Background: Malaysians, known for their diverse ethnicities, exhibit unique aesthetic features influenced by cultural nuances.Research indicates that factors including ethnicity, culture, and personal experiences affect how people perceive beauty. Objective: This study aims to address the lack of data on the preferred facial aesthetics among women from different ethnic groups in Malaysia. Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 290 Malaysian women, covering multiple regions and dimensions of facial aesthetics, including facial shape, forehead height and slope, cheekbone height, chin shape, eye region features (eyebrow shape, eyelid creases, and inner eye fold), nose (nose bridge shape, nasolabial angle, and nose width-length ratio), and lip thickness. Edited images of Asian models were used as references for facial aesthetic criteria in this study. Results: The survey revealed that the majority of participants were of Malay ethnicity (71.0%) and employed in the private sector (39.3%). The average age of the participants was 31.6±9.2 years, and most of them (66.9%) have not undergone aesthetic procedures before. Furthermore, a significant association was observed between ethnicity and women’s facial aesthetic preferences for facial shape and nasal width-length ratio (p<0.05). Oval facial shape was preferred by Malay (40.3%, n=83), Chinese (41.4%, n=12), and Indian (41.3%, n=19) women, due to its long, narrow, and rounded chin. For nasal width-length ratio, Malay (44.2%, n=91) and Chinese (37.9%, n=11) women preferred a ratio <1, whereas Indians (39.1%, n=18) favored a ratio >1. However, no significant association was found between ethnicity and other facial aesthetic criteria assessed in the study. Conclusion This study identified that Malaysian women’s preferences for facial shape and nasal width-to-length ratio are associated with ethnicity. These findings can serve as a valuable reference for aesthetic practitioners, emphasizing the importance of preservation and enhancement of unique ethnic features, customized according to the suitability of each ethnicity, rather than conforming to prevailing beauty standards.

Background: Limited efforts have been made to evaluate medication adherence among subsidized and self-paying patients. Objective: To investigate medication adherence among patients with and without medication subsidies and to identify factors that may influence patients’ adherence to medication. Setting: Government healthcare institutions in Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, and Negeri Sembilan and private healthcare institutions in Selangor and Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. Methods: This cross-sectional study sampled patients with and without medication subsidies (self-paying patients). Only one of the patient’s medications was re-packed into Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) bottles, which were returned after four weeks. Adherence was defined as the dose regimen being executed as prescribed on 80% or more of the days. The factors that may influence patients’ adherence were modelled using binary logistic regression. Main outcome measure: Percentage of medication adherence. Results: A total of 97 patients, 50 subsidized and 47 self-paying, were included in the study. Medication adherence was observed in 50% of the subsidized patients and 63.8% of the self-paying patients (χ²=1.887, df=1, p=0.219). None of the evaluated variables had a significant influence on patients’ medication adherence, with the exception of attending drug counselling. Patients who attended drug counselling were found to be 3.3 times more likely to adhere to medication than those who did not (adjusted odds ratio of 3.29, 95% CI was 1.42 to7.62, p = 0.006). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in terms of medication adherence between subsidized and self-paying patients. Future studies may wish to consider evaluating modifiable risk factors in the examination of non-adherence among subsidized and self-paying patients in Malaysia.