometric lymphocyte subset analysis (FCLSA) is essential for assessing immune status across various diseases and clinical settings. We surveyed current clinical laboratory practices related to FCLSA to establish a baseline reference for future standardization in Korea. Nine university hospitals actively performing FCLSA responded to the 22-question survey, which covered seven categories of laboratory practice. These hospitals used commercial reagent antibody kits from either Beckton Dickinson Biosciences (N = 4) or Beckman Coulter Diagnostics (N = 5). Most hospitals performed daily instrument setup and scheduled maintenance every 2–6 months. Two levels of commercial quality control materials were routinely used each day. Sample and reagent antibody volumes varied across hospitals, even when the same reagent kit was used. Acquired cell counts ranged from 5 × 10 3 to 5 × 10 4 cells, with two hospitals adjusting counts based on the cell type analyzed. Most laboratories reported percentages and general opinions; some additionally reported white blood cell and lymphocyte counts, along with lymphocyte percentages. This is the first comprehensive survey on the clinical laboratory practice of FCLSA in Korea.Standardization of FCLSA should be accelerated to ensure reliable and reproducible results.
4.Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Radiofrequency Stretta Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis From2 Tertiary Centers in Korea
Hyun LIM ; Yuri KIM ; Jin Hee NOH ; Jung In LEE ; Eun Jeong GONG ; Boram CHA ; Chan Hyuk PARK ; Da Hyun JUNG ; Ju Yup LEE ; Sun Hyung KANG ; In Kyung YOO ; Joo Young CHO ; Do Hoon KIM ;
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2026;32(2):290-297
Background/Aims:
Endoscopic anti-reflux therapy is a therapeutic option for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), providing durable effects. However, clinical data from Korea remain limited. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of endoscopic radiofrequency Stretta therapy in Korean patients.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 patients with GERD who underwent Stretta therapy at 2 tertiary hospitals in Korea between November 2015 and July 2021. Clinical outcomes, including patient satisfaction, medication cessation or reduction, and complications, were evaluated. Pre- and post-procedural esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring test results were also analyzed.
Results:
Patient satisfaction rates at 1, 6, and 12 months post-procedure were 54.7% (35/64), 70.0% (28/40), and 75.0% (21/28), respectively. Medication cessation or reduction was achieved in 31.2% (20/64) at 1 month, 70.0% (28/40) at 6 months, and 67.9% (19/28) at 12 months. Esophageal manometry (n = 21) showed no significant changes in mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure (18.7 mmHg [2.5-52.9] vs 17.4 mmHg [0.0-43.0], P = 0.702) or mean integrated relaxation pressure (8.2 mmHg [0.0-28.0] vs 10.1 mmHg [0.0-31.0], P = 0.840). The 24-hour pH monitoring (n = 18) demonstrated a nonsignificant decrease in acid exposure time (pH < 4) from 2.3% (0.0-8.4) to 1.6% (0.0-7.3) (P = 0.182). Similarly, the DeMeester score decreased non-significantly from 8.4 (0.8-27.7) to 6.6 (0.8-21.8) (P = 0.352). No procedure-related complications occurred.
Conclusion
Endoscopic radiofrequency Stretta therapy appears to be a safe treatment option for GERD and may provide favorable patient satisfaction and medication reduction.
5.Shifting the Paradigm of Medical Dispute Resolution: From Individual Punishment to System Improvement and Public Compensation
Hee Gyung KANG ; Eun Kyung EO ; Duseop KWON ; Sung-ju KIM ; HaDa RYUOK ; Serng Bai PAK ; Junghee AHN ; Minsu OCK ; Mihwa YOO ; Sang-il LEE ; Eunyoung CHO ; Eun Jin HA ; DongSeok HAN ; Juhwan OH
Korean Journal of Family Practice 2026;16(1):25-32
Legal risks and liability issues in medical practice serve as a primary catalyst for the current collapse of essential healthcare services in Korea. Currently, medical disputes in Korea are disproportionately focused on criminal prosecutions and high-damages civil litigation. This punitive approach fosters a culture of concealment, encourages defensive medicine, and accelerates the exodus of medical professionals from essential fields. Ultimately, this cycle deprives the system of opportunities for improvement and poses a significant threat to patient safety. In contrast, many advanced nations have adopted principles of “Just Culture” and “Safe Space,” prioritizing non-punitive reporting and systemic root-cause analysis over individual retribution. To address these issues, this paper proposes four key strategies: First, the establishment of an independent “Patient Safety Investigation Agency” to objectively investigate incidents and identify systemic flaws. Second, a transition from criminal punishment to licensing board-led management, focusing on re-education and counseling to maintain quality of care. Third, the enactment of “Apology Laws” to ensure that expressions of regret or apologies cannot be used as legal evidence of liability, thereby fostering trust and psychological recovery. Finally, the creation of a “Patient Safety Fund” to provide prompt and sufficient public compensation to victims regardless of proven negligence. In conclusion, it is imperative to shift the paradigm by defining medical accidents as “system failures” rather than individual faults. Strengthening the social safety net will encourage medical professionals to return to essential care and build a sustainable healthcare environment centered on patient safety.
