Neurological diseases include a variety of neurodegenerative diseases and other brain damage diseases.The treatment schemes for neurological diseases are still in research.The existing clinical and basic studies have confirmed that traditional estrogen therapy has certain protective effect on the nervous system,while it increases the risk of breast or endometrial cancer.The emergence of the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) can avoid the above mentioned problems.The available studies have confirmed the protective effect of tamoxifen as a SERM on the nervous system.This paper reviews the role and functioning mechanisms of tamoxifen in the nervous system and cognitive function,aiming to provide guidance for the future application of tamoxifen in the treatment of neurological diseases and the improvement of cognitive function.
Tamoxifen/therapeutic use* ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use* ; Cognition ; Nervous System

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer treatment with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) increases the incidence of uterine malignant mixed Müllerian tumors (uMMMTs). We examine clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of SERM-associated uMMMTs (S-uMMMTs) and discuss possible pathogenetic mechanisms. METHODS: Among 28,104 patients with breast cancer, clinicopathologic features and incidence of uMMMT were compared between patients who underwent SERM treatment and those who did not. Of 92 uMMMT cases that occurred during the same period, incidence, dose, and duration of SERM treatment, as well as overall survival rate, were compared for patients with breast cancer who underwent SERM treatment and those who did not (S-uMMMT vs NS-uMMMT) and for patients without breast cancer (de novo-uMMMT). Histopathological findings and immunophenotypes for myogenin, desmin, p53, WT-1, estrogen receptor (ER) α, ERβ, progesterone receptor, and GATA-3 were compared between S-uMMMT and de novo-uMMMT. RESULTS: The incidence of S-uMMMT was significantly higher than that of NS-uMMMT (6.35-fold). All patients with SERM were postmenopausal and received daily 20–40 mg SERM. Cumulative SERM dose ranged from 21.9 to 73.0 g (mean, 46.0) over 39–192 months (mean, 107). Clinicopathologic features, such as International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and overall survival, were not significantly different between patients with S-uMMMT and NS-uMMMT or between patients with S-uMMMT and de novo-uMMMT. All 11 S-uMMMT cases available for immunostaining exhibited strong overexpression/null expression of p53 protein and significantly increased ERβ expression in carcinomatous and sarcomatous components. CONCLUSIONS: SERM therapy seemingly increases risk of S-uMMMT development; however, clinicopathologic features were similar in all uMMMTs from different backgrounds. p53 mutation and increased ERβ expression might be involved in the etiology of S-uMMMT.
Breast Neoplasms ; Breast ; Desmin ; Estrogens ; Gynecology ; Humans ; Incidence ; Myogenin ; Obstetrics ; Prognosis ; Receptors, Progesterone ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators ; Survival Rate ; Tamoxifen

OBJECTIVE: A subset of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) may benefit from antiestrogen therapy with higher response rates reported in tumors that are strongly estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER+). PARAGON is a basket trial that incorporates 7 phase 2 trials investigating the activity of anastrozole in patients with ER+ and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive (PR+) recurrent/metastatic gynecological cancers. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with ER+ and/or PR+ ROC, who were asymptomatic and had cancer antigen 125 (CA125) progression after response to first line chemotherapy, where chemotherapy was not clinically indicated. Patients received anastrozole 1 mg daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were enrolled (52 evaluable). Clinical benefit at three months (primary endpoint) was observed in 18 patients (34.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]=23%–48%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months (95% CI=2.1–3.1). The median duration of clinical benefit was 6.5 months (95% CI=2.8–11.7). Most patients progressed within 6 months of starting anastrozole but 12 (22%) continued treatment for longer than 6 months. Anastrozole was well tolerated. In the exploratory analysis, ER histoscores and the intensity of ER staining did not correlate with clinical benefit rate or PFS. CONCLUSION: A subset of asymptomatic patients with ER+ and/or PR+ ROC and CA125 progression had durable clinical benefit on anastrozole, with acceptable toxicity. Anastrozole may delay symptomatic progression and the time to subsequent chemotherapy. The future challenge is to identify the subset of patients most likely to benefit from an aromatase inhibitor and whether the clinical benefit could be increased by the addition of other agents.
Aromatase ; Aromatase Inhibitors ; CA-125 Antigen ; Disease-Free Survival ; Drug Therapy ; Estrogen Receptor Modulators ; Estrogens ; Female ; Humans ; Ovarian Neoplasms ; Progesterone ; Receptors, Progesterone

