PURPOSE: The purpose of this cadaveric study was to compare the volume and weight of bone graft harvested using the curettage vs. the trephination technique from the anterior iliac crest. METHODS: Embalmed cadavers were studied in this experimental research. The right hemipelvis of each cadaver was used for the trephine bone harvesting technique, whereas the left hemipelvis was used for the conventional curettage technique. The weight and the volume of the harvested bone were measured and statistically compared between the 2 sides. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was employed to compare the graft volume and weight obtained from the right and left sides of the hemipelvis. RESULTS: Ten embalmed adult cadavers were used in this study. All subjects were Caucasian males with a mean age of 59.8 years (range 44 - 73 years) at the time of death. A total of 81 cylindrical bone grafts were harvested from the right iliac crest. In 9 out of 81 (11.1%), the cortex of the ilium was penetrated by the chisel. The mean weight of the bone graft harvested with the trephine technique (26.97 ± 2.32) g was heavier than that harvested with the curettage technique (23.74 ± 2.09) g (p = 0.007). Similarly, the volume of the bone graft was higher in the trephine technique (8.40 ± 0.84) cm³ compared to the curettage technique (6.60 ± 1.26) cm³ (p = 0.011). The trephination technique lasted a mean of (12.76 ± 1.87) min (range 10.30-16.10 min), while the curettage technique lasted a mean of (14.53 ± 0.89) min (range 13.50-16.00 min) (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Harvesting anterior iliac crest bone graft with the trephine technique provides a higher bone volume and weight than the conventional curettage technique. The trephine technique might be advocated over the curettage technique, especially when a large amount of autologous bone graft is required. However, a meticulous harvesting technique should be followed to prevent complications. In particular, the three-dimensional anatomy should be kept in mind, and the depth of trephination should be well-controlled. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Institutional Review Board registration: 2022/499.
Humans ; Ilium/surgery* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Aged ; Cadaver ; Curettage/methods* ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods* ; Bone Transplantation/methods* ; Adult ; Trephining/methods*

INTRODUCTIONSpiral and oblique fractures of distal 1/3 of tibia-fibula are relatively common fractures of long bones. Due to their types, aetiology, limited coverage and blood supply, these fractures often lead to union and soft tissue problems.

MATERIALS AND METHODSTwenty-seven patients with spiral and oblique fractures of distal 1/3 of tibia-fibula were treated with circular external fixator (CEF) between January 1997 and August 2000. All the fractures were closed. The type of fractures based on AO classification were A1 (n = 8), A2 (n = 6), B1 (n = 11) and C1 (n = 2).

RESULTSThe mean framing time was 14.1 +/- 1.8 weeks (range, 12 to 19 weeks), and the mean treatment time was 18.8 +/- 2.2 weeks (range, 15 to 24 weeks). The patients were followed up for 36 to 78 months (mean follow-up time: 51.9 +/- 10.4 months). The results were evaluated for shortness, angulation, rotation, ankle stiffness, pain and infection. After removal of the frames, 11 patients had ankle pain and stiffness, and 3 patients had loss of range of motion in the ankle even after rehabilitation. None of the patients suffered any complications such as shortness, angulation, rotational deformity and infection, and none had loss of motion in the knee.

CONCLUSIONSCEF might be a preferable alternative treatment for distal tibia-fibula fractures due to its easy application, fewer major complications such as shortness and angulation, early mobilisation and shorter treatment time.

Accidental Falls ; Accidents, Traffic ; Adult ; Aged ; Athletic Injuries ; External Fixators ; Female ; Fibula ; injuries ; surgery ; Fractures, Bone ; etiology ; pathology ; surgery ; Fractures, Malunited ; surgery ; Humans ; Ilizarov Technique ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Pilot Projects ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Tibial Fractures ; etiology ; pathology ; surgery ; Turkey