6.Structural Transformation of the Korean Healthcare System to Protect National Health Rights:From the Perspective of Consumers and Primary Care
Mihwa YOO ; Hee Gyung KANG ; Jae-Heon KANG ; Minjoung KO ; Jong Myoung KIM ; Kunhee PARK ; Serng Bai PAK ; Chiwon SEO ; Junghee AHN ; Juhwan OH ; Eunyoung CHO ; Eun Jin HA
Korean Journal of Family Practice 2026;16(1):9-12
The South Korean healthcare system has achieved rapid quantitative growth; however, it continues to face critical challenges in ensuring the fundamental right to health of its citizens. From the perspective of healthcare consumers and civil society, this article identifies structural problems such as imbalances in medical accessibility, instability in essential and emergency care, and the limited participation of consumers in healthcare policy-making. Although the constitution stipulates the state’s responsibility to protect public health, current healthcare policies often prioritize administrative efficiency and provider-centered interests over patient experiences and health outcomes. In particular, this article argues that these challenges are closely related to the inadequate functioning of an accountable healthcare management framework. Structural failures in essential care, workforce shortages, and regional disparities are insufficiently monitored and addressed at the system level, resulting in responsibilities being blurred or shifted to individual healthcare providers. Consequently, the risks and burdens arising from systemic weaknesses are ultimately borne by citizens. To address these issues, this article emphasizes two major shifts. First, meaningful consumer participation must be institutionalized within healthcare governance to strengthen accountability, transparency, and responsiveness. Second, family medicine and primary care should be reinforced as the cornerstone of a sustainable, community-based healthcare system that ensures continuity of care, prevention, and chronic disease management. Re-establishing the healthcare system based on the right to health is not merely a technical adjustment, but a structural transformation toward a responsible and accountable system in which the state clearly assumes responsibility for monitoring, learning, and corrective action.
7.Current Status and Improvement Strategies for the Resident Training System in South Korea:Focusing on Patient Safety and Sustainable Healthcare
Seung-Won OH ; HaDa RYUOK ; Ilyoung OH ; Jae-Heon KANG ; Eun Jin HA ; Hee Gyung KANG ; Serng Bai PAK ; Junghee AHN ; Mihwa YOO ; Eunyoung CHO ; Juhwan OH
Korean Journal of Family Practice 2026;16(1):48-58
The South Korean resident training system is currently at a critical turning point, facing structural crises characterized by excessive labor-intensive environments and deteriorating quality of education. Since the medical standoff in 2024, the limitations of relying on junior doctors’ labor for hospital operations have become increasingly apparent. This review examines the current status and problems of the resident training system, including long working hours exceeding Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) standards, lack of systematic competency-based education, and worsening regional and essential medical imbalances. By analyzing international cases from the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, and Australia, this article proposes four core strategies for reform: (1) establishing a sustainable working and educational environment through the expansion of hospitalist systems and legalizing physician assistant roles; (2) innovating the curriculum and evaluation systems based on entrustable professional activities and milestones; (3) implementing a network-based training model to bridge the gap between metropolitan and regional healthcare; and (4) securing stable financial support and strengthening governance through the establishment of an independent evaluation body (e.g., K-ACGME). Ultimately, reforming the training system is essential not only for the rights and professional growth of residents but also for ensuring patient safety and the long-term sustainability of the national healthcare system.