OBJECTIVES: Vitamin D is regarded as one of the major nutrients that significantly influence bone metabolism. This study aims to look at the effect of supplementary vitamin D on bone mineral density (BMD) in female osteoporosis patients. METHODS: The retrospective hospital record review was performed on 282 patients who were diagnosed with osteoporosis and treated with selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) between January 2015 and December 2016. Of these patients, 151 were treated with SERMs only while 131 were treated using both SERMs and vitamin D supplements. The BMD and any occurrence of osteoporotic fracture episode were investigated after one year. The result of two groups was compared to find the significance of vitamin D. RESULTS: Overall, improvement in BMD score was observed in 76% of the patients. The BMD of the SERMs only group improved by 3% in spine and 1% in the hip while that of the SERMs with vitamin D group improved by 6% and 1% respectively. Statistical significance was noticed in the spine only. One distal radius fracture and one single level vertebral fracture occurred in patients of SERMs group while two distal radius fractures occurred in SERMs with vitamin D group. There was no occurrence of around hip fracture in both groups. CONCLUSION: The result of the current study suggests that additional vitamin D may have some additive effect on improving BMD of the spine. Further study with the larger study population and the extended study period is recommended.
Bone Density ; Female ; Hip ; Hospital Records ; Humans ; Metabolism ; Osteoporosis ; Osteoporotic Fractures ; Radius Fractures ; Retrospective Studies ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators ; Spine ; Vitamin D ; Vitamins

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength resulting in a predisposition to fracture. Osteoporosis-related fractures can lead to pain, disability, and increased healthcare costs. This study aimed to explore different pharmacological treatments for osteoporosis. Various treatments are used to prevent and treat osteoporosis, particularly in postmenopausal women and elderly men, but the approach needs to be individually tailored. Bisphosphonates are most commonly used to treat osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are mainly used during the initial phase of therapy for most patients with osteoporosis, including those with a high risk of fracture. In younger postmenopausal women, menopausal hormone therapy (including tibolone) and selective estrogen receptor modulators may be considered as alternatives for fracture prevention. Parathyroid hormone therapy is recommended for osteoporosis treatment in elderly patients with an increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the mainstay for monitoring the treatment response, and clinicians may consider alternative treatments if a significant decrease in bone mineral density is detected (using DXA or bone turnover markers) or if recurrent fractures occur during treatment. For postmenopausal women undergoing long-term bisphosphonate treatment, the risk of fracture should be reassessed after 3 to 5 years, and a “drug holiday” should be considered if the risk of fracture is low-to-moderate. Therapy should be continued for patients who continue to exhibit a high risk of fracture, or alternatively, switching to other treatments may be considered.
Absorptiometry, Photon ; Aged ; Bone Density ; Bone Remodeling ; Denosumab ; Diphosphonates ; Drug Therapy ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Humans ; Male ; Osteoporosis ; Parathyroid Hormone ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Hormone therapy (HT) is the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms, and reduces both spinal and non-spinal postmenopausal osteoporotic fractures. However, a Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial revealed that progestin-containing HT is associated with higher incidences of breast cancer and coronary heart disease than those associated with placebo. Tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) is a novel progestin-free HT option composed of conjugated estrogens (CE) and a selective estrogen receptor modulator. CE at a dose of 0.45 mg combined with 20 mg of bazedoxifene was the first TSEC medication approved in the United States and Korea for women with moderate to severe menopause-related vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and for preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis. This review summarizes the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of TSEC as obtained from the five SMART clinical trials.
Breast Neoplasms ; Coronary Disease ; Estrogens* ; Estrogens, Conjugated (USP) ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Korea ; Menopause* ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal ; Osteoporotic Fractures ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators ; Treatment Outcome* ; United States ; Women's Health

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and the turnover rate [√(MoMf²+ MoMr²), multiple of median formation (MoMf) was calculated as bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) value/18.6 and multiple of median resorption (MoMr) as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) value/463] and the balance (MoMf/MoMr) and to compare differences in therapeutic effects evoked by differences in previous treatments. METHODS: In 51 osteoporotic women treated with bisphosphonates (BPs) or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), BMD was measured at 0, 24, and 48 weeks after denosumab administration. The values of BAP and TRACP-5b were measured at 0, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. RESULTS: The turnover rate decreased at week 4 and decreased further at week 12. The balance indicated a relative predominantly formative state at week 4. This balance became higher in the SERM group than in the BP group at week 4. A correlation was observed between the rate of BMD change and turnover rate at weeks 0 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to evaluate the turnover rate and balance to determine the therapeutic effect of denosumab, which induces dissociation between the trends in the bone turnover markers. Turnover rate and balance during the early stages of denosumab treatment may be predictive factors of BMD. When switching from bone resorption inhibitors to denosumab, it was necessary to consider the beginning values that were affected by the previous treatment. The state of relative anabolism is greater at 4 weeks when the previous treatment involved SERMs rather than BPs.
Acid Phosphatase ; Alkaline Phosphatase ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; Bone Density* ; Bone Remodeling* ; Bone Resorption* ; Denosumab* ; Diphosphonates ; Female ; Humans ; Metabolism ; Osteoporosis ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators ; Therapeutic Uses

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. OBJECTIVES: To propose possible mechanisms of osteoporotic back pain and its management with antiosteoporotic drugs. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: No general conclusion has yet been reached regarding whether osteoporosis without fractures can cause pain. Instead, only treatments for back pain without osteoporotic spine fractures have been reviewed in the previous literature. Although key studies of antiosteoporotic drugs have not investigated their analgesic efficacy, plausible mechanisms have been suggested. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analgesic effects of antiosteoporotic agents available in Korea were reviewed. RESULTS: Rather than the long-term use of conventional analgesics or narcotics, antiosteoporotic drugs would be more beneficial because they can enhance bone strength and have fewer side effects. Both anabolic and antiresorptive agents available in Korea have been proven to have an analgesic effect against osteoporotic back pain, with or without fractures. Anabolic agents depend on skeletal effects. Among antiresorptive agents, bisphosphonates have both skeletal and extraskeletal mechanisms for analgesia. Calcitonin and selective estrogen receptor modulators mostly depend on extraskeletal effects. The order of analgesic strength for osteoporotic back pain is teriparatide > bisphosphonate > calcitonin. This implies that the analgesic effect of antiosteoporotic drugs primarily depends on their skeletal effects rather than on their extraskeletal effects. Moreover, because non-fracture osteoporotic pain has been recognized only in the spine, where fractures can occur without a sensible injury, pain may arise from undiscovered spine fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Antiosteoporotic drugs ameliorate osteoporotic back pain. Their analgesic strength is proportional to their fracture prevention efficacy.
Anabolic Agents ; Analgesia ; Analgesics ; Back Pain ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; Calcitonin ; Diphosphonates ; Korea ; Narcotics ; Osteoporosis ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators ; Spine ; Teriparatide

Ospemifene—a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2013—is an oral medication for the treatment of dyspareunia. In postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy, ospemifene significantly improves the structure and pH levels of the vagina, reducing dyspareunia. It is available as a 60-mg tablet; hence, women who may have had prior difficulty with vaginal administration or on-demand use of nonprescription lubricants and moisturizers would likely prefer this form of treatment. Preclinical studies demonstrated that ospemifene has an estrogen agonist action on the bone, reducing the cell proliferation of ductal carcinoma in an in situ model. Studies evaluating the safety of treatment for up to 52 weeks have shown that ospemifene is a safe medication with minimal impact on the endometrium. Further studies with larger number of subjects are necessary to better conclude its effects and long-term safety.
Administration, Intravaginal ; Atrophy* ; Carcinoma, Ductal ; Cell Proliferation ; Dyspareunia ; Endometrium ; Estrogens ; Female ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Lubricants ; Menopause ; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators ; Tamoxifen ; United States Food and Drug Administration ; Vagina ; Vulva

Historically, endocrine therapy for breast cancer began with ovarian ablation (OA) for the treatment of premenopausal patients. After the identification of estrogen receptors and the development of many antiestrogens, tamoxifen has been approved and used as the standard endocrine therapy for hormonal receptor (HR)-positive premenopausal patients to date. With the development of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists, the paradigm of endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with HR-positive breast cancer began to change from OA to ovarian function suppression (OFS). To date, the indication for OFS was limited to those premenopausal patients with HR-positive breast cancer who were unable to use tamoxifen as the primary adjuvant endocrine therapy. However, following the definitive demonstration of the therapeutic role of OFS added to tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor after chemotherapy in large randomized trials, such as Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial or Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial, the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines for the use of endocrine therapy in premenopausal HR-positive breast cancer were recently updated to recommend OFS in high-risk patients who required adjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, the role of OFS to protect ovarian function during chemotherapy in premenopausal women has remained controversial, and some evidence showing the protective effect of OFS on the ovaries during chemotherapy as well as its therapeutic effect for breast cancer in premenopausal women with HR-negative breast cancer was recently published. Further evaluation is necessary to determine its exact role. In conclusion, the role of OA or OFS has been evolving, not only to improve the efficacy of breast cancer treatment, but also to preserve ovary function. OFS remains a main strategy for premenopausal women with HR-positive early breast cancer, though its exact role should be determined in further studies.
Aromatase ; Breast Neoplasms* ; Breast* ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Drug Therapy ; Estrogen Receptor Modulators ; Female ; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone ; Humans ; Medical Oncology ; Ovary ; Premenopause ; Receptors, Estrogen ; Tamoxifen