8.Challenges in Strengthening National Health Insurance Coverage and the Necessity of Reforming Private Indemnity Health Insurance
Jong Myoung KIM ; Hee Gyung KANG ; Eun Jin HA ; Sung-ju KIM ; Junghee AHN ; Mihwa YOO ; Juhwan OH
Korean Journal of Family Practice 2026;16(1):42-47
While South Korea’s National Health Insurance (NHI) was once disparaged as a rudimentary “discount program,” it has matured into the cornerstone of the nation’s medical safety net owing to sustained governmental initiatives. Nevertheless, the pursuit of expanded benefit coverage, exacerbated by demographic shifts toward low fertility and an aging society, has catalyzed a rapid escalation in aggregate national healthcare spending.Consequently, there is an urgent need for the NHI to implement benefit expansion policies that prioritize cost-efficiency and fiscal prudence. This perspective asserts that coverage enhancement should be strategically focused on high-cost catastrophic illnesses, specifically through the robust fortification of the annual out-of-pocket (OOP) maximum system. Furthermore, the reform of private health insurance is imperative, as its unbridled growth in non-reimbursable services has undermined the efficacy of public coverage efforts. This paper proposes concrete policy frameworks for both the enhancement of the OOP maximum system and the structural reform of private indemnity health insurance.
9.Beyond the Dual Control Tower: Directions for Reforming the National Emergency Medical System to Enhance Patient Safety and Ensure Continuity in South Korea
Eun Kyung EO ; Heejun SHIN ; HaDa RYUOK ; Hee Gyung KANG ; Sung-ju KIM ; Eunyoung CHO ; Eun Jin HA ; Juhwan OH ; Mihwa YOO
Korean Journal of Family Practice 2026;16(1):17-24
Recurrent difficulty securing emergency department (ED) acceptance and delayed interfacility transfer, often resulting in multiple sequential transfer attempts (“round-robin” hospital seeking), in the Republic of Korea reflect a patient safety failure across the emergency care continuum, spanning Emergency Medical Services from emergency calls and prehospital care to ED stabilization, definitive treatment, and secondary transfer. We argue that the governance split between the National Fire Agency–led prehospital response and the Ministry of Health and Welfare–led emergency medical system fragments accountability and data, undermining sustainable quality management. We describe a “double bind” in which clinicians face medico-legal risk regardless of acceptance decisions, distorting transfer behavior. We propose an outcome-linked Quality Improvement system—integrated metrics, interoperable data linkage, operational medical control, and routine feedback—to strengthen Continuity of Patient Care. This requires functional integration of the dual command structure; transferring ambulance service functions to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, or an equivalently strong joint-governance model, should be evaluated. Regionally, responsibility-based systems should be implemented through councils that set transfer principles and resource allocation, supported by stable financing and performance review, with the regional emergency medical situation room providing medical control and real-time coordination. For mass-casualty incidents, preparedness should align standardized triage, integrated command and communication, training, and after-action review. Legal reform is a necessary starting point, but trust and sustained patient safety depend more on cultivating a learning-oriented safety culture grounded in patient experience and public deliberation throughout policy design and implementation.
10.What Should Be Done Right Now for Better Health System in 10 Years?: Health System Reform Tasks
Juhwan OH ; Sang-il LEE ; Kunhee PARK ; Seung-Won OH ; Junghee AHN ; HaDa RYUOK ; Eun Jin HA ; Seung-yeon CHO ; Sung-ju KIM ; Eunyoung CHO ; Hee Gyung KANG ; Serng Bai PAK ; Eun Kyung EO
Korean Journal of Family Practice 2026;16(1):1-8
South Korea’s current healthcare system stands at a critical crossroads that will determine whether it can progress in a better direction over the next decade. Behind the relatively stable level of population health that has been maintained until now, it has become clear that the deterioration of patient experiences, the risk of collapse in critical emergency medical services, the burnout of healthcare providers, and the crisis in the sustainability of healthcare finances have all accumulated simultaneously. This crisis can no longer be overcome by partial fixes or short-term measures alone. The answer to what needs to change first must begin with a reaffirmation of what the healthcare system should aim for. Ultimately, what needs to be changed now is not an individual policy, but the criteria and priorities through which we view healthcare. The focus must shift from what to provide more of, to questioning what holds greater social value. If such a shift does not begin now, in ten years we won’t face a better healthcare system, but care enmeshed in a deeper crisis. Now is precisely the time to fundamentally define the direction of the healthcare system.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail